İLK TÜRK BEYLİKLERİNİN FETİHLERİ, SOSYAL VE KÜLTÜREL ESERLERİ İLE ANADOLU’NUN TÜRKLEŞMESİNDEKİ RÖLÜ

Anadolu'nun Türkleşmesinde ve Büyük Selçuklu Devleti'nin kuruluşunda büyük rolleri olan İlk Türk beylikleri 1071 Malazgirt Savaşı'nın hemen akabinde Sultan Alp Arslan tarafından Anadolu'nun fethiyle görevlendirilen komutanlar tarafından kurulmuştur. Bu beylikler Anadolu'nun Türkleşmesinde, Türk İslam Kültür ve Medeniyetinin yaygınlaşmasında çok büyük etkileri olmuştur. Bu beylikler genellikle kurucuların isimleriyle adlandırılmaktadır. XI. asrın son çeyreğinde tarih sahnesine çıkmışlar, yaklaşık olarak iki asır boyunca bölgenin kaderinin belirlenmesinde etkili olmuşlardır. Bu zaman dilimi içerinde her beylik hâkim oldukları coğrafyada günümüz Türkiye'sinin yaratılmasında da katkıda bulunarak büyük bir değişimi başlatmışlardır. Bölgede kurulan ilk Türk beylikleri doğuşlarını Selçuklulara borçlu olmakla beraber varlık sebepleri ve dayandıkları etnik unsur şüphesiz Oğuz Türkleri olmuştur. Anadolu'da kurulan ilk Türk beyliklerin Anadolu'ya Türk mührünün güçlü bir şekilde abideleriyle, âlimleri ve eserleriyle vurulmaya başlandığı dönemin kapısını açmışlardır. Bu Türk beylikleri döneminde bilhassa âlimler ve düşünce adamlarına büyük önem verilerek himaye edilmiştir. Bu âlimler döneme damgalarını vurarak diğer beyliklerin düşünce yapılarına etki etmişlerdir. Bu dönemde inşa edilen mimari eserlerde uygulamış oldukları tarz Türklerin sanat zevkini yansıtmış ve sonraki dönemlere model olmuştur. Mimari ustaların yetiştirdikleri öğrencileri bu mimari üslubu gittikleri bölgelere taşımışlardır. Anadolu'da kurulan ilk Türk beylikleri bir taraftan yaptırmış oldukları imar faaliyetleriyle bir taraftan da bilim ve kültüre vermiş oldukları önemle bugünkü Türkiye'nin şekillenmesinde katkı sağlamışlardır

THE FIRST TURKISH PRINCIPALS FETISH, ROLE IN SOCIAL AND CULTURAL WORKS AND ANATOLIAN TURKEY

The first Turkish principals were established by the commanders assigned by the conquest of Anatolia following the Battle of Malazgirt. These principals are very influential in the spread of Turkish Islamic Culture and Civilization in the Turkification of Anatolia is generally known by the names of the founders. XI. In the last quarter of the century they became the stage of history, and for almost two centuries they were effective in determing the fate of the region. These long periods of time, which can not be counted as long, have begun a major change in the geography where each rule is dominant, contributing to the creation of today’s Turkey. With the birth of the Turkish principals owing to the Seljuks, the reasons for their existence and the ethnic base they depend on are undoubtedly the Oghuz Turks. The Turkish principals established in Anatoliaopened the door to the period when the Turkish seal was strongly hiy by Anatolia with their friends, scholars and their works. During this period of Turkish rule, especially scholars and thinkers were given great impotance and patronized. These scholars hit stamps of revolution and influenced the minds of other principals. The architectural works built during this period reflected the taste of the art of the Turks they had applied and became a model for later periods. The students who were educated by architectural masters carried this architectural style to the regions where they were going. The first Turkish principals established in Anatolia have contributed to the formation of today’s Turkey with the importance they have given to science and culture on the one hand by the zoning activities that they had built from one side The great Seljuk State carried out the beginning of the invasion and conquest movements of Anatolia and the completion of these conquests between 1015 and 1243. During this period, the Seljuks fought against the Byzantine state with great enthusiasm and determination to make Anatolia a homeland. This struggle continued with great determination until the Anatolian became a Turkish citizen. Turkmen who came to Anatolia brought the elements of culture and civilization of the regions they had lived before. The Seljuk’s settled the large Turkmen masses from Turkistan and Horasan in various regions. Setting the Turkmens was often a big problem for the Seljuk Sultans. In 1040, the Seljuk State won the Dandanakan war between the Gaznelians and the Seljuks, and they established and independent state in Khorasas. These conquests carried