ÇOCUKLARIN ÖZEL GEREKSİNİMLİ AKRANLARINA KARŞI TUTUMLARI: OKUL ÖNCESİ KABUL ÖLÇEĞİ-YENİLENMİŞ FORMU’NUN (OÖKÖ) UYARLAMA ÇALIŞMASI

Bu araştırmada Favazza ve Odom (1996, 1999) tarafından geliştirilen Acceptance Scale of Kindergarten-Revised (ASK-R) Okul Öncesi Kabul Ölçeği-Yenilenmiş Formu'nu (OÖKÖ) Türkçe'ye uyarlamak, ölçeğin geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizlerini yapmak amaçlanmaktadır. Okul Öncesi Kabul Ölçeği-Yenilenmiş Formu; okul öncesi dönem çocuklarının özel gereksinimli olan akranlarını kabul düzeylerini belirleyen toplam 18 madde ve tek boyuttan oluşmaktadır. Araştırmanın örneklem grubu ölçüt örnekleme yöntemi ile belirlenmiş olup; araştırmada kaynaştırma programına devam eden özel gereksinimli çocukların bulunması ölçütüne uygun olarak belirlenen okullardaki çocukların tamamına ulaşılmaya çalışılmıştır. Buna göre araştırmanın örneklemini; 2016-2017 EğitimÖğretim Yılı Bahar döneminde Edirne İl Milli Eğitim Müdürlüğü'ne bağlı okul öncesi eğitim kurumlarında kaynaştırma programına devam eden özel gereksinimli çocukların bulunduğu sınıflarda eğitim öğretime devam eden, normal gelişim gösteren, 59-78 aylık toplam 409 çocuk oluşturmaktadır. Örneklemi oluşturan çocukların yaş ortalaması 67.62'dir (ss= 3.17). Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak Favazza ve Odom tarafından 1996 yılında geliştirilerek 1999 yılında revize edilen Okul Öncesi Kabul Ölçeği (OÖKÖ) ile araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen genel bilgi formu kullanılmıştır. İlgili yasal izinlerin alınması ile başlayan veri toplama sürecinde araştırmacı, çocuklarla birebir uygulamalar yapmıştır. İlk adım olarak, ölçek dil ve kültürel açıdan Türkçe'ye uyarlanmıştır. Ölçeğin geçerliliği Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi ve alt grup-üst grup %27'lik puan dilimleri farklarıyla ölçülmüştür. Ölçeğin iç güvenirliğinin hesaplanmasında Cronbach's alpha katsayısı kullanılmıştır. Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizleri sonucu incelendiğinde; ölçeğin orijinal ölçekteki gibi tek faktörlü bir yapıya sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir: ?2(84)=180,809 CFI=0.93 RMSEA=0.05, SRMR=0.07, WRMR= 1,18 ve iç güvenirlik katsayısı 0,75 olarak hesaplanmıştır

ATTITUDES OF YOUNG CHILDREN TOWARDS THEIR PEERS WITH DISABILITIES: THE ADAPTATION STUDY OF THE ACCEPTANCE SCALE FOR KINDERGARTEN- REVISED

This study aimed to adapt the Acceptance Scale of KindergartenRevised (ASK-R) developed by Favazza and Odom (1996, 1999) to Turkish and to analyze the validity and reliability of the scale. The Acceptance Scale of Kindergarten-Revised (ASK-R) consists of a total of 18 items and a single dimension that determine the acceptance levels of pre-school children of their peers with special needs. The sample group of the study was determined by the criterion sampling method, and in accordance with the criterion of the presence of children with special needs who continue the inclusion program in the study, it was attempted to reach all of the children in the schools determined. Accordingly, the sample of the study consisted of 409 children with typical development needs, aged between 59-78 months, who are attending to the mainstreaming program in inclusive classes in preschool education institutions affiliated to Edirne Provincial National Education Directorate in the Spring Term of the 2016-2017 Academic Year. The mean age of the sample children was 67,62 months (sd = 3.17). The Acceptance Scale of Kindergarten (ASK) developed in 1996 and revised (ASK-R) in 1999 by Favazza and Odom and the general information form developed by the researcher were used as the data collection tools. During the data collection process, which started with the acquisition of the relevant legal permissions, the researcher performed individual applications with the children. As a first step, the scale was adapted to Turkish in terms of language and culture. The validity of the scale was measured by Confirmatory Factor Analysis and group point differences of upper and lower 27%. The internal reliability of the scale was calculated by Cronbach's alpha method. As a result of the Confirmatory Factor Analyzes, it was determined that the scale had a one-factor structure like the original scale: χ2(84)=180,809 CFI=0.93 RMSEA=0.05, SRMR=0.07, WRMR= 1,18 and the internal reliability coefficient was calculated as 0,75Friendships established during early childhood is an important foundation for children’s concurrent and future development and education. The presence of friends with special needs in the preschool classrooms may be an opportunity to develop acceptance by children with typical development. It has been stated that children with special needs who are educated in inclusive classrooms increase their social and verbal