Şanlıurfa ilinde tarımsal ve doğal alanlarda nematod biyoçeşitliliği

Şanlıurfa ili nematod faunası ve biyoçeşitliliğini belirlemek amacıyla, tarımsal ve doğal ekosistemlerde sürvey çalışmaları 2003-2005 yılları arasında yürütülmüştür. Yarı-kurak olarak nitelendirilen bu çalışma alanı, kuru ve sulanabilir tarım alanlarını içermek-tedir. Coğrafi ve ekolojik farklılıklar ile ulaşım imkanları göz önüne alınarak çalışma alanı 5 alt-bölgeye ayrılmıştır. Örnekleme, 3 yıl boyunca, biri bahar döneminde diğeri güz döneminde olmak üzere yılda iki kez yapılmıştır. Bu çalışmada tespit edilen nematod faunası 8 takıma ait 26 tür, 28 cins ve 4 familyadan oluşmuştur. Faunada bitki paraziti ve serbest yaşayan nematodların oranı sırasıyla % 39 ve % 61 olarak gerçekleşmiştir. Bitki parazitleri 2 takıma (Tylenchida ve Dorylaimaida) ait 26 tür ve 6 cins ile; bakterivorlar 4 takıma (Cephalobida, Diplogasterida, Monhysterida ve Rhabtida) ait 4 familya ve 10 cins ile; fungivorlar 2 takıma ait (Aphelenchida ve Tylenchida) ait 3 cins ile; predatörler 2 takıma (Aphlenchida ve monochida) ait 2 cins ile; omnivorlar 1 takıma (Dorylaimida) ait 7 cins ile temsil edilmişlerdir. Ekosistem bitki örtüsünün, nematod fauna ve biyoçeşitliliğine etkisinin diğer faktörlere göre daha bariz olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Biyoçeşitlilik, nematod, bitki paraziti, serbest yaşayan

Nematode biyodiversity in agricultural and natural habitats of Sanliurfa, Turkey

The study was conducted to examine the biodiversity of terrestrial nematodes in agricultural and non-agricultural areas of Sanliurfa, Turkey. Study area defined with the semi-arid features consisting irrigated and dry cultures, has been divided into 5 sub-regions regarding the geographic and ecological boundaries. Samples were taken twice a year, one in the mid-spring and second in the mid-fall for 3 years, in 2003-2005. Nematode fauna has been represented by 26 species, 28 genus, and 4 families which all belonged to 8 orders. The proportions of plant parasitic and free-living nematodes were 39 % and 61%, respectively. Plant parasitic nematodes were represented by 26 species and 6 genera belonged to 2 orders (Tylenchida and Dorylaimida); bacterivores were represented by 4 families and 10 genus belonged to 4 orders (Rhabditida, Cephalobida, Diplogaterida and Monhysterida); fungivores were represented by 3 genus belonged to 2 orders (Aphelenchida and Tylenchida); predators were represented by 2 genus belonged to 2 orders (Mononchida and Aphelenchida) and the omnivores repsetented by 7 genus belonged to 1 order (Dorylaimida). Diversity of nematode communities either in the plant parasitic fauna or the free-living fauna have displayed differences in the sub-regions of the study area. The main reason may be due to the past history of the agricultural practices employed in each of the sub-regions.

Keywords:

Biodiversity, nematode, plant-parasitic, free-living,

PDF

___

Anonymous, 2002. Şanlıurfa ili arazi yapısı. Şanlıurfa Tarım İl Müdürlüğü verileri. (Web sayfası: http:// www.sanliurfa-tarim.gov.tr) (Erişim tarihi: Nisan 2007).
Andrássy, I., 1956. Die Rauminhalts- und Gewichtsbestimmung der Faden- würmer (Nematoden). Acta Zoologica Hungaria, 2: 1–15.
Aydemir, S., 2001. Palygorskite-influenced Vertisols and Vertic Like Soils in the Harran Plain in the Southeastern Turkey. PhD. Thesis, pp:290, Texas A&M University, Soil and Crop Sciences Department, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Bernard, E. C., 1992. Soil nematode biodiversity. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 14: 99–103.
Boag, B. & G. W. Yeates, 1998. Soil nematode biodiversity in terrestrial ecosystems. Biodiversity and Conservation, 7 (5): 617–630.
Bongers, T., 1990. The Maturity Index: An ecological measure of environmental disturbance based on nematode species composition. Oecologia, 83 (1): 14-19.
Dinç, U., S. Şenol, M. Sayın, S. Kapur & N. Güzel, 1988. Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi Toprakları (GAT) I. Harran Ovası. TÜBİTAK-TOAG Güdümlü Araştırma Projesi Kesin Raporu. Proje No: TOAG-534.
Elekçioğlu, İ. H., Ohnesorge, B., Lung, G. & Uygun, N., 1994. Plant parasitic nematodes in the East Mediterranean region of Turkey. Nematologia Mediterranea, 22: 59-63.
Ferris, H., T. Bongers & R. G. M. de Goede, 2001. A framework for soil food web diagnostics: Extension of the nematode faunal analysis concept. Applied Soil Ecology, 18: 13–29.
Ferris, H., 2001. Structure and functions of soil food webs. (web page: http://www.ucdavis.edu/ nemaplex/powerpoint/foodwebs, (Data accessed: October, 2005).
Fiscus, D. A. & D. A. Neher, 2002. Distinguishing sensitivity of free-living Nematode genera to phisical and chemical disturbances. Ecological Applications, 12 (2); 565-575.
Freckman, D. W. & J. G. Baldwin, 1990. Nematoda,155-200. In: Soil Biology Guide (DL. Dindal). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, 1349 pp.
Freckman, D. W. & E. P. Caswell, 1984. The ecology of nematodes in agroecossystems. Annual Review of Phytopatology, 23:275-295.
Hooper, D. J., 1986 Exraction of Free Living Stages from Soil. In: Labratory Methods for Work with Plant and Soil Nematodes. (Southey, J. F.) Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London: 5-30.
Ivezic M., E. Raspudic & M. Brmez, 2000. Structure of nematode communities in different agroecosystems in Croatia. Helminthologia, 37:165–169 pp.
Krall, E., 2000. Biodiversity of species and pest ptatus of some plant parasitic nematodes in Estonia. Transactions of the Estonian Agricultural University Agronomy, 209:76-79.
Neher, D. A., S. L. Peck, J. O. RawlIngs & C. L. Campbell, 1995. Measures of nematode community structure and sources of variability among and within agricultural fields. The significance and regulation of soil biodiversity. Proceedings International Symposium Michigan State University, East Lansing, May 3-6, 1995, 187-201. pp.
Neher, D. A., T. R. Weicht, M. Savın, J. H. Görres & J. A. Amador, 1999. Grazing in a porous environment. 2. Nematode community structure. Plant and Soil, 212: 85–99.
Neher, D. A., 2002. Role of nematodes in soil health and their use as indicators. Symposium Paper Presented at the 39th Annual Meeting of The Society of Nematologists, (June 24-28, 2000), Quebec City, Quebec Canada.
Popovici, I. & M. Ciobanu, 2000. Diversity and Distribution of Nematode Communities in Grasslands from Romania in Relation to Vegetation and Soil Characteristics. Applied Soil Ecology, 14: 27–36.
Prot, J. C. & H. Ferris. 1992. Sampling approaches for extensive surveys in nematology. Journal of Nematology, 24: 757-764.
Shannon, C. E., 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27: 379–423 and 623–656.
Shepherd, A. M., 1986. Extraction and Estimation of Cyst Nematodes. In: Southey, J. F. (ed). Labratory Methods for Work with Plant and Soil Nematodes. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London: 5-30.
Smolik, J. .D. & J. K. Lewis, 1982. Effect of range condition on density and biomass of nematodes in a mixed prairie ecosystem. Journal of Range Management, 5: 657-663.
Yeates, G. W., 1971. Feeding types and feeding groups in plant and soil nematodes Pedobiologia, 8:173-79.
Yeates, G. W., T. Bongers, R. G. M. de Goede, D. W. Freckman & S. S. Georgieva, 1993. Feeding habitats in soil nematode families and genera-an outline for soil ecologists. J of Nematology, 25: 315–331.
Yeates, G. W., 1996. Diversity of nematode faunae under three vegetation types on a Pallic soil in Otago, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 23 (4): 401-407.
Yeates, G. W., 1998. Soil nematode assemblages: Regulators of ecosystem productivity. Phytoparasitica, 26:2 (Guest Editorial) 97-100.
Yeates, G. W. & T. Bongers, 1999. Nematode diversity in agro-ecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 74: 113–135.