out under the leadership of Tugrul and Cagri Seignior are very important both in terms of world history and Middle East History. Tugrul Seignior sent the Seljuk princes, orders and Turkmen Seignior for the conquest of the western countries. The Turkmen bearers who successfully completed the conquest of these regions took part in the Battle of Malazgirt. In the sources, experienced orders such as Afsin, Savtekin, Sunduk, Demlecoglu Mehmet, Duduoglu, Aytekin, and Tarankoglu were constantly present beside Alparslan in the Battle of Malazgirt. Beside these, Suleyman, Mansur, Devlet, Alpilek, Artuk, Danismend, Saltuk, Mengucek, Tutak, Cavli and Porsuk were also among the Kutalmis’s orders from Seljuk’s, who were very experienced and well-versed in the war technique. Later on, after the Alparslan Malazgirt Victory, these commanders gave dominion over the regions named by their names, subject to being to Seljuks. From now on, these orders opened the gate of Anatolia to the time when the Turkish invasion began to be strongly hit by his friends, scholars and artifacts. Especially during the first Turkish seigniory established in Anatolia, scholars and thought men were given great importance and patronized. Scholars such as Abu Tahir, Mayyafarikin, Seyh Mubarek Ibnu-lEzrak, Zahid, Kadi Bahauddin, Cemaluddevle and Bahaudevle B. Nisan, who owns a million copies of the book, have stamped their seal marks. At the same time, they influenced the thought structures of other principals. The architectural works built during this period reflected the taste of the art of the Turks they had applied and became a model for later periods. We also see that the students who are educated by architects later spread to the surrounding regions and carried this architectural style to the regions that are going. Today we see that the folkloric and ethnological richness, which reflects the nomadic spirit carried to the region by the bards and poets of the Caspian and the Turkish, continues to be influenced even today. The first Turkish baths in Anatolia are primarily the four baths in Mardin, which were built during the first Turkish rule. The best medical book of the day, XII at the beginning of the 20th century, books on sports and virtues in Anatolia were prepared. The first Turkish established in Anatolia were found to have successful struggles in the regions where they ruled either with the Byzantine or the Crusaders, especially with Seljuks and other Turkish principals. Turkey as a result of this principality activity towards setting up the unity of the Turkish Anatolian Seljuk Sultan thing of the past. However, the length and tribes attached to the first principality are scattered in various regions of Anatolia. In fact, a significant part of them were sent to Rumeli and placed in the structure of today’s states. First Turkish work, it is a work of medical science called “Tuhfe-iMübarizi” which was taken by Judge Bereket in the province of Danismend in Amasya in the beginning of the 13th century. Caka Seignior took over the coastal cities like Urla and Foca by bringing them to a navy consisting of over 40 closed ships and conquered Midilli, Sakiz, Sisam, Kos, Rhodes and other islands. He is a good organizer and sailor, has brought the first Turkish navy to the Aegean coast. In addition to providing the first Turkish settlement to Izmir and its vicinity, it also provided the ground for conquest of the region by Turkmen seigniory in later periods. Turkish seigniory founded in Anatolia, which is called Tavaifi Mülük in some sources, were found in the service of Sultan Alp Arslan after Malazgirt Victory and to conquer the regions where they were judged by Alp Arslan. These beacons, which have been assigned to make Anatolia into Turkish territory, have established the first Turkish principalities founded in the name of their founders in the regions they obtained. These principals were initially formally affiliated to the Great Seljuk State. Melik Shah, the disintegration of the state led to the emergence of the principalities. The first Turkish seigniory established in Anatolia played a very important role in the conquest of Anatolia and Turkish. The first Turkish principalities pioneered the spreading of Islam to the lands of Anatolia by protecting the lands they ruled against the Crusaders. These principals had to fight the Byzantine and the Georgians for their dominance in the region. The