KÜLTÜR KAVRAMININ KAPSAMI, ANLAM VE TANIMLARI

Bu çalışmanın amacı kültür kavramının anlamını tartışmak, kültürün ne olduğu konusuna açıklık getirmek ve bu kavramı kapsam ve içerik yönünden incelemektir. Çalışmada, geniş anlam ve kapsamından hareketle kavramın günlük dilde kullanımı ve sözlüklerde yer alan tanımları incelenmiştir. Sözlüklerde yer alan kayıtlar, sözcüğünün günlük yaşamda da dili kullananlar tarafından sahiplenilerek türlü anlam ve Türkçenin ilk ya da ikinci sözcüğü "kültür" ile başlayan söz varlığının ne denli zengin olduğunu ve kültür sözcüğünün yeni bir anlamı karşılamak üzere başka sözcüklerle bir araya gelme konusunda ne denli esnek olduğunu göstermiştir. Kültürişlevlerde kullanıldığı görülmektedir. Dolayısıyla geçmişte ve günümüzde kültür kavramının nasıl ve hangi anlamlarda kullanıldığını daha iyi anlayabilmek için tarihsel süreç içinde bu kavram ile ilgili sosyal bilimler alanında sunulan farklı tanımlarına yer verilmiştir. Ayrıca kültür kavramının özellikle de kültürlerarası çalışmalarda izlediği gelişim süreci, alanın önde gelen araştırmacılarının bakış açılarıyla değerlendirilmiştir. Sunulan farklı tanımlar ve bilimsel çalışmalar, kültürün günümüzde iki temel anlamda kullanıldığını göstermiştir. Birinci temel ve dar anlamıyla kültür günümüzde, müzik, edebiyat, tiyatro gibi yüksek kültürü ve sanat kültürünü çağrıştırmaktadır. Bu anlamdaki kültür genelde eğitim, bilim ve sanat yoluyla kazanılan "estetik mükemmellik" olarak ele alınmaktadır. İkinci temel ve geniş anlamınayla kültür, insanın çevresine ait olan ve kendisi tarafından yaratılan her şeyi, örneğin dil, hukuk sistemi, teknoloji, gelenek- görenekleri, kıyafetleri, yeme içme alışkanlıklarını v.b. sosyal yaşamın tüm yönlerini kapsamaktadır. Kültür geniş anlamıyla, ayrıca kendini bölgesel, etnik, dilsel, dinsel, tarihsel v.b. ölçütlere göre bir bütün olarak gören ve kendilerini bu yönüyle diğerlerinden ayıran grupları ve toplumları da işaret etmektedir