interactions with their peers, which in turn positively affects their cognitive development (Camargo et al., 2014; Guralnick and Groom, 1987; Walton and Ingersoll 2013; Williams, Sheridan and Sandberg, 2014). For children with typical development, being in the inclusive classroom and interacting with children with special needs help them to develop a realistic awareness by recognizing differences and experiencing special needs (Favazza, Ostrosky and Mouzourou, 2016; Ostrosky, Mouzourou and Dorsey, 2013). For this reason, there is a necessity to produce new scales related to the social acceptance of preschool-aged children or to adapt the existing scales valid in the literature to Turkish language and culture. With this in mind, this study aimed to adapt the Acceptance Scale of Kindergarten – Revised (ASK-R), which was developed by Favazza and Odom (1996 ASK, 1999 ASK-R) in order to assess social acceptance of children with typical development towards their peers with special needs during preschool years, into Turkish and to analyze the validity and reliability of the scale. The previous adaptation of this scale was made by Tekin Ersan, Ata and Kaya (2017). In this study, it is aimed to determine whether the factor structure found in the previous study (Tekin Ersan et al., 2017) and original study (Favazza and Odom, 1996) for the Acceptance Scale of Kindergarten – Revised is also valid for children living in another region of Turkey (Edirne). In addition, this study aims to expand the usability and the generalization of the scale to the general population by keeping larger sample size. Method This study aimed to adapt the Acceptance Scale of KindergartenRevised (ASK-R) developed by Favazza and Odom (1996, 1999) to Turkish and to analyze the validity and reliability of the scale. The Acceptance Scale of Kindergarten- Revised consists of 18 items and a single dimension that determine the acceptance levels of pre-school children of their peers with special needs. The sample group of the study was determined by the criterion sampling method, and in accordance with the criterion of the presence of children with special needs who continue the inclusion program in the study, it was attempted to reach all of the children in the schools determined. Accordingly, the sample of the study consisted of 409 children with typical development, aged between 59-78 months, who are attending to the mainstreaming program in inclusive classrooms in preschools affiliated to Edirne Provincial National Education Directorate in the Spring Term of the 2016-2017 Academic Year. The mean age of the children was 67,62 months (SD = 3.17). The Acceptance Scale of Kindergarten (ASK) developed in 1996 and revised (ASK-R) in 1999 by Favazza and Odom and the general information form developed by the researcher were used as the data collection tools. During the data collection process, which started with the acquisition of the relevant legal permissions, the researcher performed individual applications with the children. As a first step, the scale was adapted to Turkish in terms of language and culture. The validity of the scale was measured by Confirmatory Factor Analysis and group point differences of upper and lower 27%. The internal reliability of the scale was calculated by Cronbach's alpha method.We ran the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to test validity of the scale. Following the Confirmatory Factor Analysis results, the model was retested by subtracting the items that were not significantly weighted from the scale. As the CFA model indices indicated, our final model revealed a well fit with the available data [χ2(84)= 180.809, CFI=0.93, RMSEA=0.05 (90% CI 04 - 06), SRMR=0.07, WRMR= 1,18] Items that were not significantly loaded to the scale were 11 (Do you sometimes call kids name like "dumb"?), 16 (Are you sometimes mean to other kids?), and 18 (Do you sometimes pick on kids who are different?). Item loads ranged from .23 to .75. Item 14, indicating negativity, showed the least loading weight. Model indices suggested that some items share variance (e.g., 13, 7, 10 and 12). Figure 1 shows the final state of the CFA model. In addition to the CFA, participants were divided into lower 27% and upper 27% groups according to their scores and t-test was applied to these groups to test whether there was a significant difference between these groups. Independent T-test results showed a significant difference between the lower group (M= 11.54, SD= 2.59) and the upper group (M= 25.75, SD= 2.06) (t (221) = - 45,155, p

___

  • Ahmetoğlu, E. (2015). Inclusion at Preschool Period. Ed. Irına Koleva, Recep Efe, Emin Atasoy, Zdravka Blagoeva Kostova. Education in the 21th Century: Theory and Practice, 278-296. Sofia, St. Kliment Ohridski University Press.
