Microbiological Properties of Boneless Sheep Meat in Kahramanmaraş

This study was undertaken to determine the microbiological properties of boneless sheep meat sold by supermarkets, local markets and butchers in Kahramanmaraş, Turkey, and also to examine the microbiological quality of the food surfaces and tools used. Of the meat samples, 93 were collected from supermarkets (group 1), 25 from local markets (group 2) and 21 from butchers (group 3). Food surface and tool samples were collected from 139 cutting tables, 139 chopping boards, 139 workbenches, 255 knives, 139 balances and 278 aprons. The mean values of the aerobic plate count (log CFU/g) of the boneless sheep meat samples from the 3 groups were 5.92, 5.70 and 5.83, respectively. Presumptive Escherichia coli (% detected) was 1.07 (1/93), 0.25 (1/25) and 0.21 (1/21) in the 3 groups. The mean values of pseudomonads were (log CFU/g) 4.79, 4.83 and 4.59, mean values of yeasts and moulds were 3.36, 3.59 and 4.38, and mean values of psychrotrophs were 4.61, 4.55 and 4.77, respectively. Coagulase positive Staphylococcus aureus was detected (20%) in 5 meat samples from local markets. Coagulase positive S. aureus was not detected in meat samples from supermarkets and butchers. The mean values of aerobic bacteria from the cutting tables, chopping boards, workbenches, knives, balances and aprons were (log CFU/ml) 6.67, 6.47, 7.62, 6.76, 7.0 and 6.88, respectively. The average counts of yeasts and moulds from the food surfaces and tools were; cutting tables 6.27, chopping boards 5.0, workbenches 5.51, knives 5.56, balances 6.32 and aprons 6.36 log CFU/ml, respectively. E. coli was not detected from the food surfaces or tools. Coagulase positive S. aureus was detected on knives (1.9%) and aprons (3.4%).

Microbiological Properties of Boneless Sheep Meat in Kahramanmaraş

This study was undertaken to determine the microbiological properties of boneless sheep meat sold by supermarkets, local markets and butchers in Kahramanmaraş, Turkey, and also to examine the microbiological quality of the food surfaces and tools used. Of the meat samples, 93 were collected from supermarkets (group 1), 25 from local markets (group 2) and 21 from butchers (group 3). Food surface and tool samples were collected from 139 cutting tables, 139 chopping boards, 139 workbenches, 255 knives, 139 balances and 278 aprons. The mean values of the aerobic plate count (log CFU/g) of the boneless sheep meat samples from the 3 groups were 5.92, 5.70 and 5.83, respectively. Presumptive Escherichia coli (% detected) was 1.07 (1/93), 0.25 (1/25) and 0.21 (1/21) in the 3 groups. The mean values of pseudomonads were (log CFU/g) 4.79, 4.83 and 4.59, mean values of yeasts and moulds were 3.36, 3.59 and 4.38, and mean values of psychrotrophs were 4.61, 4.55 and 4.77, respectively. Coagulase positive Staphylococcus aureus was detected (20%) in 5 meat samples from local markets. Coagulase positive S. aureus was not detected in meat samples from supermarkets and butchers. The mean values of aerobic bacteria from the cutting tables, chopping boards, workbenches, knives, balances and aprons were (log CFU/ml) 6.67, 6.47, 7.62, 6.76, 7.0 and 6.88, respectively. The average counts of yeasts and moulds from the food surfaces and tools were; cutting tables 6.27, chopping boards 5.0, workbenches 5.51, knives 5.56, balances 6.32 and aprons 6.36 log CFU/ml, respectively. E. coli was not detected from the food surfaces or tools. Coagulase positive S. aureus was detected on knives (1.9%) and aprons (3.4%).

