Seasonal and ontogenetic diet shift of two sympatric cyprinid fish species from the temperate Karamenderes River, Çanakkale, Turkey

Seasonal and ontogenetic diet shift of two sympatric cyprinid fish species from the temperate Karamenderes River, Çanakkale, Turkey

Diet composition and feeding relationships of two cyprinid species, Squalius cii and Barbus oligolepis, from the Karamenderes River, northwestern Turkey, were assessed over a 1-year period. Both species were omnivorous and fed mostly on benthic plant materials (particularly algae) and insects. The diet of B. oligolepis primarily comprised Bacillariophyceae, Diptera larvae, and other insects, while that of S. cii comprised filamentous algae (Cyanobacteria and Chlorophyceae), insect larvae, and adults. Ontogenetic shifts in diet were identified in both species. The ratio of Chlorophyceae in the diet of B. oligolepis showed a gradual increase with increase in its body size; moreover, the number of ingested taxa decreased but diet diversity increased with increasing fish size. There were seasonal variations in feeding intensities of both fish, which decreased in the colder months. Seasonal resource availability was higher for S. ciithan B. oligolepis; moreover, diet overlap was significant in the spring and summer. Findings indicate that S. cii may exclude B. oligolepisduring limited resource availability conditions. The cooccurrence of these species may be explained by their generalist feeding strategies; ontogenetic and seasonal resource partitioning played an important role in the coexistence of these species.

