Detection of high levels of somatic cells in milk on farms equipped with an automatic milking system by decision trees technique

The purpose of the study was to use decision trees to predict increased levels of somatic cells in cow's milk. The material for the study comprised data collected in 2012-2014 from five farms in Poland equipped with an automatic milking system. Data on 803 Polish Holstein-Friesian cows were collected. In order to predict somatic cell count data mining techniques were used to build a graphical model of a decision tree. This study found that the most important factors to anticipate an elevated somatic cell count in cow's milk are milk conductivity, lactation stage, and lactation (primiparous and multiparous cow groups), as well as milking speed and rumination time. An increase in these parameters was also associated with a higher percentage of samples with an elevated somatic cell count. It has been shown that in order to keep somatic cell count low in automatic milking system herds a farmer should pay particular attention to the milking speed.

___

  • Jacobs JA, Siegford JM. Invited review: the impact of automatic milking systems on dairy cow management, behaviour, health, and welfare. J Dairy Sci 2012; 95: 2227-2247.
  • Sun Z, Samarasinghe S, Jago J. Detection of mastitis and its stage of progression by automatic milking systems using artificial neural networks. J Dairy Res 2010; 77: 168-175.
  • Hovinen M, Pyörälä S. Invited review: udder health of dairy cows in automatic milking. J Dairy Sci 2011; 94: 547-562.
  • de Mol RM, Ouweltjes W. Detection model for mastitis in cows milked in an automatic milking system. Prev Vet Med 2001; 49: 71-82.
  • Pyörälä S. Indicators of inflammation in the diagnosis of mastitis. Vet Res 2003; 34: 565-578.
  • Hogeveen H, Kamphuis C, Steeneveld W, Mollenhorst H. Sensors and clinical mastitis—the quest for the perfect alert. Sensors-Basel 2010; 10: 7991-8009.
  • Kamphuis C, Mollenhorst H, Heesterbeek JA, Hogeveen H. Detection of clinical mastitis with sensor data from automatic milking systems is improved by using decision-tree induction. J Dairy Sci 2010; 93: 3616-3627.
  • Kamphuis C, Sherlock R, Jago J, Mein G, Hogeveen H. Automatic detection of clinical mastitis is improved by in-line monitoring of somatic cell count. J Dairy Sci 2008; 91: 4560- 4570.
  • Špakauskas V, Klimienė I, Matusevičius A. A comparison of indirect methods for diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in lactating dairy cows. Vet Arhiv 2006; 76: 101-109.
  • Piwczyński D, Nogalski Z, Sitkowska B. Statistical modelling of calving ease and stillbirths in dairy cattle using the classification tree technique. Livest Sci 2013; 154: 19-27.
  • Sun Z. Application of artificial neural networks in early detection of mastitis from improved data collected on-line by robotic milking stations. MSc, Lincoln University, New Zealand, 2008.
  • Antanaitis R, Žilaitis V, Juozaitienė V, Palubinskas G, Kučinskas A, Sederevičius A, Beliavska-Aleksiejūnė D. Efficient diagnostics and treatment of bovine mastitis according to herd management parameters. Vet Med Zoot 2015; 69: 3-10.
  • Mrode RA, Swanson GJT. Estimation of genetic parameters for somatic cell count in the first three lactations using random regression. Livest Prod Sci 2003; 79: 239-247.
  • Hammer JF, Morton JM, Kerrisk KL. Quarter-milking-, quarter-, udder- and lactation-level risk factors and indicators for clinical mastitis during lactation in pasture-fed dairy cows managed in an automatic milking system. Aust Vet J 2012; 90: 167-174.
  • Mollenhorst H, Hidayat MM, van den Broek J, Neijenhuis F, Hogeveen H. The relationship between milking interval and somatic cell count in automatic milking systems. J Dairy Sci 2011; 94: 4531-4537.
  • Schepers AJ, Lam TJGM, Schukken YH, Wilmink JBM, Hanekamp WJA. Estimation of variance components for somatic cell counts to determine thresholds for uninfected quarters. J Dairy Sci 1997; 80: 1833-1840.
  • Green LE, Schukken YH, Green MJ. On distinguishing cause and consequence: do high somatic cell counts lead to lower milk yield or does high milk yield lead to lower somatic cell count? Prev Vet Med 2006; 76: 74-89.
  • SAS Institute Inc. Getting started with SAS® Enterprise Miner 13.1TM. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc. 2013.
  • Grochowska E, Piwczyński D, Portolano B, Mroczkowski S. Analysis of the influence of the PrP genotype on the litter size in Polish sheep using classification trees and logistic regression. Livest Sci 2014; 159: 11-17.
  • Nogalski Z, Czerpak K, Pogorzelska P. Effect of automatic and conventional milking on somatic cell count and lactation traits in primiparous cows. Ann Anim Sci 2011; 11: 433-441.
  • Sitkowska B, Piwczyński D, Aerts J, Waśkowicz M. Changes in milking parameters with robotic milking. Arch Anim Breed 2015; 58: 137-143.
  • Österman S, Östensson K, Svennersten-Sjaunja K, Bertilsson J. How does extended lactation in combination with different milking frequencies affect somatic cell counts in dairy cows? Livest Prod Sci 2005; 96: 225-232.
  • Friggens NC, Rasmussen MD. Milk quality assessment in automatic milking system: accounting for the effects of variable intervals between milking on milk composition. Livest Prod Sci 2001; 73: 45-54.
  • Løvendahl P, Chagunda MGG. Covariance among milking frequency, milk yield, and milk composition from automatically milked cows. J Dairy Sci 2011; 94: 5381-5392.
  • Norberg E. Electrical conductivity of milk as a phenotypic and genetic indicator of bovine mastitis: a review. Livest Prod Sci 2005; 96: 129-139.
  • Lee DH, Choudhary V. Study on milkability traits in Holstein cows. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2006; 19: 309-314.
  • Kamphuis C, Dela Rue B, Mein G, Jago J. Development of protocols to evaluate in-line mastitis-detection systems. J Dairy Sci 2013; 96: 4047-4058.
  • Steeneveld W, Vernooij JCM, Hogeveen H. Effect of sensor systems for cow management on milk production, somatic cell count, and reproduction. J Dairy Sci 2015; 98: 3896-3905.