Predictive Role Of Personality Traits On Internet Addiction

Aiming to develop a model seeking to investigate the direct effects of personality types on internet addiction, this study was set and tested on tertiary level students receiving education within two learning modes: face to face and distance education. The participants of the study, selected through maximum variety method within purposive sampling, included 210 students enrolled on face-to-face and distance education programs of computer programming department. In addition to a personal data form aiming to obtain information on demographic features of the participants, a personality inventory and an Internet addiction scale were utilized to gather data. As an analysis model concurrently exerting both the mediation and direct effects, path analysis with observed variables was utilized in the current study to test the developed model. The findings revealed that while the most powerful predictor variable of internet addiction was conscientiousness, openness to experience was found as the weakest independent variable predictor. Additionally the developed model was observed as valid for both face to face and distance education students.

Keywords:

Internet Addiction, Distance Education, Personality,

PDF

___

Atak, H. (2010). Yetişkinliğe geçişte kimlik biçimlenmesi ve eylemlilik: Bireyleşme sürecinde iki gelişimsel kaynak. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, [Unpublished Doctoral
Dissertation]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara. Baruch, Y. (2004). The autistic society. Information and Management 2001; 38, 129–
Batıgün, A. D. & Hasta, D. (2010). Internet bağımlılığı: Yalnızlık ve kişilerarası ilişki tarzları açısından bir değerlendirme. [Internet addiction: An evaluation of lonliness and interpersonal relation types] Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 11(3), 213-219.
Bayraktar, F. (2001). Ergenlik döneminde internet kullanımının rolü.[The role of
Internet use on adolescency] Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, [Unpublished MA Thesis] Ege Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İzmir. Beard, K. W. (2002). Internet addiction: current status and implications for employes.
Journal of Employement Counselling , 39, 2-11. Beard, K. W. (2005). Internet addiction: A review of current assessment techniques and potential assessment questions. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8(1), 7-14.
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York: Guilford Press.
Buyukozturk, Ş., Kılıc-Çakmak, E., Akgun, O. E., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F. (2008).
Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri [Scientific Research M ethods]. Ankara: Pegem A Yay. Byun, S., Ruffini, B., Mills, J., et al. (2009). Internet addiction: Metasynthesis of 1996
CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 203-207. Cengizhan, C. (2003). Bilgisayar ve İnternet Bağımlılığı. [Computer and Internet addiciton]. IX. Türkiye'de İnternet Konferansı. [IX. Internet in Turkey Conference].
Istanbul. Retrieved on 20.03.2012 from http://mimoza.marmara.edu.tr/~cahit/Yayin.html
Cheung,G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation M odeling, 9(2), 233-255.
Chou, C., Condron, L., & Belland, J. C. (2005). A review of the research on internet addiction. Educational Psychology Review , 17,4, 363-388.
Denissen, J. J. A., Geenen, R., Selfhout, M., et al. (2008). Single-item Big Five ratings in a Soc network design. European Journal of Personality, 22: 37-54.
Douglas, A., Niang, M., Stepchenkova, S., et al. (2008). Internet addiction:
Metasynthesis of qualitative research for the decade 1996-2006. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 3027-3044.
Durak-Batıgün, A. D., & Kılıç, N. (2011). Internet bağımlılığı ile kişilik özellikleri, sosyal destek, psikolojik belirtiler ve bazı sosyo-demografik değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiler.
Relations among Internet addiciton and personality traits, social support, psychologic indicators, and some socio-demographic variables] Türk Psikoloji Dergisi 26, (66). Ehrhart, M. G., Ehrhart, K. H., Roesch, S. C., et al. (2009). Testing the latent factor structure and construct validity of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 900–905.
Eijnden, R. J.M., Meerkerk, G. J., Vermulst, A.A., et al. (2008). Online communication, compulsive internet use, and psychosocial well-being among adolescents: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 44, 655-665.
Engelberg, E., & Sjöberg, L. (2009). Internet use, social skills, and adjustment.
Cyberpsychology and Behavior , 7, 41–47. Erdogan, Y. (2008). Exploring the relationships among internet usage, internet attitudes and loneliness of Turkish adolescents. Cyberpsychology: Journal of
Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 2(2), 1-8. Fraenkel, J., & Wallen, N. (1993). How To Design and Evaluate Research in Education,
(3rd Edition). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Frangos, C. C, Frangos, C. C., & Kiohos, A. (2010). Internet addiction among Greek university students: Demographic associations with the phenomenon, using the Greek version of Young’s Internet addiction test. International Journal of Economic Sciences and Applied Research, 3(1), 49-74.
Gosling, S. (2012). Ten Item Personality Measure (TIPI). Retrived from http://homepage.psy.utexas.edu/homepage/faculty/gosling/scales_we.htm on 05.2012.
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the big five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528.
Griffiths, M. D. (2000). Does internet and computer "addiction" exist? Some case study evidence. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3, 211-218.
