PAYDAŞ İLİŞKİSİ YÖNETİMİ’NİN, ARA DEĞİŞKENLER; ÇALIŞANLARIN KURUMLARINI DEĞERLENDİRMESİ VE SOSYAL AÇIDAN VASITASIYLA FİRMA PERFORMANSINA ETKİSİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Literatürde, önemli araştırmaların yapıldığı paydaş yönetimi konusunu incelediğimiz çalışmamızda, özel olarak; paydaş ilişkisi yönetimi değerlendirmesi ve sosyal açıdan vasıtasıyla firma performansına etkisi değerlendirilip analiz edilmiştir. Hizmet sektöründe bulunan 16 telekomünikasyon firmasındaki beyaz yakalılardan toplanan anketlerin analiz edilmesiyle elde edilen sonuçlar değerlendirilmiştir. Paydaş kavramı içinde önemli bir yeri olan çalışanların, "iç paydaş" olarak ele alınmasıyla, kurumlarına paydaş ilişkisi yönetimi içinde nasıl etkide bulundukları, yoğun rekabet ortamında bulunan işletmeler için önemli bir değerlendirme ve analiz olmuştur. Çalışanların hem bireysel anlamda hemde kurumlarına karşı grup halinde hareket ettiklerinde etki düzeylerindeki etkileyebilmektedir. Özellikle rekabetin yoğun olduğu telekom sektöründe çalışanların kurumlarına karşı tutum ve davranışları kurumların bulunmaktadır. beklentilerinin ve isteklerinin kurum politikasına faydalı olacak şekilde değerlendirilmesi ve yönetim tarzının belirlenmesi gerekmektedir. Alanında yetkin ve uzman çalışanların, kurumlarının almış oldukları kararlardan benimsemediklerinde başka bir işletmeye geçmeyi düşünebilmektedirler. İşletme yönetimleri çalışanlardan üstün bir performans beklediği kadar, çalışanlarda firmalarından memnuniyetlerini ve motivasyonlarını arttırıcı politikalar sürdürebilmesi, işletme ile çalışanlar arasındaki tutum ve davranışların neticesinde ortaya çıkmaktadır. Çalışmamızda 401 beyaz yakalı çalışanın paydaş ilişkisi yönetimi ve paydaş davranışı etkisi içinde kurumlarına karşı etkileri dikkate alınarak incelenmiştir

A STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF THE STAKEHOLDERS RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT ON COMPANY PERFORMANCE BY THE INTERVENING VARIABLES OF EVALUATION OF THE COMPANY BY THE EMPLOYEES AND SOCIAL ASPECTS

Stakeholder management, stakeholder relationships management, stakeholder behaviour studies have an important place in the literature and we searched their impact on the company performance by the intervening variables of Evaluation of the Company by the Employees and Social aspects. In our study, a survey was conducted with the whitecollar employees working at the 16 telecommunications companies in the service sector and analyses were carried out. The employees as internal stakeholders holds a significant place within the stakeholder concept and therefore it is important to examine their impact on the company that is in high competitive environment in terms of stakeholders relationship management. The employees can affect the company performance individually bur if they act as a group, the impact might be different. The management of the company should consider the expectations and request of the employees, determine a management style beneficial to company policies. The business managements expect their employees to show high performance, but, at the same time, the employees expect business managements to follow policies that may increase their satisfaction and motivation. The business’ survival depends on the attitudes and behaviours between business and the employees. In our study, a survey was conducted with the total of 401 white-collar employees to examine their impact on company performance within the framework of stakeholder relationship management and stakeholder behaviour

___

  • Albareda, Lozano., & Ysa. (2007). Public policies on corporate social responsibility: The role of governments in europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 391-407.
  • Azmat, Samaratunga. (2009). The role of NGOs in CSR: Mutual perceptions among stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 175–197.
  • Bernard J. Jaworski., & Ajay Kohli. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 57.
  • Bono, Edward De. (1996). Rekabetüstü. Çev. Oya Özel. Remzi Kitabevi.
