Satisfaction Clustering Analysis Of Distance Education Computer Programming Students: A Sample Of Karadeniz Technical University
In line with recently developing technology, distant education systems based on information technologies are started to be commonly used within higher education. Students’ satisfaction is one of the vital aspects in order to maintain distant education efficiently and achieving its goal. As a matter of the fact, previous studies proved that student satisfaction is one of the most important factors in deciding the success of a system in terms of application. Therefore, this paper analyzes satisfaction variables of distant education computer programming students regarding this program as well as their clustering tendencies. 96 students who were having their majors in distant education computer programming at Karadeniz Technical University during 2012-2013 academic term constitute the sample of the study. The study employed Satisfaction Scale for Students of Distant education Based on Information Technologies as data collection tool which comprised of 42 items. Data obtained from the scale was analyzed via Ward method, one of the hierarchical clustering methods, in order to reveal their clustering tendencies. Accordingly, satisfaction variables were divided into three main clusters which were A, B and C. Of these main clusters, it was seen that A and B has two sub-clusters each which were A1, A2 and B1, B2 respectively. These divisions were named after the variables they include; A1: “Interest of the instructors and the implementation of program content”, A2: “Support and rapport of the university”, B1: “Scope of the program”, B2: “Individuality and the opportunity for interaction” and C: “The defects in application by both the program and the university”. From an overall perspective, it is seen that Cluster A covers variables positively affecting the satisfaction which are “the quality of service provided by the university for this program”, “application of program content fitting to the purpose” and “teachers’ dealing with students properly”. It is seen that Cluster B covers variables positively affecting satisfaction in terms of program scope, individuality and interactive environment. Finally, it is seen that Cluster C covers variables negatively affecting satisfaction which are about the defects in the application both by the program and the university.
Keywords:
Distance Education, Online Learning Environment, Clustering Analysis Students’ Satisfaction.,
___
- Allen, M.,Bourhis, J., Burrell, N. & Mabry, E. (2002). Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: A meta-analysis. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 83-88.
- Arbaugh, J. B. & Duray, R. (2002). Technological and structural characteristics, student learning and satisfaction with web-based courses– An exploratory study of two on-line MBA programs. Management Learning, 33(3), 331–347.
- Areti, V. (2006). Satisfying distance education students of the Hellenic Open University. E-mentor, 2 (14), 1-12.
- Artino, A. R. (2008).Motivational belief sand perceptions of instructional quality: Predicting satisfaction with online training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 260–270.
- Ates, A. & Altun, E. (2008). Investigating Pre-service Computer Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Distance Learning Regarding Various Variables. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 28(3), 125-145.
- Bollinger, D. U. & Martindale, T. (2004). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1), 61–67.
- Bolliger, D. U. & Wasilik, O., (2009). Factor influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning in higher education. Distance Education, 30(1), 103–116.
- Bolliger, D. U., Supanakorn, S. & Boogs, C. (2010). Impact of podcasting on student motivation in the online learning environment. Computers & Education, 55(2010) 714- 722.
- Calli, L., Balcikanlı C., Calli, F., Cebeci, I. & Seymen, F. (2013). Identifying factors that contribute to the satisfaction of students in e-learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 14(1), 85-101.
- Chen, N. S., Lin, K. M. & Kinshuk (2008). Analyzing Users’ Satisfaction with ELearning Using a Negative Critical Incidents Approach. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45 (2), pp.115-126.
- Delon, W. & Mclean, E. (1992). Information system success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95.
- Donavant, B. W. (2009). The new, modern practice of adult education: online instruction in a continuing professional education setting. Adult Education Quarterly, 59(3), 227-245 Karasar, N. (2006). Scientific Research Method. Ankara: Nobel Publication.
- Karatas, S. & Ustündag, M. T. (2008). Gazi University The Relationship Between Distant Education Program Students' Internet Based. Curriculum Satisfaction and Demographic Features. Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Educational Faculty, 5(2), 62-73.
- Harvey, L. & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9–34.
- Hung, M., Chou, C., Chen, C. & Own, Z. -Y. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers in Education, 55(3), 1080–1090. Ilgaz, H. (2008). The Contribution of Technology Acceptance and the Sense of Being Community to Learner Satisfaction in Distant Education. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis. Hacettepe University, Institute of science, Ankara.
- Ke, F. & Kwak, D. (2013). Online learning across ethnicity and age: A study on learning interaction participation, perception, and learning satisfaction. Computers & Education, 61 (2013) 43-51.
- Kukul, V. (2011). Student and faculty satisfaction in information technologies-based distance education. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis, Ankara University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
- Lin, Y. M., Lin, G. & Laffey, J. (2008). Building a social and motivational framework for understanding satisfaction in online learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(1), 1–27.
- Moore, J. C. (2005). The Sloan consortium quality framework and the five pillars. Newburyport, MA: Sloan Consortium. Retrieved May 25, 2013, from http://www.sloan- c.org/publications/books/qualityframework.pdf
- Ozgüngör, S. (2010). Student and School Characteristics Which Determine Satisfaction Levels Regarding Life in Faculty for Students of Faculty of Education. Turkish Education Sciences Journal, 8(3), 623-644.
- Palmer, S. R.,&Holt, D. M. (2009). Examining student satisfaction with wholly online learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(2), 101−113
- Picciano, A. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an onlinee course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21−40
- Rivera, J., McAlister, M. K. & Mc Alister M. L. (2002). A Comparison of Student Outcomes and Satisfaction between Traditional and Web Based Course Offerings. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5 (3).
- Sahin, I. (2007). Predicting student satisfaction in distance education and learning environments. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 8(2), 113-119.
- Shen, D., Cho, M-H., Tsai, C-L. & Marra, R. (2013). Unpacking online learning experiences: Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction. Internet and Higher Education, 19 (2013) 10-17.
- Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, C. C., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e- learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(2008), 1183–1202.
- Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interactivity: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22(2), 306−331
- Wegerif, R. (1998). The social dimension of asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2(1), 34-49.
- Womble, J. (2008). E-learning: The relationship among learner satisfaction, self-efficacy, and usefulness. The Business Review, 10(1), 182–188.
- ISSN: 1302-6488
- Başlangıç: 2000
- Yayıncı: Anadolu Üniversitesi