The Place Of Hydrocarbon Activities In International Law And South Cyprus

The claims of sovereignty over the sea borders and the accompanying hydrocarbon activities made the Mediterranean a critical center. The Mediterranean accounts for only 0.7 percent of the world's oceans. It is the transit zone between the Mediterranean, Asia, Europe and Africa continents, as well as the cradle of India, the Red Sea and the Atlantic Ocean.The diplomacy which ignores the Turkey's maritime jurisdiction areas in the Mediterranean, it is essentially a part of pressure and coercion techniques over Turkey. Because the effect of sea areas on the future and power of the country is indisputable. Therefore, the unilateral hydrocarbon activities of Southern Cyprus Administration (GCA) in the Eastern Mediterranean and their maritime claims must be evaluated together in international law. To put it simply, the impact of hydrocarbon studies on maritime boundary is another matter of discussion. The so-called maritime border claims of GCA arise entirely from requests for excessive maritime areas because the Cyprus issue has not been resolved and the arbitrary definition of the maritime delimitation defined in its domestic law. Furthermore, the GCA domestic law was designed in violation of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the relevant case law. In this context, it is stated that the relevant demands of the GCA are not valid under international law, and that they have taken actions to worsen the situation and international responsibility. The conclusion of the study, in essence, has established the internal legislation of the GCA contrary to the nature of the law of the sea outside Article 301, and it has been possible to put forward international responsibility in line with the paragraphs specified in Articles 74 (3) and 83 (3).paragraphs specified in Articles 74 (3) and 83 (3).

Hidrokarbon Faaliyetlerinin Uluslararası Hukuktaki Yeri ve Güney Kıbrı

Deniz sınırları üzerindeki egemenlik iddiaları ve beraberindeki hidrokarbon faaliyetleri Akdeniz’in kritik merkez halini olmasını sağlamıştır. Akdeniz dünya okyanuslarının sadece yüzde 0.7’sini oluşturmaktadır. Akdeniz, Asya, Avrupa, Affika kıtaları arası geçiş bölgesi olduğu gibi, Hindistan, Kızıldeniz ve Atlantik Okyanusunun beşiğinde olan bölgedir. Türkiye’nin Akdeniz’deki deniz yetki alanlarını görmezden gelme diplomasisi esasen Türkiye üzerinde baskı ve zorlama tekniklerinin bir parçaısıdır. Zira dünyada deniz alanlarının ülke geleceği ve gücüne etkisi tartışılmazdır. Dolayısıyla, Doğu Akdeniz’de, Güney Kıbrıs Rum Yönetimi’nin tek yanlı hidrokarbon faaliyetleri ve bu faaliyet alanlarının deniz sınırı iddiaları, uluslararası hukuk açısından birlikte değerlendirilmesi gerekir. Zira bu bir uyuşmazlık meselesidir. İfade etmek gerekirse, deniz hukuku ihtilaflarında hidrokarbon çalışmaları, deniz sınırı belirlenmesindeki etkisi hassas bir tartışma konusudur. Güney Kıbrıs’ın sözde deniz sınır iddiaları, Kıbrıs meselesi çözümlenmeden ve iç hukukunda deniz hukuku sınırlandırma ilkelerinin keyfi tanımlanması münasebetiyle aşırı deniz alanları iddialarından kaynaklanmaktadır. GKRY, sınırlandırma hususunda kendi iç hukukunu, Birleşmiş Milletler Deniz Hukuku Sözleşmesi ve ilgili içtihat hukukuna aykırı şekilde dizayn etmiştir. Bu çerçevede, çalışma, GKRY’nin ilgili taleplerinin uluslararası hukuk nezdinde geçerliliği bulunmadığını, bizzat durumu kötüleştirici adımları ile uluslararası sorumluluğu doğuracak eylemlerde bulundukları belirtilmektedir. Çalışmanın öz itibarıyla vardığı sonuç, GKRY’nin deniz hukukunun doğasına aykırı şekilde iç mevzuatlarını 301. Maddenin dışında oluşturmuş olduğu vurgulanmakta ve ilgili politikalarının 74(3) ve 83(3) maddelerinde belirtilen fıkralar doğrultusunda uluslararası sorumluluğa imkân oluşturmasına dairdir.

