Tüketicilerin Paylaşım Ekonomisine Katılmalarına Etki Eden Paylaşım Engelleri ve Farklı Paylaşım Durumları

Paylaşım ekonomisi, içinde bulunduğumuz dijital çağın sunduğu teknolojik avantajlar ve sosyal etkileşimler sonucunda giderek daha fazla tüketicinin dâhil olduğu bir sistem olmakla birlikte önemli sayıda tüketici kitlesinin sistemden uzak durduğu gözlenmektedir. Sürdürülebilirlik açısından önemli bir avantaj sağlayan paylaşım ekonomisine katılımın önündeki engellerin bilinmesi, bu engelleri ortadan kaldıracak önlemlerin alınması açısından önem taşımaktadır. Katılımcıların sistemden uzak durmasına etki eden risk algısı ve güvenlik faktörleri gibi çeşitli engelleyici faktörler bulunmaktadır. Diğer taraftan tüketicilerin farklı paylaşım durumlarında paylaşma niyetleri de farklılık gösterebilmektedir. Bu çalışmada öncelikle paylaşım ekonomisine katılımı engellediği düşünülen faktörlerin (materyalist eğilimler, bulaşma korkusu, risk algısı ve güvenlik) paylaşma niyetine olan etkisi belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca farklı paylaşım durumlarında katılımcıların paylaşım niyetlerini belirlemek üzere üç farklı kategoride (kişisel ürün paylaşımı ve kişisel olmayan ürün paylaşımı; tüketim eyleminin birlikte gerçekleştiği ve birlikte gerçekleşmediği paylaşımlar; paylaşım için ücret ödenen ve ücret ödenmeyen paylaşım durumları olmak üzere) toplamda altı grup üzerinde senaryo temelli nicel bir araştırma yürütülmüştür. Araştırma sonucunda risk algısının, güvenlik kaygılarının ve bulaşma korkusunun paylaşım niyeti üzerinde negatif yönde anlamlı bir farklılık gösterdiği belirlenmiştir. Bununla birlikte katılımcıların materyalist eğilimleri ve statü tüketim eğilimlerinin paylaşım niyetleri üzerinde negatif bir etkisi görülememiştir. Ayrıca paylaşım eylemi için ücret ödenen ve ödenmeyen durumların paylaşım niyeti üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisi olduğu belirlenmiştir.

The Sharing Barriers and Different Sharing Situations That Affect Consumers' Participation in the Sharing Economy

Sharing economy, as a result of the technological advantages and social interactions offered by the present age, is a system involving more and more consumers but still observed that a significant number of consumers stay away from the system. Knowing the barriers to participation in the sharing economy, which provides an important advantage in terms of sustainability, is important in terms of taking measures to eliminate these barriers. There are various preventive factors such as risk perception and security factors that affect participants' stay away from the system. On the other hand, consumers' intention to share in different sharing situations may also vary. In this study, firstly, the effects of the factors (materialist tendencies, fear of transmission, risk perception and security) which are thought to prevent participation in the sharing economy were determined. In addition, a scenario-based quantitative study was conducted on six groups in three different categories in order to determine the participants' intention to share in different sharing situations (personal product sharing and non-personal product sharing; shares in which consumption action occurs and does not occur together; paid and non-paid sharing). As a result of the study, it was determined that risk perception, security concerns and fear of transmission showed a significant difference negative effect on sharing intention. However, the materialist tendencies of the participants and the status consumption tendencies could not have a negative effect on the sharing intentions. It was also determined that the paid and unpaid cases for the sharing action had a significant effect on the sharing intention.

