Zeynep TATLI, Alipasa AYAS

6742

Virtual Chemistry Laboratory: 
Effect Of Constructivist Learning Environment

The lab applications, which were started to be applied through mid 19th century, not only provide a new point of view but also bring about a new dimension to the lessons. At early times they were used to prove theoretical knowledge but lately they turned into environments where students freely discover knowledge as an individual or in groups. The activities that have come up with the recent form of labs substantially contributed to training ideal students for constructivist approach, who research, inquire, test, seek solutions, wear scientist shoes and deeply reason about the concept of concern. However, on the present stage of our educational system, these activities cannot be included in science lessons for several reasons. At that point virtual labs emerged as an alternative solution for the problems of the instruction in science courses. Thanks to virtual labs presenting different disciplines in a flexible manner, the interaction between the teacher and the learner become 7/24 independent from time and place. This article presents a study that provides insight in the appropriateness of Virtual and real laboratory applications on constructivist learning environment using interactive virtual chemistry laboratory (VCL) development was used in academic year of 2009-2010 for a six week period. The sample of this quasi-experimental study was 90 students from three different 9th grade classrooms of an Anatolian Secondary school in the center of Trabzon city. The student groups were randomly attained as one experimental and two control groups. The data collection tools of the study were; questionnaire of teaching philosophy (QTP), Semi-structured interviews and unstructured observations. The results showed that virtual chemistry laboratory software was just as effective as real chemistry laboratory and it positively affected the facilitating of constructivist learning environment. It was determined that the students in experimental group conducted the experiments as precise as the real ones; they felt themselves safe during the experiments; they could relate the experiments with daily life; they had the opportunity to investigate both macro-molecular and symbolical dimensions of the experiments. It was speculated that using virtual chemistry laboratories as a supportive complement in education will become an indispensable instructional material in terms of both the economy of the nation and the persistency of the learning.
Keywords:

