Bülent Baki TELEF, Ersin UZMAN, Enes ERGÜN

ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARINDA PSİKOLOJİK İYİ OLUŞ VE DEĞERLER ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Bu araştırmanın amacı, öğretmen adaylarının psikolojik iyi oluşları ile değerleri arasındaki ilişkileri incelemektir. Araştırma betimsel yönteme dayanmaktadır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubu 2011-2012 eğitim-öğretim yılında Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi'nde farklı bölümlerde öğrenim görmekte olan 260 öğretmen adayından oluşmaktadır. Katılımcıların %72'si kız (n=188), %28'i erkek (n=72) öğrencidir. Araştırma verileri Psikolojik İyi Oluş Ölçeği, Portre Değerler Ölçeği ve Kişisel Bilgi Formu ile toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın verilerinin analizinde çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizi ve pearson momentler çarpımı korelâsyon tekniği kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın istatistiksel analizleri SPSS 16.0 programı kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonucunda, psikolojik iyi oluş ile başarı, hazcılık, özyönelim, evrenselcilik, iyilikseverlik, uyma ve güvenlik arasında pozitif yönde anlamlı ilişkiler olduğu görülmüştür. Psikolojik iyi oluş ile güç, uyarılım ve geleneksellik arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmamıştır. Çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizi sonucunda güç, başarı, hazcılık, uyarılım, özyönelim, evrenselcilik, iyilikseverlik, geleneksellik, uyma ve güvenlik, psikolojik iyi oluşun %20'sini açıklamaktadır. Hazcılık ve evrenselcilik yordamaktadır. Değerler boyut olarak ele alındığında yeniliğe açıklık, özgenişletim, özaşkınlık ve muhafazacılık boyutları psikolojik iyi oluşun %16'sını açıklamaktadır. Özaşkınlık boyutunun psikolojik iyi oluşun anlamlı düzeyde yordayıcısı olduğu görülmüştür. Sonuç olarak öğretmen adaylarının sahip oldukları bazı değerlerin psikolojik iyi oluşlarını arttırdığı söylenebilir

EXAMINE THE RELATION BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL WELLBEING AND VALUES IN TEACHER CANDIDATES

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between psychological well-being and values in teacher candidates. The study was based on descriptive method. The sample of this study consisted of 260 teacher candidates attending Dokuz Eylül University, Buca Faculty of Education during the 2011-2012 academic period. Among the participants, 72% were female (n=188) and 28 % were male (n=72). The data were collected by means of the Psychological Wellbeing Scale, the Portre Values Scale and a Personal Information Form developed by the researchers. In the analyses, both multiple linear regression and Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient techniques were used. These statistical analyses of the research were performed with the help of SPSS 16.0 software. The results of this study showed that there was a meaningful relationship between psychological well-being and the values of achievement, hedonism, self-direction, universalism, benevolence, conformity and security; however, no relationship was found between psychological well-being and power, stimulation and traditional values. The multiple linear regression analysis showed that power, achievement, hedonism, stimulation, selfdirection, universalism, benevolence, tradition, conformity and security values explained 20% of psychological well-being. It was also found that hedonism and universalism values predicted psychological well-being. When values are examined in a dimensional context it can be said that openness to change, self-enhancement, self-transcendence and conservation dimensions explained 16% of psychological well-being. Statistical analyses showed that the self-transcendence dimension was a meaningful predictor of psychological well-being. To sum up, it can be said that having some values increases the psychological well-being of teacher candidates

