Alexis Marie PARISI, Shannon Kate THOMPSON, Abdullah KAYA, Erdoğan MEMİLİ

Molecular, cellular, and physiological determinants of bull fertility

Bull fertility, defined as the ability of the spermatozoon to fertilize and activate the ovum and then support embryonic and even fetal development, is a crucial factor influencing animal reproduction and production efficiency. Despite significant influences of fertility on herd genetic improvement and efficient cattle production, the mechanisms regulating this phenotype and reliable biomarkers associated with bull fertility are poorly defined. Specifically, there is a broad lack of knowledge in bull fertility. In this paper, bull fertility is reviewed within the context of animal systems physiology, and system biology markers associated with bull fertility are provided. This mini-review is intended to be a useful resource for students, animal producers, and the general public to help understand and appreciate this economically important trait.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Bull fertility, sperm, markers, systems biology, systems physiology

Molecular, cellular, and physiological determinants of bull fertility

Keywords:

Bull fertility, sperm, markers, systems biology, systems physiology,

PDF

___

Peddinti D, Nanduri B, Kaya A, Feugang JM, Burgess SC, Me- mili E. Comprehensive proteomic analysis of bovine sperma- tozoa of varying fertility rates and identification of biomarkers associated with fertility. BMC Syst Biol 2008; 2: 19.
Walton R. Important milestones in the AI industry. In: 24th Technical Conference on Artificial Insemination and Repro- duction. Milwaukee, WI, USA: NAAB; 2012.
Blaschek M, Kaya A, Zwald N, Memili E, Kirkpatrick BW. A whole-genome association analysis of noncompensatory fertility in Holstein bulls. J Dairy Sci 2011; 94: 4695–4699. 6. Dogan S, Mason MC, Govindaraju A, Belser L, Kaya A, Stokes J, Rowe D, Memili E. Interrelationships between apoptosis and fertility in bull sperm. J Reprod Develop 2013; 59: 18–26.
Gilbert, GL, Gilbert, EA, Govindaraju A, Jury L, Mason MC, Pfeiffer KE, Rowlinson TM, Ward L, Kaya A, Larson J et al. Endocrine control of bull fertility. In: Liu G, editor. Cattle Do- mestication, Diseases and the Environment. Hauppauge, NY, USA: Nova Publishers; 2012. pp. 1–34.
Inskeep EK, Tyler WJ, Casida LE. Hereditary variation in conception rate of Holstein-Friesian cattle. J Dairy Sci 1961; 44: 1857–1862.
Collins WE, Inskeep EK, Tyler WJ, Casida LE. Variation in conception rates of Guernsey cattle. J Dairy Sci 1962; 45: 1234– 1236.
Kaya A, Birler S, Enwall L, Memili E. Determinants of sperm morphology. In: Chenoweth PJ, Lorton SP, editors. Animal Andrology: Theories and Applications. Wallingford, UK: CAB International; 2014. pp. 34–56.
Den Daas JHG, Jong G, Lansbergen LMTE, Van Wagtendonk- De Leeuw AM. The relationship between the number of spermatozoa inseminated and the reproductive efficiency of individual dairy bulls. J Dairy Sci 1998; 81: 1714–1723.
Amann RP, DeJarnette JM. Impact of genomic selection of AI dairy sires on their likely utilization and methods to estimate fertility: a paradigm shift. J Dairy Sci 2012; 77: 795–817.
Van Camp SD. Common causes of infertility in the bull. The Veterinary Clinic of North America: Food Animal Practice 1997; 13: 203–231.
Feugang JM, Kaya A, Page GP, Chen L, Mehta T, Hirani K, Nazareth L, Gibbs RA, Memili E. Two stage genome wide association study identifies Integrin beta five as having a potential role in bull fertility. BMC Genomics 2009; 10: 176.
Foote RH. Factors influencing the quantity and quality of se- men harvested from bulls, rams, boars, and stallions. J Dairy Sci 1978; 47: 1–11.
Walker J, Perry G, Daly R, Olson K. Bull management and nutrition. In: Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XXI. Casper, WY, USA: RBCS; 2009. pp. 116–124.
