OSMANLI MÜLKİYE TEŞKİLATINDA ÜST DÜZEY BİR MEMURUN SOSYO-EKONOMİK DURUMU: MISRÎZÂDE AHMED TAHİR EFENDİ ÖRNEĞİ (1840-1889)

Osmanlı seyfiye teşkilatının XIX. yüzyılda mülkiye ve askeriye şeklinde ikiye bölünmesi, mülkiye ile kalemiye arasındaki irtibatı da gündeme getirmiştir. Bu dönemde özellikle merkezi yönetimi güçlendirmek için atılan adımlar, Osmanlı bürokrasisinin temelini oluşturan kalemiyenin, mülkiyeye dönüşüm sürecini başlatmıştır. İşte bu araştırmayla kalemiyeden mülkiyeye geçiş sürecinde söz konusu teşkilatının üst düzey görevlilerinden biri olan Ahmed Tahir Efendi'nin tanıtılması amaçlanmıştır. Mısır'dan gelip Tarsus'a yerleştikleri için "Mısrîzâde" diye bilinen bir aileye mensup olan Ahmed Tahir Efendi 1840 yılında Tarsus'ta doğmuştur. Babası Tarsus meclis azası olduğu için erken denilebilecek bir yaşta memuriyete başlamıştır. Mülkiye teşkilatının çeşitli birimlerinde genellikle üst düzey görevlerde bulunduktan sonra 1889'da yine Tarsus'ta vefat etmiştir. 49 yaşında nispeten genç denilebilecek bir dönemde ölmüş olmasına rağmen, Tarsus'un dışında İstanbul, Ankara, Erzurum, Prizren, Girit,Selanik ve Yanya gibi birçok şehirde görev yapmıştır. Arşiv belgelerinin temel kaynak alındığı bu çalışmayla onun ailesi, eğitim ve meslek hayatı, ekonomik durumu ile kütüphanesinde bulunan kitapları ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Şu ana kadar onunla ilgili herhangi bir araştırmaya rastlanmamaktadır. Bu da yapılan çalışmanın özgün değerini ortaya koymaktadır. Her ne kadar mikro ölçekli bir inceleme olsa da, Ahmed Tahir Efendi'ye dair ulaşılan bulguların, onunla muadil görevlerde bulunan diğer memurlarının sosyo-ekonomik durumları ile entelektüel seviyeleri hakkında da bir fikir verecek olması, yapılan araştırmanın önemini arttırmaktadır

SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS OF A SENIOR OFFICER IN OTTOMAN CIVIL SERVICE ORGANIZATION: CASE OF MISRÎZÂDE AHMED TAHIR EFENDI (1840-1889)

Ottoman Seyfiye being separated into two as civil and military service in 19 ͭ ͪ century brought the contact between civil service and kalemiye. Steps taken especially in order to strengthened centralized management in this period started transformation process of kalemiye which forms the basis of Ottoman bureaucracy into civil service. With this study it was aimed to introduce Ahmed Tahir Efendi who is one of the senior officers of the mentioned organisation in the process of transition from the kalemiyye to the civil service. Ahmed Tahir Efendi who belongs to a family known as“Mısrîzâde” since they had settled Tarsus from Egypt was born in Tarsus in 1840. Ahmed Tahir Efendi whose father was a congressman in Tarsus started civil service at the early age. Ahmed Tahir Efendi who especially served at high ranks in various units of civil service organization died in Tarsus in 1889. Although he died at a very early age, when he was 49, he served in many other cities such as İstanbul, Ankara, Erzurum, Prizren, Girit, Selanik and Yanya apart from Tarsus. With this study which is based on archive documents, his family, educational status and occupational life, economic status and books in his library were found out. There has been no study about him since now. So, this reveals the original value of the study being done. Although it is a micro-size analysis, findings about Ahmed Tahir Efendi that would give idea to us about socio-economic status and intellectual level of other officers who have equal duties with him which increase the importance of study.Before 19 ͭ ͪ century, officers in Ottoman state organisation were divided into three groups namely seyfiye, kalemiye and ilmiye according to the status of their duty. Seyfiye being separated into two as civil and military service in this century brought the contact between civil service and kalemiye. Steps taken especially in order to strengthened centralized management in this period started transformation process of kalemiye which forms the basis of Ottoman bureaucracy into civil service. In this study, the life of Ahmed Tahir Efendi who served as senior officer in civil service organisation in 19 ͭ ͪcentury was analyzed. The main resources of the study are Sicill-i Ahval record in the Ottoman Archives of the Prime Ministry and heritage dated March 5, 1889 in Tarsus Şer’iyye Record no 316. of Ahmed Tahir Efendi who belongs to one of the prominent families of city and called as “Mısrîzâde” since they settled in Tarsus coming from Egypt. Apart from this, other archive documents and studies carried out on Sicill-i Ahval and heritage records of other people were also used. All the data obtained from these resources were compiled and analyzed in descriptive method. In this way, the family, educational status and occupational life, economic status of Ahmed Tahir Efendi who is a senior civil service officer in 19 ͭ ͪcentury and books in his library were found out. There has been