principalities established new towns and villages in the regions where they were principality They have made very important contributions to the Turkish settlement of the region by primarily giving Turkish names to these settlements they have built. They have left this spirit as inherited by the Anatolian Seljuks State and the states established after them by patronizing the Turkism movement and the Turkish culture. Because it is possible to evaluate Anatolia as a Turkish homeland in three phases. First semester, XIV. It is the Seljuk period that continues until the beginning of the century. The second period is the homeland of the Western Anatolia and Thrace in the period of the principals under the rule of the Seljuks. The third period continues until the completion of the conquest of the Black Sea coasts of the Ottoman period, until the ashes of the republic. These phases continued in line with this ideality that these principals inherited from us. Principalities have built their country with social facilities by building city and town palaces, almshouse, caravansary, bridges where they live. The starting point of Turkish art at that time was XII. Beginning in Anatolia in the 16th century, almost every inhabitant showed a rich and bright development. For example, the dome problem that started in the Uighurs and continued in the Seljuks was especially conveyed to the magnificent monumental works which were not similar in the world during these periods of the principalities. Thanks to countless scholars, thoughts, ideas, artists and commanders who have been educated, they have contributed to the Turkification of Anatolia by bringing many works to Anatolia. The first Turkish principals established in Anatolia led the nomadic Turks who came from the east to lead the way to adapt to the region they were living in. while the first Turkmen principalities tried to make the region into a Turkish citizen by conquering movements from one side; they started scientific activities in Anatolia for the first time. The indigenous people living in the region have been culturally influenced by approaching with deep tolerance. The first Turkish principalities have built medallions in the regions where they are ruling in Anatolia and gave great importance to the knowledge and the other regions came to the region. These principals contributed greatly to the development of the Turkish-Islamic civilization in the Anatolian region. The artifacts which are as high as the day to day artistic value of the first Turkish principals are the precious wealth of today. To protect these artifacts, which are a kind of tapestry of Anatolia, falling to us, is to best protect and convey this spirit to the next generation. İt is also to encourage research on this area by emphasizing the period of the First Turkish Emirates established in Anatolia, Which has not yet attained enlightenment.

___

  • Agacanov, Sergey Grigoreviç. (2006), Selçuklular, (Çev. Ekber N.Ahmet- R.Annaberdiyev), Ötüken Neşriyat, İstanbul.
  • Ahmed b. Mahmud. (1977), Seçuk-Name, II, (Haz. Erdoğan Merçil), İstanbul.
  • Ahmed Tevhid. (1321), Meskûkât-ı Kadime-i İslâmiyye Kataloğu, İstanbul.
  • Anonim Selçukname.(1952), (Ter. Feridun Nafiz Uzluk), Ankara.
  • Ara, Altun. “Artuklu Sanatı”, TDVDİA, C.III, s.418.
  • Aslanapa, Oktay.(1974), Türk Denizciliği ve Selçuklu Tersaneleri, Türk Tarih Kurumu, Ankara.
  • Aslanapa, Oktay.(2007), Anadolu’da İlk Türk Mimarisi Başlangıç ve Gelişmesi, Atatürk Kültür Merkezi Yayını, Ankara.
  • Ataoğlu, Remzi. (1994),“Kaynaklara Göre Artuklu Devlet Teşkilatı”, XI. Türk Tarih Kongresi, TTK. Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Atıf, Kahraman. (1995), Osmanlı Devletinde Spor, Kültür Bakanlığı Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Ayan, N., Özen, F., (2017). Tarihsel Süreç İçinde Selçuklular Devrinde Halep Kalesi,Turkish Studies International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 12/1,p.33-54, ISSN:1308-2140,www.turkishstudies. net, DOI Number: http//dx.doi.org/ 10.7827/Turkish 11302, ANKARA- TURKEY
  • Bar Hebraeus.(1950), Abu’l-Farac Tarihi, II, (Trc. Ömer Rıza Doğrul),TTK Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Baykara, Tuncer. (1974), İzmir Şehri ve Tarihi, Ege Üniversitesi Arkeoloji Enstitüsü Yayınları, İzmir.
  • Bayram, Mikail. (1994), Selçuklular zamanında Anadolu’da Bazı Yöreler Arasında Farklı Kültürel Yapılanma ve Siyasal Boyutları, Konya.