SCOPE, MEANING, AND DEFINITIONS OF THE CONCEPT OF CULTURE

The objectives of this study are to discuss the meaning of concept of culture, to clarify what the culture is, and to examine this concept in terms of context and scope. In this study, considering its broad meaning and scope, its use in daily language and its definitions in dictionaries were examined. The records in dictionaries indicate how rich the Turkish language is in terms of the compound words including the term “culture” as the first or second word, and how the word “culture” is flexible in combining other words in order to construct a new meaning. The word “culture” seems to be adopted by the individuals using the language also in their daily lives and to beused in various meanings and functions. Hence, in order tobetter understand how and in which meanings the concept of culture has been and is being used in the past and present, different definitions of this concept that have been presented in social sciences within the context of historical process were involved in this paper. Moreover, the process of development of the concept of “culture”,especially in the intercultural studies, was discussed from the perspectives of leading researchers in the literature. Different definitions and scientific studies indicated that the culture is nowadaysmainly used in two meanings. From the aspect of first and narrow meaning, it nowadays connotatesthe high culture and art culture such as music, literature, and theater. The culture, from this aspect, is generally consideredas the “aesthetical perfection” gained through the education, science, and art. In terms of second and broad meaning, the culture covers all of the aspects of social life belonging to the environment of and created by the human such as language, legal system, technology, clothes, traditions, eating and drinking habits. In its broad meaning, culture also represents the groups and societies that are considered themselves as the whole with or different from others in terms of the regional, ethnic, religious, and historical aspects.The objective of this study is to discuss the meaning of concept of culture, to clarify what the culture is, and to examine this concept from the aspects of context and scope. Culture is an abstract word having a very broad and high number of meanings. Thus, it is very difficult to define this concept into a single meaning and, it is almost impossiblefor some scientists. Despite the fact that there are hundreds of scientific definitions of culture even in social sciences, the new ones that are continuously added to these meanings is possibly the most important sign of this difficulty. The reason for why the culture couldn’t have a clear meaning is not known in fact. First of all, the culture is a very old concept that never becomes old. For many centuries, the culture has represented various meanings, and the philosophers have suggested their own definitions. Furthermore, there are numerous scientific disciplines studying the culture. In addition to the classical disciplines such as anthropology, history, ethnology, and sociology, also the relatively newer disciplines such as media studies also relate the culture totheir own research universes. Every scientific discipline pays importance and priority to different aspects of the culture. As a result, the meaning of culture significantly varies depending on the scientific discipline, and it gains new meanings through this process. With reference to its broad meaning and scope, the use of concept of culture in daily language and its definitions in dictionaries were investigated in this study. The records in dictionaries indicate how rich the Turkish language is in terms of the compound words including the term “culture” as the first or second word, and how the word “culture” is flexible in combining other words in order to establish a new meaning. The word “culture” seems to be adopted by the individuals using the language also in their daily lives and to be used in various meanings and functions. Hence, in order to better understand how and in which meanings the concept of culture has been and being used in past and today, different definitions of this concept that have been presented in social sciences within the context of historical process were involved in present paper. Furthermore, the process of development of the concept of “culture”, especially in intercultural studies, was discussed from the perspectives of leading researchers in the literature. The word “culture” has been used for different meanings and contexts since the ancient times. This word, which has been initially used in the meaning of agriculture, has been firstly used by Marcus Tullius Cicero (B.C. 106 –43),a Roman politician, philosopher, and author,as “cultura animi”, which means the education of mind, in relation with the human. Kuçuradi has defined the word“cultura animi” as the “whole of activities enabling the development of individuals’ personal resources (processing and cultivation of these resources), and making art and philosophy, and benefiting what is done” (1988: 40). According to the author, cultura animi meets one of thetraditional meanings of culture most widely used in daily language. The use of culture in the meaning of cultura animi has become popular mainly since 18th century, and gained a place in Western thinking for centuries. Since 17th century, with the enlargement of meaning, culture has started to be used as antonym of “nature” concept. “In those years, the ‘culture’was the name given to what the people created in addition to what the nature offers”(Kartarı, 2006: 14). This concept, which has been seen firstly in French language and then in English and German languages, and then conveyed to the other ones from these languages in the course of time, has been used as the synonym of civilization in some of languages,while it has been used in other meanings in other languages. These two words used as synonyms in French are generally used in separate meanings in German tradition of thought. That is to say, the concepts of culture and civilization are clearly distinguished from each other. In German language, the culture represents a concept that is unique and specific to a society, while the civilization representsa concept that can be transferred and conveyed from a society to another one. But, in English language, there is no difference between these concepts (Özkul, 2008: 39). Different definitions and scientific studies that are presented indicate that the culture is nowadays used in both of these two fundamental meanings. Tekinalp defines twofundamental meanings of culture; the “aesthetical perfection” and the “life’s own” (2005:76). In its first and narrow meaning, the cultureconnotateshigh culture and art culture such as the music, literature, and theater. The culture, in terms of this meaning,is expressed as the “aesthetical perfection” that is generally gained through the education, science, and art. In its second and broader meaning, the culture covers all of the aspects of social life belonging to the environment of and created by the human such as the language, legal system, technology, clothes, traditions, eating and drinking habits. Moreover, in its broad meaning, culture also indicate the groups and societies that are considered themselves as a whole with or different from the others in terms of the regional, ethnic, religious, and historical aspects. On the other hand, Kartarı defines the cultureas both of the human behaviors and the system of beliefs, thinking, and value orientations that become visible through the tangible and intangible products created by the human. According to the author, in broader aspect, “the culture is also used in another meaning and,rather than the lifestyle of a group,this concept representsthegroup differing from the others in terms of the lifestyle.” (Kartarı, 2006: 14). Besides the singular and narrow and the plural and broad meanings of culture, this concept is seen to be defined in two different ways in intercultural studies; the action-oriented one and the grouporiented one. According to the action-oriented approach considering the culture as one of the ordinary behaviors, the culture iswhat the person is, what he/she creates, how he/she perceives, how he/she thinks, how he/she feels and, and how the person should do what. Within this context, the culture covers all aspects of the social life. But, however, the action-oriented culture is anthropocentric, rather than being groupcentered. It seems as the values and judgments, which the person internalized in order to communicate with others and to behave in harmony with them in family environment in childhood and then in schools and social environments and which the individuals change throughout their lives. However, the group-oriented culture that characterizes the group in terms of ethnic, lingual, religious, and historical criteria within the scope of geographical and political borders is defined as the values, norms, symbols, and habits that the individuals internalize through learning. According to the group-oriented approach, culture is the lifestyle of a nation or society and the common identity that they have, and they differ from other groups and societies from this aspect.

