Communities of Practice in an Arabic Culture: Wenger's Model and the United Arab Emirates Implications for Online Learning

With the advent of globalization and the proliferation of online learning, the creation of culturally sensitive online learning environments takes on increasing importance. Online education provides new opportunities for learners from different cultural backgrounds to come together, learn, expand their knowledge, share ideas, and develop passion for their vocation. Emerging models of how communities work, such as Communities of Practice (CoPs) are being increasingly used to understand how online communities might grow and develop. Schwen & Hara (2003) outline 4 stages of design necessary to ensure that CoPs are properly designed for an online environment: phase 1) Possible Design Interventions, phase 2) Analysis, phase 3) Design and, phase 4) Evaluation and Revision. Phase 1 and phase 2 of this design model are considered in this study, in light of Etienne Wenger’s (2002) elements of a Community of Practice: domain, community and practice. These elements are considered in order to gauge the degree to which they can be applied in an Arab educational culture. The investigation focuses on College-level education in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and the government-supported Higher Colleges of Technology (HCT) system. By analyzing faculty perceptions related to the students’ propensity to adopt Community of Practice elements into their educational culture, we can provide guidance for the design of online learning that supports a cross-cultural Community of Practice, specifically as it relates to phase 1 and phase 2 of Schwen and Hara’s design structure.

___

  • Bandura, A. (1977) Social Learning Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development. Vol. 6. Six theories of child development (pp. 1-60). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Barab S. & Duffy, T. (2000). From Practice Fields to Communities of Practice. In D.
  • Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.). Theoretical foundations of learning environments. Mahwa, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Bohannan, L. (1981). Shakespeare in the Bush. In Thomas, P. et. Al. Introduction to
  • Literature: British, American, Canadian. Toronto: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Brown, J. S. & Duguid, P. (2000). The Social Life of Information. Harvard Business School Press, 336 pp.
  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of
  • Learning. Educational Researcher; v18 n1, pp. 32-42, Jan-Feb 1989.
  • Codrai, R. (1992). Abu Dhabi: An Arabian Album. Dubai, UAE: Motivate Publishing.
  • Cortazzi, I. & Hall, B. (1998). Vygotsky and Learning. Education Libraries Journal, v.41, no. 3. (pp. 17-21).
  • Dubai: A Pictorial Tour. (1996). Dubai, UAE: Motivate Publishing.
  • Foster, W. (1986). Towards a Critical Practice of Leadership. In J. Smyth (Ed.) Critical
  • Perspectives on Educational Leadership. London: Falmer. Hung, D. & Tan, S. (2004). Bridging Between Practice Fields and Real Communities through Instructional Technologies. Int’l Journal of Instructional Media, vol. 31, iss. 2, pp. 167-174.
  • Hung, D. W. L., & Chen, D. (2001). Situated cognition, Vygotskian thought and learning from the communities of practice perspective: implications for the design of web-based e-learning. Educational Media International, 38, 3-12.
  • Johnson, D. (1994). Research Methods in Educational Management. Great Britain: Pearson Education.
  • Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Cambell, J. & Haag, B. B. 1995. Constructivism and Computer-Mediated Communication in Distance Education. The American Journal of
  • Distance Education 9 (2), 7-26. Kenneth Keniston, "Language, Power, and Software," in Charles Ess, ed., Culture, Technology, Communication: Towards and Intercultural Global Village (New York: SUNY Press, 2001), 283-306.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation.
  • Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Mertens, D. M. (1998) Research Methods in Education and Psychology: Integrating
  • Diversity with Quantitative & Qualitative Approaches. California, USA: Sage Publications Inc Mograby, A. (1999). Human Development in the United Arab Emirates: Indicators and Challenges, in Education and the Arab World: Challenges of the Next Millennium. Abu
  • Dhabi, UAE: The Emirates Center for Strategic Studies in Leadership. Postman, N. (1992). The Judgment of Thamus, Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to
  • Technology. Ch1, pp. 3-20. Vintage Books. Rutland, P. and Trevor, D. The HCT Learning Model. Higher Colleges of Technology: Academic Services. Ryan, J. (2003). Leading Diverse Schools. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Scardamalia, M. (2000). Can schools enter a Knowledge Society? In M. Selinger and J.
  • Wynn (Eds.), Educational technology and the impact on teaching and learning (pp. 6-10). Abingdon, RM Schwen T.M.; Hara N. (2003). Community of Practice: A Metaphor for Online Design? The Information Society, Jul-Aug 2003, vol. 19, iss. 3, pp. 257-270(14), Taylor and Francis Ltd
  • Wenger, E. & Snyder, W. (2000). Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier.
  • Harvard Business Review. Jan 1, 2000.
  • Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. New York:
  • Cambridge University Press. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., and Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: a guide to managing knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press
  • Wheeler, Deborah, "New Technologies, Old Culture: A Look at Women, Gender, and the Internet in Kuwait," in Charles Ess, ed., Culture, Technology, Communication: Towards and Intercultural Global Village (New York: SUNY Press, 2001), 67-85. APPENDIX A
  • Given this, which element of a Community of Practice does you feel would most strongly motivate your students to become members in a CoP? The response in this last question was unanimous with 12 of 12 faculty members all emphatically stating that the Community elements is, or would be, most important in motivating students to participate in a Community of Practice.