___

• Andersen, J. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness.
• In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication Yearbook, 3 (pp. 543-559). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books. Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323-340.
• Freitas, A. F., Myers, S. A., & Avtgis, T. A (1998). Student perceptions of instructor immediacy in conventional and distributed classrooms. Communication Education, 47, 372.
• Gorham, J. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37, 40-53.
• Kelley, D., & Gorham, J. (1988) Effects of immediacy on recall of information.
• Communication Education, 37(2), 198-207. Mehrabian, A. (1969). Some referents and measures of nonverbal behavior.
• Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 1(6), 205-207. Menzel, K. E., & Carrell, L. J. (1999). The impact of gender and immediacy of willingness to talk and perceived learning. Communication Education, 48, 31-40.
• Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Myers, S. A., Zhong, M., & Guan, S. (1998). Instructor immediacy in the Chinese college classroom. Communication Studies, 49, 240-253.
• Richmond, V. P., Lane, D. R., & McCroskey, J. C. (2006). Teacher immediacy and the teacher-student relationship. In T. P. Mottet, V. P. Richmond, & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.),
• Handbook of instructional communication: Rhetorical and relational perspectives (pp. 194). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D.R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education14 (2), 50-71.
• Swan, K., Polhemus, L., Shih, L-F., & Rogers, D. (2001). Building knowledge building communities through asynchronous online course discussion. Seattle, WA: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
• Swan, K. (2002). Immediacy, social presence, and asynchronous discussion. In J.
• Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds), Elements of Quality Online Education, Volume 3 (pp. 157- ). Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education. Swan, K., & Richardson, J. C. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students‘ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7, 68-82.
• Tsang, E.Y.M., Choi, H.M.F., & Tam, K.C. (2002). Students‘ participation in computer- mediated communication. In D. Murphy, N. Shin & W. Zhang (Eds.), Advancing online learning in Asia. Hong Kong: Open University of Hong Kong.
• Tu, C. H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16 (3), 131-150.
• Wallace, R.M. (2003). Online Learning in Higher Education: a review of research on interactions among teachers and students. Education, Communication and Information 3(2), 241-280.