Engagement in Distance Education Settings: A Trend Analysis
This study examined studies focusing on student engagement in distance education using a trend analysis technique. 154 studies published in web of science database were included in the study. Analysis showed that there is an increasing effort to understand student engagement. Researchers are mostly focusing on instructional design and educational technology. More effort is needed in the area of distance education systems and theories. The findings offer support for Chickering and Gamson’s Seven Principles of Good Practice as important in promoting student engagement in distance education. However, six new components were added to these principles: media properties, student characteristics, teaching method, course/content design, innovative techniques, and instructor competencies.
___
- Adwan, J. (2016). Dynamic online peer evaluations to improve group assignments in nursing e-learning
environment. Nurse Education Today, 41, 67-72. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.028
Anadolu University (2017). Retrieved June 04, 2017 from https://www.anadolu.edu.tr/universitemiz/
sayilarla-universitemiz/ogrenci-sayilari/2016-2017-ogrenci-sayilari/haziran-2017
Andrew, L., Ewens, B., Maslin-Prothero, S.. (2015). Enhancing the online learning experience using virtual
interactive classrooms. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 22. Retrieved June 05, 2017
from http://www.ajan.com.au/Vol32/Issue4/3Andrew.pdf
Armellini, A., & Aiyegbayo, O. (2010). Learning design and assessment with e‐tivities. British Journal of
Educational Technology, 41(6), 922-935. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01013.x
Bernat, F., & Frailing, K. (2015). Perfecting lessons learned for criminal justice online graduate education:
Reflection, integration, and application. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 26(3), 330-353. do
i:10.1080/10511253.2015.1036090
Bolliger, D. U., & Halupa, C. (2018). Online student perceptions of engagement, transactional distance,
and outcomes. Distance Education, 1-18, 299-316. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2018.1476845
Boston, W. E., Ice, P., & Gibson, A. M. (2011). Comprehensive assessment of student retention in online
learning environments. School of Arts and Humanities. Retrieved June 07, 2017 from https://
digitalcommons.apus.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=facultySAH
Boyle, F., Kwon, J., Ross, C., & Simpson, O. (2010). Student–student mentoring for retention and engagement
in distance education. Open Learning, 25(2), 115-130. doi:10.1080/02680511003787370
Bozkurt, A., Kumtepe, E. G., Kumtepe, A. T., Aydin, I. E., Bozkaya, M., & Aydin, C. H. (2015). Research
trends in Turkish distance education: A content analysis of dissertations, 1986-2014. European
Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 18(2), 1-21. doi:10.1515/eurodl-2015-0010
Brinton, C. G., Rill, R., Ha, S., Chiang, M., Smith, R., & Ju, W. (2015). Individualization for education at
scale: MIIC design and preliminary evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 8(1),
136-148. doi:10.1109/TLT.2014.2370635
Carpenter, S., Reddix, R., & Martin, D. (2016). Pills, thrills, and pharmacology drills! Strategies to increase
student retention in an entry-level nursing pharmacology course. Teaching and Learning in Nursing,
11(4), 179-183. doi:10.1016/j.teln.2016.04.002
117
Chae, S. E., & Shin, J. H. (2016). Tutoring styles that encourage learner satisfaction, academic engagement,
and achievement in an online environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1371-1385.
doi:10.1080/10494820.2015.1009472
Chen, J., Luo, N., Liu, Y., Liu, L., Zhang, K., & Kolodziej, J. (2016). A hybrid intelligence-aided approach
to affect-sensitive e-learning. Computing, 98(1-2), 215-233. doi:10.1007/s00607-014-0430-9
Chen, P. S. D., Gonyea, R., & Kuh, G. (2008). Learning at a distance: Engaged or not?. Innovate: Journal
of Online Education, 4(3), 3. Retrieved April 10, 2017 from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/
viewcontent.cgi?article=1058&context=innovate
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education.
AAHE bulletin, 3, 7. Retrieved February 08, 2017 from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED282491.
pdf
Chickering, A. W., & Ehrmann, S. C. (1996). Implementing the seven principles: Technology as lever.