Virtual Laboratory Constructivism, Learning Environments,

PDF

___

  • Akbulut, O. E, (2008). Akdeniz AR. Designing a constructivist instructon material using a interactive simulation software and prospective teachers’ views: transformers. E-J New World Sci Acad, :644-654.
  • Appleton, K. (1997). Analysis and description of students’ learning during science classes using a constructivist based model. J Res Sci Teaching, 34:303-318.
  • Ari, E. (2011). The impact of a constructivist learning approach and learning styles on the achievement, scientific process skills and attitutes of preservise science teachers through general chemistry laboratory, PhD. Marmara University, 2008.
  • Atasoy, S., Kucuk. M, & Akdeniz, A. R. (2011). Remedying science student teachers’ misconceptions of force and motion using worksheets based on constructivist learning theory. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B, 3: 653-668.
  • Ayas, A., Cepni, S. & Akdeniz, A. R. (1994). Importance of laboratory in science education-II. Contemp Educ J, 205:7-11.
  • Ayas, A. (1998). Fen Bilgisi Ogretiminde Laboratuvar Kullanimi. AOF Publications,
  • Eskisehir, 1998 (in Turkish).
  • Azar, A. A. (2010). Comparison of the effects of two physics laboratory applications with different approaches on student physics achievement. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B, :161–185.
  • Bakar, H. N. B., & Zaman, H. H. B. (2007). Development of vlab-chem for chemistry subject based on constructivism-cognitivism-contextual approach, Proceedings of the international conference on electrical engineering and ınformatics institut teknologi bandung, Indonesia, June 17-19, 2007.
  • Baki, A. (2008). Kuramdan Uygulamaya Matematik Egitimi. Harf Egitim Publishing, Ankara, (in Turkish).
  • Bennett, C. & Pilkington, R. (2001). Using a virtual learning environment in higher education to support independent and collaborative learning, second ieee ınternational conference on advanced learning technologies, Wisconsin, August 6-8, 2001.
  • Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E. Wade, A. & Wozney, L. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Rev Educ Res, 74:379-439.
  • Birgin, O. (2008). Students’ vıews about the application of portfolio assessment as an alternative assessment method. J Turkish Educ Sci , 6:1-24.
  • Bozdogan, A. E. & Yalcin, N. (2004). The rate of experiments being carrıed out in science lessons at elementary education and the problems encountered during the physics experiments. J Kirsehir Educat Fac, 5:59-70.
  • Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In search of understanding: the case for constructivist classrooms, Association for supervision and curriculum development, Alexandria, USA.
  • Cepni, S. (2009). Effects of computer supported instructional material (CSIM) in removing, students misconceptions about concepts: “Light, light source and seeing.”
  • Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B, 1:51–83. Champagne, A. B., Klopfer, L. E, & Anderson, J. H. (1980)Factors influencing the learning of classical mechanics. Am J Physics, 48:9-14.
  • Dede, C. J., Salzman, M., & Loftin, R. B. (1992). The development of a virtual world for learning new onian mechanics, First International Conference, Russian Academy of
  • Sciences 5-8 July, Moscow, 1994.on high school students, Journal of Educational Research, 1992;8:5-10.
  • Driver, R. (1998). Students’ conceptions and the learning of science. Int J Sci Educ, :481-490.
  • Edwards, S., & Hammer, M. (2004). Teacher education and problem-based learning: exploring the issues and identifying the benefits. International Education Research
  • Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, University of Notre Dame, Australia, 28November-2 December, 2004.
  • Ertmer, N. A. & Newby, T. J. (2008). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: comparing critical features from an ınstructional design perspective. Performe Imp Quart, 6:50-72.
  • Falvo, D. A. (2008). Animations and simulations for teaching and learning molecular chemistry. Int J Technol Teaching Learn 2008;4:68–77.
  • Fetaji, M., Loskovska, S. Fetaji, B., & Ebibi, M. (2007). Combining virtual learning environment and ıntegrated development environment to enhance e-learning. 29th
  • International Conferance on Information Technology Interfaces, IEEE, Cavtat, 25-28 June, 2007.
  • Glaserfeld, E. V. (1995). Radical constructivism: a way of knowing and learning,
  • RoutledgeFalmer, London. Grayson, D. J., Anderson, T. R., Crossley, L. G. (2001). A four-level framework for ıdentifying and classifying student conceptual and reasoning difficulties. Int J Sci Educ :611-622.
  • Gunes, G. (2008). Reflection on new primary school mathematics curriculum on the teaching and learning environment. Ph.D. Karadeniz Technical University, 2008.
  • Hewson, P. W. (1984). Hewson MG. The role of conceptual conflict ın conceptual change and the design of science ınstruction. Instruc Sci , 13:1-13.
  • Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching neglected aspects of research. Rev Educ Res, 52:201-217.
  • Josephsen, J. & Kristensen A. K. (2006). Simulation of laboratory assignments to support students’ learning of introductory inorganic chemistry. Chemy Educ Res Pract , 7:266
  • Kang, N. H., Wallace, C. (2005). Secondary science teachers' use of laboratory activities: linking epistemological beliefs, goals, and practices. Sci Teach Educ 89:140-165.