no study about him until now. So, this reveals the original value of the study being done. Although it is a micro-size analysis, findings about Ahmed Tahir Efendi would give idea to us about socio-economic status and intellectual level of other officers who have equal duties with him which increases the importance of study. Ahmed Tahir Efendi was born in Tarsus in 1840. He was taught Arabic grammar and syntax in Tarsus school and madrasah; Persian, Logic and until Tuhfe, Baharistan and Gülistan in rhetoric until he is 15 years old; started to work as clerk officer intern in Tarsus council a year later. Although it is observed that intern officers start working at the age of twelve, thirteen until thirty in those periods in Ottoman Empire; most of the intern officers are under twenty. Since Ahmed Tahir Efendi had the chance to be an intern officer at the age of sixteen, he is one of those people who started working before twenty. Ahmet Tahir Efendi went to Istanbul in 1859 and became an officer at Divan-ı Humayun office (Imperial Court) after an examination. Then, after working for seven years at different units of Meclis-i Vala (The Supreme Court of Judicial Ordinances), he was assigned as a member of Bahriyye Levazım Komisyonu (Marine Quartermaster Commission) with the rank of head clerk. Then he served as provincial head clerk respectively in Ankara, Erzurum, Yanya, Prizren, Girit and Selanik; meanwhile he served as clerk policeman as well. After being assigned as clerk policeman for the second time in 1879, Ahmed Tahir Efendi worked at this duty for eight years and he was dismissed from his service on September 1, 1887 for being assigned as lieutenant governor for he was in need of change of scenery. At the start of 1889, he died in Tarsus which is his hometown before he was assigned as a lieutenant governor of a district. Having started to work for 170 piastres at first, the average salary appreciated for Ahmed Tahir Efendi was around 3.500 piastres especially after 1868 although his salary had a rough course after going to Istanbul. Ahmed Tahir Efendi, the son of Mısrîzâde Ali Efendi who served as the member of Tarsus council and third-degree officer had two wives namely Huriye and Melek and three children from Mrs. Huriye whose names are Celaleddin, Mehmed and Zehra. His elder son Celaleddin Bey is a high-rank officer at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. With this study, it was made clear how much money Ahmed Tahir Efendi left to his heirs and what his heritage is composed of apart from the family and education and occupational life of him. Total value of his heritage is 24.000 piastres. 6.964 piastres 30 para which is the cost of his debts and cost of heritage distribution was taken from this sum and the rest of money -17.035 piastres 10 para- was distributed to his heirs. 17.500 piastres of personal assets is composed of his stock and grains, 3.756 piastres 30 para is composed of his household goods, 895 piastres 30 para is the cost of his garments, 504 piastres 20 para is the cost of his books and 1.320 piastres 20 para is the cost of his goods apart from these.There are 49 books in the heritage of Ahmed Tahir Efendi. Having that many books for a person who does not belong to the ilmiye class gives us the impression that he is fond of reading. Actually, in the studies carried out on this subject so far, it is seen that the number of books in the libraries of book owners throughout the country and primarily the ulema class is not so different from the number of books owned by Ahmed Tahir Efendi. This shows us that he is an intellectual person. In the lifetime of forty nine years, Ahmed Tahir Efendi spent twenty years of his life in Tarsus which includes his childhood and first years of official duty, twenty years of moderate and high-drade official duty in Istanbul, four years in Ankara, and five years during his duty as provincal clerk in Erzurum, Selanik, Prizren, Girit and Yanya. Ahmed Tahir Efendi quit two times and was dismissed two time as well during his duty, therefore the duration of his active official duty lasted for twenty nine years since he was unemployed for four years. One of the answers sought in this study is whether the salary of Ahmed Tahir Efendi who lived in big cities for twenty nine years covers living standards in these cities. Also, his earning and the amount of his heritage was compared and according to this the reasons of the table was analyzed. According to the calculations of Carter V. Findley who is known for his studies about Ottoman bureaucracy and officers, a moderate officer needs 1.000 piastres nominal salary to maintain a family in Istanbul in 1894. The average of salary appreciated for Ahmed Tahir Efendi is 3.500 piastres. But the salary mentioned in Sicill-i Ahval records are not the net salary obtained by the officer but the gross salary. According to Findley, the