  • Bayram, Mikail.(2005), “Danişmend Oğullarının Dini ve Milli Siyaseti,” Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, S.18,Konya.
  • Claude, Cahen. (1992), Türklerin Anadolu'ya İlk Gelişi, (Trc. Yaşar Yücel- Bahaeddin Yediyıldız),Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Demir, Mustafa.(2005), Türkiye Selçukluları ve Beylikler Devrinde Sivas, “Danişmendli Emaretinin Kurucuları,” Sakarya.
  • Demirkent, Işın.(1995), "1101 Yılı Haçlı Seferleri", Fikret Işıltan'a 80.Doğum Yılı Armağanı, Dünya Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  • Demirkent, Işın.(1996), Türkiye Selçuklu Hükümdarı Sultan I.Kılıç Arslan, TTK Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Ebu’l-Ferec (Bar Hebraeus). (1987), Abû’l-Farac Tarihi, (çev. Ömer Rıza Doğrul), TTK Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Ersan, Mehmet, Alican, Mustafa. (2014), Türklerin Kayıp Yüzyılı, Beylikler Devri, Türkiye Devri, Timaş Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Günay, Umay Türkeş. (2007), Türklerin Tarihi, Akçağ Yayınları, Ankara.
  • HAZAR, M.,(2008). Artukoğulları Zamanında Dedekorkut Kitabı’ndaki Kişi Adları, Turkish Studies International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 3/1 Winter 2008, p.22-33, ISSN:1308-2140, www. turkishstudies. net, DOI Number: http//dx.doi.org/ 10.7827/Turkish 255, ANKARA- TURKEY.
  • Hüseyin Hüsameddin.(1927), Amasya Tarihi, III, İstanbul.
  • İbn Battuta.(1983), Seyahatname (Tuhfetu’n- Nuzar Fi Garaibi’l-Emsar), (sad. Mümin Çevik), Ankara.
  • İbn Bibi, el-Evamirü’l-Alaiyye fi’l Umuri’l-Alaiyye, I, (1996), (Ter. Mürsel Öztürk),Kültür Bakanlığı Yayınları, Ankara.
  • İbn’ül-Esir.(1987), el-Kamil fi’t-Tarih, X-XII, (Ter. Abdülkerim Özaydın),Çağrı Yayınları, İstanbul. İpşirli, Mehmet. “Danşmend”, TDVDİA, VIII, ss.464-465.
  • Jonathan, Riley-Smith.(2005), Haçlılar Kimlerdir, (Çev. Berna Kılınçer) Bileşim Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Karavazlı Mustafa Efendi, Amasya Tarihi hahkındaki eseri“Amasya Bayezid Umum Kütüphanesi” (el yazma eser)
  • Kesik, Muharrem.(2006), Danişmendliler Zamanında Sivas (1071-1175), Selçuklular Döneminde Sivas Sempozyumu Bildirileri, (29 Eylül-1 Ekim 2005) Sivas 2006, ss.108-120.
  • Kırzıoğlu, F.(1987),”Millî Destanlarımızdan dede Korkut Oğuz-nâmelerinin Tarih Belgesi Bakımından Değerleri”, Belleten, Ankara, S.198, I, 915.
  • Koca, Salim. (2011), Selçuklu Devri Türk Tarihinin Temel Meseleleri, Berikan Yayınları, Ankara. Köprülü, Fuat. (1997),“Artuk Oğulları” İA, C.I, ss.617-618.
  • Köprülü, Fuat.(1996), Anadolu’da İslâmiyet, Ankara.
  • Kurat, Akdes Nimet. (1966), Çaka Bey İzmir ve Yakınındaki Adaların İlk Türk Beyi,1081-1096,Türk Kültürünü Araştırma Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Mecit, Songül. (2017), Anadolu Selçukluları, Bir Hanedanın Evrimi, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Merçil, Erdoğan.(1993), Müslüman Türk Devletleri Tarihi, Türk Tarih Kurumu, Ankara
  • Müneccimbaşı Ahmed b. Lütfullah. (2001), Câmiu’d-Düvel Selçuklu Tarihi II Anadolu Selçukluları ve Beylikler, (Trc. Ali Öngül), İzmir.