  • Armstrong, M., Morris, C., Abraham, C., & Tarrant, M. (2017). Interventions utilising contact with people with disabilities to improve children's attitudes towards disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Disability and Health Journal, 10(1), 11-22. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.10.003
  • Ayral, M., Özcan, Ş., Can, R., Ünlü, A., Bedel, H., Şengün, G., Demirhan, Ş., Çağlar, K. (2013). Kaynaştirma Öğrencilerinin Sosyal Kabul Düzeyleri. Elmis Uluslararasi Özel Eğitim Kongresi, 19-21 Haziran 2013, Akşehir.
  • Batten, G., Oakes, P. M., & Alexander, T. (2013). Factors Associated With Social Interactions Between Deaf Children and Their Hearing Peers: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 19(3), 285-302. doi:10.1093/deafed/ent052
  • Bayar, A., Özaşkın, G. A., Bardak, Ş. (2015). Kaynaştirma Eğitimi ile İlgili Duygular, Tutumlar ve Kaygilar Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlama, Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalişmasi. Journal of Turkish Studies, 10(3), 175-186. doi:10.7827/turkishstudies.7556
  • Beelmann, A., & Heinemann, K. S. (2014). Preventing prejudice and improving intergroup attitudes: A meta-analysis of child and adolescent training programs. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35(1), 10-24. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2013.11.002
  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238– 246.
  • Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
  • Blacher, J., Howell, E., Lauderdale-Littin, S., DiGennaro Reed, F. D., & Laugeson, E. A. (2014). Autism spectrum disorder and the student teacher relationship: A comparison study with peers with intellectual disability and typical development. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(3), 324-333. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2013.12.008
  • Brady, M. P., McEvoy, M. A., Gunter, P., Shores, R. E. & Fox, J. J. (1984). Considerations for socially integrated school environments for severely handicapped students. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 19, 246-253.
  • Bricker, D. (1995). The challenge of inclusion. Journal of Early Intervention, 19, 179-194. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 230-258. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005
  • Civelek, A. H. (1990). Eğitilebilir zihinsel özürlü çocukların sosyal kabul görmelerinde normal çocukların bilgilendirilmelerinin ve iki grubun resim is ile beden eğitimi derslerinde bütünleştirilmelerinin etkileri. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • Conant, S., & Budoff, M. (1982). The development of sighted people's understanding of blindness. Visual Impairment and Blindness, 76(3), 86-90.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik spss ve lisrel uygulamaları. (2. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Derman-Sparks, L., & ABC Task Force (1989). Anti-bias curriculum: Tools for empowering young children. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
  • Diamond, K. E. (1993). Preschool Children's Concepts of Disability in Their Peers. Early Education & Development, 4(2), 123-129. doi:10.1207/s15566935eed0402_4
  • Diamond, K. E. (2001). Relationships Among Young Children's Ideas, Emotional Understanding, and Social Contact with Classmates with Disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 21(2), 104-113. doi:10.1177/027112140102100204
  • Diamond, K. E., & Hestenes, L. L. (1994). Preschool Children's Understanding of Disability: Experiences Leading to the Elaboration of the Concept of Hearing Loss. Early Education & Development, 5(4), 301-309. doi:10.1207/s15566935eed0504_5
  • Diamond, K. E., & Hestenes, L. L. (1996). Preschool Children's Conceptions of Disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 16(4), 458-475. doi:10.1177/027112149601600406
  • Diamond, K., Furgy, W. L., & Blass, S. (1993). Attitudes of Preschool Children Toward Their Peers with Disabilities: A Year-Long Investigation in Integrated Classrooms. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 154(2), 215-221. doi:10.1080/00221325.1993.9914735
  • Dorsey, E. A., Mouzourou, C., Park, H., Ostrosky, M. M., & Favazza, P. C. (2016). Teacher perceptions of two multi-component ınterventions: disability awareness and science. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 36(2), 103-114. doi:10.1177/0271121415626711
  • Dyson, L. L. (2005). Kindergarten Children's Understanding of and Attitudes Toward People With Disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 25(2), 95-105. doi:10.1177/02711214050250020601