Griffiths, M. D. (2005). A ‘components’ model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. Journal of Substance Use, 10, 191-197.
Hamburger, Y. A., & Ben-Artzi, E. (2000). The relationship between extraversion and neuroticism and the different uses of the internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 449.
Hofmans, J., Kuppens, P., & Allik, J. (2008). Is short in length short in content? An examination of the domain representation of the Ten Item Inventory scales in Dutch language. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 750-755.
Hojat, M. (1982). Loneliness as a function of selected personality variables. Journal of
Clinical Psychology, 38, 137-141. Inderbiten, H. M., Walters, K. S., & Bukowski, A. L. (1997). The role of social anxiety in adolescent peer relations: Differences among sociometric status groups and rejected subgroups. Journal of Clinical & Child Psychology, 26, 338-348.
Internet World Stats. (2012). Europe Stats. Retrived from http://www.internetworldstats.com on 01.02.2012.
Jackson, L. A., Alexander, E., Biocca, F. A., et al. (2003). Personality, cognitive style, demographic characteristics and internet use. Findings from the HomeNetToo project.
Swiss Journal of Psychology , 62, 79-90. Kagitcibasi, C. (1996). Family and Human Development Across Cultures: A View From the Other Side. NJ Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
Kesici, Ş., & Şahin, I (2009). A comparative study of uses of the Internet among college students with and without Internet addiction. Psychological Reports, 105, 3, 1103
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and Practices of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation M odeling (2nd ed).
New York: Guilford Press. Kraut, S., Kiesler, B., Boneva, J., et al. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 49-74.
Kubey, R. W., Lavin, M. J. & Barrows, J. R. (2001). Internet use and collegiate academic performance decrements: Early findings. Journal of Communication, 51, 366-382.
Levine, I. & Stokes, J. P. (1986). An examination of the relation between individual difference variables to loneliness. Journal of Personality , 54, 717-733.
Morahan-Martin, J. & Schumacher, P. (2000). Incidence and correlates of pathological internet use among college students. Computers in Human Behavior , 16, 13–29.
Muck, P. M., Hell, B. & Gosling, S. D. (2007). Construct validation of a short Five-Factor model instrument. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 166-75.
Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of internet use. Journal of Broadcast Electron M edia, 44, 175-196.
Scherer, K. (1997). College life on-line: healthy and unhealthy internet use. Journal of
College Student Development, 38, 655–665. Sencer, M. (1989). Toplumbilimlerinde Yöntem [Methodology in Social Sciences]. Istanbul: Beta Basım.
Sepehrian, F., & Lotf, J. J. (2011). The rate of prevalence in the Internet addiction and its relationship with anxiety and students’ field of study. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(10), 1202-1206.
Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., et al. (2011). Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big-Five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology , 94, 718–737. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics, 5th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Thompson, S. (1996). Internet Addiction Survey. Retrieved from http://cac.psu.edu/sjt112/mcnair/journal.html on 10.03.2012.
Tsai, C., & Lin, S. S. (2003). Internet addiction of adolescents in Taiwan: An interview study. CyberPsychology & Behaviour, 6(6), 649–652.
Tsai, H. F., Cheng, S. H., Yeh, T.L., et al. (2009). The risk factors of Internet addiction,
A survey of university freshmen. Psychiatry Research, 30; 167(3), 294-9. Tuten, T. L., & Bosnjak, M. (2001). Understanding differences in Web usage: The role of need for cognition and five factor model of personality. Social Behavior and Personality, , 391-398.
Weibel, D., Wissmath, B., & Groner, R. (2010). Motives for creating a private website and personality of personal homepage owners in terms of extraversion and heuristic orientation. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 4(1).
Retrieved on 5 March 2012 from http://cyberpsychology.eu/view.php?cisloclanku=2010053101&article=5
Weinstein, A., & Lejoyeux, M. (2010). Internet addiction or excessive internet use.
American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse , 36(5):277-83. Widyanto, L., & Griffiths, M. (2006). Internet addiction: A critical review’. International
Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 4, 31-51. Xiuqin, H., Huimin, Z., & Mengchen, L., et al. (2010). Mental health, personality, and parental rearing styles of adolescents with Internet addiction disorder. Cyberspace,
Behavior, and Social Netw orking 13, 4, 401-406. Yalın, H. I, Karataş, S., & Karabulut, C. B. (2011). Internet addicted children and advices for teachers. W orld Conference on Educational Technology Researches
(WCETR-2011), Near East University, Kyrenia-North Cyprus.
Yeh, Y. C., Ko, H. C., Wu, J.Y.W., & Cheng, C. P. (2008). Gender differences in relationships of actual and virtual social support to internet addiction mediated through depressive symptoms among college students in Taiwan. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 485-487.
Young, K. S. (1998). Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder.
Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 1, 237–244. Young, K. S. (2004). Internet Addiction: A new clinical phenomenon and its consequences. American Behavioral Scientists, 48, 402-415.
Young, K. S., & Case, C. J. (2004). Internet abuse in the workplace: New trends in risk management. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7, 1, 105-111.