___

  • CNERNA-CNRS (Centre Nationale d’Etudes et de Recommodations sur la Nutrition et l’Alimentation): Criteres microbiologiques. In: J.L. Jouve (eds.), La qualite microbiologique des aliments. Polytechnica, Paris, 353-361, 1996.
  • Jablonski, L.M., Bohach, G.A.: Staphylococcus aureus, in: Doyle, M.P. Beuchat L.R. and Montville, T.J. (eds.), Food Microbiology: fundamentals and frontiers. American Society for Microbiology, Washington D.C., 1997; 353-375.
  • Jay, J.M.: Modern food microbiology. 6thed. Aspen Publishers Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland. 2000; 387-406.
  • Kitchell, A.G., Ingram, G.C., Hudson, W.R.: Microbiological sampling in abattoirs. (Board R.G. and Lovelock D.W. eds) in: Sampling-Microbiological Monitoring of Environments, Society for Applied Bacteriology Technical Series No. 7, Academic Press, London, 1973; 43-59.
  • International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods (ICMSF): Microorganisms in Food 1, Their Significance and Methods of Enumeration. Univ of Toronto Press, London, 1982.
  • Oxoid: Oxoid Handbuch, Oxoid, Wesel, Deutschland. 390 pages, 1983.
  • Lancette, G.A., Tatini, S.R.: Staphylococcus aureus, in: Vanderzart C. and Splittstoessser D.F. (eds.) Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods. APHA, Washington D.C., 1992; 533-550.
  • Palleroni, N.J.: Genus Pseudomonas, in: Krieg N, Holt J.G. (eds.) Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Vol. I, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1984; 141-199.
  • Harrigan, W.F.: Laboratory Methods in Food Microbiology. 3rd Edition, Academic Press, 1998.
  • Vanderline, P.B., Shay, B., Murray, J.: Microbiological quality of Australian beef carcass meat and frozen bulk packed beef. J. Food Prot., 1998; 61: 437-443.
  • Widders, P.R., Coates, K.J., Warner, S., Beattie, J.C., Morgan, I.R., Hickey, M.W.: Controlling microbial contamination on beef and lamb meat during processing. Aust. Vet. J., 1995; 72: 208- 211.
  • Bell, R.G., Harrison, J.C.L., Rogers, A.R.: Preliminary investigation of the distribution of microbial contamination on lamb and beef carcasses. Meat Industry Research Institute of New Zealand Technical Report No. 927, Hamilton, New Zealand, 1993.
  • Bell, R.G., Hathaway, S.C.: The hygienic efficiency of conventional and inverted lamb dressing systems. J. Appl. Bacteriol., 1996; 81: 225-234.
  • Heinzel, M.: Importance of personnel hygiene during meat processing. Fleischwirtschaft, 1984; 64: 1366-1368.
  • De Wit, J.C., Kampelmacher, E.H.: Some aspects of microbial contamination of hands of workers in food industries. Zbl. Bakt. Hyg. I. Abt. Orig. B., 1981; 172: 667-669.
  • Hansson, I.B.: Microbiological meat quality in high and low capacity slaughterhouses in Sweden. J. Food Prot., 2001; 64: 820-825.
  • Newton, K.G., Harrison, J.C.L., Wauters, A.M.: Sources of psychrotrophic bacteria on meat at the abattoir. J. Appl. Bacteriol., 1978; 45: 75-82.
  • Snijders, J.M.A., Gerats, G.E., Van Logtestijn, J.G.: Good manufacturing practices during slaughtering. Arch. Lebensmittelhyg., 1984; 35: 99-103.
  • Erdoğrul, Ö.T.: Halka açık gıda satıflı yapan iflyerlerinin genel hijyenik durumu, Kükem Derg., 1998; 21: 65-68.
  • Wehr, H.M.: Attitudes and policies of governmental agencies on microbial criteria for foods. Food Technol., 1982; 36: 45-54.
  • Emprey, W.A., Scott, W.J.: Investigations on chilled beef: Part 1 - microbial contamination acquired in the meat works. Bull. Counc. Sci. Ind. Res. Austr., 1939; 126: 43- q49.
  • Phillips, D., Sumner, J., Alexander, J.F., Dutton, K.M.: Microbiological quality of Australian Beef. J. Food Prot., 2001; 64: 692-696.