Morphological and Biometrical Comparisons of Mesocricetus Nehring, 1898 (Mammalia: Rodentia) species distributed in the Palaearctic Region

Currently, 4 species, Mesocricetus auratus, Mesocricetus raddei, Mesocricetus newtoni, and Mesocricetus brandti of the genus Mesocricetus are accepted as the valid taxa based on karyotype and morphologic features. A potential fifth species, Mesocricetus nigriculus, is under dispute and is currently listed as a subspecies of M. raddei, along with Mesocricetus raddei raddei and Mesocricetus raddei avaricus. UPGMA cluster analyses performed with biometrical measures confirm, only partially, the common separation of Mesocricetus hamsters into a Transcaucasian group with Mesocricetus newtoni, Mesocricetus brandti, and Mesocricetus auratus, and a Ciscaucasian group including the M. raddei subspecies. The status of M. nigriculus could not be resolved by these analyses. Biometric measurements group M. nigriculus and M. auratus together. M. raddei were found to be the most divergent species according to its biometrical characteristics. In addition to this, there are no morphologic or biometric differences in the subspecies level between M. r. raddei and M. r. avaricus; however, the differences among taxa might be explained by the fact that the species inhabits mountainous areas and that body measures and coloration reflect ecological adaptation more than true phylogenetic position. Morphometric data revealed an increasing similarity in M. brandti from the eastern to the western part of its range. M. newtoni proved to be an intermediary between M. auratus and M. brandti.

Morphological and Biometrical Comparisons of Mesocricetus Nehring, 1898 (Mammalia: Rodentia) species distributed in the Palaearctic Region

Currently, 4 species, Mesocricetus auratus, Mesocricetus raddei, Mesocricetus newtoni, and Mesocricetus brandti of the genus Mesocricetus are accepted as the valid taxa based on karyotype and morphologic features. A potential fifth species, Mesocricetus nigriculus, is under dispute and is currently listed as a subspecies of M. raddei, along with Mesocricetus raddei raddei and Mesocricetus raddei avaricus. UPGMA cluster analyses performed with biometrical measures confirm, only partially, the common separation of Mesocricetus hamsters into a Transcaucasian group with Mesocricetus newtoni, Mesocricetus brandti, and Mesocricetus auratus, and a Ciscaucasian group including the M. raddei subspecies. The status of M. nigriculus could not be resolved by these analyses. Biometric measurements group M. nigriculus and M. auratus together. M. raddei were found to be the most divergent species according to its biometrical characteristics. In addition to this, there are no morphologic or biometric differences in the subspecies level between M. r. raddei and M. r. avaricus; however, the differences among taxa might be explained by the fact that the species inhabits mountainous areas and that body measures and coloration reflect ecological adaptation more than true phylogenetic position. Morphometric data revealed an increasing similarity in M. brandti from the eastern to the western part of its range. M. newtoni proved to be an intermediary between M. auratus and M. brandti.

