OKUL ÖNCESİ VE SINIF ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN MATEMATİK ÖĞRETİMİ VE ÖĞRENİMİ HAKKINDAKİ İNANIŞLARI
Matematik günlük yaşamın bir parçasıdır ve çocuklar küçük yaşlardan itibaren matematiksel düşünceler geliştirdikleri deneyimlere sahip olabilmektedirler. Okul Öncesi dönem ve bu dönemde alınan eğitimin matematik öğrenme sürecinde etkili olduğu söylenebilir. Okul Öncesi öğretmenlerin matematik öğretimi ve öğrenme üzerindeki inançlarının kaliteli bir matematik öğretme ve öğrenme sürecindeki etkisi göz ardı edilmemelidir. Öğretmenlerin öğretim pratikleri matematik öğretimi üzerindeki inançlarını oluşturmaktadır (Cohen ve Ball, 1990). Öğretmen adaylarına ve öğretmenlere istenen inançlar kazandırılmaya çalışılmalı ve onların kendi öğrencilerinin de matematiğin doğası ve öğretimi ile ilgili istenen inançlara sahip olmaları sağlanarak matematik eğitiminde hedeflenen amaçlara ulaşılmasına olumlu katkıda bulunulmalıdır. Bu çalışmada Okul Öncesi ve sınıf öğretmenlerinin Matematik öğretimi ve öğrenimi üzerindeki inançlarını incelemek amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmanın verileri Güven, Karataş, Öztürk, Arslan ve Gürsoy tarafından (2013) geliştirilen 'Matematik Öğretimi, Öğrenimi ve İnançları Ölçeği' ile toplanmıştır. Katılımcılar uygun örnekleme yolu ile seçilmiş ve ölçek Kütahya il merkezinde görev yapan Okul Öncesi ve birinci sınıf okutan toplam 233 öğretmene uygulanmıştır. Verilerin analizi sonrasında cinsiyet değişkeni ele alındığında ölçeğin müfredat boyutunda bayan öğretmenler lehine anlamlı fark olduğu görülmüştür. Branş değişkeni ele alındığında ise matematiğin doğası boyutunda okul öncesi öğretmenleri lehine, müfredat boyutunda ise sınıf öğretmenleri lehine anlamlı fark olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca mesleki tecrübenin müfredat alt boyutunda anlamlı farka neden olduğu belirlenmiştir
PRESCHOOL AND PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS’ BELIEFS ABOUT MATHEMATIC TEACHING AND LEARNING
Mathematic is a part of daily life. Children has started to have several experiences which need mathematical thinking. Preschool term and education which is given in this term have influence mathematic learning. Thus preschool and primary school teachers’ beliefs about mathematic teaching and learning is crucial, because teaching experiences of them have been influenced by their beliefs (Cohen and Ball, 1990). Both preservice teachers and teachers’ should be informed about their beliefs about the nature of mathematics and teaching of mathematics affected their teaching and their students' also are affected these beliefs. Therefore teachers and teacher candidates should try to gain desired beliefs about mathematics. The purpose of this research is to investigate preschool and primary school teachers’ beliefs about mathematic teaching and learning. The data was collected by using “Mathematics, Education, Learning and Beliefs Scale”. The authors use convenience sampling method to choose participants. The sample consisted of 233 preschool and primary school teachers in Kütahya. According to the results, there is a significant difference between male and female teachers on curriculum subscale. Also there is a significant difference between preschool and primary school teachers on the nature of mathematics and curriculum subscale. In addition, it is interpreted from the result that teaching experience causes significant difference on curriculum subscale. purpose of this research is to investigate preschool and primary school teachers’ beliefs about mathematic teaching and learning For this purpose, the study focuses on the following research questions: 1. To what extend are preschool and primary school teachers’ beliefs about mathematic teaching and learning? 2. Are there any significant differences in preschool and primary school teachers’ beliefs about mathematic teaching and learning by considering gender of participants? 3. Are there any significant differences in preschool and primary school teachers’ beliefs about mathematic teaching and learning by considering professional experience? 4. Are there any significant differences in preschool and primary school teachers’ beliefs about mathematic teaching and learning by considering their department that they graduated? The authors applied quantitative survey method to the study in order to determine preschool and primary school teachers’ beliefs about mathematics teaching and learning. Survey method is generally used in scientific research methods to understand the universe's unique features (Karas, 2008; Özdemir, 2014). The data was collected by using “Mathematics, Education, Learning and Beliefs Scale”. The authors use convenience sampling method to choose participants. The sample consisted of 233 preschool and primary school teachers in Kütahya. According to the results, there is a significant difference between male and female teachers on curriculum subscale. Also there is a significant difference between preschool and primary school teachers on the nature of mathematics and curriculum subscale. In addition, it is interpreted from the result that teaching experience causes significant difference on curriculum subscale. These results indicated that both preschool and primary school teachers’ beliefs about mathematic teaching and learning are effected by several different variables such as their pedagogical content knowledge, their experience and gender. Indeed, female teachers believed mathematic curriculum’s effects on problem solving and social environment. It is also concluded from the study that preschool teachers have more positive beliefs that primary school teachers on the nature of mathematics and curriculum. On the other hand, primary school teachers have more positive beliefs about teacher competences than preschool teachers. Changing teachers’ beliefs is difficult but not impossible. Removing obstacles in mathematic teaching and supporting teachers to have positive attitudes toward teaching are some required steps to change teachers’ negative beliefs about mathematic teaching. In addition, the authors found that beliefs about mathematic teaching and learning is affected by teaching experience. The research concluded that teachers have positive beliefs about mathematic teaching and learning
___
- Adıgüzelli, Y. (2015). Öğretmenlerin Öğretim Etkinliklerini Gerçekleştirme Sürecinde Yaşadıkları Sorunların Bazı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi. Turkish Studies. 10(15), 1-18
- Aslan, D. (2003). Social Sciences And Humanities. A Comparison Of Pre- And İn-Service Preschool Teachers’ Mathematical Anxiety And Beliefs About Mathematics For Young Children. Part-II: Social Sciences and Humanities, 4 (2), 225-230.