___

  • Admasu D, Dadebo E (1997). Diet composition, length-weight relationship and condition factor of Barbus species Rüippell, 1836 (Pisces: Cyprinidae) in lake Awasa Ethiopia. SINET Ethiopian Journal of Science 20: 13-30.
  • Al‐Hussaini AH (1947). The anatomy and histology of the alimentary tract of the plankton‐feeder, Atherina forskali Rüpp. J Morphol 80: 251-286.
  • Altındağ A (1997). Reproduction and Feeding of The Chub (Leuciscus cephalus, L. 1758 ) in Akşehir Lake (Konya). Turk J Zool 21: 229-240.
  • Bagenal T (1978). Methods For Assessment of Fish Production in Fresh Waters. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Balestrieri A, Prigioni C, Remonti L, Sgrosso S, Priore G (2006). Feeding ecology of Leuciscus cephalus and Rutilus rubilio in southern Italy. Ital J Zool 73: 129-135.
  • Barko JW, Smart RM (1986). Sediment-related mechanisms of growth limitation in submersed macrophytes. Ecology 67: 1328-1340.
  • Beklioğlu M, Ince O, Tuzun I (2003). Restoration of the eutrophic Lake Eymir, Turkey, by biomanipulation after a major external nutrient control I. Hydrobiologia 490: 93-105.
  • Bektaş S, Yıldırım A, Arslan M (2009). Seasonal and spatial variability of condition and length-weight relationship of European Chub (Leuciscus cephalus) inhabited in Upper Çoruh River (Turkey). Cybium 33.1: 3-10 (in Turkish with English abstract).
  • Çiçek E, Birecikligil SS, Fricke R (2015). Freshwater fishes of Turkey: a revised and updated annotated checklist. Biharean Biologist 9: 141-157.Costello MJ (1990). Predator feeding strategy and prey importance: a new graphical analysis. J Fish Biol 36: 261-263.
  • Crowder LB (1990). Community ecology. In: Schreck CB, Moyle PB, editors. Methods for Fish Biology. Bethesda, MD, USA: American Fisheries Society, pp. 609-632.
  • Demirsoy A (1992). Yaşamın Temel Kuralları Omurgasızlar/Böcekler Entomoloji. Ankara, Turkey: Meteksan (in Turkish).Desta Z, Borgstrøm R, Gebremariam Z, Rosseland BO (2008). Habitat use and trophic position determine mercury concentration in the straight fin barb Barbus paludinosus, a small fish species in Lake Awassa, Ethiopia. J Fish Biol 73: 477-497.
  • Erdoğan O, Turkmen M, Yıldırım A (2002). Studies on the age, growth and reproduction characteristics of the chub, Leuciscus cephalus orientalis, (Nordmann, 1840) in Karasu River, Turkey. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 26: 983-991.
  • Foged N (1981). Diatoms in Alaska. Vaduz, Liechtenstein: J. Cramer.
  • Hellawell JM (1971). The autecology of the chub Squalius cephalus (L.) of the rivers Lugg and Afon Llynfi. III. Diet and feeding habits. Freshwater Biol 1: 369-387.
  • Hyslop EJ (1980). Stomach contents analysis—a review of methods and their application. J Fish Biol 17: 411-429.
  • Koç HT, Erdoğan Z, Tinkci M, Treer T (2007). Age, growth and reproductive characteristics of chub, Leuciscus cephalus (L., 1758) in the İkizcetepeler dam lake (Balikesir), Turkey. J Appl Ichthyol 23: 19-24.
  • Kottelat M, Freyhof J (2007). Handbook of European Freshwater Fishes. Berlin, Germany: Kottelat. Kramer DL, Bryant MJ (1995). Intestine length in the fishes of a tropical river: 2. Relationships to diet - the long and short of a convoluted issue. Environ Biol Fish 42: 129-141.
  • Krebs CJ (1999). Ecological Methodology. Menlo Park, CA, USA: Benjamin/Cummings.Levins R (1968). Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations (No. 2). Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University.
  • Ligon FK, Dietrich WE, Trush WJ (1995). Downstream ecological effects of dams. BioScience 45: 183-192.
  • Magalhãtes MF (1992). Feeding ecology of the Iberian cyprinid Barbus bocagei Steindachner, 1865 in a lowland river. J Fish Biol 40: 123-133.
  • Marković G (2007). A contribution to data on Chub (Leuciscus cephalus L., Cyprinidae, PISCES) diet in river conditions. Acta Agriculturae Serbica 12: 13-18.
  • Montgomery L (1977). Diet and gut morphology in fishes, with special reference to the Monkeyface Prickleback, Cebidichthys violaceus (Stichaeidae: Blennioidei). Copeia 1: 178-182.
  • Nastova-Gjorgjioska R, Kostov V, Georgiev S (1997). Nutrition of chub Leuciscus cephalus (Linnaeasus, 1758) from river Babuna. Croatian Journal of Fisheries 55: 53-65.
  • Nikolsky GV (1963). The Ecology of Fishes (Translated by L. Birkett). London, UK: Academic Press.Olsson J, Quevedo M, Colson C, Svanbäck R (2007). Gut length plasticity in perch: into the bowels of resource polymorphisms. Biol J Linn Soc 90: 517-523.
  • Pennak RW (1953). Freshwater Invertebrates of United States. New York, NY, USA: Roland Press.
  • Potier M, Marsac F, Lucas V, Sabatié R, Hallier JP, Ménard F (2004). Feeding partitioning among tuna taken in surface and mid-water layers: the case of Yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) and Bigeye (T. o b e s u s) in the Western Tropical Indian Ocean. Western Indian Ocean Journal of Marine Science 3: 51-62.
  • Prescott GW (1964). How to Know the Freshwater Algae. Dubuque, IA, USA: W.M.C. Brown Company.Ribble DO, Smith MH (1982). Relative intestine length and feeding ecology of freshwater fishes. Growth 47: 292-300.
  • Sanchez-Hernandez J, Cobo F (2011). Summer food resource partitioning between four sympatric fish species in Central Spain (River Tormes). Folia Zool 60: 189-202.
  • Sánchez-Hernández J, Vieira-Lanero R, Servia MJ, Cobo F (2011). Feeding habits of four sympatric fish species in the Iberian Peninsula: keys to understanding coexistence using prey traits. Hydrobiologia 667: 119-132.
  • Sarı H, Balık S, Ustaoğlu MR, İlhan A (2006). Distribution and ecology of freshwater Ichthyofauna of the Biga Peninsula, North-western Anatolia, Turkey. Turk J Zool 30: 35-45.
  • Schoener TW (1968). The Anolis lizards of Bimini: resource partitioning in a complex fauna. Ecology 49: 704-726.
  • Şekercioğlu ÇH, Anderson S, Akçay E, Bilgin R, Can ÖE, Semiz G, Tavşanoğlu Ç, Yokeş MB, Soyumert A, İpekdal K et al. (2011). Turkey’s globally important biodiversity in crisis. Biol Conserv 144: 2752-2769.
  • Shurin JB, Allen EG (2001). Effects of competition, predation, and dispersal on species richness at local and regional scales. Am Nat 158: 624-637.
  • Sibbing FA, Nagelkerke LA (2000). Resource partitioning by Lake Tana barbs predicted from fish morphometrics and prey characteristics. Rev Fish Biol Fisher 10: 393-437.
  • Thompson SK (1992). Sampling. New York, NY, USA: Wiley.Treer T, Habekovic D, Anicic I, Safner R, Kolak A (1997). Standard growth curve for chub (Leuciscus cephalus L., 1758) in Croatia. Ribarstvo 55: 47-52.
  • Treer T, Habekovic D, Safner R, Kolak A (1999). Length-mass relationship in chub (Leuciscus cephalus) from five Croatian rivers. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus 64: 137-142.
  • Ünver B, Erk’akan F (2011). Diet composition of chub, Squalius cephalus (Teleostei: Cyprinidae), in Lake Tödürge, Sivas, Turkey. J Appl Ichthyol 27: 1350-1355.
  • Windell JT, Bowen SH (1978). Methods for study of fish diets based on analysis of stomach contents. In: Bagenal T, editor. Methods for Assessment of Fish Production in Fresh Waters. IBP Handbook No. 3. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, pp. 219-226.
  • Winemiller KO (1989). Ontogenetic diet shifts and resource partitioning among piscivorous fishes in the Venezuelan ilanos. Environ Biol Fish 26: 177-199.
  • Wood KA, Hayes RB, England J, Grey J (2016). Invasive crayfish impacts on native fish diet and growth vary with fish life stage. Aquatic Sciences (in press).
  • Wootton RJ (1990). Ecology of Teleost Fishes. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
  • Yalçın Özdilek Ş (2008). Karamenderes’in doğal ve istilacı balıkları. In: Akdemir A, Demircan O, Yılmaz S, Takaoğlu T, Akbulak C, editors. Ezine Değerleri Sempozyumu. Çanakkale, Turkey: Olay Matbaası. p. 224.
  • Yalçın Özdilek Ş, Jones RI (2014). The diet composition and trophic position of introduced Prussian carp Carassius gibelio (Bloch, 1782) and native fish species in a Turkish river. Turk J Fish Aquat Sc 14: 769-776.