Aldwin G. LAURON Ph.D. Candidate School of Policy Studies, Education and Management Mindanao Polytechnic State College Cagayan de Oro City , PHILIPPINES

Perceptions of Course Coordinators and Course Writers for Developing Distance Learning Material

The main aim of this research is to better understand and draw perceptions of course writers and course coordinators towards the process of developing distance learning material. For developing good self-instructional material cooperative efforts among course development personnel are essential. The study indicates the areas where contradiction is found among perceptions of a sample of seventy course coordinators and seventy course writes of Allama Iqbal Open University, Pakistan through a self developed questionnaire covering preparation, implementation and execution aspects of course development process.

___

  • E-mai: alauron73@yahoo.com Argyle, M. Cooperation in working groups. Cooperation: The Basis of Sociability, 115– London: Rutledge, 1991.
  • Argote, L. D. Gruenfeld, and C. Naquin. Group learning in organizations. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at Work: Theory and Research, 369–411. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001.
  • Chidambaram, L. and R. P. Bostrom. Group development (I): A review and synthesis of developmental models. Group Decision and Negotiation 6(2): 59–187, 1997.
  • Cook, S. D. N, and J. S. Brown. Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science 10(4): –400, 1999.
  • Daniel, J. S. (1995). The mega-universities and the knowledge media: implications of new technologies for large distance teaching universities. Unpublished Master of Arts thesis, Concordia University, Montreal.
  • Dede, C., Emerging Technologies in Distance Education for Business, Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 71, No. 4, 1996.
  • Dillenbourg, P., & Schneider, D. (1995). Collaborative learning and the internet,
  • Online document]. Available: http://tecfa.unige.ch/tecfa/research/CMC/colla/iccai95_1.html [1998, 18 August].
  • Harasim, L, Hiltz, S., Teles, L., & Turoff, M., Learning Networks, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, p. 30, 1995.
  • Hiltz, S., Collaborative Learning in Asynchronous Learning Networks: Building Learning Communities, Web 98 Symposium, Orlando, Florida, 1998.
  • Henri, F., & Rigault, C. R. (1996). Collaborative distance learning and computer conferencing. In T. T. Liao (Ed.), Advanced educational technology: Research issues and future technologies (pp. 45-76). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. JALN Volume 5, Issue 1 - February 2001 33
  • Haythornthwaite, C. Communicating Knowledge: Articulating Divides in Distributed Knowledge Practice. International Communication Assoc., New Orleans, LA, 2004.
  • Jarvis, P., Adult Learning in the Social Context, London, Croon-Helm, 1987.
  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1996). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D.
  • H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 1017-1044). New York: Simon and Schuster Macmillan.
  • Johnson, D. W., R. T. Johnson and K. A. Smith. Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company, 1991.
  • Goldenberg, J., Virtual Learning Communities: A Student's Perspective, Journal of Instruction Delivery Systems, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1999.
  • Gunawardena, C., N., Lowe, C., A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational
  • Computing Research, 17(4), 397-431. Levin, J. A. (1995, 18 April 1995). Organizing educational network interactions: Steps towards a theory of network-based learning environments, [Web document]. Levin, J.
  • A. Available: http://lrs.ed.uiuc.edu/Guidelines/Levin-AERA-18Ap95.html [1998, 13 November].
  • McGrath, J. E., and A. B. Hollingshead. Groups Interacting with Technology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1994.
  • McComb, M. Benefits of computer-mediated communication in college courses. Communication Education 43(2): 159–170, 1994.
  • Michaelsen, L. K. Three keys to using learning groups effectively. Essays on Teaching Excellence 9(5): 1998.
  • Murphy, K., Drabier, R., & Epps, M., Interaction and Collaboration via Computer Conferencing, Proceedings of the National Convention for Educational Communications and Technology. (ERIC Publication No. ED 423 852). 2000.
  • Nonaka, I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science 5(1): 14–37, 1994.
  • Orlikowski, W. J. Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science 13(3): 249–273, 2002.
  • Stoll, E., An Introduction to Collaborative Learning: From Theory to Application, Communication Education. Vol. 45, No. 3, 1996.
  • Thompson, L., J. M. Levine, and D. M. Messick (Eds.). Shared Cognition in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1999.
  • Turoff, M. and S. R. Hiltz. Effectively managing large enrollment courses: A case study. In J. Bourne and J. C.Moore (eds.), Online Education. Needham, MA, Sloan-C: 2001.
  • Turoff, M., S. R. Hiltz, Z. Li, Y. Wang, and H. K. Cho. The Delphi process as a collaborative learning method. In J. C. Moore (ed.), Elements of Quality Online Education: Into the Mainstream: Wisdom from the Sloan Consortium. Needham, MA: Sloan-C: 2004.
  • Verdejo, M. F. (1996). Interaction and collaboration in distance learning through computer mediated technologies. In T. T. Liao (Ed.), Advanced educational technology:
  • Research issues and future technologies (pp. 77-88). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Warschauer, M., Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice, The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 81, pp. 5, 470 - 481, 1997.
  • Wegner, D. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of Group Behavior, 185-208. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1987.