  • Karaer, H. (2007). Examining the attitudes of 8th grade students in primary schools about science course regarding to some variables. J Erzincan Educ Fac, 9:107-120.
  • Korakakis, G., Pavlatou E.A., Palyvos, J.A., & Spyrellis, N. (2009). 3D visualization types in multimedia applications for science learning: a case study for 8th grade students in greece. Comput Educ, 52:390–401.
  • Koray, O., Koksal, M. S., & Hazer, B. (2010). Simple production experiment of poly (3- hydroxy butyrate) for science laboratories and its importance for science process skills of prospective teachers.Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B, 2:39–54.
  • Leite, L., & Afonso, A. S. (2002). Prospective physical sciences teachers’ use of laboratory activities: an analysis of its evolution due to a science teaching methods course. Rev
  • Elect Enseñ Ciencias , 1:153-179. Liew, C. W., & Treagust, D.F. (1995). A predict-observe-explain teaching sequence for learning about students’ understanding of heat and expansion of liquid, Aust Sci Teachers’ J, 41:68-71.
  • Limniou, M., & Papadopoulos, N. (2009). Whitehead C. Integration of simulation ınto pre-laboratory chemical course: computer cluster versus WEBCT. Comput Educ, :45–52
  • McCoy, P. (1991). The effect of geometry tool software on high school geometry achievement. J Comput Math Sci Teaching, 10:51-57.
  • Odubunni, T., & Balagun, A. (1991). The effect of laboratory and lecture teaching methods on cognitive achivement in ıntegrated science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28:213-224.
  • Ozden, Y. (2003). Ogrenmeye Farkli Bir Bakis: Yapilandirmacilik, Ogrenme ve Ogretme.
  • Pegem-A Publishing, Ankara, (in Turkish). Palmer, D. (1995). The "POE" in the primary school: an evaluation. Res Sci Educ, 25:323
  • Pekdag, B. (2010). Chemistry learning alternative routes: animation, simulation, video, multimedia, J Turkish Sci Educ, 7:79-110.
  • Rusten, E. (2004). Using computer in schoool, computer in schools model of use, learnlinkaed publications.
  • Sahin, C., Calik, M., & Cepni S. (2009). Using different conceptual change methods embedded within 5E model: Asample teaching of liquid pressure. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B, 1:115–125.
  • Sahin, I. (2007). New Turkish Curriculum for grade 1 to 5. Elemen Educ Online, 6:284
  • Saka, M. (2002). Primary school students' opinions on science laboratory practice and laboratory conditions, V. National Science and Mathematics Education Congrees, METU, 18 September, 2002
  • Sanger M. J. (2000). Addressing student misconceptions concerning electron flow in aqueous solutions with instruction ıncluding computer animations and conceptual change strategies. Int J Sci, 22:521-537.
  • Senemoglu, N. (1997). Gelisim, ogrenme ve ogretim. Spot Publising, Ankara, (in Turkish).
  • Stieff, M., & Wilensky, U. (2003). Connected chemistry-ıncorporating ınteractive simulations ınto the chemistry classroom. J Sci Educ Technol, 12:3.
  • Subramanian, R., & Marsic, I. (2001). VIBE: Virtual biology experiments, The 10th World
  • Wide Web Conference Hong Kong. May 1-5, 2001.
  • Sumbuloglu, K. & Sumbuloglu, V. (2002). Biyoistatistik. Hatipoğlu Yayınları, Ankara, (in Turkish).
  • Tas, E., Apaydin, Z., & Cetinkaya, M. (2011). Research of efficacy of web supported science and technology material developed with respect to constructivist approach.
  • Energy Educ Sci TechnolPart B 2011;3:455-468.
  • Tasdelen K. (2004). Internet-based, interactive, virtual microcontroller laboratory desing for engineering education, Master of Thesis, University of Suleyman Demirel, Isparta, Turkey.
  • Tatli Z. H. Computer based education: Online learning and teaching facilities. Energy Educ Sci TechnolPart B 2009;1:171–181.
  • Tatli Z. (2011). Development, Application and Evaluation of Virtual Chemistry Laboratory
  • Experiments for "Chemical Changes" Unit at Secondary School 9th Grade Curriculum. PhD. Karadeniz Technical University. Tezcan, H., & Bilgin, E. (2004). Affects of laboratory method and other factors on the student success in the teaching of the solvation subject at the high schools. J Gazi Educ Fac , 24:175-191.
  • White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing Understanding, Falmer Press, London.
  • Winberg, T. M., & Berg, A. R. (2007). Students’ cognitive focus during a chemistry laboratory exercise: effects of a computer-simulated prelab. J Res Sci Teaching, 44:1108
  • Yang, K. Y,; & Heh, J. S. (2007). The impact of internet virtual physics laboratory instruction on the achievement in physics, science process skills and computer attitudes of 10th grade students. J Sci Educ Technol, 16:451–461.
  • ‘‘chemical equilibrium’’ topic. PhD. Karadeniz Technical University.
Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-Cover
  • ISSN: 1302-6488
  • Başlangıç: 2000
  • Yayıncı: Anadolu Üniversitesi
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

DESIGNING MLEARNING

Reviewed By Ozlem OZAN

Nadia RASHID, Muhammad RASHID

From EDİTOR

Assistant professor Gina G. BERRIDGE Teacher Education in the Pott College of Science and Engineering at the University of Southern Indiana in Evansville. Director of Distance Education Samantha PENNEY, Indiana State University in Terre Haute. Department coordinator of instructors

Gina G. BERRIDGE, Samantha PENNEY, Judith A. WELLS

Mahnaz MOHAMADZADEH, Jabraeal FARZANEH, Mina MOUSAVI

Meral GUVEN, Dilruba KURUM, Mustafa SAGLAM

Zeynep TATLI, Alipasa AYAS

Ahmet BASAL, Mehmet GUROL, Tuncay SEVINDIK

Mahfudzah OTHMAN, Muhaini OTHMAN

Kevin YEE, Jace HARGIS