11944

Sağlık İşletmeleri Yönetimive Nükleer Tıp İlaçlarındaFiyatlandırmaStratejileri: Eczacıbaşı Holding Monrol Örneği

Günümüzde nükleer tıp ilaç kullanımı genel sağlık ilaçlarının kullanımının yaklaşık % 25-30'unu oluşturmaktadır. Sağlık sektöründe araştırma geliştirme faaliyetleri neticesinde uygulanabilir bir ilaç geliştirme yüzdesi ise oldukça düşüktür. Öte yandan, nükleer tıp ilaçları için düşük fiyat belirleme yaklaşımları, araştırma ve geliştirme (Ar-Ge) faaliyetlerinin sürüdürülebilmesinde bir tehdit unsuru oluşturmaktadır. Çok düşük fiyatlandırma stratejisi ile üreticiler sağlık endüstrisinin sermaye potansiyelini kendi üretimlerine çekebilmekteyken; bu durum araştırma geliştirme faaliyetleri önünde bir kısıt oluşturmaktadır.Özellikle gelişmemiş ve gelişmekte olan ekonomilerin sağlık hizmetlerinde ilaç kıtlığı yaşanmakta ve nükleer tıp ilaçları uygulamaları buna bağlı olarak kısıtlı biçimde gerçekleştirilmektedir. Bütünsel olarak değerlendirildiğinde ilaç üreticilerinin ürünlerine fiyatlandırma yaparken, diğer sektörlerdeki üreticilerden daha büyük bir sosyal yükümlülük altında oldukları bir gerçektir. Bu çalışmadaamaç nükleer tıp ilaç sektörü hakkında bilgilendirmeler yapılırken, bir ilacın değer öyküsünün nasıl oluşturulacağı, etkin bir şekilde piyasaya nasıl ve hangi stratejik fiyattan sunulacağı ve nihayetinde çeşitli müzakerelerle en doğru fiyatlandırma stratejilerine nasıl ulaşılabileceğini bir örnek üzerinden teorik olarak tartışmaktır. Çalışmada doğru değerlendirmelerle gerçekçi fiyatlandırma stratejisi önerilerinde bulunabilmek için özellikle Eczacıbaşı Holding’in nükleer tıp ilaç markası Monrol örneğinden istifade edilmektedir. Çalışma sonunda sağlık sektöründe mevcut düzenlemelerle belirlenen fiyatların tüketici davranışına etkileri incelendikten sonra,nükleer tıp ilaçlarının fiyatlandırma stratejilerinin tüketici davranışına bağlı olarak belirlenmesinin sağlık hizmetlerinin gelişimi için oldukça faydalı olacağı görüşüne varılmaktadır.

Health Management and Strategic Pricing in Nuclear Medicine Drugs: An Example of Eczacıbaşı Holding Monrol

Today, the use of nuclear medicine makes up approximately 25-30% of the use of health drugs. As a result of research and development activities in the health sector, the percentage of developing a viable drug is quite low. On the other hand, low price determination approaches for nuclear medicine drugs pose a threat to research and development (R&D) activities. While with the very low pricing strategy, manufacturers can attract the potential capital of the health industry to their own productions; this poses a constraint to research and development activities.There is a shortage of drugs especially in the health services of the undeveloped and developing economies, and nuclear medicine applications are limited accordingly. When evaluated in a holistic way, it is a fact that pharmaceutical producers are under greater social responsibility than the producers in other sectors while pricing their products. The purpose of this study is to discuss how to form a value of a drug, how to market drug effectively and at what strategic price should sell, and how to reach the most accurate pricing strategies through various negotiations while informing readers about the nuclear medicine industry. In order to make realistic pricing strategy suggestions with accurate evaluations in the study, the example of pricing strategies of nuclear medicine drug brand Monrol belongs to Eczacıbaşı Holding would have been benefited.At the end of the study, it has been concluded that by examining the influences of the prices in the health sector with the effects of current government regulations on consumer behavior, determining the pricing strategies of nuclear medicine accordingly, will be very beneficial for the development of health services in economies.

