NOTE FOR EDITOR: Self-Efficacy Beliefs, Achievement Motivation 
And Gender As Related To Educational Software Development

This study aims to investigate preservice computer teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and achievement motivation levels for educational software development before and after the “Educational Software Design, Development and Evaluation (ESDDE)” course. A pretest and post test design without a control group was employed. In 2008, 46 senior students (25 male and 21 female) who were enrolled at Computer Education and Instructional Technology department participated in this study. The data were collected by the scale of self-efficacy beliefs towards Educational Software Development (ESD), achievement motivation scale besides student demographics form. Positively, the results revealed that the students’ self efficacy beliefs towards educational software development significantly improved after ESDDE course. Before the course, the students’ self-efficacy beliefs were significantly different according to perceived level of programming competency and gender in favor of male, however after the course there was no significant difference in self-efficacy beliefs regarding gender and perceived level of programming competency. Hence, achievement motivation levels after the course were significantly higher than before while gender and perceived level of programming competency had no significant effect on achievement motivation for ESD. The study is considered to contribute studies investigating gender and computer related self efficacy beliefs in IT education.

___

  • Askar, P. & Umay, A. ( 2001). Perceived computer self-efficacy of the students in the elementary mathematics teaching programme. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 21,1-8.
  • Askar, P. & Dönmez, O.(2004). A self-efficacy scale for educational software development. Educational Science and Practice, 6(3), 259-274.
  • Bandura, A. (1989). Human Agency in Social Cognitive Theory. American Psychologist, (9), 1175-1184.
  • Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998).
  • Bandura, A. & Lock, E.A. (2003). Negative Self-Efficacy and Goal Effects Revisited.
  • Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (1), 87-99. Barretto, S.F.A., Piazzalunga, R., Ribeiro, V.G. , Dalla, M.B.C. and Filho, R.M.L. (2003).
  • Combining interactivity and improved layout while creating educational software for the Web. Computers & Education, 40 (2003), 271–284.
  • Borich, G. D. (2007). Effective teaching methods: Research based practice. Sixth edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Bozanoglu, I. (2004). Academic Motivation Scale: Development, Reliability,
  • Validity. Ankara University, Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 37 (2), 83-98. Cakmak, M. & Ercan, L. (2006). Views of Experienced and Student Teachers about
  • Motivation in Effective Teaching Process. Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 26 (3),133-143. Demirer, V., Ozdinç, F. & Sahin, I. (2009). Computer teacher candidates‘ self-efficacy for educational software development. In Proceedings of the 9th International
  • Educational Technology Conference (IETC2009), Ankara, Turkey, 435-441.
  • Imer, G. & Ozkilic, R. (2009). Self-Efficacy Of Teacher Trainees Toward Educational
  • Software Development. E-Journal of New World Science Academy,4,2. Kurbanoglu, S. S. (2003).Self-efficacy: a concept closely linked to information literacy and lifelong learning‖, Journal of Documentation, 59 (6), 635-646.
  • Marshall, G. (1998). A Dictionary of Sociology. UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Meelissen, M. R. M., & Drent, M. (2008). Gender differencies in computer attitudes:
  • Does the school matter?. Computers in Human Behavior, 24 (3), 969-985. Ortaçtepe, D. (2006). The relationship between teacher efficacy and professional development within the scope of an in-service teacher education program. Unpublished master thesis. Institute of Social Sciences, Boğaziçi University, Turkey.
  • Smith, R.S. (2001). Interface Design for Educational Multimedia I. Retrieved August , 2008, from http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/~iacc/IDEMM1.pdf .
  • Umay, A. (2002). Level of achivement motivation of mathematics teacher candidates, change of achievement motivation and factors effects this change, Hacettepe
  • University Journal of Education, 22, 148-155. Volman, M. & van Eck, E. (2001). Gender equality and information technology in education: The second decade. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 613-634.
  • Whitley, B. E. (1997). Gender differences in computer-related attitudes and behavior: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 13(1), 1–22.