Developing A MOOC Initiative: Lessons Learned from the Universitat Politècnica de València Experience
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia (UPV) was the European institution with more MOOC course runs done by December 2016. This paper describes and analyses the decision-making process, and rationale of the development of this low budget real MOOC institutional initiative carried out by a traditional higher educational medium sized institution. This analysis is done using an Evaluative Research (ER) method based on an iterative approach of 6 cycles of formative evaluation. It has been a multiple stage process that includes many aspects. In this paper, we will analyze two of them: the creation, organization and management of a fast and cheap MOOC production process, including the several tools, plans, and procedures that have enabled UPV to create courses fast and with a low-cost; and the technical evolution of the initiative, with the different platforms that have been used. As a consequence of this process, UPV has its own platform (upvx.es) based on openedX and is a member of edx.org, with 50 courses, 177 editions, and more than 632.000 enrollments. The completion rate is 8.69%, and post-course surveys reveal a high level of satisfaction from students. The paper will finish addressing the challenges of making this an entirely self-sustainable initiative and reflecting about what is required for evaluating this experience globally.
___
- Abeer, W. & Miri B. (2014). Students' preferences and views about learning in a MOOC.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 152 (2014), 318-323.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.203
Despujol, I. (2014, February 13). Servicios TIC de apoyo a la docencia. Universitat
Politecnica de Valencia. Retrieved from http://es.slideshare.net/ndespujol/
presentacin-global-servicios-mmedia-asic-2014
Despujol, I., Turro C., Busquets J., & Canero A. (2014). Analysis of demographics and
results of student’s opinion survey of a large scale MOOC deployment for the
Spanish speaking community. Proceedings of Frontiers in education conference
2014, Madrid, 1-8. DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2014.7044102
Despujol, I., Turro C., Orts J., & Busquets J. (2015). Sizing an on premises MOOC
Platform: Experiences and tests using Open edX. Proceedings of EMOOCs 2015,
Mons, 97-101.
Bartolomé-Pina, A. R., & Steffens, K. (2015). Are MOOCs promising learning
environments? Comunicar, 22(44), 91-99 DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C44-
2015-10
Bates, A. W. (2015). Teaching in a digital age. BC Open Textbooks Project.
Bulfin, S., Pangrazio, L., & Selwyn, N. (2014). Making MOOCs: The construction of a new
digital higher education within news media discourse. The International Review
of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 290-305 DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1856
Caceres-Gonzalez, P., & Martinez-Naharro, S. (2011). Memoria del plan docencia en red
2007-2011. Retrieved from: http://www.upv.es/contenidos/DOCENRED/
infoweb/docenred/info/U0702930.pdf
Caceres-Gonzalez, P., & Martinez-Naharro, S. (2014). Guia para la creacion de cursos
MOOC. Retrieved from http://www.upv.es/contenidos/DOCENRED/
infoweb/docenred/info/U0711219.pdf
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education. Routledge.
Conole, G. (2013). MOOCs as disruptive technologies: strategies for enhancing the learner
experience and quality of MOOCs, Revista de Educacion a Distancia, vol. 39, no.
1–17, 2013.
Conole, G. (2014). A new classification schema for MOOCs. The International Journal for
Innovation and Quality in Learning, 2(3), 65-77. https://goo.gl/bL4GwN
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five
approaches. London: Sage publications.
Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and
possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education 2012(3), p.Art. 18. DOI
http://doi.org/10.5334/2012-18
Denscombe, M. (2010). Ground Rules for Good Research: Guidelines for Good Practice.
New York, NY: McGraw Hill - Open University Press.
Downes, S. (2009, April 25). New technology supporting informal learning. Retrieved
from http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2009/04/new-technology-supportinginformal.html
EdX and World’s Top Universities Launch MicroMasters Programs: New Master’s-Level
Credentials to Advance Careers in the Most In-Demand Fields. (2016, September
20). Retrieved from https://www.edx.org/press/edx-worlds-top-universitieslaunch
231
El-Hmoudova, D. (2014). MOOCs Motivation and Communication in the Cyber Learning
Environment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 131 (2014), 29-34.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.074
Elpeboin, Y. (2016). MOOCs: searching for a viable business model. Proceedings of EUNIS
2016, Thesaloniki, 297-311. http://www.eunis.org/eunis2016/wpcontent/uploads/sites/8/2016/02/EUNIS2016_paper_12.pdf
European MOOC scoreboard 2015. (2015). Open Education Europa. Retrieved from
http://openeducationeuropa.eu/sites/default/files/images/scoreboard/Scorebo
ard_December_2015.png
Fin de la primera edicion de cursos - cifras remarcables. (2013, April 4th). MiriadaX.
Retrieved from https://goo.gl/DQwyfD
Fitzgerald, M. (2013, June 5). EdX Goes Open Source To Woo MOOC Developers. Retrieved
from http://www.informationweek.com/software/edx-goes-open-source-towoo-mooc-developers/d/d-id/1110257
Google Cloud Platform Quotas. (2016). Retrieved from https://cloud.google.com/
appengine/docs/quotas#Safety_Quotas_and_Billable_Quotas
Grundy, S. (1982). Three modes of action research. Curriculum perspectives, 2(3), 23-34.
Haggard, S., Brown, S., Mills, R., Tait, A., Warburton, S., Lawton, W., & Angulo, T. (2013).
The Maturing of the MOOC: literature review of massive open online courses and
other forms of online distance learning. London. Department for Business,
Innovation and Skills, UK Government.