  • Ocak, Ahmet Yaşar. “Danişmendname”, DİA, VIII, ss. 478-480.
  • Olcay, Osman Fevzi. (1996), Amasya Tarihi zeyli “Amasya Bayezid Umum Kütüphanesi” el (yazma eser), YayınlanmamışYüksek Lisans Tezi, Amasya.
  • Öngül, Ali.(2002), “Saltuklular”, Türkler, VI, (Edt. Hasan Celal Güzel- Salim Koca vd.),Yeni Türkiye Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Özaydın, Abdülkerim. (1993), “Danişmend Gazi” Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi, C.VIII, İstanbul.
  • Özaydın, Abdülkerim.(1994), Vekayinâme, II, Siyasî-Dinî-Kültürel-Sosyal İslâm Tarihi, İstanbul, VIII, 51.
  • Özaydın, Abdülkerim.(2016), Anadolu Beylikleri El Kitabı, (Edt. Haşim Şahin), Grafiker Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Runciman , Steven.(1987) Haçlı Seferleri Tarihi, C.I, (Trc. Fikret Işıltan), Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları, Ankara .
  • Sert, M., (2014). Selçuklular Döneminde Muş ve Çevresi, Turkish Studies-International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 9/1 Winter 2014,P.185-207,ISSN:1308-2140, www. turkishstudies. net, DOI Number: http//dx.doi.org/ 10.7827/Tukish 6087, ANKARA- TURKEY.
  • Sevim, Ali, Yaşar Yücel. (1989), Türkiye Tarihi, Selçuklu ve Beylikler Dönemi, Çağ Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Sevim, Ali. "Artukluların Soyu ve Artuk Bey'in Siyasî Faaliyetleri", Belleten, XXVI/101, ss. 121-- 145.
  • Sevim, Ali. ( 1994 ),“Dilmaç Oğulları”Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi, İstanbul, s.301.
  • Solmaz, Sefer.(2001), Danişmendliler Devleti ve Kültürel Mirasları, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Konya.
  • Sümer, Faruk. (1952),”XVI. Asırda Anadolu’da, Suriye ve Irak’da yaşayan Türk Aşiretlerine Umumî Bakış”, İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, XI/I-4.
  • Sümer, Faruk. (1971), “Saltuklular”, Selçuklu Araştırmaları Dergisi, Ankara.
  • Sümer, Faruk. (1989), “Ahlatşahlar”, Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi, C.II, İstanbul, s.27.
  • Sümer, Faruk. (1990), Selçuklular Devrinde Doğu Anadolu’da Türk beylikleri, Türk Tarih Kurumu, Ankara.
  • Sümer, Faruk.(1992), Oğuzlar (Türkmenler),Tarihleri- Boy-Teşkilatı-Destanları, Türk Dünyası Araştırmaları Vakfı, İstanbul.
  • Şahin, Haşim.( 2016), Anadolu Beylikleri El Kitabı, (Edt. Haşim Şahin), Grafiker Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Turan, Osman. (1974), Selçuklular Zamanında Türkiye, Siyasi Tarih Alp Arslan’dan Osman Gazi’ye (1071-1318), TODAİE Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Turan, Osman. (1993), Doğu Anadolu Türk Devletleri Tarihi, Turan Neşriyat Yurdu, İstanbul.
  • Turan, Osman.(1965), Selçuklular Tarihi ve Türk-İslâm Medeniyeti, İkinci Baskı, İstanbul.
  • Wittek, Paul. (1943),“ Ankara Bozgunundan İstanbul Zaptına", Belleten, Ankara, VII, 582.
  • Yaşa, Recep.(2016), Anadolu Beylikleri El Kitabı, (Edt. Haşim Şahin), Grafiker Yayınları, Ankara. Yinanç, M.Halil. “Danişmendliler”, İA, III, ss.468-479.
  • Yinanç, M.Halil.”Bitlis”, İA, II, ss.659-660.
  • Yinanç, Mükrimin Halil.(1944),Türkiye Tarihi Selçuklular Devri I.Anadolu’nun Fethi, Burhaneddin Matbaası, İstanbul.
  • Yinanç, Refet. (1982), “Selçuklu Medreselerinden Amasya Halifet Gazi Medresesi ve Vakıfları”, Vakıflar Dergisi, S. 15, Ankara.