Identification of microbiological, physical, and chemical quality of milk from milk collection centers in Kastamonu Province
The aim of this study is to perform microbiological, physical, and chemical analyses of the samples from producers who continuously bring milk to 30 actively operating milk collection centers throughout the spring, summer, autumn, and winter seasons in Kastamonu Province and determine whether the identified values are within legal limits. For microbiological properties of milk included in the research, total aerobic mesophilic bacteria (TAMB) and coliform group bacteria counts were identified. For the determination of physical and chemical properties, dry matter, fat, nonfat dry matter, lactose, protein, ash, pH, titratable acidity, refractive index, and specific gravity values were identified and the presence of carbonate, peroxidase, and antibiotics was researched. As a result of the research, in the 240 investigated raw milk samples in all seasons, the majority of mean dry matter, fat, nonfat dry matter, lactose, protein, ash, pH, titratable acidity, refractive index, specific gravity, carbonate, peroxidase, and antibiotic values were found to comply with the Turkish Food Codex Communiqué on Raw Milk and Heat Processed Drinking Milk. However, the TAMB and coliform group bacteria counts were not found to comply with these criteria. The main sources of variation in the study of milk collection center, season (apart from lactose), and milk collection center × season interaction were identified to have very significant effects (P < 0.01) on the microbiological, physical, and chemical properties of the milk samples.
___
- 1. Megha SV, Annadurai B. Isolation and Identification of
Proteolytic Bacteria From Raw Milk Samples. Global Journal
of Bio-Science and Biotechnology 2014; 3 (4): 391-397.
- 2. Metin M. Süt Teknolojisi: Sütün Bileşimi ve İşlenmesi. 15th
ed. İzmir, Turkey: Ege Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi
Yayınları; 2017 (in Turkish).
- 3. Turkish Food Codex Communiqué on Raw Milk and Heat
Treated Drinking Milk, Communiqué No: 2000/6. Ankara,
Turkey: Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and
Forestry; 2000.
- 4. TS 1018 Cow Milk - Raw Standard. Ankara, Turkey: Turkish
Standards Institution; 2002.
- 5. Maijala K. Cow milk and human development and wellbeing. Livestock Production Science 2000; 65 (1-2): 1-18. doi:
10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00194-9
- 6. Heck JML, Van Valenberg HJF, Dijkstra J, Van Hooijdonk
ACM. Seasonal variation in the Dutch bovine raw milk
composition. Journal of Dairy Science 2009; 92 (10): 4745-
4755. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2146
- 7. Wijesinha-Bettoni R, Burlingame B. Milk and dairy product
composition. In: Muehlhoff E (editor). Milk and Dairy Products
in Human Nutrition. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations; 2013. pp. 41-102.
- 8. Özhan M, Tüzemen N, Yanar M. Büyükbaş Hayvan Yetiştirme.
Erzurum, Turkey: Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi
Yayınları; 2012 (in Turkish).
- 9. Rajčević M, Potočnik K, Levstek J. Correlations between
somatic cells count and milk composition with regard to the
season. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus 2003; 68 (3): 221-
226.
- 10. Tekelioglu O, Cimen M, Soylu D, Soylu I. Milk components from
machine milking cows in winter and spring periods. Journal
of Animal and Veterinary Advances 2010; 9 (4): 795-797. doi:
10.3923/javaa.2010.795.797
- 11. Sudhasaravanan R, Binukumari S. Microbial quality of raw and
pasteurized milk samples collected from different regions of
Madurai District, (T.N.) India. IOSR Journal of Environmental
Science, Toxicology and Food Technology 2015; 9 (1): 71-73. doi:
10.9790/2402-09117173
- 12. T, Erbil F, Kurdal E. Sütün insan beslenmesindeki önemi. In:
Proceedings of İçme Sütü Sempozyumu; Tekirdağ, Turkey; 1998.
pp. 31-41 (in Turkish).
