FERİT EDGÜ’NÜN “ÜÇ DÜŞ/ÜŞ” VE SÂDIK HİDÂYET’İN “ÜÇ DAMLA KAN” ADLI ÖYKÜLERİNİN ANLATIMSAL VE İÇERİKSEL KARŞILAŞTIRMASI

Her bilimsel ve sanatsal çalışma, kendinden önce yapılan çalışmaların üzerine inşa edilerek gelişen bir seyir ve yapı içerisindedir. Söz konusu yapı, özellikle sanatsal çalışmaların görsel ve yazılı alanlarında oluşturulmuş olan temeller üzerinden seyreder ve bu seyrediş kimi zaman, iki eser arasındaki paralellikler oluşturur. Bu paralellikler, konu, anlatım tekniği, şahıs kadrosu, zaman ve mekân unsurları arasında gerçekleşebileceği gibi yazar/şair/sanatkarların dünya görüşleri etrafında da şekillenebilir. Nitekim hiçbir eser, kendinden önce yazılmış eserlerden ayrı tutulamayacağı gibi, farklı coğrafyalarda ve farklı dönemlerde yaşamış, farklı birer kültürel ortamdan beslenmiş olan sanatkârların eserleri arasında benzerlik ve ikincil bir metinlerarasılık görülebilir. Bu duruma verilebilecek en önemli örneklerden birisi de Modern İran Öykücülüğü'nün kurucularından sayılan Sâdık Hidâyet ile modern ve post-modern Türk edebiyatının önemli isimlerinden biri olan Ferit Edgü arasındadır. Nitekim, söz konusu iki sanatkârın birçok roman ve hikâyesi bulunmakla beraber, kimi zaman her iki sanatkârda da düşünce seyirlerindeki aynîlik itibariyle aynı sona, aynı yöntemle gitme eğilimi görülebilir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Sâdık Hidâyet'in Üç Damla Kan ve Ferit Edgü'nün Üç Düş/üş öykülerindeki anlatım tekniklerini, konuyu ve konunun inşası için kullanılan unsurları mukayese ederek ve özellikle de söz konusu öykülerdeki post-modern unsurlara değinmek ve "farklı dönemlerde, farklı coğrafyalarda yaşamış sanatkârların aynı düşünce ve ifade tarzına sahip olabilecekleri" tezine katkıda bulunmaktır. Bu durum, aynı kültür düzeyine sahip, aynı dünya görüşünü benimsemiş insanlarda ortaya çıkar

COMPARING ÜÇ DÜŞ/ÜŞ BY FERİT EDGÜ AND ÜÇ DAMLA KAN BY SÂDIK HİDÂYET WITH THE ASPECTS OF CONTENT AND VERBALISM

Idea is a work for artists who want to know himself/herself with the help of literature. Thus, literature becomes a way for artists to express themselves. Especially authors as artists who don’t write just an author but also as a thinker, an individual who effects and is effected by life. This situation shows that writing as a reflection of ideas and as an expressionist action helps author to understand himself, people around and the world surrounds him/her. Modernism and postmodernism as ways of understanding and abilities to interpret the world and author him/herself are uncompleted processes. Thus, these two are always related to eachother with the aspect of completing eachother. Especially postmodernism which means “beyond” for reality, mind, interpretation and individual to pass a whole new dimension. Protagonist-based examines in literature are done like; in classical-term respectively with nature, human and God, in modernterm respectively with society, himself/herself and Godlessness and in postmodern-term respectively with technology, reality and author. These also show the structure of human mind in mentioned-terms. Because what an individual thinks shows what an individual has in himself/herself. Sâdık Hidâyet who is from Iran and killed himself coal gas when he was 48 years old is one of the most important authors in Iran. He is known as founder of the modern story-writing in Iran. Especially in his stories depression and nausea of individual can be seen clearly. As its known this is the most spesific characteristic of postmodern literature. Because depression and nausea of individual transforms to a strangeness for the world first. This strangeness diffuses protagonist’s daily life and at least to him/herself. Lonelyness which is used in modern literature most is transformed to lonelyness not just in public but to a lonelyness of individual who is divided in him/herself. With the lonelyness mentioned conflict with the world or people around becomes more complicated with the conflict of reality. As it is seen in works of Sâdık Hidâyet, these mentioned facts aren’t used just as a material for literature but also a lifesytle for author himself. Ferit Edgü, who is one of the most important authors in Turkey, born in İstanbul in 1936 also wrote by using postmodernism as a method in his works. Comparing to Sâdık Hidâyet it’s obvious that Ferit Edgü hasn’t had such a life and even if he did it clearly can be seen that Ferit Edgü didn’t reflected his depression and nausea as much as Sâdık Hidâyet did. Because in the works of Sâdık Hidâyet, suicide, depression and nausea, deadlock and deadend of individual can be seen obviously. In “Üç Damla Kan” story of Mirza Ahmet is told. It’s hard to call it as “story” because the whole story complex, difficult to solve and nested. In “Üç Damla Kan” it is obviously seeen that protagonist, space, time and even being/existence of other protagonists of story are tentative, uncertain and slippery. Actually in this story Ahmet Mirza Ferit Edgü’nün “Üç Düş/Üş” Ve Sâdık Hidâyet’in “Üç Damla Kan” Adlı... 783 Turkish Studies International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 10/3 Winter 2015 isn’t in the centre but also there are unknown and just repeated humans/animals in the story. It can be said that every protagonist in this story is in the centre because nearly all of them live the same things with the same unnamed characters. This also shows world view of Sâdık Hidâyet; different individual, same people, same things and same endings. “Üç Düş/üş” by Ferit Edgü tells story of author. Especially conflict with author in postmodern-term is the main theme of the story with one simple difference: in his/her sleep author sees three dreams. In these dreams he became a dog, a hunter and the hunt and fateful of the story is when author wakes up he does as a hunt,a hunter and a dog but not as himself/herself. Strangeness of author with dream which comes from his/her own brain can be the best example for conflict with reality. Using same method and postmodernism as a way to show nausea and depression of individual, Ferit Edgü and Sâdık Hidâyet have the same way of thinking. Considering mentioned topics in mentioned stories it can be said that this comes from fragile and sensitive structure of artisan spirit. Both of stories tentative, uncertain and slippery space, time and characters are used. Literature as a way to express author’s/poet’s feelings and ideas is especially takes an important place in works of Sâdık Hidâyet. Before his suicide, from his first work to last one suicide is used as a fact. As a result Ferit Edgü and Sâdık Hidâyet even being from different countries and times have the same way of thinking and writing.

___