difference is the wage cut made for resources such as retirement fund and payment delays. Although the difference between net and gross salary of Ahmed Tahir Efendi is not known, it can be said that during his life in Istanbul, he had earned three times more than the earning of a moderate officer would need. Compared with his salary, Ahmed Tahir Efendi left quite low amount of heritage. For example total personal assets of Mehmed Hilmi Efendi who was Mudarris of Koyuncu Madrassah in Tarsus and who died at the same year with him was 10.605 piastres. This mudarris was paid averagely 2.276 piastres a year from madrassah foundation during the six year period covering the years of 1882-1887. Annual earning of Ahmed Tahir Efendi who was working for 3.500 piastres salary counts up to 42.000 piastres. According to this, only monthly earning of Ahmed Tahir Efendi is more than the annual earning of a mudarris in Tarsus in the same period. According to this accounting, total sum of salary of Ahmed Tahir Efendi in a year is eighteen times more than the annual earning of Mudarris Mehmed Hilmi Efendi. On the other hand, the heritage of Ahmed Tahir Efendi is only a little more than two times of the heritage of Mehmed Hilmi Efendi. Undoubtedly, the most important reason of this difference is that while Ahmed Tahir Efendi lived in big cities apart from hometown, Mehmed Hilmi Efendi lived in the city where he was born. While the rental expenses causes a serious spending item in big cities, a person who lives in his hometown may be exempted from this expenditure. For example, while Mudarris Mehmed Hilmi Efendi has a house of his own in Tarsus, Ahmed Tahir Efendi did not have. This shows us that Ahmed Tahir Efendi had to spare part of his salary for the rent. Although his rental expense is not known, data about this issue dating twenty five years further gives idea about house rentals in Istanbul and earnings of mudarris in Tarsus and Mersin. According to the accounting of Istanbul Chamber of Commerce, in 1914 monthly rental expense of a moderate family is 150 piastres in Istanbul. Monthly earning of a mudarris in Tarsus and Mersin in those years is between 200 and 250 piastres. According to this, monthly rental expense of a family who lives in Istanbul at the beginning of 20 ͭ ͪcentury is more than half of the monthly earning of a mudarris who lives in the province in those years. The second reason for the difference between annual earning and heritage of Ahmed Tahir Efendi and Mehmed Hilmi Efendi is the unemployment period of Ahmed Tahir Efendi which lasted for four years. Economic loss of him in four years was 168.000 piastres. This amount is seven times more than heritage of mentioned person. For these reasons, Ahmed Tahir Efendi left quite a low amount of heritage, since he could not make so much saving.

___

  • BOA, DH, SAİD, Dosya No: 1, Gömlek No: 23, s. 44.
  • Tarsus Şer‘iyye Sicilleri, Defter No: 291, 294, 296, 304, 309, 316, 330, 335, 385, 406.
  • VGMA, Defter No: 4291, Sayfa No: 284, Sıra No: 118.
  • VGMA, Defter No: 4291, Sayfa No: 320-321, Sıra No: 128.
  • İMMA, Dosya No: 1620, 1628.
  • Aslan, A., (2006) Sicill-i Ahvâl Defterlerine Göre Osmanlı Döneminde Afyonkarahisarlı Devlet Memurları (1879-1909), (Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Muğla Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • Arslan, İ., (2014), “19. Yüzyıl Sonlarında Edremit’te Beş Köylü Beş Tereke”, Tarih Okulu Dergisi,7 (17), ss. 443-466.
  • Aydın, M. A., (2003), “Mehir”, DİA, c. XXVIII, ss. 389-391, Ankara: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı.
  • Barkan, Ö. L., (1966), “Edirne Askerî Kassamı’na Ait Tereke Defterleri (1545-1659)”, Belgeler, 3 (5-6), ss. 1-479, Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu.
  • Cin, H., (1974), İslâm ve Osmanlı Hukukunda Evlenme, Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Yayınları.
  • Cohen, A., (2003), Osmanlı Kudüs’ünde Loncalar, çev. Nurettin Elhüseyni, İstanbul: Türkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı.
  • Darkot, B., (1974), “Tarsus”, İA, c. XII, ss. 18-24, İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi.
  • Doğan, F., (2015), “Bir Eğitim Tarihi Kaynağı Olarak Giresun Şer‘iye Sicilleri: Tereke Kayıtlarına Yansıyan Kitaplar”, Turkish Studies-International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, Wolume 10/9, p. 153-168. ISSN: 1308-2140, www. turkishstudies.net, DOI Number: http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/ TurkishStudies.8020, ANKARA-TURKEY.
  • Gazel, A. A., (2007), “Sicill-i Ahval Defterlerine Göre Osmanlı Dönemi’nde Görev Yapan Anamurlu Memurlar”, A.Ü. Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı 32, ss. 203-213.
  • Findley, C. V., (1996), Kalemiyeden Mülkiyeye Osmanlı Memurlarının Toplumsal Tarihi, çev. Gül Çağalı Güven, İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları.