___

  • Akbar, P., Mai, R., & Hoffmann, S. (2016). When do materialistic consumers join commercial sharing systems. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4215-4224.
  • Argo, J. J., Dahl, D. W., & Morales, A. C. (2006). Consumer contamination: How consumers react to products touched by others. Journal of Marketing, 70(2), 81-94.
  • Belk, R. (2010). Possessions and self. Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing.
  • Belk, R. (2007). Why not share rather than own?. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611(1), 126-140.
  • Belk, R. W. (1984). Three scales to measure constructs related to materialism: Reliability, validity, and relationships to measures of happiness. ACR North American Advances.
  • Ballús-Armet, I., Shaheen, S. A., Clonts, K., & Weinzimmer, D. (2014). Peer-to-peer carsharing: Exploring public perception and market characteristics in the San Francisco Bay area, California. Transportation Research Record, 2416(1), 27-36.
  • Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer behavior as risk taking. Chicago, IL, 384-398.
  • Böcker, L., & Meelen, T. (2017). Sharing for people, planet or profit? Analysing motivations for intended sharing economy participation. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 23, 28-39.
  • Botsman, R. ve Rogers, R. (2010). What’s Mine Is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption, Harper-Collins, New York.
  • Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010). What’s mine is yours. The rise of collaborative consumption.
  • Burns, G.L., Keortge, S., Formea, G., & Sternberger, L.G. (1996). Revision of the Padua Inventory of obsessive compulsive disorder symptoms: Distinctions between worry, obsessions, and compulsions. Behavior Research and Therapy, 34, 163-173.
  • Demirer, D., & Hassan, A. (2016). Değiş tokuş ve kiralama uygulamalarının konaklama işletmeleri üzerindeki olası etkileri. Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 27(1), 43-61.
  • Dillahunt, T. R., & Malone, A. R. (2015, April). The promise of the sharing economy among disadvantaged communities. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2285-2294). ACM.
  • Ersoy-Quadir, S. (2012). An analysis of some of the factors behind materialism among university students in Turkey. Journal of adult development, 19(2), 79-87.
  • Dimoka, A. (2010). What does the brain tell us about trust and distrust? Evidence from a functional neuroimaging study. Mis Quarterly, 373-396.
  • Eastman, J. K., Goldsmith, R. E., & Flynn, L. R. (1999). Status consumption in consumer behavior: Scale development and validation. Journal of marketing theory and practice, 7(3), 41-52.
  • Edbring, E. G., Lehner, M., & Mont, O. (2016). Exploring consumer attitudes to alternative models of consumption: motivations and barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 5-15.
  • Edbring, E. G., Lehner, M., & Mont, O. (2016). Exploring consumer attitudes to alternative models of consumption: motivations and barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 5-15.
  • Ertz, M., Durif, F., & Arcand, M. (2016). An Analysis of the Origins of Collaborative Consumption and Its Implications for Marketing.
  • Garson, D. (2012). Testing statistical assumptions. Statistical Associates Publishing-Blue Book Series, Asheboro
  • Gazzola, P., Vătămănescu, E. M., Andrei, A. G., & Marrapodi, C. (2019). Users' motivations to participate in the sharing economy: Moving from profits toward sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(4), 741-751.
  • Goldsmith, R. E., & Clark, R. A. (2012). Materialism, status consumption, and consumer independence. The Journal of social psychology, 152(1), 43-60.
  • Griskevicius, V., & Kenrick, D. T. (2013). Fundamental motives: How evolutionary needs influence consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(3), 372-386.
  • Güllülü, U., Ünal S., & Bilgili, B. (2010). Kendini Gösterim Ve Kişilerarası Etkileşimin Gösterişçi Tüketim Üzerindeki Etkilerini Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Araştırma. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(1), 105-139.
  • Hajli, N., & Lin, X. (2016). Exploring the security of information sharing on social networking sites: The role of perceived control of information. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(1), 111-123.
  • Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., & Ukkonen, A. (2016). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2047-2059.
  • Hawlitschek, F., Teubner, T., & Gimpel, H. (2018). Consumer motives for peer-to-peer sharing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 144-157.
  • Hong, S. J. (2017). Assessing economic value of reducing perceived risk in the sharing economy: the case of ride-sharing services.
  • Hwang, J., & Griffiths, M. A. (2017). Share more, drive less: Millennials value perception and behavioral intent in using collaborative consumption services. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 34(2), 132-146.
  • İlhan, M., & Çetin, B. (2014). LISREL ve AMOS programları kullanılarak gerçekleştirilen yapısal eşitlik modeli (yem) analizlerine ilişkin sonuçların karşılaştırılması. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 5(2), 26-42.
  • Kalaycı, Ş. (2014). “SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri”, Ankara: Asil Yayınları
  • Kalaycı, Ş. (Ed.), (2006). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri (2. Baskı). Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Karaca, Ş. (2019). Materyalist Eğilimlerin Anlık Satın Alma Davranışına Etkisinin İncelenmesi: Üniversite Öğrencilerine Yönelik Bir Çalışma. Third Sector Social Economic Review, 54(1), 243-260.
  • Kurtuluş, K. (2010). “Araştırma Yöntemleri”, İstanbul: Türkmen Kitabevi