Brito LF, Barth AD, Rawlings NC, Wilde RE, Crews DH Jr, Mir PS, Kastelic JP. Effect of nutrition on calfhood and peripubertal period on serum metabolic hormones, gonadotropins and tes- tosterone concentrations, and on sexual development in bulls. Domest Anim Endocrin 2007; 33: 1–18.
Barth AD, Brito LFC, Kastelic JP. The effect of nutrition on sexual development of bulls. Theriogenology 2008; 70: 485– 494.
Fuerst-Waltl B, Schwarzenbacher H, Perner C, Sölkner J. Effects of age and environmental factors on semen production and semen quality of Austrian Simmental bulls. Anim Reprod Sci 2006; 95: 27–37.
Senger PL. Organization of function and the male reproduc- tive systems. In: Senger PL, editor. Pathways to Pregnancy and Parturition. Pullman, WA, USA: Current Conceptions; 2003. p. 44–79.
Lorton SP. Evaluation of semen in the Andrology Laboratory. In: Chenoweth PJ, Lorton SP, editors. Animal Andrology: The- ories and Applications. Wallingford, UK: CAB International; 2014. pp. 100–143.
Hoflack G, Van Soom A, Maes D, de Kruif A, Opsomer G, Duchateau L. Breeding soundness and libido examination of Belgian Blue and Holstein Friesian artificial insemination bulls in Belgium and The Netherlands. Theriogenology 2006; 66: 207–216.
Bearden JH, Fuquay JW, Willard S, editors. Applied Animal Reproduction. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2004.
Chenoweth PJ and McPherson JF. Genetic Aspects of Male Reproduction. In: Chenoweth PJ, Lorton SP, editors. Animal Andrology: Theories and Applications. Wallingford, UK: CAB International; 2014. pp. 144–173.
Bochenek M, Smorag Z, Pilch J. Sperm chromatin structure assay of bulls qualified for artificial insemination. Theriogenology 2001; 56: 557–567.
Evenson DP, Darzynkiewicz Z, Melamed MR. Relation of mammalian sperm chromatin heterogeneity to fertility. Science 1980; 210: 1131–1133.
Agarwal A, Prabakaran SA, Said TM. Prevention of oxidative stress injury to sperm. J Androl 2005; 26: 654–660.
Agarwal A, Said TM. Role of sperm chromatin abnormalities and DNA damage in male infertility. Hum Reprod Update 2003; 9: 331–345.
Gilbert I, Bissonnette N, Boissonneault G, Vallée M, Robert C. A molecular analysis of the population of mRNA in bovine spermatozoa. Reproduction 2007; 133: 1073–1086.
Govindaraju A, Uzun A, Robertson L, Atli MO, Kaya A, Topper E, Crate EA, Padbury J, Perkins A, Memili E. Dynamics of microRNAs in bull spermatozoa. Reprod Biol Endocrin 2012; 10: 82.
Feugang JM, Rodriguez-Osorio N, Kaya A, Wang H, Page G, Ostermeier GC, Topper EK, Memili E. Transcriptome analysis of bull spermatozoa: implications for male fertility. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 21: 312–324.
Liu WM, Pang RTK, Chiu PCN, Wong BPC, Lao K, Lee KF, Yeung WSB. Sperm-borne microRNA-34c is required for the first cleavage division in mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109: 490–494.
Govindaraju A, Dogan S, Rodriguez-Osorio N, Grant K, Kaya A, Memili E. Delivering value from sperm proteomics for fer- tility. Cell Tissue Res 2012; 349: 783–793.
Wu AT, Sutovsky P, Xu W, van der Spoel AC, Platt FM, Oko R. The postacrosomal assembly of sperm head protein, PAWP, is independent of acrosome formation and dependent on microtubular manchette transport. Dev Biol 2007; 312: 471– 483.
Oliveira R. Protamines and male fertility. Hum Reprod Update 2006; 12: 417–435.
Kasimanickam R, Kasimanickam V, Thatcher CD, Nebel RL, Cassel BG. Relationships among lipid peroxidation, glutathione peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, sperm parameters, and competitive index in dairy bulls. Theriogenology 2007; 67: 1004–1012.
Sanocka D, Kurpisz M. Reactive oxygen species and sperm cells. Reprod Biol Endocrin 2004; 2: 12.
Petcoff DW, Holland WL, Stith BJ. Lipid levels in sperm, eggs, and during fertilization in Xenopus laevis. J Lipid Res 2008; 49: 2365–2378.