- 13. Dehinenet G, Mekonnen H, Ashenafi M, Emmanuelle G.
Determinants of raw milk quality under a smallholder production
system in selected areas of Amhara and Oromia National Regional
States, Ethiopia. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North
America 2013; 4 (1): 84-90. doi: 10.5251/abjna.2013.4.1.84.90
- 14. Diler A, Baran A. Determination of some quality characteristics
of raw cow milk on smallholder dairy farms in Hinis District of
Erzurum. Alınteri Zırai Bilimler Dergisi 2014; 26 (1): 18-24 (in
Turkish with an abstract in English).
- 15. Tekinşen OC. Süt Ürünleri Teknolojisi. Konya, Turkey: Selçuk
Üniversitesi Yayınları; 1997 (in Turkish).
- 16. Kesenkaş H, Akbulut N. Determination of milk quality produced
from middle and large scale dairy farms and informal/street milk
quality sold in İzmir. Ege Ünivesitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi
2010; 47 (2): 161-169 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
- 17. Patır B, Can ÖP, Gürses M. Somatic cell counts in raw cow milk
collected from different city. Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri
Veteriner Dergisi 2010; 24 (2): 87-91 (in Turkish with an abstract
in English).
- 18. Sayın C, Mencet MN, Taşcıoğlu Y. Evaluating the roles of milk
collecting facilities against milk roundsman system. Akdeniz
Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 2010; 23 (2): 117-125 (in
Turkish with an abstract in English).
- 19. Kurt A, Çakmakçı S, Çağlar A. Süt ve Mamulleri Muayene ve
Analiz Metotları Rehberi. Erzurum, Turkey: Atatürk Üniversitesi
Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları; 2012 (in Turkish).
- 20. Milk, Cream and Evaporated Milk-Determination of Total Solids
Content. IDF 021:2010. Brussels, Belgium: International Dairy
Federation; 2010.
- 21. Metin M. Süt ve Mamülleri Analiz Yöntemleri, 6th ed. İzmir,
Turkey: Ege Üniversitesi Rektörlük Yayınları; 2012 (in Turkish).
22. Milk and Milk Products-Determination of Nitrogen Content. IDF
020-4: 2016. Brussels, Belgium: International Dairy Federation;
2016.
- 23. Oysun G. Süt ve Ürünlerinde Analiz Yöntemleri. İzmir, Turkey:
Ege Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Yayınları; 2011 (in
Turkish).
- 24. Reybroeck W, Ooghe S, De Brabander HF, Daeseleire E.
Validation of the βeta-s.t.a.r. 1 + 1 for rapid screening of residues
of β-lactam antibiotics in milk. Food Additives & Contaminants
2010; 27 (8): 1084-1095. doi: 10.1080/19440041003724871
- 25. Bek Y, Efe E. Araştırma ve Deneme Metotları. Adana, Turkey:
Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Notları; 1995 (in
Turkish).
- 26. Turkish Food Codex Communiqué on Raw Milk and Heat
Treated Drinking Milk, Communiqué No: 2009/14. Ankara,
Turkey: Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and
Forestry; 2009.
- 27. Üzüm M. The isolation of some pathogens and Salmonellashigella in raw milk sold in Ankara area. MSc, Gazi University,
Ankara, Turkey, 2006 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
- 28. Eser AG, Bilgücü E. Süt toplama merkezlerindeki çiğ inek
sütlerinin mikrobiyolojik kalite kriterlerinin araştırılması: Biga
örneği. In: Proceedings of Türkiye 12. Gıda Kongresi; Edirne,
Turkey; 2016. p. 30 (in Turkish).
- 29. Beykaya M, Özbey A, Yıldırım Z. Determination of physical,
chemical and microbiological properties of milk from some
dairy plants in Sivas Province. Turkish Journal of Agriculture -
Food Science and Technology 2017; 5 (4) : 388-396 (in Turkish
with an abstract in English). doi: 10.24925/turjaf.v5i4.388-
396.1172
- 30. Dede C. İstanbul’da satılan sokak sütlerinin mikrobiyolojik
olarak incelenmesi. MSc, Gebze Technical University, Kocaeli,
Turkey, 2000 (in Turkish).
