___

• Abraham, A. (2007). Student centred teaching of accounting to engineering students:
• Comparing blended learning with traditional approaches. Proceedings of ASCILITE, Singapore. Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ascilite) 2007 - ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning, 2-5 December 2007, Singapore, 1- 9 http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/abraham.pdf
• Carmody, K. & Berge, Z. (2005). Elemental analysis of the online learning experience,
• International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 1(3), 108-119. Cooner, T. S. (2010). Creating opportunities for students in large cohorts to reflect in and on practice: lessons learnt from a formative evaluation of students’ experiences of a technology-enhanced blended learning design. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 271–286.
• Delialioglu, O. & Yildirim, Z. (2008). Design and development of a technology enhanced hybrid instruction based on MOLTA model: Its effectiveness in comparison to traditional instruction. Computers & Education, 5(1), 474–483.
• Dziuban, C. D., Hartman, J., Juge, F., Moskal, P. D. & Sorg, S. (2006). Blended learning enters the mainstream. In Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local
• Designs , edited by C. J. Bonk and C. R. Graham, pp. 195–208. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing El-Deghaidy, H. & Nouby, A. (2008). Effectiveness of a blended e-learning cooperative approach in an Egyptian teacher education programme. Computers & Education, 51(3), 988-1006. Retrieved from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360131507001273
• Garrison, D., R. & Kanuka, H. (2004) Blended learning: Uncovering transformative potential in higher education, The Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95-105.
• Ginns, P., Prosser, M. & Barrie, S. (2007). Students’ perceptions of teaching quality in higher education: the perspective of currently enrolled students. Studies in Higher Education, 32(5), 603–615.
• Gomez, J. & Igado, M. (2008). Blended Learning: The Key to Success in a Training
• Company. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 5(8). Graham, C. R. (2005). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-21). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
• Green, B. S. & Salkind, J. N. (2007). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and Understanding Data (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
• Haladyna, T. M., Downing, S. M. & Rodriguez, M. C. (2002). A review of multiplechoice item-writing guidelines for classroom assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 15(3), 309-334.
• Kabitsis, C. & Charachousou-Kabitsi, Y. (1993). Research Methods in Sports Sciences.
• Statistical Analysis - Evaluation. Thessaloniki: Meandros. Kerres, M. & De Witt, C. (2003). A didactical framework for the design of blended learning arrangements. Journal of Educational Media, 28(2/3), 101–113.
• Larson, D., K. & Sung, C., H. (2009). Comparing Student Performance: Online versus
• Blended versus Face-to-Face, Journal of Asynchornous Learning Networks, 13(1), 31-42. Laurillard, D., 2002. Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies, second ed. Routledge Falmer, London.
• Macedo-Rouet, M., Ney, M., Charles, S. & Lallich-Boidin, G. (2009). Students’ performance and satisfaction with Web vs. paper-based practice quizzes and lecture notes. Computers &
• Education, 53(2), 375-384. Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360131509000633
• McFarlin, B. K. (2008). Hybrid lecture-online format increases student grades in an undergraduate exercise physiology course at a large urban university. Advances in
• Physiology Education, 32, 86-91. Retrieved May 21 2010, from http://advan.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/32/1/86?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10
• &RESULTFORMAT=&author1=McFarlin&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&sortspec=relevance &resourcetype=HWCIT Melton B., Graf H. & Chopak-Foss J. (2009). Achievement and Satisfaction in Blended
• Learning versus Traditional General Health Course Designs. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(1), http://www.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl Mood, D. P. (1989). Measurement Methodology for Knowledge Tests. In M.J. Safrit & T.M.
• Wood (Eds.), Measurement Concepts in Physical Education and Exercise Science (pp. 251- 269). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. NASPE. (2007). Initial guidelines for online physical education [Position paper]. Reston, VA: Author.
• O’Donnell, A. M., Hmelo-Silver, C. & Erkens, G. (2006). Collaborative, learning, reasoning, and technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Pereira, J., Pleguezuelos, E., Meri, A., Molina-Ros, A., Molina-Tomas, M. & Masdeu, C. (2007). Effectiveness of using blended learning strategies for teaching and learning in human anatomy. Medical Education, 41 (2), 189-195.
• Picciano, A. G. (2009). Blending with purpose: The multimodal model. Journal of asynchronous learning networks, 13 (1), 7-18.
• Reasons, S. G. (2004). Hybrid courses: hidden dangers? Distance Education. Report, 8(7), 3–
• Safrit, M. J. & Wood, T. M. (1995). Introduction to Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. (3rd ed). USA: Mc Graw-Hill.
• Salomon, G. & Ben-Zvi, D. (2006). The difficult marriage between education and technology: Is the marriage doomed? In M. Boekaerts, F. D. L. Verschaffel, & S. Vosniadou
• (Eds.). Instructional psychology: Past, present and future trends: Essays in honor of Erik De Corte (pp. 209–222). Elsevier. So, H.-J. & Brush, T. A (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51, 318-336.
• Sparrow, L., Sparrow, H. & Swan, P. (2000). Student centred learning: Is it possible? In A.
• Herrmann & M.M. Kulski (Eds.), Flexible Futures in Tertiary Teaching. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, 2-4 February 2000. Perth: Curtin University of
• Technology. Available http://cleo.murdoch.edu.au/confs/tlf/tlf2000/sparrow.html.
• Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge.
• Cambridge, MA: MIT press. Thomas, J. R. & Nelson, J. K. (1996). Research methods in physical activity. (3rd ed.).
• Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Twigg, C. A. (2003). Improving learning and reducing costs: New models for online learning. EDUCAUSE Review, 38(5), 28–38.
• Vernadakis, N., Antoniou, P., Giannousi, M., Zetou, E. & Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2011).
• Comparing hybrid learning with traditional approaches on learning the Microsoft Office Power Point 2003 program in tertiary education. Computers & Education, 56(1), 188-199.
• Zachopoulou, E. (2007). Physical education at the beginning of the 21st Century: Goals,
• Objectives, aims in the Early Childhood. Thessaloniki: Christodoulides Editions.