Accreditation Of Open And Distance Learning: A Framework For Turkey

The purpose of this study is to develop a framework for the accreditation of higher open and distance learning (ODL) programs in Turkey. The study was designed as a sequential monomethod multistrand mixed model including two strands which were both qualitative (QUAL→QUAL). In the first strand, both quantitative and qualitative data were collected through a three-round Delphi study with an expert panel consisting of 28 experts. In the second strand, qualitative data were collected via focus group interview. Based on a comprehensive literature review and the findings from the study, a framework was proposed including an initial accreditation process for new ODL programs and a re-accreditation process for ongoing programs. In addition, 35 criteria for new programs and 42 criteria for ongoing programs were developed to be used in the accreditation process.

___

  • Belawati, T. (2010). Quality assurance. In T.Belawati & J.Baggaley (Eds.), Policy and practice in Asian distance education (pp. 49-60). New Delhi: SAGE.
  • Best Practices For Electronically Offered Degree and Certificate Programs (2001).
  • Retrieved from http://wcet.wiche.edu/wcet/docs/cigs/studentauthentication/ Accrediting_BestPractice s.pdf Chalmers D., & Johnston, S. (2012). Quality assurance and accreditation in higher education. In I. Jung & C. Latchem (Eds.), Quality assurance and accreditation in distance education and e-learning: models, policies and research (pp. 1-12).
  • Newyork, NY: Routledge. Clayton, M. J. (1997). Delphi: a technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision-making tasks in education. Educational Psychology, 17(4), 373-386.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quantitaive and qualitative research. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Dalkey, N. C. (2002). Toward a theory of group estimation. In H.A. Linstone & M.
  • Turoff (Eds.), The Delphi method: techniques and applications (pp. 231-256). Retrieved from http://is.njit.edu/pubs/delphibook Daniel, J. S. (2006). Preface. In B. N. Koul & A. Kanwar (Eds.), Perspectives on distance education: towards a culture of quality (pp. vii-viii). Vancouver:
  • Commonwealth of Learning. Retrieved from http://www.col.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/PS-QA_web.pdf DEC Handbook. (2009). Assessment and accreditation of open and distance learning
  • (ODL) Institutions. India: Distance Education Council and Indira Gandhi National Open University. Retrieved from www.ignou.ac.in/upload/.../Click%20here%20for %20Handbook.doc Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: a guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Glenview, IL:
  • Scott, Foresman and Company. DETC. (2009). Accreditation handbook (6th ed.). Washington, D.C.: DETC
  • Accrediting Commission. Retrieved from http://www.detc.org/downloads/accredhandbook /2009/1-2009handbook.pdf
  • EADTU. (2009). Quality assessment for e-learning: a benchmarking approach. Heerlen: EADTU.
  • Eaton, J. S. (2011). An overview of US accreditation. Washington, D.C.: CHEA. http://www.chea.org/pdf/Overview%20of%20US%20Accreditation%2003 .2011.pdf
  • Eaton, J. S. (2008). Accreditation and recognition in the United States. Washington,
  • D.C.: CHEA. Retrieved from http://www.chea.org/pdf/ Accreditation_and_Recognition _PP_ Sept08.pdf Fish, L. S., & Busby, D. M. (2005). The Delphi method. In D.H.Sprenkle & F. P.Piercy
  • (Eds.), Research methods in family therapy (pp. 238-253). New York: Guilford Press. Franklin, K. K., & Hart, J. K. (2006). Influence of web-based distance education on the academic department chair role. Educational Technology & Society, 9 (1), 213
  • Frederiks, M. (2010, September). Assessing learning outcomes: the experience of
  • NVAO. Paper presented at the Quality Assurance and Learning Outcomes Workshop, Vienna, Austria. Garrod, B., & Fyall, A. (2005). Revisiting Delphi: the Delphi technique in tourism research. In B. W. Ritchie, P. Burns & C. Palmer (Eds.), Tourism research methods: integrating theory with practice (pp. 85-98). UK: CABI Publishing.
  • Gordon, T. J. (1994). The Delphi method. Retrieved from AC/UNU Millennium
  • Project: Futures Research Methodology website: http://www.gerenciamento.ufba.br/ Downloads/delphi%20(1).pdf Grisham, T. (2008). The Delphi technique: a method for testing complex and multifaceted topics. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 2(1), 130.