Harrison, L. (2013, August). Open UToronto MOOC Initiative: Report on First Year of
Activity. Retrieved from http://www.ocw.utoronto.ca/wpcontent/uploads/2013/08/Open-Utoronto-MOOC-Report-August-2013.pdf
- Hollands, F. M., & Tirthali, D. (2014). MOOCs: expectations and reality. Full report. New
York, NY: Center for Benefit Cost Studies of Education, Teachers College,
Columbia University, NY.
I premio MECD- telefonica L.S.-Universia al mejor curso online masivo en abierto (mooc)
de la plataforma miriada X (2012). MiriadaX. Retrieved from
https://goo.gl/F9NdxY
Kevat, P. (2014, February). Open2Study Research Report. February 2014 (cohorts 1-7).
Retrieved from https://www.open2study.com/research/download/819
Lane, L. (2012, August 15). Three Kinds of MOOCs, Lisa’s (Online) Teaching Blog.
Retrieved from http://lisahistory.net/wordpress/2012/08/three-kinds-ofmoocs/
Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic
study of the published literature 2008-2012. The International Review of
Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202-227. Retrieved from
http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1455/2531
Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of massive open
online courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80, 77-83. DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in education : A conceptual
introduction (Fifth ed.). New York: Longman
Mukta G. (2015). How to bring less educated learners to MOOCs. Retrieved from:
http://blog.edx.org/how-bring-less-educated-learners-moocs
Newby, P. A. (2014). Research methods for education (second ed.). New York: Routledge
232
O’Connor, K. (2014). MOOCs, institutional policy and change dynamics in higher
education. Higher Education, 68(5), 623-635. DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9735-z
Objetos de aprendizaje Riunet (2017). Universitat Politecnica de Valencia. Retrieved
from: https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/192
Pedreno, A., Moreno, L., Ramon, A. B., & Pernias, P. A. (2015). The crisis of the current
model. MOOCs and search for a business. Campus Virtuales, 2(2), 54-65
http://www.uajournals.com/campusvirtuales/journal/3/4.pdf
Raffaghelli, J. E., Cucchiara, S., & Persico, D. (2015). Methodological approaches in MOOC
research: Retracing the myth of proteus. British Journal of Educational
Technology, 46(3), 488-509. doi:10.1111/bjet.1227
Rodriguez, C. O. (2012). MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like courses: Two successful and
distinct course formats for massive open online courses. European Journal of
Open, Distance and E-Learning, 15(2). DOI
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ982976.pdf
Rolfe, V. (2015). A systematic review of the socio-ethical aspects of massive online open
courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 18(1), 52-71.
Retrieved from: http://www.eurodl.org/?p=current&sp=full&article=670
Schuwer, R., Jaurena, I. G., Aydin, C. H., Costello, E., Dalsgaard, C., Brown, M., ... &
Teixeira, A. (2015). Opportunities and threats of the MOOC movement for higher
education: the European perspective. The International Review of Research in
Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6).20-38
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2153
Shah, D. (2016, December 29). Monetization over Massiveness: A Review of MOOC Stats
and Trends in 2016. Class Central. Retrieved from https://www.classcentral.com/report/moocs-stats-and-trends-2016/
Siemens, G. (2012, June 3). What is the theory that underpins our moocs? Elearnspace.
Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2012/06/03/what-is-thetheory-that-underpins-our-moocs/
- Silvestre Cerdà, J.A., Del Agua Teba, M.A, Garcés Diaz-Munio, G.V., Gasco Mora, G.,
Giménez Pastor, A., Martinez-Villaronga, A.A., …, Juan Ciscar, A. (2012).
Translectures. Proceedings of IberSPEECH. VII Jornadas en Tecnologia del Habla
and III Iberian SLTech Workshop. 2012, Madrid.
Toven-Lindsey, B., Rhoads, R. A., & Lozano, J. B. (2015). Virtually unlimited classrooms:
Pedagogical practices in massive open online courses. The internet and higher
education, 24, 1-12. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.07.001
Tripp, D. (2005). Action research: a methodological introduction. Educacao e pesquisa,
31(3), 443-466. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1517-97022005000300009
UPValenciaX page. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.edx.org/course?school=
UPValenciaX
Turro, C., & Salom L. (2014). Developing Xblocks .Open edX conference 2014, Boston.
Retrieved from https://openedx.atlassian.net/wiki/download/
attachments/15466526/Developing%20XBlocks%20@%20UPValencia.pptx?ver
sion=1&modificationDate=1416858807667&api=v2
Turro, C., Canero, A., & Busquets, J. (2010, December). Video learning objects creation
with Polimedia. IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM), 2010,
Taichung, 371-376. Doi: 10.1109/ISM.2010.69
233
Veletsianos, G., & Shepherdson, P. (2016). A systematic analysis and synthesis of the
empirical MOOC literature published in 2013--2015. The International Review of
Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2), 198-221
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2448
Wieringa, R. (2014). Empirical research methods for technology validation: Scaling up to
practice. Journal of systems and software, 95, 19-31. DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2013.11.1097
Yousef A., Chatti M., Schroeder U. & Wosnitza M. (2014) What Drives a Successful MOOC?
An Empirical Examination of Criteria to Assure Design Quality of MOOCs.
Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) IEEE14th International Conference, pp.
44-48, 2014.
Zancanaro, A., Nunez, C. & Dominguez, M.J. (2017). Evaluation of free platforms for
delivery of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCS). Turkish Online Journal of
Distance Education -TOJDE, 18 (1), 166-181