___

  • Acar, M. ve Demir, Ö. (2005). Sosyal Bilimler Sözlüğü. Ankara: Adres Yayınları.
  • Aksan, D. (1977). Her Yönüyle Dil. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
  • Alemdar, K. ve Erdoğan, İ. (1994). Popüler Kültür ve İletişim. Ankara: Ümit Yayıncılık.
  • Baecker, D. (2003). Wozu Kultur? Berlin: Kulturverlag Kadmos.
  • Barutçugil, İ. (2011). Farklılıkların Yönetimi. İstanbul: Kariyer Yayıncılık.
  • Çeçen, A. (1984). Kültür ve Politika. İstanbul: Hil.
  • Doğan, D. M. (2005). Kültürel Savaş ve Savaş Kültürü. İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık.
  • Doytcheva, M. (2009). Çokkültürlülük [Le Multiculturalisme]. (Çev. T. Akıncılar Onmuş).İstanbul: İletişim.
  • Eagleton, T. (2011). Kültür Yorumları. (Çev. Ö. Çelik). Istanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  • Elias, N. (2005). Uygarlık Süreci. (Çev. E. Ateşman). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • Göklap, Z. ( 2001). Türkçülüğün Esasları (Günümüz Türkçesiyle). Haz. Ünlü, M.,Çotuksöken, Y. İstanbul: İnkılap Kitabevi
  • Göktürk, I.(2016). Kültür Sosyolojisi. Kültürel Çalışmalar ve Toplumbilimlerin Yeniden Biçimlenmesi. İstanbul: Doğu Kitapevi.
  • Güvenç, B. (1999). İnsan ve Kültür. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
  • Güvenç, B. (2002). Kültürün ABC’si. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  • Hasanov, B. (2014). ClIfford Geertz’e Göre Kültürel Bir Sistem Olarak Din. Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 1, Sayı 2, 2014, ss. 79-96.
  • Hofstede, G. (2006). LokalesDenken, globales Handeln. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.
  • İyi, S. (2003). Çağdaş Açılımlarıyla Kültür Kavramı ve İoanna Kuçuradi. Maltepe Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Maltepe Üniversitesi Yayınları, Cilt 1, ss.15-33.
  • Kaplan, M. (1999). Kültür ve Dil. İstanbul: Dergâh.
  • Kartarı, Asker (2006). Farklılıklarla Yaşamak. Ankara: Ürün Yayınları.
  • Kuçuradi, İ. (1988). Uludağ Konuşmaları. Ankara: TFK Yayınları.
  • Kula, O.B. (1992). Demokratikleşme süreci &Eleştirel Kültür Bilinci. Ankara: Gündoğan Yayınları.
  • Lüddemann, S. (2010). Kultur. EineEinführung. Wiesbaden: VerlagfürSozialwissenschaften.
  • Maletzke, G. (1996). Interkulturelle Kommunikation: Zur Interaktion zwischen Menschen verschiedener Kulturen. Opladen: WestdeutscherVerlag.
  • Marschall, W. (1993). Die zweite Natur des Menschen. Kulturtheoretische Positionen in der Ethnologie. In: Kulturbegriff und Methode: der stille Paradigmenwechsel in den Geisteswissenschaften. Hrsg. von K.P. Hansen. Tübingen, SS. 17-26.
  • Meriç, C. (1971). Kültür ve Ötesi. HİSAR Dergisi Sayı 93, Eylül 1971.
  • Molzbichler, D. (2004). Kulturen in Konflikt? Anleitungen für einen konstruktivenUmgang mit interkulturellen Konflikten und transkulturelle Lösungsstrategien. (Doktora Tezi: Salzburg Üniversitesi) http://www.alois- mock.at/pdf/Arbeit_Molzbichler.pdf
  • Mutlu, E. (1995). İletişim Sözlüğü. Ankara: Ark Yayınevi.
  • Nişanyan, S. (2007). Sözlerin Soyağacı: Çağdaş Türkçenin Etimolojik Sözlüğü. İstanbul: Adam Yayınları
  • Nişanyan, S. Nişanyan Sözlük Çağdaş Türkçenin Etimolojisi http://www.nisanyansozluk.com/? Özkul, O. (2008). Kültür ve Küreselleşme. İstanbul: Açılımkitap.
  • Özlem, D. (2000). Kültürbilimleri ve Kültür Felsefesi. İstanbul: İnklap.
  • Seyyar, A. (2007). İnsan ve Toplum Bilimler Terimleri. (Ansiklopedik Sosyal Bilimler Sözlüğü).İstanbul: Değişim Yayınları
  • Tabakcı, N. (2008). Kültürlerarası İletişim Sürecinde Alt Kültürde Kimliğin Oluşumu (Türkiye’deki Karaçay Topluluğu Örneği). Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Halkla İlişkiler ve Tanıtım Anabilim Dalı Araştırma Yöntemleri Bilim Dalı, Doktora Tezi.
  • Thomas, A. (2003). PsychologieinterkulturellenHandelns. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
  • Treichel, D.,Mayer,C. H. (2011) Lehrbuch Kultur. Lehr- und Lernmaterialien zur Vermittlung kultureller Kompetenzen. Münster: Waxmann.
  • Türk Dil Kurumu. Büyük Türkçe Sözlük. http://tdkterim.gov.tr/bts/
  • Türk Dili Kurumu. (1988). Türkçe Sözlük. (8. Baskı). Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
  • Türk Dili Kurumu. (2011). Türkçe Sözlük. (11. Baskı). Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
  • Uygur, N. (1996). Kültür Kuramı. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  • Çetindaş, B. (2016). “Kültür Kavramının Kapsamı, Anlam ve Tanımları / Scope, Meaning, and Definitions of the Concept of Culture”, TURKISH STUDIES -International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic-, ISSN: 1308-2140, Volume 11/18Fall 2016, ANKARA/TURKEY, www.turkishstudies.net, DOI Number: http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.10082, p. 227-248