  • Hall, J. W. (2003). Networked learning, convergence and accreditation: is it time for global standards? In S. Panda (Ed.), Planning and management in distance education (pp. 253-261). London: Kogan Page Limited.
  • Hatcher, T., & Colton, S. (2007). Using the internet to improve HRD research: The case of the web-based Delphi research technique to achieve content validity of an
  • HRD-oriented measurement. Journal of European Industrial Training, 31(7), 570- Doi: 10.1108/03090590710820060
  • Higher Education Council [HEC]. (2007). Türkiye’nin yükseköğretim stratejisi.
  • Higher education strategy of Turkey]. Ankara: Yükseköğretim Kurulu. Retrieved from http://www.yok.gov.tr/content/ view/557/238/lang,tr_TR/ Higher Education Council [HEC]. (2004). Türk yükseköğretiminin bugünkü durumu.
  • Current situation of Turkish higher education]. Ankara: Yükseköğretim Kurulu. Retrieved from http://www2.yok.gov.tr/component/option,com_docman/ task,cat_view/gid,179/ Itemid,215/lang,tr/ Hsu, C. C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). Minimizing non-response in the Delphi process: how to respond to non-response. Practical Assessment Research &
  • Evaluation, 12(17). Retrieved from http://pareonline. net/getvn.asp?v=12&n=17 Hung, H.L., Altschuld, J. W., & Lee, Y.F. (2008). Methodological and conceptual issues confronting a cross-country Delphi study of educational program evaluation.
  • Evaluation and Program Planning, 31, 191–198. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan. 02.005
  • Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research: quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches. California: SAGE.
  • Jung, I., & Latchem, C. (2012). Quality assurance and accreditation in open and distance learning. In I. Jung & C. Latchem (Eds.), Quality assurance and accreditation in distance education and e-learning: models, policies and research
  • (pp. 13-22). Newyork, NY: Routledge. Jung, I., & Latchem, C. (2007). Assuring quality in Asian open and distance learning. Open Learning, 22(3), 235-250.
  • Jung, I., Wong, T. M., Li, C., Baigaltugs, S., & Belawati, T. (2011). Quality assurance in Asian distance education: diverse approaches and common culture. International
  • Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(6), 63-83. Keeney, S., Hasson, F., & McKenna, H. (2006). Consulting the oracle: ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, (2), 205–212.
  • Keeney, S., Hasson, F., & McKenna, H. (2001). A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 38(2), 195-200.
  • Kilfoil, W. R. (2007). Acquiring accreditation in distance learning. Commonwealth of
  • Learning Knowledge Series. Retrieved from http://www.col.org/Publication Documents/pub_KS2007_Acquiring-Accreditation.pdf
  • Knight, J. (2007). Cross-border higher education: issues and implications for quality assurance and accreditation. In GUNI Series on the Social Commitment of
  • Universities, Higher education in the world 2007: accreditation for quality assurance: what is at stake? (pp.134-146).New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Latchem, C., Ozkul, A. E., Aydin, C.H., & Mutlu, M. E. (2006). The open education system, Anadolu University, Turkey: e-transformation in a mega-university. Open
  • Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 21(3), 221-235. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02680510600953203
  • Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (2002). Introduction. In H.A. Linstone & M. Turoff
  • (Eds.), The Delphi method: techniques and applications (pp.3-12) Retrieved form http://is.njit.edu/pubs/delphibook Loane, S. (2001). Distance education and accreditation. Washington, D.C.: ERIC
  • Clearinghouse on Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.ericdigests.org/2003-1/distance.htm
  • Middlehurst, R. (2003). Quality assurance and accreditation for virtual education: a discussion of models and needs. Retrieved from http://portal.unesco.org/education/ en/ev.php
  • URL_ID=21927&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
  • Mitchell, V. W. (1991). The Delphi technique: an exposition and application.
  • Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 3(4), 333–358. Mullen, P. M. (2003). Delphi: myths and reality. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 17(1), 37-52.
  • Olcott, D. (2003). Accreditation in the digital era: preparing for the new distance education landscape. In S. Panda (Ed.), Planning and management in distance education (pp. 253-261). London, UK: Kogan Page Limited.