  • Gökmen, E., (2014), “Manisa Mevlevîhânesi Şeyhi Mehmed Bahâeddin Efendi’nin Terekesi (1771)”, Sûfî Araştırmaları, 5 (9), ss. 1-62.
  • Kılıç, O., (2007), “Harputlu Hacı Osman’ın 1725 Tarihli Terekesi ve Düşündürdükleri”, Turkish Studies-International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, Wolume 2/1, p. 17-28. ISSN: 1308-2140, www.turkishstudies.net,DOINumber:http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.8020, ANKARA-TURKEY.
  • Koca, E., (2009), “18. ve 19. Yüzyıl Osmanlı Erkek Modası”, Türk-İslâm Medeniyeti Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi, Sayı 7 Kış, ss. 63-81.
  • Korkmaz, Ş., (2004), “Tanzimat’tan Cumhuriyet’e Çorum’da Eğitim ve Kültür Hayatı”, Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8 (1), , ss. 135-150.
  • Küpeli, Ö., (1999), “Afyonkarahisar Din Bilginlerinden Şeyh Receb Efendi’nin Terekesinde Yer Alan Kitaplar”, Taşpınar, 1 (1), ss. 33-37.
  • Maydaer, S., (2008), “XVII. Yüzyılda Bursa’da Emekli Bir Kadı: Baldırzade Oğlu Derviş Mehmed Efendi ve Serveti”, Uludağ Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 17 (2), ss. 569-592.
  • _________ , (2011), “XVI. Yüzyılda Bir Osmanlı Müderrisi: Mevlana Muslihuddin Efendi ve Mirası”, Uludağ Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 20 (1), ss. 117-155.
  • Mert, T., (2009), “Kısakürek-zâde Mehmed Hilmi Efendi (1841-1916)”, Osmanlı Araştırmaları, Sayı 33, ss. 209-219.
  • Rafet, M., (2013), “Tereke Kayıtlarına Göre XVIII. Yüzyılda Gebze (Gekbuza) de Sosyal Hayata Dair Genel Bir Bakış”, Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6 (26), ss. 362-374.
  • Oğuz, İ., (2006), Mersin Kentinin Kuruluş Öyküsü, Mersin: Mersin Ticaret ve Sanayi Odası.
  • Oğuz, D., (2014), “Tereke Kayıtlarının Güvenilirliği ve Kadıların Mirastan Mal Kaçırma Yöntemleri”, Turkish Studies-International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, Volume 9/1 Winter 2014, p. 409-426, ISSN: 1308-2140, www.turkishstudies.net, DOI Number: http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.8020, ANKARA-TURKEY.
  • Özcan, T., (2005), “Muhallefât”, DİA, c. XXX, ss. 406-407, İstanbul: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı.
  • Özdemir, R., (1989), “Kırşehir’de Ailenin Sosyo-Ekonomik Yapısı (1880-1906)”, Osmanlı Araştırmaları, c. IX, ss. 101-157.
  • Özen, Ş., (2013), “Bir Mirasın Gölgesinde Velâ Tartışması: Müzellef Ahmed Efendi’nin Terekesi ve Ganîzâde Mehmed Nâdirî’nin Şeyhülislâma Mektubu”, Osmanlı Araştırmaları, XLI, ss. 71- 124.
  • Öztürk, S., (1995), Askeri Kassama Ait On Yedinci Asır İstanbul Tereke Defterleri (Sosyo-Ekonomik Tahlil), İstanbul: Osmanlı Araştırmaları Vakfı.
  • Poş, A., (2014), “Taşrada Kitapsever Bir Toplum: Tarsus Müslümanları Örneği (1827-1918)”, İSTEM, Sayı 24, ss. 103-129.
  • Soyluer, S., (2006), Sicill-i Ahvâl Defterlerine Göre Osmanlı Döneminde Muğlalı Devlet Memurları (1879-1909), (Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Muğla Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • Telci, C., (2000), “Aydın Muhassılı Abdullah Paşa ve 1148 (1735) Senesinde Zabtedilen Muhallefâtı”, Tarih İncelemeleri Dergisi, 15, ss. 199-219.
  • ________ , (2011), “Muhassılın Serveti: Aydın Muhassılı Abdülbaki Paşa’nın 25 Temmuz 1697 ( 6 Muharrem 1109) Tarihli Muhallefatı”, Tarih İncelemeleri Dergisi, 26 (2), ss. 551-575.
  • Ulutaş, S., (2006), “Bir Tereke Defterinin Penceresinden 1904-1909 Yılları Arasında Tarsus”, Kebikeç, 21, ss. 175-195.
  • Yağcı, Z. G., Genç, S., (2009), “XIX. Yüzyılda Balıkesirli Bir Paşa: Giridîzâde Mehmed Paşa ve Serveti”, Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Volume 2/6, ss. 282-293.