___

• Adams, W. K., Alhadlaq, H., Malley, C. V., Perkins, K. K., Olson, J., Alshaya, F., Alabdulkareem, S. & Wieman, C. E. (2012). Making on-line science course materials easily translatable and accessible worldwide: challenges and solutions. Journal of
• Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 1–10. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2006). Making the grade online education in the United
• States, 2006. The Sloan Consortium (SLOAN-C). Retrieved March 17, 2012, from www.sloan-c.org.
• Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on Demand Online Education in the United States, 2009. The Sloan Consortium (SLOAN-C). Retrieved March 17, 2012, fromhttp://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/pdf/learningondemand.pdf.
• Annetta, L. A., & Minogue, J. (2004). The effect teaching experience has on perceived effectiveness of ınteractive television as a distance education model for elementary school science teacher’s professional development: another digital divide?. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(4), 485-494.
• Arbaugh, J.B. (2005). Is there an optimal design for on-line MBA courses? Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(2), 135-149.
• Armitage, C. J. & Conner, M. (2001). Effcacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour:
• A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499. Artino, A. R. (2008). Motivational beliefs and perceptions of instructional quality: predicting satisfaction with online training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, , 260–270.
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
• Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psycnology, 32, 1–20.
• Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behavior: Reactions and reflections.
• Psychology& Health, 26(9), 1113-1127.
• Bhattacherjee, A., & Premkumar, G. (2004). Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: A theoretical model and longitudinal test. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 229-254.
• Boitshwarelo, B. (2009). Exploring blended learning for science teacher professional development in an African context. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(4). Retrieved March 17, 2012, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/687/1339.
• Boone, W.J. (1996). Advanced distance education technology and hands-on science.
• Journal of Science Education and Technology, 5(1), 33-46. Campbell, P. B., & Storo, J. (1996). Reducing the distance: Equity issues in distance learning in public education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 5(4), 295.
• Chang, Y. H., Chang, C. Y., & Tseng, Y. H. (2010). Trends of science education research: an automatic content analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19, 315-331.
• Crippen, K. J. (2003). Rethinking course assessment: Creating accountability with web-based tools. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(4), 431-438.
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.
• Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of
• Man-Machine Studies, 38(3), 475-487. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 1003.
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press (Taylor & Francis).
• Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2008). What do teachers believe? Developing a framework for examining beliefs about teachers' knowledge and ability.
• Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 134-176. Gong, M., Xu, Y., & Yu, Y. (2004). An enhanced technology acceptance model for web-based learning. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(4), 365-374.
• Haney, J.J., Czerniak, M.C. & Lumpe, A.T. (1998). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of
• Research in Science Teaching, 33(9), 971–993. Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education- JRTE, 41(4), 393-416.
• Hermans, C. M., Haytko, D. L., & Mott-Stenerson, B. (2009). Student satisfaction in web-enhanced learning environments. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 1, 1-19.
• Horton, W. (2000). Designing web-based training: How to teach anyone anything anywhere anytime. New York: Wiley.
• Horzum, M. B. (2011). Web pedagojik içerik bilgisi ölçeği’nin türkçeye uyarlaması
• Adaptation of web pedagogical content knowledge survey to Turkish]. İlköğretim Online [Elementary Education Online], 10(1), 257-272. Horzum, M. B. (2012). The effect of web based instruction on students’ web pedagogical content knowledge, course achievement and general course satisfaction. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 41(1), 36-51.
• Hunt, D. L. (1999). Web-based training. In W. J. Rothwell & K. J. Sensenig (Eds.),
• The Sourcebook For Self-Directed Learning (pp. 121-145). Amherst, MA: HRD Press. Jackson, M. D. (1998). A distance-education chemistry course for nonmajors.
• Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7(2), 163-170. Jong, D., & Wang, T. S. (2009). Student acceptance of web-based learning system.
• Proceedings of the 2009 International Symposium on Web Information Systems and Applications (WISA’09) (pp. 533-553). Nanchang, People Republic of China.
• Kao, C. P., & Tsai, C. C. (2009). Teachers’ attitudes toward web-based professional development, with relation to Internet self-efficacy and beliefs about web-based learning. Computers & Education, 53, 66-73.
• Kao, C. P., Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2009). Elementary school teachers’ motivation toward web-based Professional development, and the relationship with Internet self-efficacy and belief about web-based learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 406-415.