  • Ono, R., & Wedemeyer, D.J. (1994). Assessing the validity of the Delphi technique. Futures, 26 (3), 289-304.
  • Ozkul, A. E., & Latchem, C. (2011, September). Progress towards assuring quality in
  • Turkish distance education. Paper presented at the 25th Asian Association of Open Universities (AAOU) Annual Conference, Penang, Malaysia. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
  • Paykoc, F., & Ok, A. (1990). Delfi tekniği ile Türk eğitim sistemindeki bazı problemlerin incelenmesi. [Examining some of the problems in Turkish educational system by Delphi technique]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 75 (14), 14-21.
  • Powell, C. (2003). The Delphi technique: myths and realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(4), 376–382.
  • QAA (2004). Section 2: collaborative provision and flexible and distributed learning.
  • Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education. UK: Quality Assurance Agency. Retrieved from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/ academicinfrastructure/ codeOfPractice/section2/collab2004.pdf
  • Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15 (4), 353-375.
  • Sahin, A. E. (2010). Professional status of elementary teaching in Turkey: a Delphi study. Teachers and Teaching, 16 (4), 437-459.
  • Sahin, A. E. (2001). Eğitim araştırmalarında Delphi tekniği ve kullanımı. [Delphi technique and its uses in educational research]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20, 215-220.
  • Scheibe, M., Skutsch, M., & Schofer, J. (2002). Experiments in Delphi methodology.
  • In H. A. Linstone & M. Turoff (Eds.), The Delphi method: techniques and applications (pp. 257-281). Retrieved from http://is.njit.edu/pubs/delphibook/ Skulmoski, G. J., Hartman, F. T., & Krahn, J. (2007). The Delphi method for graduate research. Journal of Information Technology Education, 6, 1–21. Retrieved from http://jite.org/documents/Vol6/ JiteContentsVol6.pdf
  • Sohm, K. (2004). Austria: accreditation in Austrian fachhochschule sector. In P. Di
  • Nauta, P.L. Omar, A. Schade & J.P. Scheele (Eds.), Accreditation models in higher education: experiences and perspectives. Helsinki: ENQA. Retrieved from http://www.enqa.eu/files/ENQAmodels.pdf Stella, A. (2007). Accreditation of higher education in the Asia-Pacific region. In
  • GUNI Series on the Social Commitment of Universities, Higher education in the world 2007: accreditation for quality assurance: what is at stake? (pp. 224-238). 2.
  • New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Stella, A., & Granam, A. (2004). Quality assurance in distance education: the challenges to be addressed. Higher Education, 47, 143-160.
  • Swedish National Agency for Higher Education. (2008). E-Learning quality: aspects and criteria for evaluation of e-learning in higher education (Report 2008:11 R).
  • Stockholm: Swedish National Agency for Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.eadtu.nl/e-xcellencelabel/files/0811R.pdf
  • Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Thorpe, M. (2003). External control and internal quality assurance. In S. Panda
  • (Ed.), Planning and management in distance education (pp. 219-228). London, UK: Kogan Page Limited. Welch, T., & Glennie, J. (2005). An overview of quality assurance in distance education in South Africa. In T. Welch & Y. Reed (Eds.), Designing and delivering distance education: quality criteria and case studies from South Africa (pp. 5-17).
  • South Africa: NAEDOSA. Retrieved from http://www.nadeosa.org.za/Resources/ Reports/NADEOSA%20QC%20 Section%201. pdf Welch, T., & Glennie, J. (2005). The NADEOSA quality criteria for distance education in South Africa. In T. Welch & Y. Reed (Eds.), Designing and delivering distance education: quality criteria and case studies from South Africa (pp. 18-56). South
  • Africa: NAEDOSA. Retrieved from http://www.nadeosa.org.za/Resources/Reports/ NADEOSA%20QC% 20Section%201.pdf Wellman, J. (2000). Point of view: accreditors have to see past Learning outcomes.
  • The Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. B20. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/weekly/v47 /i04/04b02001.htm - 8k
  • Westbrook, L. (1997). Information access issues for interdisciplinary scholars: results of a Delphi study on women’s studies research. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 23(3), 211-216.
  • Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2005). Research methods in education: an introduction.
  • USA: Pearson Education. Williams, P. L., & Webb, C. (1994). The Delphi technique: a methodological discussion. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19 (1), 180–186. APPENDIX A