Population size of endemic Rana tavasensis in its terra typica, Turkey

Population size of endemic Rana tavasensis in its terra typica, Turkey

We applied capture mark recapture (CMR) methods to estimate the population size of the Tavas frog Rana tavasensis in its terra typica. For this purpose, we used Pollock s robust design in program MARK in the 2011 2015 breeding seasons in its terra typica. Based on the selected model, equal catchability of each individual and absence of temporary migration were found to be the most likely biological hypotheses. Population sizes were estimated as 398, 348, 275, and 117 individuals during the four study years, respectively. Annual capture probabilities were estimated to average 0.07, and annual survival rates across years averaged 0.19. The year-specific estimations showed a remarkable decline in population size and survival rates. Anthropogenic factors, such as off-road activities, recreational activities, and animal grazing, might have played a role in this decline. This trend provides us with useful knowledge for conservation and management activities.

___

  • Alford RA, Richards SJ (1999). Global amphibian declines: a problem in applied Ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30: 133-165.
  • AmphibiaWeb (2016). Information on amphibian biology and conservation. [online]. Website http://amphibiaweb.org/ (accessed 24 February 2016).
  • Araujo MB, Thuiller W, Pearson RG (2006). Climate warming and the decline of amphibians and reptiles in Europe. J Biogeogr 33: 1712-1728.
  • Ayaz D, Tok CV, Mermer A, Tosunoğlu M, Afsar M, Çiçek K (2007). Population size of the Marsh frog (Rana ridibunda Pallas, 1771) in Lake Yayla (Denizli, Turkey). Turk J Zool 31: 255-260.
  • Baran I, Balık S, Kumlutaş Y, Tok CV, Olgun K, Durmuş H, Türkozan O, Ilgaz Ç, Iret F (2001). Rana holtzi (Toros Kurbağası)’nin biyolojik ve ekolojik yönden araştırılması ve koruma stratejisinin saptanması. IV Ulusal Ekoloji ve Çevre Kongresi; 8–9 February 2013; Ankara, Turkey. Ankara, Turkey: Hacettepe University, pp. 213-218 (in Turkish).
  • Barinaga M (1990). Where have all the froggies gone? Science 247: 1033-1034.
  • Başkale E, Kaya U (2012). Decline of the Levantine Frog, Pelophylax bedriagae Camerano, 1882, in the western Aegean Region of Turkey: changes in population size and implications for conservation. Zool Middle East 57: 69-76.
  • Başkale E, Yıldırım E, Çevik İE, Kaya U (2013). Population size and age structure of metamorphic and pedomorphic forms of Ommatotriton ophryticus (Berthold, 1846) in Northwestern Black Sea Region of Turkey. J Herpetol 47: 270-276.
  • Beebee TJC (2013). Effects of road mortality and mitigation measures on amphibian populations. Conserv Biol 27: 657-668.
  • Blaustein AR, Wake DB (1990). Declining amphibian populations: a global phenomenon. Trends Ecol Evol 5: 203-204.
  • Bowkett AE (2009). Recent captive-breeding proposals and the return of the ark concept to global species conservation. Conserv Biol 23: 773-776.
  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR(2002). Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. 1st ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
  • Çevik İE, Başkale E, Kaya U (2008). A mark-recapture study of the fire-bellied toad (Bombina bombina) using digital photographic identification techniques in north-western Turkey. Acta Biol Univ Daugavp 8: 75-79.
  • Çiçek K, Mermer A, Tok CV (2011) Population dynamics of Rana macrocnemis Boulenger, 1885 at Uludağ, Western Turkey. Zool Middle East 53: 41-60.
  • Collins JP, Storfer A (2003). Global amphibian declines: sorting the hypotheses. Divers Distrib 9: 89-98.
  • Cooch E, White GC(2015). Program Mark, a gentle introduction. 14th ed. [online] Website http://www.phidot.org/software/mark/docs/book/ (accessed 10 December 2015).