PDF

___

Akhmetov, I., & Bubnov, R. V. (2017). Innovative payer engagement strategies: will the convergence lead to better value creation in personalized medicine?. EPMA Journal, 8(1), 5-15.
Atikeler, E. K., & Özçelikay, G. (2016). Comparison of pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement systems in Turkey and certain EU countries. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1876.
Becquerel, A. H. Antoine Henri Becquerel. Nobel Prize in Physics, 70.
Berwick, D. M., DeParle, N. A., Eddy, D. M., Ellwood, P. M., Enthoven, A. C., Halvorson, G. C., ... & Roper, W. L. (2003). Paying for performance: Medicare should lead. Health affairs,22(6), 8-10.
Biesecker, L. G., & Green, R.C. (2014). Diagnostic clinical genome and exome sequencing. New England Journal of Medicine,370(25), 2418-2425.
Cherry, S. R., Sorenson, J. A., & Phelps, M. E. (2012). Physics in nuclear medicine e-Book.Elsevier Health Sciences.ISBN:9781416051985.(110),1-6.
Cook, A. G. (2016). Forecasting for the pharmaceutical industry: models for new product and in-market forecasting and how to use them. CRC Press, ISBN:9781472460110.(23),59-86.
Dalen, D. M., Strøm, S., & Haabeth, T. (2006). Price regulation and generic competition in the pharmaceutical market. The European Journal of Health Economics,7(3), 204-211.
Di Paola, R., Bazin, J. P., Aubry, F., Aurengo, A., Cavailloles, F., Herry, J. Y., & Kahn, E. (1982). Handling of dynamic sequences in nuclear medicine. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 29(4), 1310-1321.
Dosi, G., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2014). The role of intellectual property rights in the development process, with some lessons from developed countries: an introduction. Intellectual property rights: Legal and economic challenges for development, 1, 1-55.
Dumoulin, J. (2001). Global pricing strategies for innovative essential drugs. International Journal of Biotechnology,3(3-4), 338-349.
Farres, R. (2012). Optimal pricing models in B2B organizations. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management,11(1), 35-39.
Foster, S. D. (1991). Pricing, distribution, and use of antimalarial drugs. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 69(3), 349.
Gürsoy, K., Köselerli, R., Dogru, S. T., & Köksal, I. (2014). How is current pharmaceuticals pricing policy on generics performing in Turkey regarding price erosion?. Value in Health,17(7), A407.
Harmon, R., Demirkan, H., Hefley, B., & Auseklis, N. (2009). Pricing strategies for information technology services: A value-based approach. In 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences(2), 1-10. IEEE.
Hinterhuber, A. (2004). Towards value-based pricing—An integrative framework for decision making. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(8), 765-778.
Ho, C. M. (2014). Drugged Out: How Cognitive Bias Hurts Drug Innovation. San Diego L. Rev., 51, 419.
Hong, S. H., Shepherd, M. D., Scoones, D., & Wan, T. T. (2005). Product-line extensions and pricing strategies of brand-name drugs facing patent expiration. Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy, 11(9), 746-754.
Jackson, S. B., & Wilcox, W. E. (2000). Do managers grant sales price reductions to avoid losses and declines in earnings and sales?. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 3-20.
Gagnon, M. A. (2013). Corruption of pharmaceutical markets: addressing the misalignment of financial incentives and public health. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics,41(3), 571-580.
Grabowski, H. G., DiMasi, J. A., & Long, G. (2015). The roles of patents and research and development incentives in biopharmaceutical innovation. Health Affairs, 34(2), 302-310.
Johansson, M., Hallberg, N., Hinterhuber, A., Zbaracki, M., & Liozu, S. (2012). Pricing strategies and pricing capabilities. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 11(1), 4-11.
McCarthy, I. (2009). Simulating sequential search models with genetic algorithms: analysis of price ceilings, taxes, advertising and welfare. Computational Economics, 34(3), 217-241.