  • Evans, I. M., Salisbury, C. L., Palombaro, M. M., Berryman, J., & Hollowood, T. M. (1992). Peer interactions and social acceptance of elementary-age children with severe disabilities in an inclusive school. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 17(4), 205- 212. doi:10.1177/154079699201700401
  • Favazza, C. P., Ostrosky, M. M., & Mouzourou, Ch. (2016). The making friends program: Supporting acceptance in your K-2 classroom. Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks Publishing Co., Inc.
  • Favazza, P. C. & Odom, S. L. (1996). Use of the acceptance scale to measure attitudes of kindergarten-age children. Journal of Early Intervention, 20(3), 232-248. doi:10.1177/105381519602000307
  • Favazza, P. C., Phillipsen, L., & Kumar, P. (2000). Measuring and promoting acceptance of young children with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 66(4), 491-508. doi:10.1177/001440290006600404
  • Favazza, P. C., Siperstein G. N., & Ghio, K. (2014). Young athletes globalization project: Final report. Center for Social Development and Education The University of Massachusetts Boston.
  • Frea, W., Craıg-Unkefer, L., Odom, S. L., & Johnson, D. (1999). Differential effects of structured social ıntegration and group friendship activities for promoting social ınteraction with peers.
  • Journal of Early Intervention, 22(3), 230-242. doi:10.1177/105381519902200306
  • Goldstein H., & Kaczmarek L. (1992). Promoting communicative interaction among children in integrated intervention settings. In Warren S., Reichle J. (Eds.), Causes and effects in communication and language intervention (pp. 81–111). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Gonçalves, T., & Lemos, M. (2014). Personal and social factors ınfluencing students’ attitudes towards peers with special needs. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 949-955. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1253
  • Guralnick, M. J. (1990). Social competence and early ıntervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 14(1), 3-14. doi:10.1177/105381519001400101
  • Guralnick, M. J., & Groom, J. M. (1987). The peer relations of mildly delayed and nonhandicapped preschool children in mainstreamed playgroups. Child Development, 58(6), 1556-1572. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1987.tb03866.x
  • Haring, T. G., & Breen, C. G. (1992). A peer-mediated social network intervention to enhance the social integration of persons with moderate and severe disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25(2), 319-333. doi:10.1901/jaba.1992.25-319
  • Hartup, W. W., Glazer, J. A., & Charlesworth, R. (1967). Peer reinforcement and sociometric status. Child Development, 38(4), 1017. doi:10.2307/1127099
  • He, J. & Van de Vijver, F. (2012). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural research. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(2). doi: 10.9707/2307-0919.1111
  • Holahan, A. & Costenbader, V. (2000). A comparison of developmental gains for preschool children with disabilities in ınclusive and self-contained classrooms. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20(4), 224-235. doi:10.1177/027112140002000403
  • Hong, S., Kwon, K., & Jeon, H. (2013). Children's attitudes towards peers with disabilities: associations with personal and parental factors. Infant and Child Development, 23(2), 170- 193. doi:10.1002/icd.1826
  • Horne, M. (1985). Attitudes toward handicapped students: Professional, peer and parent reactions. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Hourlock, B. E. (1978). Child growth and development. New York: McGraw-Hill Education. Huckstadt, L. K., & Shutts, K. (2014). How Young Children Evaluate People With and Without Disabilities. Journal of Social Issues, 70(1), 99-114. doi:10.1111/josi.12049
  • Jones, T. W., Sowell, V. M., Jones, J. K., & Butler, L. G. (1981). Changing children's perceptions of handicapped people. Exceptional Children, 47(5), 365-368. doi:10.1177/001440298104700508
  • Jordan, A., Glenn, C., & McGhie-Richmond, D. (2010). The Supporting Effective Teaching (SET) project: The relationship of inclusive teaching practices to teachers' beliefs about disability and ability, and about their roles as teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 259- 266. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.005
  • Karasar, N. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi “kavramlar ilkeler teknikler”. 26. Basım. Ankara: Nobel Akademik.