- 31. Akın MS, Yapık Ö, Akın MB. Some properties of raw milk
obtained from dairy production farm and collectors in
Adıyaman. Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi 2016; 20
(4): 253-265 (in Turkish with an abstract in English). doi:
10.29050/harranziraat.282266
- 32. Yalçın H, Özdemir S, Gökalp HY, Kurt A. Çiğ inek sütlerinden
izole edilen koliform grubu ve Staphylococcus aureus
bakterilerinin tanımlanması. Gıda 1991; 16(2): 107-110 (in
Turkish with an abstract in English).
- 33. Atasoy FA, Turkoglu H, Ozer BH. Some microbiological
properties of raw milk, yogurt and fresh urfa cheese produced
and sold in Şanlıurfa Province. Harran Üniversitesi Ziraat
Fakültesi Dergisi 2003; 7 (3-4): 77-83 (in Turkish with an
abstract in English).
- 34. Güllüce M, Leloğlu S, Ayyıldız A. Erzurum Bölgesi sütlerinin
bakteriyolojik ve antibiyotik yönünden incelenmesi. In:
Proceedings of 6. Ulusal KÜKEM Kongresi; Erzurum, Turkey;
1989. pp. 23-30 (in Turkish).
- 35. Uraz G, Yücel N. Çiğ sütlerde koliform grubu
mikroorganizmalarının dağılımı üzerine bir araştırma. Gıda
1998; 23 (4): 241-245 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
- 36. Kurt A, Demirci M, Kurdal E. Erzurum piyasasında satılan
sütlerin bileşimleri ve çeşitli hileler yönünde araştırılması ΙΙ
Yaz mevsiminde piyasaya arzedilen sütler. Atatürk Üniversitesi
Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 1977; 8 (4): 17-35 (in Turkish with an
abstract in German).
- 37. Yaylak E, Alçiçek A, Konca Y, Uysal H. Determination of
variations on some nutrients and physical characteristics of
milk collected in winter months by dairy in Izmir’s County.
Hayvansal Üretim Dergisi 2007; 48 (1): 26-32 (in Turkish with
an abstract in English).
- 38. Şekerden Ö, Özkütük K. Büyükbaş Hayvan Yetiştirme. Adana,
Turkey: Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Kitabı;
1995 (in Turkish).
- 39. Tokur E. Physical and chemical properties of the milks sold in
the streets of Ankara. MSc, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey,
2006 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
- 40. Karakoç D, Çimen M, Demir N, Şos C, Gökyer H et al. Ağustos
ve Kasım aylarında Batman İlinden elde edilen sütlerde
ekonomik öneme sahip biyokimyasal parametreler. Bilim ve
Gençlik Dergisi 2013; 1 (1): 19-23 (in Turkish with an abstract
in English).
- 41. Ateş R. A research: Determination of changes in the
composition of raw milk provided from private farms and
association of manufacturers in different region of turkey
all the year round. MSc, Namık Kemal University, Tekirdağ,
Turkey, 2015 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
- 42. Aslan M, Çimen M, Bal S. Elazığ İli Karakoçan İlçesinden
elde edilen sütlerde yağ ve protein oranlarının AB ve
Türk standartlarına uygunluklarının belirlenmesi. Tunceli
Üniversitesi Bilim ve Gençlik Dergisi 2013; 1(2): 39-43 (in
Turkish with an abstract in English).