___

14/07/2011 2082. D Letter to United Nations General Secretary from Lebanon: https://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/communications/lbn_re_cyp_isr_agreement2010.pdf

Arbitral Tribunal Constituted Pursuant To Article 287, And In Accordance With Annex VII, Of The United Nations Convention On The Law Of The Sea In The Matter Of An Arbitration Between: Guyana - And - Suriname Guyana v. Suriname, (2007). Permanent Court of Arbitration, Award of the Arbitral Tribunal. https://pcacases.com/web/sendAttach/902

ASDEAM, November 2012 Report, (2012).“The Legal Framework Of Lebano n’s Maritime Boundaries : The Exclusive Economic Zone And Offshore Hydrocarbon Resources” ASDEAM: http://orientmontpelerin.ch/the-legal-framework-of-lebanons-maritimeboundaries/

Başeren, S., H., (2010), Doğu Akdeniz Deniz Yetki Alanları Uyuşmazlığı, Türk Deniz Araştırmaları Vakfi, Yayın No.31. http://tudav.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Dogu_Akdeni_-yetki-_alanlari_uyusmazligi.pdf

Bilge, Ö., (2020). Rumlardan KKTC sınırında tatbikat, Hürriyet gazetesi, 7 Ağustos 2020. https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/dunya/rumlardan-kktc-sinirinda-tatbikat-41581380

Case Concerning The Continental Shelf (Tunısia/Libyan Arab Jamahiriya) Judgment Of 24 February 1982, International Court of Justice. https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/63/063-19820224-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf

Case Concerning Delimitation Of The Maritime Boundary In The Gulf Of Maine Area (Canada/United States Of Amerıca), (1984). International Court of Justice. https://www.icjcij.org/files/case-related/67/067-19841012-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf

Case Concerning Sovereignty Over Pulau Ligitan And Pulau Sıpadan (Indonesıa Malaysia),(2002). International Court of Justice. https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/102/102-20021217-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf

Case Concerning Maritime Dispute (Peru V. Chile) (2014). International Court of Justice. https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/137/137-20140127-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf

Case Concerning The Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamahırıya/Malta) (1985). International Court of Justice. https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/68/068-19850603-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf

Chapter IV State Responsibility. https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/4191e9/pdf/

Collins E., & Rogoff, M., A., (1982), “The International Law of the Maritime Boundary Delimitation”, Maine Law Review, Vol.34:1, 1982, ss.1-62

Counter-Memorial Of The Libyan Arab Jamahiriya,(1982). International Court of Justice. https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/68/9573.pdf

Cysneî (Responsibility of Germany for acts committed subsequent to 31 July 1914 and before Portugal entered into the war), (1930). UNRIAA, vol. II, s. 1035 s. 1052. https://www.legaltools.org/doc/4191e9/pdf/

Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d'Ivoire), (2017). ITLOS. https://www.itlos.org/cases/list-ofcases/case-no-23/

Doğu Akdeniz'de doğal gaz krizi: Akıncı'dan Rum tarafına ortak komite teklifi, (2019). Euronews, 14.07.2019: https://tr.euronews.com/2019/07/14/dogu-akdeniz-de-dogal-gaz-krizi-akincidan-rum-tarafina-ortak-komite-teklifi-kibris-enerji

Erciyes, Ç., ( May 2019), “Maritime Issues, Maritime Bondary Delimitation and Turkey’s Offshore Activities in the Eastern Mediterrnaean”, Presentation, Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Ege Kıta Sahanlığı Davası,(1978). Uluslararası Adalet Divanı, Aegean Sea Continental Shelf Case (Greece V. Turkey) Judgment Of 19 December 1978, International Court of Justice. https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/62/062-19781219-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf

Fisheries Jurisdiction Case (United Kingdom Of Great Brİtaın And Northern Ireland V. Iceland), (1974). https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/55/055-19740725-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf

Fisheries Case (United Kingdom V. Norway) (1951). International Court of Justice. https://www.icjcij.org/files/case-related/5/005-19511218-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf

Ghana/Côte d’Ivoire, (Provisional Measurments), (2015). https://www.itlos.org/en/cases/list-ofcases/case-no-23/

GKRY 1964 Karasuları Yasa. https://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/CYP_1964_Law.pdf

GKRY 5 Nisan 1974 Kıta Sahanlığı Yasa. https://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/CYP_1974_Law.pdf

