EDUCATION 4.0: DEFINING THE TEACHER, THE STUDENT, AND THE SCHOOL MANAGER ASPECTS OF THE REVOLUTION
In this research, it is aimed to determine the school managers’, teachers’ and students’ characteristics of Education 4.0 according to opinions of educational experts. The study, which is a qualitative one, was designed by using basic qualitative research model. Participants of the study consisted of 10 faculty members, selected with snowball sampling method. Data of the study was collected via semi-structured interview form. To analyze data, content analysis technique will be used. It is expected to operationalize Education 4.0 revolution in education system for the case of Turkish Education System. According to findings, open access, individualized education, mental transformation, integration of digital technologies to education, seamless learning environments, lifelong learning, exploratory education and multidisciplinary education are the main components defining Education 4.0. It was found that the main qualities expected from the students of Education 4.0 are cooperation-communication skills, technological skills, learning skills and personal characteristics. The main qualifications expected from the teachers of Education 4.0 are technological skills, guidance skills, lifelong learning skills and personal characteristics. Lastly, the main qualifications expected from the school managers of Education 4.0 are guidance skills, technological skills, learning skills and technical skills.
___
- Abersek, B., & Flogie, A. (2017). Evolution of competences for new era or education 4.0. In XXV Conference
of Czech Educational Research Association (CERA/CAPV)“Impact of Technologies in the Sphere of
Education and Educational Research”, Czech.
- Anggraeni, C. W. (2018). Promoting Education 4.0 in English for survival class: What are the challenges?.
Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 2(1), 12-24.
- Ballantyne, N., Wong, Y. C. ve Morgan, G. (2017). Human services and the fourth industrial revolution:
From husITa 1987 to husITa 2016. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 35(1), 1-7.
- Basar, H. (1993). Egitim denetcisi: Roller, yeterlikleri, secilmesi, yetistirilmesi (2. Baski). Ankara: PEGEM.
- Benesova, A., & Tupa, J. (2017). Requirements for education and qualification of people in Industry 4.0.
Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 2195-2202.
- Blinder, A. P. (2006). Offshoring: The next industrial revolution?. Foreign Affairs, 85(2), 113-128.
27
- Bloem, J., Van Doorn, M., Duivestein, P., Excoffier, D., Maas, R. & Van Ommeren, E. (2014). The fourth
industrial revolution. Things to tighten the link between IT and OT. SOGETI: VINT Research
Report 3 of 4.
- Buyukozturk, S., Cakmak, E.K., Akgun, O.E., Karadeniz, S., Demirel, F. (2011). Bilimsel arastirma
yontemleri (10. Baski). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
- Ciolacu, M., Tehrani, A. F., Beer, R., & Popp, H. (2017). Education 4.0—Fostering student’s performance
with machine learning methods. In 2017 IEEE 23rd International Symposium for Design and
Technology in Electronic Packaging (SIITME) (pp. 438-443). IEEE.
- Collins, A. & Halverson, R. (2010). The second educational revolution: Rethinking education in the age of
technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 18-27.
- Cagiltay, K., Yildirim, S., Aslan, I., Gok, A., Gurel, G., Karakus, T., Saltan, F., Uzun, E., Ulgen, E., & Yildiz,
I. (2007). Ogretim teknolojilerinin universitede kullanimina yonelik aliskanliklar ve beklentiler:
Betimleyici bir calisma. Akademik Bilisim’07 - IX. Akademik Bilisim Konferansi Bildirileri, Kutahya,
Dumlupinar Universitesi.
- Drath, R. & Horch, A. (2014). Industrie 4.0: Hit or hype? [industry forum]. IEEE Industrial Electronics
Magazine, 8(2), 56-58.
- Galetta, A. (2013). Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and
publication. New York, USA: New York University Press.
- Garrison, D. R. & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher
education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105.
- Gogebakan-Yildiz, D., Kiyici, G. & Altintas, G. (2016). Ters-yuz edilmis sinif modelinin ogretmen
adaylarinin elestirileri ve gorusleri acisindan incelenmesi. Sakarya University Journal of Education
6(3), 186-200.
- Gulicheva, E., Lisin, E., Osipova, M., & Khabdullin, A. (2017). Leading factors in the formation of
innovative education environment. Journal of International Studies Vol, 10(2), 129-137.