  • Kemple, K., Speranza, H., & Hazen, N. (1992). Cohesive discourse and peer acceptance: Longitudinal relations in the preschool year. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 38, 362–381.
  • Kline, R. B., (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, London: The Guilford Press.
  • Ladd, G.W., Price, J.M., & Hart, C.H. (1990). Preschoolers' behavioral orientations and patterns of peer contact: Predictive of peer status? In S.R. Asher & J.D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 90-115). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149.
  • MacMillan, M., Tarrant, M., Abraham, C., & Morris, C. (2013). The association between children's contact with people with disabilities and their attitudes towards disability: a systematic review. Developmental Medicine ve Child Neurology, 56(6), 529-546. doi:10.1111/dmcn.12326
  • Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391–410.
  • Marshall, H. R., & McCandless, B. R. (1957). A study in prediction of social behavior of preschool children. Child Development, 28(2), 149. doi:10.2307/1125877
  • Mavropoulou, S., & Sideridis, G. D. (2014). Knowledge of autism and attitudes of children towards their partially ıntegrated peers with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(8), 1867-1885. doi:10.1007/s10803-014-2059-0
  • McHale, S. M., & Simeonsson, R. J. (1980). Effects of interaction of nonhandicapped children's attitudes toward autistic children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 85, 18-24.
  • Mitchell, D. (2014). What really works in special and ınclusive education: Using evidence-based teaching strategies. New York: Routledge.
  • Monsen, J. J., Ewing, D. L., & Kwoka, M. (2013). Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion, perceived adequacy of support and classroom learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 17(1), 113-126. doi:10.1007/s10984-013-9144-8
  • Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2012). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables. User's guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen ve Muthen.
  • Nowicki, E. A., & Sandieson, R. (2002). A meta-analysis of school-age children's attitudes towards persons with physical or ıntellectual disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 49(3), 243-265. doi:10.1080/1034912022000007270
  • Odom, S. L., & Brown, W H. (1993). Social interaction skills intervention for young children with disabilities in integrated settings. In Ch. A. Peck, S. L. Odom, & D. D. Bricker (Eds.), Integrating young children with disabilities into community programs: Ecological perspectives on research and implementation (pp. 39-64). Baltimore, MD, England: Paul H. Brookes Publishing, xi, 287 pp.
  • Odom, S. L., Zercher, C., Li, S., Marquart, J. M., Sandall, S., & Brown, W. H. (2006). Social acceptance and rejection of preschool children with disabilities: A mixed-method analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 807-823. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.807
  • Ostrosky, M. M., Mouzourou, C., Dorsey, E. A., Favazza, P. C., & Leboeuf, L. M. (2013). Pick a book, any book: Using children's books to support positive attitudes toward peers with disabilities. Young Exceptional Children, 18(1), 30-43. doi:10.1177/1096250613512666
  • Piercy, M., Wilton, K., & Townsend, M. (2002). Promoting the social acceptance of young children with moderate–severe ıntellectual disabilities using cooperative-learning techniques. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 107(5), 352. doi:10.1352/0895- 8017(2002)1072.0.co;2
  • Raab, M., Dunst, C. J., & Hamby, D. W. (2016). Effectiveness of contrasting approaches to responsecontingent learning among children with significant developmental delays and disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41(1), 36-51. doi:10.1177/1540796915621189
  • Ramsey, P. G. (1987). Teaching and learning in a diverse world: Multicultural education for young children. New York: Teachers College Press. Sigelman.