  • Brickson. (2007). Organizational identity orientation: The genesis of the role of the firm and distinct forms of social value. Academy of Management, 32(3), 864-888.
  • Byung Il Park., Agnieszka Chidlow., & Jiyul Choi. (2014). Corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders influence on MNEs’ activities. International Business Review, 1-14.
  • Cai, Wheale. (2004). Creating sustainable corporate value: A case study of stakeholder relationship management in china. Business and Society Review, 109(4), 507-547.
  • Cavusgil, Calantone. (2006). Information system innovations and supply chain management: Channel relationships and firm performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40.
  • Celuch. (2002). The effects of perceived market and learning orientation on assessed organizational capabilities. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 545-554.
  • Chang, Shih-Chia., Lin, Neng-Pai., Yang, Chen-Lung., & Sheu, Chewn. (2003). Quality dimensions, capabilities ve business strategy: an empirical study in high-tech industry. Total Quality Management, 14(4), 407-421.
  • Chaston Ian., Mangles Terry. (1997). Core capabilities as predictors of growth potential in small manufacturing firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 47-57.
  • Cindy McCauley., Michael Wakefield. (2006). Talent management in the 21st century: Help your company find, Develop and keep its strongest workers. The Journal For Quality and Participation, 29(4), 4.
  • David A, Aaker. (1996). Building Strong Brands, The Free Press, A division of simon & Schuster Inc.
  • Dess G., Davies Beard. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 52–73.
  • Duane. (1999). Conflict management in buyer-seller relationships. University of Florida, 127.
  • Eren, Erol. (2002). Stratejik yönetim ve isletme politikasi. Beta Basim, Istanbul.
  • Freeman R, Edward. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston, 276.
  • Freeman R, Edward. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
  • Freeman R, Edward., Fitil Parmar. (2004). The stakeholder approach revisited. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftund Unternehmensethik, 5(3), 228-241.
  • Friedman., & Miles. (2002). Developing stakeholder theory, Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 1–21.
  • Grant, Robert M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135.
  • Hoskins., & McFadyen. (1997). Global television and film: An introduction to the economics of the business, Oxford University Press.
  • Hulya G, Cekmecelioglu. (2006). İş tatmini ve örgütsel bağlılık tutumlarının işten ayrılma niyeti ve verimlilik üzerindeki etkilerinin değerlendirilmesi: Bir araştırma. İş Güç Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 8(2), 155.
  • Jansson, Eva. (2005). The stakeholder model: The influence of the ownership and governance structures. Journal of Business Ethics, 56, 1-13.
  • Jiyul Choi. (2014). Corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders influence on MNEs’ activities. International Business Review, 23(5), 966–980.
  • John P. Meyer., & Natalie J, Allen. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications, 3.
  • Jones, B. (2011). Shareholder value versus stakeholder values: CSR and financialization in global food firms. Oxford University Press.
  • Karen S. Cravens., & Elizabeth Goad Oliver. (2006). Employees: The key link to corporate reputation management. Business Horizons, 49(4), 297.
  • Kauser, Shaw. (2004). The influence of behavioural and organisational characteristics on the success of international strategic alliances. International Marketing Review, 21(1), 7-52.
  • Kohli, Jaworski. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1-18.
  • Kumar, Scheer., & Steenkamp. (1995). The effects of supplier fairness on vulnerable resellers. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(1), 54.
  • Ladd., Brenda Scott., & Verena Marshall. (2004). Participation in decision making: A matter of context. The Leadership&Organization Development Journal, 25(8), 646-662.
  • Laplume Andre O., Sonpar., & Litz. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management.
  • Leonidou., Palihawadana., & Theodosiou. (2006). An integrated model of the behavioural dimensions of industrial buyer-seller relationships. European Journal of Marketing, 40(1/2), 145-173.
  • Lynch, Daniel F., Keller, Scott B., & Ozment, John. (2000). The effects of logistics capabilities and strategy on firm performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 21(2), 47-67.