Mould, R. F. (2008). Antoine-Henri Becquerel 1852-1908. Nowotwory. Journal of Oncology, 58(6), 554-554.
Negahdary, M., & Heli, H. (2018). Applications of nanoflowers in biomedicine. Recent patents on nanotechnology,12(1), 22-33.
Palia, A. P. (2014, January). Target profit pricing with the web-based breakeven analysis package. In Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning: Proceedings of the Annual ABSEL conference(Vol. 35).
Rapaccini, M. (2015). Pricing strategies of service offerings in manufacturing companies: a literature review and empirical investigation. Production Planning & Control, 26(14-15), 1247-1263.
Romano, P. (2016). Towards supply chain collaboration in B2B pricing. International Journal of Operations& Production Management, 36(7), 734-756.
Rosenkrantz, A. B., Wang, W., Bodapati, S., Hughes, D. R., & Duszak Jr, R. (2017). Private practice radiologist subspecialty classification using Medicare claims. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 14(11), 1419-1425.
Sarkar, S. D. (2006, July). Benign thyroid disease: what is the role of nuclear medicine?. In Seminars in nuclear medicine(Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 185-193). WB Saunders.
Schoonveld, E. (2020). The price of global health: drug pricing strategies to balance patient access and the funding of innovation. Routledge:LCCN 2019055319 (ebook)ISBN9780429320712. (338), 20-63.
Smith, B. D. (2012). Excellence in market access strategy: A research-based definition and diagnostic tool. Journal of Medical Marketing, 12(4), 259-266.
Stoppel, E., & Roth, S. (2015). Consequences of usage-based pricing in industrial markets. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management,14(3), 140-154.
Stoppel, E., & Roth, S. (2017). The conceptualization of pricing schemes: From product-centric to customer-centric value approaches. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 16(1), 76-90.
Tekiner, H. (2014). Pharmacy in Turkey: past, present, and future. Die Pharmazie-An International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 69(6), 477-480.
Tekin, R. B., & Yazgan, M. E. (2009). Exchange rate pass-through in Turkish export and import prices. Applied Economics,41(17), 2221-2228.
Toraman, C., & Tuncay, M. (2017). Effect of the political risk on capital asset valuation in financial markets: the case of turkey. Business & Economics Research Journal, 8(3).
Udell, J. G. (1964). How important is pricing in competitive strategy?. Journal of Marketing, 28(1), 44-48.
Vassy, J. L., Lautenbach, D. M., McLaughlin, H. M., Kong, S. W., Christensen, K. D., Krier, J., ... & Lehmann, L. S. (2014). The MedSeq Project: a randomized trial of integrating whole genome sequencing into clinical medicine. Trials,15(1), 85.
Verghese, N. R., Barrenetxea, J., Bhargava, Y.,Agrawal, S., & Finkelstein, E. A. (2019). Government pharmaceutical pricing strategies in the Asia-Pacific region: an overview. Journal of Market Access & Health Policy, 7(1), 1601060.
Walzer, S., Droeschel, D., Nuijten, M., & Chevrou-Séverac, H. (2014). Health economic analyses in medical nutrition: a systematic literature review. ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research:CEOR, 6, 109.
Whitehead, M., Dahlgren, G., & Evans, T. (2001). Equity and health sector reforms: can low-income countries escape the medical poverty trap?. The Lancet, 358(9284), 833-836.
Wu, C. H. (2012). Product-design and pricing strategies with remanufacturing. European Journal of Operational Research, 222(2), 204-215.
Zhou, X., Qian, H., Pérez-Rodríguez, J.V., & López-Valcárcel, B. G. (2020). Risk dependence and cointegration between pharmaceutical stock markets: The case of China and the USA. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 52, 101175.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2020.101175

ISSN: 2667-5617
Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
Başlangıç: 2006
Yayıncı: ASOS Eğitim Bilişim Danışmanlık Otomasyon Yayıncılık Reklam Sanayi ve Ticaret LTD ŞTİ