  • Sale, P., & Carey, D. (1995). The sociometric status of students with disabilities in a full-inclusion school. Exceptional Children, 62, 6-19.
  • Salend, S. J., & Moe, L. (1983). Modifying non handicapped student's attitudes toward their handicapped peers through children's literature. Journal for Special Educators, 19, 22-28.
  • Savaşır, I., & Şahin, N.H. (1997). Bilişsel-davranışçı terapilerde değerlendirmede sık kullanılan ölçekler. (Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Scales Commonly Used in the Assessment). Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği, No:9.
  • Sebanc, A. M. (2003). The friendship features of preschool children: links with prosocial behavior and aggression. Social Development, 12(2), 249-268. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00232
  • Stanton-Chapman, T. L., & Brown, T. S. (2014). A strategy to ıncrease the social ınteractions of 3- year-old children with disabilities in an ınclusive classroom. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(1), 4-14. doi:10.1177/0271121414554210
  • Swan, K. L., & Ray, D. C. (2014). Effects of child-centered play therapy on ırritability and hyperactivity behaviors of children with ıntellectual disabilities. The Journal of Humanistic Counseling, 53(2), 120-133. doi:10.1002/j.2161-1939.2014.00053.x
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.  Tekin Ersan, D., Ata, S. , & Kaya, S. (2017). Examining the psychometric properties of acceptance scale for kindergarten-revised (ASK-R) in Turkish. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(5), 58-63.
  • Thorndike, R. M., & Thorndike-Christ, T. (2010). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education (8th ed). Boston: Prentice Hall.
  • Triandis, H. c., Adamopoulos, J., & Brinberg, D. (1984). Perspectives and issues in the study of attitudes. In R. L. Jones (Ed.), Attitudes and attitude change in special education: Theory and practice (pp. 21-40). Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 249 694).
  • Van Westervelt, D., & McKinney, J. D. (1980). Effects of a film on nonhandicapped children's attitudes toward handicapped children. Exceptional Children, 46(4), 294-296. doi:10.1177/001440298004600412
  • Van Westervelt, D., Brantley, J., & Ware, W. (1983). Changing children's attitudes toward physically handicapped peers: Effects of a film and teacher-led discussion. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 8(4), 327-343. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/8.4.327
  • Vignes, C., Coley, N., Grandjean, H., Godeau, E., & Arnaud, C. (2008). Measuring children's attitudes towards peers with disabilities: A review of instruments. Developmental Medicine ve Child Neurology, 50(3), 182-189. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.02032.x
  • Voeltz, L. M. (1980). Children's attitudes toward handicapped peers. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 84, 455-464.
  • Weidner, M. E., St. Louis, K. O., Burgess, M. E., & LeMasters, S. N. (2015). Attitudes toward stuttering of nonstuttering preschool and kindergarten children: A comparison using a standard instrument prototype. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 44, 74-87. doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2015.03.003
  • Williams, P., Sheridan, S., & Sandberg, A. (2014). Preschool – an arena for children’s learning of social and cognitive knowledge. Early Years, 34(3), 226-240. doi:10.1080/09575146.2013.872605
  • Wong, C., Odom, S. L., Hume, K. A., Cox, A. W., Fettig, A., Kucharczyk, S., & Schultz, T. R. (2015). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder: A comprehensive review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(7), 1951-1966. doi:10.1007/s10803-014-2351-z
  • Yu, S., Ostrosky, M. M., & Fowler, S. A. (2014). The relationship between preschoolers' attitudes and play behaviors toward classmates with disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(1), 40-51. doi:10.1177/0271121414554432
  • Yu, S., Ostrosky, M. M., Meyer, L. E., Favazza, P. C., Mouzourou, C., & Van Luling, L. (2016). Using teacher ımpression journals to ımprove ıntervention effectiveness. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(4), 245-255. doi:10.1177/0271121415590810
  • Yuker, H. (1988). Attitudes toward persons with disabilities. New York: Springer.
  • Yükselen, A., & Yaban, H. (2013). Kaynaştırma programına devam eden hafif düzeyde zihin engelli çocukların sosyal yeterlilikleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(3), 457- 471.