GKRY, 2 Nisan 2004 tarihli Münhasır Ekonomik Bölge İlanını Sağlayan Yasası. https://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/cyp_2004_eez_proclamation.pdf

GKRY, 1964 ve 2014 Birleştirilmiş Karasuları Yasası. https://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/CYP_TS_Law_2014.pdf

GKRY-Mısır Arasında Münhasır Ekonomik Bölge Anlaşması: https://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/CYP_EEZCS_Law_2014.pdf

GKRY’nin 2003’te tüm ada adına Coğrafi Koordinatları BMGS’ne Bildirimi: https://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/CYP_1993_Coordinates.pdf

Haber 7, Yunanistan'dan bir Türkiye açıklaması daha! Rum yönetiminden kriz çıkartacak Oruç Reis tehdidi, (11 Ağustos 2020). https://www.haber7.com/dunya/haber/3003069-yunanistandanbir-turkiye-aciklamasi-daha-rum-yonetiminden-kriz-cikartacak-oruc-reis-tehdidi

Özgür H., K., (2017), “Eastern Mediterranean Hydrocarbons: Regional Potential , Challanges Ahead, and the ‘Hydrocarbon-ization’ of the Cyprus Problem”, Perceptions, Summer-Autumn 2017, Volume XXII, Number 2-3, ss.31-56

ILM-International Legal Materials, Vol. 25, No.1., (1986). Cambridge University Press.

ILM-International Legal Materials, Vol. 31, No.1, (1992). Cambridge University Press.

Kjourtellos K., (2015). “The Legal Regime for Exploration of Hydrocarbons in Cyprus Waters”, International Company and Commercial Law Review, ss. 292-294

Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria (Cameroon v. Nigeria: Equatorial Guinea intervening),(2002). International Court of Justice, https://www.icjcij.org/en/case/94

Law of the Sea Bulletin, No. 57. (2005). https://www.un.org/Depts/los/doalos_publications/LOSBulletins/bulletinpdf/bulletin57e.pdf

Letter dated 18 March 2020 from the Permanent Representative of Turkey to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General, A/74/757.

Letter dated 15 June 2012 from the Permanent Representative of Cyprus to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General)

Maritime Delimitation In The Indian Ocean (Somalıa V. Kenya), (2017). International Court of Justice. https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/161/161-20170202-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf

Memorial Of The Malta, (1982). International Court of Justice. https://www.icj-cij.org/files/caserelated/68/9569.pdf

Minnerop P., Oellers-Frahm K., Schorko F., Walter C., Weerth A.,(2009). World Court Digest, Vol.4, 2001-2005, Springer.

Morelli, V., L., (2018). “Tension in the Eastern Mediterranean Focus on the Politics of Energy “, CRS Insights, 1 Mart 2018, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/IN10864.pdf

M.Z.N. 6. 1996. LOS of 30 June 1996: https://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/DEPOSIT/cyp_mzn6_1996.pdf

North Sea Continental Shelf Cases, Judgement of 20 February 1969, International Court of Justice.https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/52

Olgun M., E., (2019). “Hydrocarbons Will Determine the Political Future of Cyprus”, Instito Affari Internazionali (IAI)

Patel, B., N., (2014). The World Court Reference Guide and Case Law Digest, Leiden:Boston, Brill Nijhoff.

Presentation by Ambassador Tasos Tzionis, Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, to Ambassadors of EU Member States accredited to Cyprus, regarding recent developments in the continental shelf/EEZ of the Republic of Cyprus (31.5.2019)

Somali ve Kenya arasında Hindistan Okyanusunda Deniz Sınırlandırması, (2014). International Court of Justice. https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/161

South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of the Philippines v The People’s Republic of China) (Merits) (2016). Permanent Court of Arbitration.

Timor Maritime Agreement: UNTS 3, 2258; http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/dfat/treaties/2003/13.html

Türkiye Ulaştırma Bakanlığı: http://imo.udhb.gov.tr/TR/19Marpol.aspx

Treatment of Polish Nationals and Other Persons of Polish Origin or Speech in the Danzing Terriotry, Permanent Court of International Justice, General List No.42, Advisory Opinion No.23, (4 February 1932). http://www.worldcourts.com/pcij/eng/decisions/1932.02.04_danzig.htm