Morphometric and Electrophoretic Variation in Different Honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) Populations

Honeybee colonies from Turkey, Naxcivan (Azerbaijan) and Austria were studied for morphometric and electrophoretic variation and for comparison among different subspecies. Out of six enzyme systems, four were found to be polymorphic with 14 allozymes. Discriminant function analysis of 10 morphometric variables resulted in a total of four groups. Cluster analysis of electrophoretic data showed a similar type of groupings. Among the four polymorphic loci, Mdh-1 showed the highest and Est-3 the lowest differentiation among populations.

Morphometric and Electrophoretic Variation in Different Honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) Populations

Honeybee colonies from Turkey, Naxcivan (Azerbaijan) and Austria were studied for morphometric and electrophoretic variation and for comparison among different subspecies. Out of six enzyme systems, four were found to be polymorphic with 14 allozymes. Discriminant function analysis of 10 morphometric variables resulted in a total of four groups. Cluster analysis of electrophoretic data showed a similar type of groupings. Among the four polymorphic loci, Mdh-1 showed the highest and Est-3 the lowest differentiation among populations.

___

  • Ruttner, F.: Biogeography and Taxonomy of Honeybees. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heildelberg, 1988.
  • Cornuet, J.M., Garnery, L.: Genetic diversity in Apis mellifera In: Smith, D.R. Ed. Diversity in the genus Apis. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1991.
  • Darendelioğlu, Y., Kence, A.: Morphometric study on population structure on honeybee, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Türkiye 2. Entomoloji Kongresi Bildirileri, 1992; 387-396.
  • Kandemir, İ., Kandemir, G., Kence, M., İnci, A., Kence, A.: Morphometrical and electrophoretical discrimination of honeybees from different regions of Turkey. XXXIVthInternational Apicultural Congress in Apimondia, 14-19 August 1995, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Güler, A., Kaftanoğlu, O.: Türkiye’deki önemli balarısı (Apis mellifera L.) ırk ve ekotiplerinin morfolojik özellikleri-I. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 1999; 23: Suppl. 3: 565-570.
  • Güler, A., Kaftanoğlu, O.: Türkiye’deki önemli balarısı (Apis mellifera L.) ırk ve ekotiplerinin morfolojik özellikleri-II. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 1999; 23: Suppl. 3: 571-575.
  • Güler, A., Akyol, E., Gökçe, M., Kaftanoğlu, O.: Artvin ve Ardahan yöresi balarıları (Apis mellifera L.)’nın bazı morfolojik özellikler yönünden iliflkilerinin belirlenmesi. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 2002; 26: 595-603.
  • Asal, S., Kocabafl, S., Elmacı, C., Yıldız, M.A.: Enzyme polymorphism in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) from Anatolia. Turk. J. Zool., 1995; 19: 153-156.
  • Kence, M., Kence, A., Kandemir, İ.: Türkiye’de balarısı ırklarının (Apis mellifera L.) karakterizasyonu ve korunması. TÜBİTAK Veterinerlik ve Hayvancılık Arafltırma Grubu, Proje No VHAG- 1077, Kesin Raporu, fiubat, 1998.
  • Arias, M.C., Sheppard, W.S.: Molecular phylogenetics of honeybee subspecies (Apis mellifera L.) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequence. Mol. Phyl. Evol., 1996; 5: 557–566.
  • Frank, P., Garnery, L., Solignac, M., Cornuet, J.M.: Molecular confirmation of a fourth lineage in honeybees from the Near East. Apidologie, 2000; 31: 167-180.
  • Louveaux, J.: Ecotypes in honeybees. International Apicultural Congress (Apimondia) 1969; 22: 499-501.