  • Lamberton, C. P., & Rose, R. L. (2012). When is ours better than mine? A framework for understanding and altering participation in commercial sharing systems. Journal of Marketing, 76(4), 109-125.
  • Larsen, V., Sirgy, J.M. and Wright, N.D. (1999),“Materialism: The construct, measures,antecedents, and consequences”,Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, Vol. 3,No. 2, pp. 78-110.
  • Lawson, S. J., Gleim, M. R., Perren, R., & Hwang, J. (2016). Freedom from ownership: An exploration of access-based consumption. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2615-2623.
  • Lee, J., Kim, S., & Ham, C. D. (2016). A double-edged sword? Predicting consumers’ attitudes toward and sharing intention of native advertising on social media. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(12), 1425-1441.
  • Lee, Z. W., Chan, T. K., Balaji, M. S., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2018). Why people participate in the sharing economy: an empirical investigation of Uber. Internet Research, 28(3), 829-850.
  • Lim, N. (2003). Consumers’ perceived risk: sources versus consequences. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2(3), 216-228.
  • Lindblom, A., Lindblom, T., & Wechtler, H. (2018). Collaborative consumption as C2C trading: Analyzing the effects of materialism and price consciousness. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 44, 244-252.
  • Lutz, C., & Newlands, G. (2018). Consumer segmentation within the sharing economy: The case of Airbnb. Journal of Business Research, 88, 187-196.
  • Mahadevan, R. (2018). Examination of motivations and attitudes of peer-to-peer users in the accommodation sharing economy. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 27(6), 679-692.
  • Manchiraju, S., & Krizan, Z. (2015). What is materialism? Testing two dominant perspectives on materialism in the marketing literature. Management & Marketing, 10(2), 89-102.
  • Mittendorf, C., & Ostermann, U. (2017). Private vs. business customers in the sharing economy–The implications of trust, perceived risk, and social motives on Airbnb.
  • Morgan, G. A., Leech, N. L., Gloeckner, G. W., & Barrett, K. C. (2012). IBM SPSS for introductory statistics: Use and interpretation. Routledge.
  • Möhlmann, M. (2015). Collaborative consumption: determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 14(3), 193-207.
  • Neunhoeffer, F., & Teubner, T. (2018). Between enthusiasm and refusal: A cluster analysis on consumer types and attitudes towards peer‐to‐peer sharing. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 17(2), 221-236.
  • O'cass, A., & McEwen, H. (2004). Exploring consumer status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, 4(1), 25-39.
  • Ozanne, L. K., & Ballantine, P. W. (2010). Sharing as a form of anti-consumption? An examination of toy library users. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 485–498.
  • Özata, F. Z., Er, İ., Öztürk, S. A., & Ağlargöz, F. (2015). Ortak Tüketememek: Paylaşma Davranışını Engelleyen Faktörlerin Belirlenmesi Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Ulusal Pazarlama Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, 2, 625-626.
  • Öztürk, S. A., & Öztay, H. (2019) Yerli Ve Yabancı Hızlı Moda Markası Satın Alma Niyetinde Etnosentrizm, Materyalizm Ve Dış Görünüş Kaygısının Etkisi. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(1), 14-29.
  • Pavlou, P. A., Liang, H., & Xue, Y. (2007). Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective. MIS quarterly, 105-136.
  • Perfili, M., Parente, S., Grimaldi, M., & Morales-Alonso, G. (2019). A Study on Consumer Behaviour in the Sharing Economy. In Engineering Digital Transformation (pp. 79-86). Springer, Cham.
  • Rachman, S. (2004). Fear of contamination. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42(11), 1227-1255.
  • Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of consumer research, 19(3), 303- 316.
  • Schor, J. B., & Fitzmaurice, C. J. (2015). 26. Collaborating and connecting: the emergence of the sharing economy. Handbook of research on sustainable consumption, 410.
  • Sekaran, U. (2003). “Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach”, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • So, K. K. F., Oh, H., & Min, S. (2018). Motivations and constraints of Airbnb consumers: Findings from a mixed-methods approach. Tourism Management, 67, 224-236.
  • Srikant, M. (2013). Materialism in consumer behavior and marketing: a review. Management & Marketing, 8(2), 329.
  • Sundararajan, A. (2014) ‘Peer-to-peer businesses and the sharing (collaborative) economy: Overview, economic effects, and regulatory issues’, Written testimony for the hearing titled The Power of Connection: Peer to Peer Businesses.
  • Teubner, T., Hawlitschek, F., 2018. The economics of peer-to-peer online sharing, in: Albinsson, P., Perera, Y. (Eds.), The Sharing Economy: Possibilities, Challenges, and the Way Forward. Praeger Publishing, pp. 129–156
  • Tosun, N. B., & Cesur, D. K. Tüketimin Paranormali: Gösterişçi Tüketim Ve Paranormal İnanç İlişkisi1. Öneri Dergisi, 13(49), 167-186.
  • Tussyadiah, I. P., & Pesonen, J. (2018). Drivers and barriers of peer-to-peer accommodation stay– an exploratory study with American and Finnish travellers. Current Issues in Tourism, 21(6), 703-720.
  • Yakın V., Kacar İ. A., Ay İ. C., (2017) Sharing Economy: Why the Turkish consumers use Airbnb?, Journal of Marketing and Consumer Behaviour in Emerging Markets 2(6).
  • Yakın, Volkan (2018). “Paylaşım Ekonomisi A’dan Z’ye Tüm Boyutlarıyla”. Paylaşım Ekonomisi: Tanımı ve Sınıflandırmaları. Ed. C. Ay, V. Yakın, A.İ. Kacar. Ankara: Akademisyen Kitabevi: 19-30
  • Zhu, G., So, K. K. F., & Hudson, S. (2017). Inside the sharing economy: understanding consumer motivations behind the adoption of mobile applications. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(9), 2218-2239.