___

  • Argyropola, A. I. 1933. Die Gattungen und Arten der Hamster (Cricetinae Murray, 1866) der Paläarktik. Z. Säugetierkunde, 8: 9-149.
  • Corbet, G. B. 1978. The mammals of the Palaearctic region; a taxonomic review. British Museum (Natural History), Cornell University Press, London.
  • Doğramacı, S. Kefelioğlu, H., and Gündüz, I., 1994. Karyological analysis of Anatolian Mesocricetus (Mammalia: Rodentia) species. Tr. J. of Zoology, 18: 41-46 (In Turkish with English summary).
  • Ellerman, J. R. and Morrison-Scott, T. C. S. 1951. Checklist of Palaearctic and Indian Mammals 1758 to 1946. British Museum Natural History, London.
  • Felten, H., Spitzenberger, F. and Storch, G. 1971. Zur Kleinsäugerfauna West - Anatoliens. Senkerbergiana Biology Teil I, 52, 393 - 424.
  • Gattermann, R., Fritzsche, P., Neumann, K., Al – Husseyin, I., Kayser, K., Abiad, M. and Yakti, R. 2001. Notes on the current distribution and the ecology of wild golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). Journal of Zoology London 254, 359 – 365.
  • Gromov, I. M. and Erbajeva, M. A. 1995. The Mammals of Russia and Adjacent Territories; Lagomorphs and Rodents, Russian Academy of Science, Zoological Institute, St. Petersburg (In Russian).
  • Hamar, M. and Schutowa, M. 1966. Neue Daten über die geographische Veränderlichkeit und die Entwicklung der Gattung Mesocricetus Nehring, 1898 (Glires, Mammalia). Z. Säugetierkunde, 31, 237 - 251.
  • Harrison, D. L. and Bates, P. J. J. 1991. The mammals of Arabia. Harrison Museum Publication, Kent / England.
  • Hosey, G. R. 1982. The Bosporus Land – Bridge and Mammals Distributions in Asia Minor and the Balkans. Säugetierkundliche Mitteillungen, 30, 53 – 62.
  • Lehman, L. M. and Macpherson, I., 1967. The karyotype of the Kurdistan Hamster. Journal of Heredity, 58, 29 - 31.
  • Lehmann, E. 1969. Eine neue Säugetieraufsammlung aus der Türkei im Museum Koenig. Bonner Zoologischer Beiträge, 15, 299 - 327.
  • Lukjanenko, A. A. 1954. Über die Veränderung der nördlichen Grenze des Verbreitungsareals von Mesocricetus raddei nigriculus, Nehr. 1898. Zool. Journal, 33, 218 – 220 (In Russian).
  • Lyman, C. and O’Brien, R. A. 1977. Laboratory study of the Turkish Hamster Mesocricetus brandti. Breviora (Cambridge, Mass), 442, 1 - 27.
  • Nehring, A. 1898 a. Über Cricetus, Cricetulus und Mesocricetus n. Subg. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 21, 493 - 495.
  • Nehring, A. 1898 b. Die Gruppe der Mesocricetus-Arten. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, 1, 373-392.
  • Neuhäuser, G. 1936. Die Muriden von Kleinasien. Z. Säugetierkunde, 11, 161 - 236.
  • Niethammer, J. 1982. Mesocricetus newtoni (Nehring, 1898) – Rumänischer Goldhamster. In: Handbuch der Säugetiere Europas. Ed. By J. Niethammer and F. Krapp. Wiesbaden: Akad. Verlagsges, Vol. 2/1, 29 – 38.
  • Ognev, S. I. and Heptner, W. G. 1927. A new subspecies of hamster from Daghestan (Mesocricetus raddei, Nehr.), and some remarks on the Russian species of Mesocricetus (with a key to them). Ann. Mag. Nat. History, 9, 141 - 152.
  • Popescu, N. C. and Di Paolo, J. A. 1972. Chromosomal interrelationship of hamster species of the genus Mesocricetus. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics, 28, 10 - 23.
  • Radjabli, S. I. 1975. Karyotypic differentiation of Palaearctic Hamsters (Rodentia: Cricetidae). Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 225, 697 – 700, (In Russian).
  • Raicu, P. and Bratosin, S.,1966. Le Caryotype chez le Mesocricetus newtoni (Nehring, 1898). Z. Säugetierkunde, 31, 251 - 255.
  • Rohlf, F. J. 2000. NTSYS – pc, version 2.1. Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Exeter Publishing, LTD. New York.
  • Satunin, K. 1900. Die kaukasischen Mesocricetus-Arten nebst Beschreibung einer neuen Art: Mesocricetus koenigi nov. spec., Zool. Anzeiger, 23, 301-305.
  • Sickenberg, O. 1972. Über das Vorkommen des Goldhamsters Mesocricetus auratus brandti (Nehring, 1898) in Zentralanatolien. Säugetierkundliche Mitteilungen, 19, 362 - 362.
  • Spitzenberger, F. 1972. Der Hamster Mesocricetus brandti (Nehring, 1898) in Zentralanatolien. Z. Säugetierkunde, 37, 229 - 231.
  • Steiner, H. and Vauk, G. 1966. Säugetiere aus dem Beysehir Gebiet (Vilayet Konya, Kleinasien). Zoologischer Anzeiger, 176, 97 - 102.
  • Todd, N. B., Nixon, C. V., Mulvaney, D. A. and Connelly, M. E. 1972. Karyotypes of Mesocricetus brandti and hybridization within the genus. Journal of Heredity, 63, 73 - 77.
  • Wilson, E. and Reeder, M. D. 1993. Mammal species of the world. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington and London.
  • Yigit, N., Colak, E., Sozen, M., Ozkurt, S. and Verimli, R. 2000. The distribution, morphology, and karyology of the genus Mesocricetus (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Turkey. Folia Zool. 49, 167-174.
  • Yigit, N. 2003. Age – Dependent Cranial Variations in Mesocricetus brandti (Mammalia: Rodentia) Distributed in Turkey. Tr. J. of Zoology, 27, 65 – 71.
Turkish Journal of Zoology-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0179
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Age growth, and sex of golden grey mullet, Liza aurata (Risso, 1810) in homa lagoon (Risso, 1810) in homa lagoon (İzmir bay, Aegean Sea)

H. Tuncay KINACIGİL, Akın Türkler İLKYAZ, Kürşat SAKA, Kürşat FIRAT

Two new records of Hydrophilid (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae species of the Turkish Fauna

Ümit İNCEKARA, Abdullah MART, Rüstem HAYAT

İstilacı Bir Balık Türü, Pseudorasbora parva (Temminck & Schlegel, 1846)’nın Türkiye’deki Dağılımı

Fitnat Güler EKMEKÇİ, Şerife Gülsün KIRANKAYA

İstilacı Bir Balık Türü, Pseudorasbora parva (Temminck & Schlegel, 1846)’nın Türkiye’deki Dağılımı

Fitnat Güler EKMEKÇİ, Şerife Gülsün KIRANKAYA

Türkiye Yalancı akrep Faunası İçin Yeni Bir Kayıt; Lamprochernes savignyi (Simon, 1881) (Arachnida, Pseudoscorpionida)

Fatih SEZEK, Muhlis ÖZKAN

Homa Dalyanı’nda (İzmir Körfezi, Ege Denizi) Altınbaş Kefal’in Liza aurata (Risso, 1810) Yafl, Büyüme ve Efşey Oranı

Akın Türker İLKYAZ, Kürşat FIRAT, Şahin SAKA, Hasan Tuncay KINACIGİL

New Torrenticola Piersig (Acari: Hydrachnidia: Torrenticolidae) Species for the Turkish Fauna

Vladimir PESIC, Orhan ERMAN, Yunus ESEN

A New record for the Turkish pseudoscorpion fauna; Lamprochernes savignyi (Simon, 1881) (Arachnida, Pseudoscorpionida)

Fatih SEZEK, Muhlis ÖZKAN

Mammalian Remains in the Pellets of Long-eared Owls (Asio otus) in Diyarbakır Province

Seven SEÇKİN, Yüksel COŞKUN

Chromosomal Polymorphism in Thracian Populations of Rattus rattus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Rodentia: Muridae)

Tolga KANKILIÇ, Nuri YİĞİT, Teoman KANKILIÇ