  • Mana Kalathil., & Rudolf. (1995). Corporate social responsibility in a globalizing market. Advanced Management Journal, 60(1), 29–47.
  • Marta Fossas Olalla. (1999). The resource-based theory and human resources. Journal of International Advances in Economic Research, 5(1), 84-92.
  • McVea., & Freeman. (2005). A names-and-faces approach to stakeholder management, how focusing on stakeholders as individuals can bring ethics and entrepreneurial strategy together. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(1), 57-69.
  • Medina-Munoz., & Garcia-Falcon. (2002). Building the valuable connection hotels and travel agents. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 43(3), 46-52.
  • Mohr, Nevin. (1990). Communication strategies in marketing channels: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 36.
  • Mohr., & Speakman. (1994). Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behaviour and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 135-152.
  • Monczka. (1998). Success factors in strategic supplier alliances: The Buying Company Perspective, 29(3), 553–577.
  • Moore G.A. (2000). Living on the fault line: Managing shareholder value in the age of the internet. Harper Business. New York.
  • Morgan, Hunt. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20-38.
  • Paulraj., Lado., & Chen. (2007). Inter-organizational communication as a relational competency: Antecedents and performance outcomes in collaborative buyer-supplier relations. Journal of Operations Management, 1-20.
  • Polonsky, Michael Jay. (1995). A stakeholder theory approach to designing environmental marketing strategy. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 10(3), 36–40.
  • Porter, Lyman W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 603-609.
  • Porter, Michael E. (1980). Competitive strategies: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. The Free Press, New York.
  • Porter, Michael E. (1985). Competitive advantage-creating and sustaining superior performance. The Free Press, New York.
  • Preble, Jhon F. (2005). Toward a comprehensive model of stakeholder management. Business and Society Review, 110(4), 423-424.
  • Qu, Byung Il Park. (2007). Effects of government regulations, market orientation and ownership structure on corporate social responsibility in China: An empirical study. International Journal of Management, 24(3), 582–591.
  • Rosenzweig, Eve D., Roth, Aleda V., Dean Jr., & James W. (2003). The influence of an integration strategy on competitive capabilities ve business performance: an exploratory study of consumer products manufacturers. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 437-456.
  • R, T, Mowday., R, M, Steers., & L, W, Porter. (1979). The Measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224-247.
  • Ruth Spellman. (2011). Managers and leaders who can: How You Survive and Succeed in The New Economy, 93.
  • Sheu., Yen., Chae. (2006). Determinants of supplier-retailer collaboration: evidence from an international study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(1), 26.
  • Slater., & Narver. (1993). Product‐market strategy and performance: An analysis of the miles and snow strategy types. European Journal of Marketing, 27(10), 33–51.
  • Stoner. (1978). Management, Prentice Hall Inc. New Jersey, 345.
  • Thomas S, Bateman., & J, Michael Crant. (1993). Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103– 118.
  • Tixier. (2003). Note: Soft vs. hard approach in communicating on corporate social responsibility. Thunderbird International Business Review, 45(1), 71–91.
  • Vorhies. (1999). The capabilities and performance advantages of market‐driven firms. European Journal of Marketing, 33(11/12), 1171 – 1202.
  • Voronov, Vince. (2012). Integrating emotions into the analysis of institutional work. Academy of Management, 37(1), 58-81.
  • Yamin. (1999). Relationship between generic strategies, competitive advantage and organizational performance: an empirical analysis. Technovation, 19(8), 507–518
  • Yang, Rivers. (2009). Antecedents of CSR practices in MNCs’ subsidiaries: A stakeholder and institutional perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 155–169.
  • Yoo, Boonghee C., & Naveen Donthu. (2001). Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of Business Research, 52(1), 1-14.
  • Yoo, Boonghee C., Naveen Donthu., & Sungho Lee. (2000). An examination of selected marketing mix elements and brand equity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 195- 211.
  • Yoon, E., H, J, Guffey., & V, Kijewski. (1993). The effects of information and company reputation on intentions to buy a business service. Journal of Business Research, 27, 215-228.