Determination of fat preferences of adult dogs

This study was carried out to determine the preferences of dogs for some commonly used fat sources in dog food. Three different types of food were produced using 5% additional sunflower oil, poultry fat, or beef tallow. The food was extruded using a twin-screw extruder at approximately 25% moisture and temperatures in the range of 90 °C to 135 °C. The extrudates were dried for 30–45 min at temperatures of up to 148 °C in a belt dryer. Next, the heated fats were sprayed onto the extrudates. The foods were cooled, sampled, and packaged. A total of 30 neutered adult between 1 and 3 years old male dogs were used. The preference of the dogs for the 3 different fat sources was determined via a 2-pan preference test. Preference tests were conducted for 12 days in pairs, and the dogs consumed each food for 8 days. The dogs had the greatest preference for food containing the additional sunflower oil, with a preference rate of 56%. Beef tallow was the least preferred fat, with a preference rate of 44%. Dogs preferred food containing sunflower oil more than food containing animal fats. It was concluded that dogs showed a preference in proportion to the linoleic acid level in each food.

___

  • 1. NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Dogs and Cats. Washington, DC, USA: The National Academies Press; 2006.
  • 2. Case LP, Hayeg MG, Daristotle L, Raasch MF. Canine and Feline Nutrition. 3rd Edition. Missouri, USA: Mosby Elsevier; 2011.
  • 3. FEDIAF. Nutritional guidelines for complete and complementary pet food for cats and dogs. European Pet Food Industry Federation; 2018.
  • 4. Bauer JE. Essential fatty acid metabolism in dogs and cats. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 2008; 37: 20-27. doi: 10.1590/ S1516-35982008001300004
  • 5. Aldrich GC, Koppel K. Pet food palatability evaluation: a review of standard assay techniques and interpretation of results with a primary focus on limitations. Animals 2015; 5: 43-55. doi: 10.3390/ani5010043
  • 6. Hutton J. How to test palatability. Feed International 2002; June: 14-17.
  • 7. Dust JM, Grieshop CM, Parsons CM, Karr-Lilienthal LK, Schasteen CS et al. Chemical composition, protein quality, palatability, and digestibility of alternative protein sources for dogs. Journal of Animal Science 2005; 83: 2414-2422. doi: 10.2527/2005.83102414x
  • 8. Tobie C, Péron F, Larose C. Assessing food preferences in dogs and cats: a review of the current methods. Animals 2015; 5: 126-137. doi: 10.3390/ani5010126
  • 9. Vondran JC. A two-pan feeding trial with compainion dogs: Considerations for future testing, MSc, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, 2013.
  • 10. Larose C. Criteria to assure reliability of palatability tests. PETS International Magazine 2003; 14-15.
  • 11. Verbrugghe A, Hesta M, Gulbrandson KE, Janssens GPJ. The effect of salmon oil freshness on the palatability of dog foods. Vlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift 2007; 76: 201-207.
  • 12. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 17th ed. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International; 2003.
  • 13. TS ISO 6493. Hayvan yemleri - Nişasta muhtevasının tayini - Polarimetrik metot; 2004.
  • 14. Yoneda T, SaitouK, Asano H, Mizushige T, Matsumura S et al. Assessing palatability of long-chain fatty acids from the licking behavior of BALB/c mice. Physiology and Behavior 2009; 96 (4-5): 735-741. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.01.010
  • 15. Adachi S, Eguchi A, Sakamoto K, Asano H, Manabe Y et al. Behavioral palatability of dietary fatty acids correlates with the intracellular calcium ion levels induced by the fatty acids in GPR120-expressing cells. Biomedical Research (Tokyo) 2014; 35: 357-367. doi: 10.2220/biomedres.35.357
  • 16. Wiseman J. Fats in Animal Nutrition. Tiptree, Essex: Anchor Brendon Ltd; 1984.