AAHE Bulletin (October), 3–6. Retrieved February 08, 2017 from http://sphweb.bumc.bu.edu/
otlt/teachingLibrary/Technology/seven_principles.pdf
Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational technology research and development,
42(2), 21-29. doi:10.1007/BF02299088
Clark, S. E. (1995). The generation effect and the modeling of associations in memory. Memory & Cognition,
23(4), 442-455. doi:10.3758/BF03197245
Cochran, J. D., Campbell, S. M., Baker, H. M., & Leeds, E. M. (2014). The role of student characteristics in
predicting retention in online courses. Research in Higher Education, 55(1), 27-48. doi:10.1007/
s11162-013-9305-8
Conway, S. E., Johnson, J. L., & Ripley, T. L. (2010). Integration of team-based learning strategies into
a cardiovascular module. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 74(2), 35. doi:10.5688/
aj740235
Costas, R., & van Bochove, C. (2012, Sep). On the relationship between author collaboration and impact of
scientific publications. Paper presented at 17th international conference on science and technology
indicators, Canada.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. California:
Sage.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. Retrieved January
11, 2017 from http://www.worldcat.org/title/finding-flow-the-psychology-of-engagement-witheveryday-life/oclc/316021272/viewport
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of
Rochester Press. Retrieved January 07, 2017 from http://www.worldcat.org/title/handbook-ofself-determination-research/oclc/249185072/viewport
Franklin, J. (1999). Structure and domain-independence in the formal sciences. Studies in History and
Philosophy of Sciences, 30(4), 721–723. doi: 10.1016/S0039-3681(99)00022-9
Fukuzawa, S., & Boyd, C. (2016). Student engagement in a large classroom: using technology to generate a
hybridized problem-based learning experience in a large first year undergraduate class. Canadian
Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 7. doi:10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2016.1.7
George-Walker, L. D., & Keeffe, M. (2010). Self‐determined blended learning: a case study of blended learning
design. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(1), 1-13. doi:10.1080/07294360903277380
Goktas, Y., Kucuk, S., Aydemir, M., Telli, E., Arpacik, O., Yildirim, G., & Reisoglu, I. (2012). Educational
technology research trends in Turkey: A content analysis of the 2000-2009 decade. Educational
Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(1), 191-199. Retrieved June 13, 2017 from http://www.kuyeb.
com/pdf/en/8ecf88b0ec56544a81b24731d44b685610b.pdf
118
Gregory, S., & Masters, Y. (2012). Real thinking with virtual hats: A role-playing activity for pre-service
teachers in Second Life. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(3). doi:10.14742/
ajet.843
Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, T. C. (2003). Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning
environments. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1). doi:10.14742/ajet.1701
Hew, K. F., Huang, B., Chu, K. W. S., & Chiu, D. K. (2016). Engaging Asian students through game
mechanics: Findings from two experiment studies. Computers & Education, 92, 221-236.
doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.010
Hung, J. L., & Zhang, K. (2012). Examining mobile learning trends 2003–2008: A categorical meta-trend
analysis using text mining techniques. Journal of Computing in Higher education, 24(1), 1-17.
doi:10.1007/s12528-011-9044-9
Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: A review of
publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. British Journal of Educational Technology,
42(4). doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01183.x
Karatas, S., Ozcan, S., Polat, E., Yilmaz, Y., & Topuz, A. C. (2014). Trends in Distance Education: Theories
and Methods. Handbook of Research on Emerging Priorities and Trends in Distance Education:
Communication, Pedagogy, and Technology: Communication, Pedagogy, and Technology, 141.
Karatas, S., Bagriacik-Yilmaz, A., Dikmen, C. H., Ermis, U. F., Gurbuz, O. (2017). Interaction in Distance
Education Environments: A Trend Analysis. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 18(1), 63-82.
Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching
and learning. Educational technology, 38(5), 20-23.
Kilic-Cakmak, E., Kukul, V., Cetin, E., Berikan, B., Kandemir, B., Pamukcu, B. S., Taskin, N., & Marangoz,
M. (2015). 2013 yili egitim teknolojileri arastirmalarinin incelenmesi: AJET, BJET, C&E, ETRD,
ETS ve L&I dergileri. Egitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 5(1), 128-160. doi:10.17943/
etku.17190
Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of educational research, 61(2), 179-211.
Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational technology research
and development, 42(2), 7-19. doi:10.1007/BF02299087
Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE: Benchmarks for
effective educational practices. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 35(2), 24-32.
doi:10.1080/00091380309604090
Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal
of College Student Development, 50(6), 683–706. Retrieved January 12, 2017 from https://eric.
ed.gov/?id=EJ868898
Kuiper, A., Solomonides, I., & Hardy, L. (2015). Time on task in intensive modes of delivery. Distance
Education, 36(2), 231-245. doi:10.1080/01587919.2015.1055058
Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics,
33, 159-174. doi:10.2307/2529310
Kumar, S. S., & Shastry, P. M. (2019). Analysis of Student Engagement and Course Completion in Massive
Open Online Courses. In Integrated Intelligent Computing, Communication and Security (pp. 447-
458). Singapore: Springer.
Lee, L. (2016). Autonomous learning through task-based instruction in fully online language courses.
Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 81-97. Retrieved June 08, 2017 from http://llt.msu.edu/
issues/june2016/lee.pdf
Ma, J., Han, X., Yang, J., & Cheng, J. (2015). Examining the necessary condition for engagement in an
online learning environment based on learning analytics approach: The role of the instructor. The
Internet and Higher Education, 24, 26-34. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.09.005
119
Maisonneuve, H., Chambe, J., Lorenzo, M., & Pelaccia, T. (2015). How do general practice residents use
social networking sites in asynchronous distance learning?. BMC medical education, 15(1), 154.
doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0435-x
Martin, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., & Budhrani, K. (2017). Systematic review of two decades (1995 to 2014)
of research on synchronous online learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 31(1), 3-19.
doi:10.1080/08923647.2017.1264807
Martin, F. & Bolliger, D.U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of
engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning 22(1), 205-222.
doi:10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
Matthews, K. E., Andrews, V., & Adams, P. (2011). Social learning spaces and student engagement. Higher
Education Research & Development, 30(2), 105-120. doi:10.1080/07294360.2010.512629
Mehvar, R. (2010). A participation requirement to engage students in a pharmacokinetics course
synchronously taught at a local and distant campus. American journal of pharmaceutical education,
74(7), 118. doi:10.5688/aj7407118
Moore II, E., Utschig, T. T., Haas, K. A., Klein, B., Yoder, P. D., Zhang, Y., & Hayes, M. H. (2008). Tablet
PC technology for the enhancement of synchronous distributed education. IEEE Transactions on
Learning Technologies, 1(2), 105-116. doi:10.1109/TLT.2008.19
Neumann, D. L., & Hood, M. (2009). The effects of using a wiki on student engagement and learning of
report writing skills in a university statistics course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,
25(3). doi:10.14742/ajet.1141
Northey, G., Bucic, T., Chylinski, M., & Govind, R. (2015). Increasing student engagement using asynchronous
learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 37(3), 171-180. doi:10.1177/0273475315589814
NSSE, (2017). About NSSE. Retrieved May 10, 2017 from http://nsse.indiana.edu/html/about.cfm
Park, J. H., Schallert, D. L., Sanders, A. J., Williams, K. M., Seo, E., Yu, L. T., Vogler, J. S., ... & Knox, M.
C. (2015). Does it matter if the teacher is there?: A teacher’s contribution to emerging patterns of
interactions in online classroom discussions. Computers & Education, 82, 315-328. doi:10.1016/j.
compedu.2014.11.019
Pascarella, E. T., and Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Prior, D. D., Mazanov, J., Meacheam, D., Heaslip, G., & Hanson, J. (2016). Attitude, digital literacy and
self efficacy: Flow-on effects for online learning behavior. The Internet and Higher Education, 29,
91-97. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.01.001
Protsiv, M., Rosales-Klintz, S., Bwanga, F., Zwarenstein, M., & Atkins, S. (2016). Blended learning across
universities in a South–North–South collaboration: a case study. Health research policy and systems,
14(1), 67. doi:10.1186/s12961-016-0136-x
Rienties, B., Lewis, T., McFarlane, R., Nguyen, Q., & Toetenel, L. (2018). Analytics in online and offline
language learning environments: the role of learning design to understand student online engagement.
Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(3), 273-293, doi: 10.1080/09588221.2017.1401548
Shneiderman, B., Alavi, M., Norman, K., & Borkowski, E. Y. (1995). Windows of opportunity in electronic
classrooms. Communications of the ACM, 38(11), 19-24. doi:10.1145/219717.219725
Simpson, O. (2013). Student retention in distance education: are we failing our students?. Open Learning:
The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 28(2), 105-119. doi:10.1080/02680513.2013.847
363
Snodgrass, S. (2011). Wiki activities in blended learning for health professional students: Enhancing critical
thinking and clinical reasoning skills. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(4).
doi:10.14742/ajet.938
120
Stebbings, S., Bagheri, N., Perrie, K., & Blyth, P. (2012). Blended learning and curriculum renewal across
three medical schools: The rheumatology module at the University of Otago. Australasian Journal
of Educational Technology, 28(7). doi:10.14742/ajet.795
Sutherland, L., Howard, S., & Markauskaite, L. (2010). Professional identity creation: Examining the
development of beginning preservice teachers’ understanding of their work as teachers. Teaching
and teacher education, 26(3), 455-465. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.006
Tan, M., & Hew, K. F. (2016). Incorporating meaningful gamification in a blended learning research
methods class: Examining student learning, engagement, and affective outcomes. Australasian
Journal of Educational Technology, 32(5). doi:10.14742/ajet.2232
Thoms, B., & Eryilmaz, E. (2014). How media choice affects learner interactions in distance learning classes.
Computers & Education, 75, 112-126. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.002
Toven-Lindsey, B., Rhoads, R. A., & Lozano, J. B. (2015). Virtually unlimited classrooms: Pedagogical
practices in massive open online courses. The internet and higher education, 24, 1-12. doi:
doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.07.001
Tower, M., Walker, R., Wilson, K., Watson, B., & Tronoff, G. (2015). Engaging, supporting and retaining
academic at-risk students in a Bachelor of Nursing: Setting risk markers, interventions and
outcomes. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 6(1), 121. doi:10.5204/
intjfyhe.v6i1.251
Tsai, C. W. (2015). The effect of online co-regulated learning in the implementation of team-based learning
on improving students’ involvement. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(6), 1270-
1280. doi:10.1080/07294360.2015.1024631
van Oordt, T., & Mulder, I. (2016). Implementing basic e-learning tools into an undergraduate taxation
curriculum. Meditari Accountancy Research, 24(3), 341-367. doi:10.1108/MEDAR-08-2015-0054
Wanner, R. A., Lewis, L. S., & Gregorio, D. I. (1981). Research productivity in academia: a comparative
study of the sciences, social sciences and humanities. Sociology of Education, 54(4), 238–253. doi:
10.2307/2112566
Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2015). Personalising learning: Exploring student and teacher perceptions about
flexible learning and assessment in a flipped university course. Computers & Education, 88, 354-
369. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.008
Williams, K. M., Stafford, R. E., Corliss, S. B., & Reilly, E. D. (2018). Examining student characteristics,
goals, and engagement in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education, 126, 433-442,
doi: /10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.014
Wu, W. H., Wu, Y. C. J., Chen, C. Y., Kao, H. Y., Lin, C. H., & Huang, S. H. (2012). Review of trends from
mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 59(2), 817-827. doi:10.1016/j.
compedu.2012.03.016
Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yontemleri (Qualitative research methods
in social sciences). Ankara: Seckin.
Xie, K. (2013). What do the numbers say? The influence of motivation and peer feedback on students’
behaviour in online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 288-301.
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01291.x
Zawacki-Richter, O., Backer, E. M., & Vogt, S. (2009). Review of distance education research (2000 to
2008): Analysis of research areas, methods, and authorship patterns. The International Review of
Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(6), 21-50. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v10i6.741
Zawacki‐Richter, O., & von Prummer, C. (2010). Gender and collaboration patterns in distance education
research. Open Learning, 25(2), 95-114. doi:10.1080/02680511003787297