  • Fahrig L, Pedlar JH, Pope SE, Taylor PD, Wegner JF (1995). Effect of road traffic on amphibian density. Biol Conserv 73:177-182.
  • Fellers GYM, Drost CA (1993). Disappearance of the cascades frog, Rana cascadae, at the southern end of its range. Biol Conserv 65: 177-181.
  • Franzen M, Bubmann M, Kordges T, Thiesmeier B (2008). Die Amphibien und Reptilien der Südwest-Türkei. Berlin, Germany: Laurenti-Verlag (in German).
  • Gardner T (2001). Declining amphibian populations: a global phenomenon in Conservation Biology. Anim Biodivers Conserv 24: 25-44.
  • Gasc JP, Cabela A, Crnobrnja-Isailovic J, Dolmen D, Grossenbacher K, Haffner P, Lescure J, Martens H, Martínez Rica JP, Maurin H, et al., editors (1997). Atlas of Amphibians and Reptiles in Europe. Paris, France: Backhuys Publishers.
  • Griffiths RA, Pavajeau L (2008). Captive breeding, reintroduction, and the conservation of amphibians. Conserv Biol 22: 852-861.
  • Groot B, Hazebroek E (1996). Ungulate traffic collisions in Europe. Conserv Biol 10: 1059-1067.
  • IUCN (2015). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2015-4 [online] Website http://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed 22 December 2015).
  • IUCN (2016). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2015-4 [online] Website http://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed 22 February 2016).
  • Kaya U, Başkale E, Çevik İE, Kumlutaş Y, Olgun K (2010). Population sizes of Taurus frog, Rana holtzi, in two different localities, Karagöl and Eğrigöl: new estimations, decline, and a warning for their conservation. Russ J Herpetol 17: 247-250.
  • Kaya U, Çevik İE, Erişmiş UC (2005). Population status of the Taurus frog Rana holtzi Werner (1898), in its terra typica: is there a decline? Turk J Zool 29: 317-319.
  • Kaya U, Erişmiş UC (2001). Marsh frogs, Rana ridibunda in Lake Akören -26 August National Park (Afyon): a preliminary study of population size and a taxonomical evaluation. Turk J Zool 25: 31-34.
  • Mader HJ, Schell C, Kornacker P (1990). Linear barriers to arthropod movements in the landscape. Biol Conserv 54: 209-222.
  • Marsh DM, Trenham PC (2001). Metapopulation dynamics and amphibian conservation. Conserv Biol 15: 40-49.
  • Mermer A, Ayaz D, Çiçek K (2008). Abundance of syntopic newts, Triturus karelinii (Strauch, 1870) and Triturus vittatus (Gray, 1835), in Uludağ National Park (Bursa, Turkey). Turk J Zool 32: 59-64.
  • Pollock KH (1982). A capture-recapture design robust to unequal probability of capture. J Wildlife Manage 46: 757-760.
  • Reed RA, Johnson-Barnard J, Baker WL (1996). Contribution of roads to forest fragmentation in the Rocky Mountains. Conserv Biol 10: 1098-1106.
  • Sas, I, Covaciu-Marcov, SD, Demeter L, Cicort-Lucaciu AS, Strugariu A, 2008. Distribution and status of the moor frog (Rana arvalis) in Romania. Z Feldherpetol 13: 337-354.
  • Schmidt BR, Schaub M, Anholt BR (2002). Why you should use capture-recapture methods when estimating survival and breeding probabilities: on bias, temporary emigration, over dispersion, and common toads. Amphibia-Reptilia 23: 375-388.
  • Stuart S, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Young BE, Rodrigues ASL, Fishman DL, Waller RW (2004). Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306: 1783-1786.
  • Tarkhnishvili DN, Gokhelashvili RK (1999). Amphibians of the Caucasus. (Advances in Amphibian Research in the Former Soviet Union). Sofia, Bulgaria: Pensoft Publishers.
  • White GC, Burnham KP (1999). Program MARK: Survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46: 120-139.
  • Yıldız MZ, Göçmen B (2012). Population dynamics, reproduction and life history traits of Taurus frog, Rana holtzi Werner, 1898 (Anura: Ranidae) in Karagöl (Ulukışla, Niğde) Turkey. Herpetol Romanic 6: 1-40.