• Kao, C., Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C.C. (2011). Elementary school teachers’ motivation toward web-based professional development, and the relationship with Internet self-efficacy and belief about web-based learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, , 406-415.
• Kahn, B.H. (1997). Web-based instruction (WBI): What is it and why is it? In B. H.
• Kahn (Ed.), Web-Based Instruction (pp. 5-23). Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, Inc. King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model.
• Information & Managemement, 43,740-755. Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education. 9(1).
• Retrieved March 17, 2012,http://www.citejournal.org/vol9/iss1/general/article1.cfm
• Kollias, V., Mamalougos, N., Vamvakoussi, X., Lakkala, M., & Vosniadou, S. (2005).
• Teachers’ attitudes to and beliefs about web-based collaborative learning environments in the context of an international implementation. Computers & Education, 45, 295-315. Kumar, D.D., & Altschuld, J.W. (2002). Complementary approaches to evaluation of technology in science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, (2), 179-191.
• Lederer, A. L., Maupin, D. J., Sena, M.P., & Zhuang, Y. (2000). The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decision Support Systems, 29, 269–282.
• Lee, M. H. & Tsai, C.C. (2010). Exploring teachers’ perceived self efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the World Wide Web. Instructional Science, 38(1), 1-21.
• Lee, M. H., Tsai, C. C. & Chang, C. Y. (2008). Exploring teachers’ self-efficacy toward the web pedagogical content knowledge in Taiwan. Annual meeting of the american educational research association. New York, 24-28 Mart, 2008. Retrieved
• March 17, 2012, from http://www.ntnu.edu.tw/acad/rep/r97/a2/a201-1.doc
• Lertlum, W., & Papasratorn, B. (2006). Factors influencing rote learner's intention to use WBL: Developing country study. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 1(1), 61-66.
• Liu, S. H., Liao, H. L., & Pratt, J. A. (2009). Impact of media richness and flow on e- learning technology acceptance. Computers & Education, 52, 599-697.
• Lu, J., Yu, L. C. S, Liu, C., & Yao, J. E. (2003). Technology acceptance model for wireless Internet. Internet Research, 13(3), 206.
• Lynch, M. M. (2002). The online educator: a guide to creating the virtual classroom.
• London: Routledge Falmer Taylor & Francis Group. Ma, O., & Liu, L. (2004). The technology acceptance model: A meta-analysis of empirical findings. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 16(1), 59-72.
• Martins, L. L., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2004). A model of business school students’ acceptance of a Web-based course management system. Academy of Management
• Learning and Education, 3, 7-26. Masrom, M. (2007). Technology acceptance model and e-learning. 12th
• International Conference on Education, Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah Institute of Education Universiti Brunei Darussalam. 21-24 May 2007. Retrieved March 17, , from http://eprints.utm.my/5482/1/MaslinMasrom2006_Techn.pdf
• Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
• Norton, L., Richardson, J. T. E, Hartley, J., Newstead, S. & Mayes, J. (2005).
• Teachers’ beliefs and intentions concerning teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 50, 537-571. Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students' behavioral intention to use e-learning.
• Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150-162. Russell, M., Bebell, D., O’Dwyer, L., & O’Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use: implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation.
• Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297-310. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
• Smarkola, C. (2011). A mixed-methodological technology adoption study. In T. Teo (Ed.),
• Technology acceptance in education: Research and issues. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers Sun, D., & Looi, C. K. (2012). Designing a web-based science learning environment for model- based collaborative inquiry. Journal of Science Education and Technology. Retrieved April 17, , http://www.springerlink.com/content/x21t25416446t170/fulltext.pdf?MUD=MP
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). The theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
• Waheed, M. (2009). A study of teacher’s acceptance of elearnıng technology: TAM as the core model. eGovshare. Retrieved March 17, 2012, from http://edem.todaie.gov.tr/yd39_STUDY_OF_TEACHER%E2%80%99S_ACCEPTANCE_OF_eLEARNING_T
• ECHNOLOGY__TAM_AS_THE_CORE_MODEL.pdf. Yang, F. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Investigating university student preferences and beliefs about learning in the web-based context. Computers & Education, 50, 1284–1303.
• Yang, F. Y., & Chang, C. C. (2009). Examining high-school students' preferences toward learning environments, personal beliefs and concept learning in web-based contexts. Computers & Education, 52, 848-857.
• Yi, M. Y., & Hwang, Y. (2003). Predictingthe use of web-based information systems: Self- efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model.
• International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 431-449.