PDF

___

AFLAKSEİR, A. (2012). Religiosity, personal meaning, and psychological well-being: a study among Muslim students in England. Pakistan Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 27-31.
BERGMAN, M. M., & SCOTT, J. (2001). Young adolescents’ wellbeing and health-risk behaviors: Gender and socio-economic differences. Journal of Adolescence, 24, 183-197.
BILSKY, W., & SCHWARTZ, S. H. (1994). Values and personality. European Journal of Personality, 8, 163-181.
BOBOWIK, M., BASABE, N., PAEZ, D., JIMENEZ-ARISTIZABAL, A., & BILBAO, M. A. (2011). Personal values and well-being among Europeans, Spanish natives and immigrants to Spain: Does the culture matter? Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 401–419.
BROWN, K. W., & KASSER, T. (2005). Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle. Social Indicators Research, 74, 349-368.
BURR, A., SANTO, J. B., & PUSHKAR, D. (2011). Affective well-being in retirement: The influence of values, money, and health across three years. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 17–40.
BURROUGHS, J. E., & RINDFLEISCH, A. (2002). Materialism and well-being: A conflicting values perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 348–370.
COHEN, A., & SHAMAI, O. (2010). The relationship between individual values, psychological well-being, and organizational commitment among Israeli police officers. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 33, 30-51.
CORRAL-VERDUGO, V., MIRELES-ACOSTA, J., TAPIA-FONLLEM, C., & FRAİJO-SİNG, B. (2011). Happiness as correlate of sustainable behavior: A study of pro-ecological, frugal, equitable and altruistic actions that promote subjective well-being. Human Ecology Review, 18, 96-104.
DEMİRUTKU, K. (2007). Parenting styles, internalization of values, and the self-concept [Çocuk yetiştirme tarzları, değerler içselleştirilmesi ve benlik kavramı]. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi.
DIENER, E., WIRTZ, D., BISWAS-DIENER, R., TOV, W., KIM-PRIETO, C., CHOI, D., ET AL. (2009). New measures of well-being. The Netherlands: Springer. The collected works of Ed Diener.
DIENER, E., WIRTZ, D., TOV, W., KIM-PRIETO, C., CHOI, D., OISHI, S., & BISWASDIENER, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143–156.
DUNN, E. W., AKNIN, L. B., & NORTON, M. I. (2010). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319, 1687-1688.
FORGEARD, M. J. C., JAYAWICKREME, E., KERN, M., & SELIGMAN, M. E. P. (2011).
Doing the right thing: Measuring wellbeing for public policy. International Journal of Wellbeing, 1, 79-106.
GÜMÜŞ, Ö. D. (2009). Kültür, değerler, kişilik ve siyasal ideoloji arasındaki ilişkiler: Kültürler arası bir karşılaştırma. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
HASLAM, N., WHELAN, J., & BASTIAN, B. (2009). Big Five traits mediate associations between values and subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 40- 42.
JARDEN, A. J. (2010). Relationships between personal values, and depressed mood and subjective well-being. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
JOSHANLOO, M., & GHAEDI, G. (2009). Value priorities as predictors of hedonic and eudaimonic aspects of well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 294-298.
KARABATİ, S., & CEMALCİLAR, Z. (2010). Values, materialism, and well-being: A study with Turkish university students. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31, 624-633.
KASSER, T. M., & RYAN, R. M. (1993). A dark side of the American dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 410–422.
KASSER, T., & AHUVIA, A. C. (2002). Materialistic values and well-being in business students. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 137-146.
LU, L., GILMOUR, R., & KAO, S. (2001). Cultural values and happiness: An east–west dialogue. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 477-493.
MYERS, D. G., & DIENER, E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6, 10-19.
ÖZDEMİR, Y. ve KORUKLU, N. (2011). Üniversite öğrencilerinde değerler ve mutluluk arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. YYÜ, Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8, 190-210.
PAREEK, S., & JAIN, M. (2012). Subjective well-being in relation to altruism and forgiveness among school going adolescents. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 138-141.
PARKS, L., & GUAY, R. P. (2009). Personality, values and motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 675-684.
POST, S. G. (2005). Altruism, happiness, and health: It's good to be good. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 12, 66-77.
RASK, K., ASTEDT-KURKI, P., & LAIPPALA, P. (2002). Adolescent subjective well-being and realized values. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 38, 254-263.
RYAN, R. M., & DECI, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141-166.
RYFF, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological wellbeing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081.
RYFF, C. D., & KEYES, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719-727.
RYFF, C. D., MAGEE, W. J., KLING, K. C., & WING, E. H. (1999). Forging macro-micro linkages in the study of psychological well-being. In C. D. Ryff, V. W. Marshall (Eds.), The Self and Society in Aging Processes (pp. 247–278). New York: Springer.
SAGIV, L., & SCHWARTZ, S. (2000). Value priorities and subjective well-being: direct relations and congruity effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 177-198.
SCHWARTZ, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25) (pp. 1-65). New York: Academic Press.
SCHWARTZ, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the content and structure of values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19-45.
SCHWARTZ, S. H., SAGIV, L., & BOEHNKE, K. (2000). Worries and values. Journal of Personality, 68, 309–346.
SCHWARTZ, S. H., MELECH, G., LEHMANN, A., BURGESS, S., HARIS, M., & OWENS, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of the basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519-542.
SCHWARTZ, S. H. (2010). Basic values: How they motivate and inhibit prosocial behavior. In M. Mikulincer, P. Shaver, (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 221-241). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
SHELDON, K. M. (2005). Positive value change during college: Normative trends and individual differences. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 209-223.
SINHA, B. (2012). Value priorities and well-being: Implications for value oriented education. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research, 1, 10-20.
TELEF, B. B. (2011). Psikolojik iyi oluş ölçeği: Türkçeye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. 11. Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Kongresi, 3–5 Ekim, Selçuk- İzmir.
VANSTEENKISTE, M., DURIEZ, B., SIMONS, J., & SOENENS, B. (2006). Materialistic values and well-being among business students: Further evidence of their detrimental effect. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 2892-2908.
WELZEL, C., & INGLEHART, W. (2010). Agency, values, and well-being: A human development model. Social Indicators Research, 97, 43-63