- Hariharasudan, A., & Kot, S. (2018). A scoping review on Digital English and Education 4.0 for Industry
4.0. Social Sciences, 7(11), 227, 1-13.
- Harkins, A. M. (2008). Leapfrog principles and practices: Core components of education 3.0 and 4.0.
Futures Research Quarterly, 24(1), 19-31.
- Hermann, M., Pentek, T. ve Otto, B. (2016). Design principles for industrie 4.0 scenariop. 49th Hawaii
International Conference on System Sciences (p. 3928-3937). IEEE.
- Hussin, A. A. (2018). Education 4.0 made simple: Ideas for teaching. International Journal of Education and
Literacy Studies, 6(3), 92-98.
- Kilic, T. (2018). Hezarfen egitim modeli. Istanbul: AZ Kitap.
- Krefting, L. (1991). Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. American Journal of
Occupational Therapy, 45, 214-222.
- Larson, L. C., & Miller, T. N. (2011). 21st century skills: Prepare students for the future. Kappa Delta Pi
Record, 47(3), 121-123.
- McComas, W. F. (Ed.). (2014). The language of science education: An expanded glossary of key terms and
concepts in science teaching and learning. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publisher.
- Merriam, P. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (2nd Ed.). San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
- Miles, B. M. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An extended sourcebook (2nd Edition).
Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.
- Moravec, J. W. (2008). Moving beyond Education 2.0. https://www2.educationfutures.com/blog/2008/02/
moving-beyond-education-20/ adresinden 15.04.2020 tarihinde edinilmistir.
- Moravec, J.W. (2013). Rethinking human capital development in Knowmad Society, J.W. Moravec (Ed.),
Knowmad society (31-56) icinde, Minneapolis, MN: Education Futurep.
- Partnership for 21st Century Skills-P21. (2009). P21 framework definitions. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/
ED519462.pdf adresinden 15.04.2020 tarihinde edinilmistir.
- Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel arastirma ve degerlendirme yontemleri (3. Baskidan Ceviri). (Cev. Ed. M. Butun
ve P.B. Demir). Ankara: Pegem akademi.
- Peters, M. A. (2017). Technological unemployment: Educating for the fourth industrial revolution. Journal
of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 5(1), 32-41.
- Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
- Puncreobutr, V. (2016). Education 4.0: New challenge of learning. St. Theresa Journal of Humanities and
Social Sciences, 2(2), 92-97.
- Salmon, G. (2019). May the fourth be with you: Creating Education 4.0. Journal of Learning for Development-
JL4D, 6(2), 95-115.
- Scanga, D. (2004). Technology competencies for school administrators. Unpublished Dissertation of Doctor of
Philosophy. Florida, USA: South Florida University.
- Sendov, B. (1987). Education for an information age. Impact of Science on Society, 37(2), 193-201.
- Trilling, B. & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco, USA: John
Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Turan, S. (2002). Teknolojinin okul yonetiminde etkin kullaniminda egitim yoneticisinin rolu. Kuram ve
Uygulamada Egitim Yonetimi, 30(30), 271-281.
- Wallner, T. & Wagner, G. (2016). Academic education 4.0. Proceedings of the international conference on
education and new developments END 2016 icinde (pp. 155-159). Ljubljana, Slovenia, 12–14
Haziran 2016.
- Weng, C. H. & Tang, Y. (2014). The relationship between technology leadership strategies and effectiveness
of school administration: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 76, 91-107.
- World Economic Forum. (2017). ASEAN 4.0: What does the Fourth Industrial Revolutaion mean for
regional economic integration? https://www.adb.org/publications/asean-fourth-industrialrevolution-
regional-economic-integration adresinden 05.03.2018 tarihinde edinilmistir.
- Yaman, F., & Yazar, T. (2015). Ogretmenlerin yasam boyu ogrenme egilimlerinin incelenmesi: Diyarbakir ili
ornegi. Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi, 23(4), 1553-1566.
- Yildirim, A., Simsek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yontemleri (8. Tipki Basim). Ankara: Seckin
Yayincilik.
- Yildiz-Aybek, H. P. (2017). Universite 4.0’a gecis sureci: Kavramsal bir yaklasim. Acikogretim Uygulamalari
ve Arastirmalari Dergisi, 3(2), 164-176.
- Youngkin, C. A. (2014). The flipped classroom: practices and opportunities for health sciences librarians.
Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 33(4), 367-374.