- Aslan, D., Oğul Gürgah, İ.,Taş, I. (2013). The İmpacts Of Preschool Teachers' Mathematics Anxiety And Beliefs On Children's Mathematics Achievement İnternational. Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 2 (3), 45-49.
- Balcı, A. (2015). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma: Yöntem, Teknik Ve İlkeler. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
- Baydar S.C. ve Bulut S. (2002). Öğretmenlerin Matematiğin Doğası Ve Öğretimi İle İlgili İnançlarının Matematik Eğitimindeki Önemi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, 62-66.
- Bowman, B. T., Donovan, M. S., & Burns, M. S. (Eds.) (2001). Eager To Learn: Educating Our Preschoolers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ç. E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
- Cohen, D. K., ve Ball, D. L. (1990). Relations Between Policy And Practice: A Commentary. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 331-338.
- Cohen, J. (1992). A Power Primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
- Ernest, P., (1991). The Philosophy Of Mathematics Education. The Falmer Press.
- Evans, B. (2011). A Comparison Of Two Alternative Pathway Programs İn Secondary Mathematics Teacher Certification. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, University of Nevada, Reno.
- Gay, L., Mills, G. ve Airasian, P. (2006). Educational Research: Competencies For Analysis And Application. New Jersey: Pearson.
- Güven, B., Karataş, İ., Öztürk, Y., Arslan, S., ve Gürsoy, K. (2013). Okul Öncesi Öğretmenlerinin Ve Öğretmen Adaylarının Okul Öncesi Matematik Eğitimine İlişkin İnançların Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Ölçek Geliştirme Çalışması. İlköğretim Online, 12(4), 969-980.
- Golafshani, N. (2013). Teachers’ Beliefs and Teaching Mathematics with Manipulatives. Canadian Journal of Education, 36:3
- Handal B. (2003). Teachers’ Mathematical Beliefs: A Review. The Mathematics Educator, 13(2), 47–57.
- Holm, J. Ve Kajander, A. (2012). Interconnections of Knowledge and Beliefs in Teaching Mathematics. Canadıan Journal Of Scıence, Mathematıcs And Technology Educatıon, 12(1), 7–21,
- Karasar, N. (2008). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
- Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). The strands of mathematical proficiency. Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics, 115-118.
- Kösece P. ve Taşkaya S. M. (2015). Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Matematik Dersi Öğretim Yöntemlerine İlişkin Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi. Turkish Studies. 10(3), 955-970
- Kubat, U. (2015). Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Öğretme Ve Öğrenme Sürecine Yönelik Yeterlikleri. Turkish Studies. 10(15), 601 - 614
- Özdemir, E. (2014). Tarama Yöntemi. M. Metin (Ed.) içinde Kuramdan Uygulamaya Eğitimde Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (77-98). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
- Raymond, M. (1997). Inconsistency Between A Beginning Elementary School Teacher's Mathematics Beliefs And Teaching Practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 5, 550-576.
- Richardson, V. (2003). Pre-service Teachers’ Beliefs. In J. Raths, & A. C. McAninch. (Eds.). Teacher Beliefs And Classroom Performance: The İmpact Of Teacher Education. (pp. 1-22). Greenwich, Connecticut: Information Age Publishing.
- Toluk Uçar, Z ve. Demirsoy, N.H. (2010). Eski-Yeni İkilemi: Matematik Öğretmenlerinin Matematiksel İnançları Ve Uygulamaları. H. Ü. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 39, 321-332.
- Wilkins, J. L. (2008). The relationship among elementary teachers’content knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 139–164