A Content Analysis of Dissertations in the Field of Educational Technology: The Case of Turkey

The present study aimed at conducting content analysis on dissertations carried out so far in the field of Educational Technology in Turkey. A total of 137 dissertations were examined to determine the key words, academic discipline, research areas, theoretical frameworks, research designs and models, statistical analyses, data collection tools, participants, instructional design models, variables/research focus and related institutions. When the research results were examined, it was found in relation to the dissertations that the most frequent method was “mixed method”; that the most frequent data collection tools were “interview”, “questionnaire” and “scale”; that the participants were generally “university students”; that the dependent variables were “attitude” and “achievement”; that the most frequent data analysis method was “parametric analysis”; and that the field of “education and training” was the one most frequently investigated. Among the most frequent key words was Online Learning, which was followed by Information and Communication Technology (ICT), Teacher Training and Special Education. In this respect, the present study, which examined dissertations, is thought to be important since it tried to reveal the current state of educational technologies in Turkey and to determine the related research trends.

___

  • Goktas, Y., Kucuk, S., Aydemir, M., Telli, E., Arpacik, O., Yildirim, G., & Reisoglu, I. (2012). Educational technology research trends in Turkey: A content analysis of the 2000- 2009 decade. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 12(1): 191–196. Hart, S.A. & Laher, S. (2015). Perceived usefulness and culture as predictors of teachers attitudes towards educational technology in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 35(4): 01-13. Jaewoo, C. & Woonsun, K. (2014). Themes and trends in korean educational technology research: a social network analysis of keywords. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 131: 171–176. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.099 Januszewski, A. & Molenda, M. (2008). Educational technology: a definition with commentary (2nd ed). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Karoglu, A.K. (2015). Mixed method research analysis in the field of instructional technology : 2005-2015. Ahi Evran Universitesi Kirsehir Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 16(2): 353-369. Kilic Cakmak, E., Ozudogru, G., Bozkurt, S.B., Ulker, U., Unsal, N.O., Boz, K., Bozkurt, O.F., Sonmez, E.E., Bastemur Kaya, C., Karaca, C., Bahadir, H., & Ustun Gul, H. (2016). 2014 yilinda egitim teknolojileri alanindaki yayimlanan makalelerin incelenmesi. Egitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 6(1): 80-108. Kilic Cakmak, E., Cebi, A., Mihci, P., Gunbatar, M.S. & Akcayir ,M. (2013). A content analysis of educational technology research in 2011. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106: 74–83. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.010 Kilic, E. & Karadeniz, S. (2004). The effects of gender and learning style on navigation strategy and achievement. Gazi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 3: 129–146. Klein, J.D. (1997). ETR&D-development: An analysis of content and survey of future direction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3): 57–62. doi:10.1007/BF02299729 Kurt, A.A., Sahin Izmirli, O., & Karakoyun F (2009). Current trends in research in the field of computer education and instructional technologies. Recent Advances In Applied Mathematics And Computational And Information Sciences, 2: 338–343.