- 43. Gayretli D. Determination of seasonal and monthly changes
of some biochemical parameters in milk obtained from
Diyarbakir province. MSc, Tunceli University, Tunceli, Turkey,
2013 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
- 44. Özkan M. Effect of somatic cell count on raw milk composition
and quality of dairy cattles. MSc, Namık Kemal University,
Tekirdağ, Turkey, 2017 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
- 45. Ozrenk E, İnci SS. The effect of seasonal variation on
composition of cow milk in Van province. Pakistan Journal of
Nutrition 2008; 7(1): 161-164. doi: 10.3923/pjn.2008.161.164
- 46. Jaeggi JJ, Wendorff WL, Romero J, Berger YM, Johnson ME.
Impact of seasonal changes in ovine milk on composition and
yield of a hard-pressed cheese. Journal of Dairy Science 2005;
88 (4): 1358-1363. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72802-2
- 47. Önal AR. The determination of somatic cell count and some
components of raw milk which evaluated by a private company
in Trakya. MSc, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey, 2005.
- 48. Tuncer K. Determination of some quality characteristics of raw
milk samples collected from dairy farms in TR71 region. MSc,
Ahi Evran University, Kırşehir, Turkey, 2015 (in Turkish with
an abstract in English).
- 49. Salman M, Khaskheli M, Ul-Haq I, Talpur R, Khuhro AP et
al. Comparative studies on nutritive quality of buffalo and cow
milk. International Journal of Research in Applied, Natural and
Social Sciences 2014; 2 (12): 69-78.
- 50. Gemechu T, Beyene F, Eshetu M. Physical and chemical quality
of raw cow’s milk produced and marketed in Shashemene Town,
Southern Ethiopia. ISABB Journal of Food and Agricultural
Science 2015; 5 (2): 7-13. doi:10.5897/ISABB-JFAS2014.0017
- 51. Kul E, Erdem H, Atasever S. Kaliteli çiğ süt üretiminin temel
koşulları. In: Proceedings of Türkiye Süt Sığırcılığı Kurultayı;
İzmir, Turkey; 2007. pp. 379-385 (in Turkish).
- 52. Özek K. Factors affecting composition of milk in dairy cattle
and relation between nutrition and milk composition. Journal
of Bahri Dagdas Animal Research 2015; 4 (2): 37-45 (in Turkish
with an abstract in English).
- 53. Yurt B, Uluçay B. Iğdır’da üretilen sütlerin bazı kimyasal
özellikleri ve aflatoksin M1 miktarının belirlenmesi. Türk
Doğa ve Fen Dergisi 2017; 6 (2): 32-39 (in Turkish with an
abstract in English).
- 54. Yapık Ö. A comparative study on the determination of some
chemical and microbiological properties of street milk and
raw milk produced in milk farm in Adıyaman. MSc, Harran
University, Şanlıurfa, Turkey, 2014 (in Turkish with an abstract
in English).
- 55. Ceylan B, Çimen M, Bakır K, Oduncu İ. Farklı mevsimlerden
elde edilen inek sütlerinde pH seviyelerinin peynir
standartlarına uygunluklarının belirlenmesi. Bilim ve Gençlik
Dergisi 2013; 1 (1): 7-12 (in Turkish with an abstract in
English).
- 56. Turkish Food Codex Communiqué on Raw Milk and Heat
Treated Drinking Milk, Communiqué No: 2006/38. Ankara,
Turkey: Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and
Forestry; 2006.
- 57. Turkish Food Codex Regulation on the Classification of
Pharmacologically Active Substances and Maximum Residue
Limits in Foodstuffs of Animal Origin. Ankara, Turkey:
Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry; 2017.
- 58. Duraklı-Velioğlu S. Determining the changes of antibiotic
residues in milk with heat treatment and during storage. MSc,
Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey, 2006.
- 59. Bakırcı İ, Akyüz N. Antibiotic residue problems in milk
products. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi
1996; 6 (1): 119-131 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
- 60. S.S. Kastamonu Köy Kalkınma Ve Diğer Tarımsal Amaçlı
Kooperatifler Birliği 2017 Genel Kurul Kitapçığı. Kastamonu,
Turkey: Kastamonu Köy Koop; 2017 (in Turkish).