Assessment of Israel’s Position in the 1991 Gulf War

Özet   1991 Körfez Krizi Orta Doğu’nun şu anki vaziyetinin şekillenmesinde en etkili faktörlerden birisi olmuştur. Bu kriz hakkında birçok çalışma yapılmış ve İsrail’in saldırıya uğramasına ragman pasif tutumunu devam ettirmesi araştırmacılar için ilgi çekici bir husus olarak öne çıkmıştır. Saddam Hüseyin’in Kuveyt’I işgal etme kararını takip eden bu savaş hülasa olarak anlatılacak ve İsrail’in aldığı bu kararın oluştuğu dış yapı aktarılmaya çalışılacaktır. Israil bu savaş dışında Ortadoğu’nun en aktif ve agresif devleti olarak nitelendirilebilecek ve günümüz topraklarını revizyonist bir yaklaşımla genişletme amacında olan bir devlet olarak kabul edilecektir. Bu yaklaşım İsrail’İn 1991 Savaşı’ndaki pasif tutumunu daha ön plana çıkaracağı ve problematize edeceği için tercih edilmiştir. Bu davranış, İsrail’İn o döenmdeki sosyal, askeri ve diplomatic gücü dikkate alınarak analiz edilecektir. Bu analiz sonresında İsrail’in bu kararı kendi fayda-zarar analizleri sonucunda alıp almadığı sorusu üzerinde durulacak ve buna cevap aranacaktır. İsrail’in bu tavrının bu şekilde analizi ile bu hareketin rasyonel bir hareket olup olmadığı ve süpriz devlet davranışı olarak sayılıp sayılmayacağına bakılacaktır. Ve bu seçimin sonucu olarak İsrail’in elde ettiği çıktılar sonuç bölümünde analiz edilecektir.

Assessment of Israel’s Position in the 1991 Gulf War

Abstract   The Persian Gulf War was one of the defining incidents took place which shaped the current situation of the Middle East. There has been a vast amount of studies about this conflict but on a specific case why Israel stayed out of the conflict even though she was attacked continued to be a charming question for researchers. Saddam’s decision on invading Kuwait and the War following this is going to be summarized in order to present the structure when this incident took place and also to build an environment in which Israel’s decision on not joining the war is going to be analyzed. Israel is perceived as one of the most aggressive countries of the Middle East mostly because of the Wars that she was involved with and the grand projects that she wants to be feasible. With this assumption it is rather hard to understand Israel’s passive behaviour during the Persian Gulf War which is going be analyzed in this study. Israel’s state in that period and her capacity will be analyzed in order to understand this decision was taken by Israel or was sort of dictated by another country. Possible reasons that resulted with Israel’s passive attitude will be under the scope to explain what Israel did was rather rational or not. And the advantages and negative results that Israel enjoyed and suffered will be tried to be shown at the later part of the study.

___

  • Baker, James. A. The Politics of Diplomacy, New York, Putnam
  • Bar-Illıan, Bar (1991), “Israel After the Gulf War”, Commentary, pp. 35-40
  • Baker, James. A. The Politics of Diplomacy, New York, Putnam
  • Bar-Illıan, Bar (1991), “Israel After the Gulf War”, Commentary, pp. 35-40
  • Baram, Amatzia (1993), “The Invasion of Kuwait: Decision Making in Baghdad,”
  • Beinin and Hajjar, Joel & Lisa, “Palestine, Israel and Arab-Israeli Conflict: A Primer”, MERIP: Middle East Research and Information Project
  • Ben-Zvi, Abraham (1994), “The U.S. & Israel: The Limits of the Special Relationship”, New York, Columbia University Press
  • Brands and Palkki, Hal & David (2011), Saddam, “Israel, and the Bomb, Nuclear Alarmism Justifed?”, International Security, Vol. 36, No. 1 (Summer 2011), pp. 133–166
  • Brinkley, Joel (1991), “WAR IN THE GULF: Israel; Israelis Say Their Patience With Scud Attacks Is Thin”, The New York Times, Published: January 30
  • Donnelly, Jack (2013), “Realism”, in Scott Burchill and Andrew Linklater (eds.) et. al. Theories of International Relations, 5th Edition, Palgrave Macmillan
  • Eric Karsenty, Joshua Shemer, Itzhik Alshech, Bruno Cojocaru, Marian Moscovitz, Yair Shapiro, Yehuda L. Danon (1991), "Medical Aspects of the Iraqi Missile Attacks on Israel," Israel Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol. 27, pp. 603-607
  • Feldman, Shai (1997), “Israel’s Grand Strategy”, paper presented at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 7 May, Cambridge
  • Freedman and Karsh, Lawrence and Efraim (1993), “Thr Gulf Conflict”, Princeton University Press, New Jersey
  • George N. Lewis & Steve Fetter, and Lisbeth Gronlund (1993), “Casualties And Damage From Scud Attacks In The 1991 Gulf War”, Working Paper for Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Defense And Arms Control Studies Program
  • Goldberg, J. J. (1991), “Doves and Hawks Together: American Jews, Israel and The War”, Commonweal, pp. 123-5
  • İnat, Kemal (2009), “Irak: ABD ve Saddam Hüseyin İşbirliği ile Gelen Yıkım”, (in) Kemal İnat and Burhanettin Duran et. al. (eds.) Dünya Çatışmaları Çatışma Bölgeleri ve Konuları, Nobel Yayınları, Ankara
  • Inbar, Efraim (2008), Israel’s National Security: Issues and Challanges Since the Yom kippur War, Routledge, New York
  • Spiers, Edward M. (1986), Chemical Warfare, Chicago: University of Illinois
  • Terry, Janice J. (2008), The United States and Iraq at cross purposes – a Historic Overview, International Journal of Contemporary Iraqi Studies Volume 2 Number 3, Intellect Ltd,
  • Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979), “Theory of International Politics”, Waveland Press, Long Grove
  • Yitzhak, Shamir (1994), Summing Up, Little Brown and and Coop. Boston
  • Lasensky, Scott B. (1999), “Friendly Restrained: U.S.-Israel Relations During the Gulf War Crisis of 1990-9”, Middle East Review of International Affairs, June
  • Lebow, Richard N. (2010), “Classical Realism”, in Tim Dunne et. al. (eds.) International Relations Theories (Discipline and Diversity), Oxford University Press
  • Marr, Phebe (2012), The modern history of Iraq, 3rd ed., Westview Press, Philadelphia
  • Podhoretz, Norman (1991), “In Israel with Scuds and Patriots”, Commentary, April, pp. 19-26
  • Quandt, William (1993), Peace Process, Brookings Institution, Washington
  • Reich, Bernard (2008), A Brief History of Israel, Second Edition, New York
  • Shlaim, Avi (1991), in Alex Danchev and Dan Keohane, eds., International Perspectives on the Gulf Conlict, 1990-91, London, St Martin’s Press, 1994, pp. 59-79.