Characteristics and outcomes of critically ill children transported by ambulance in a Turkish prehospital system: a multicenter prospective cohort study

Background. The most underdeveloped area in the care of critically-ill-children (CIC) is the prehospital period. Appropriate prehospital assessment and life-saving-interventions (LSI) of this population are challenging and require dedicated resources to ensure the best outcomes. We aimed to determine the characteristics and outcomes of CIC transported to the Turkish Pediatric Emergency Departments (EDs). The frequency and distribution of LSI administered by prehospital providers on route and in the EDs were also investigated. Methods. This prospective study was conducted at 4 metropolitan cities and 9 tertiary pediatric EDs between August 2014-August 2015. A survey based study evaluated all CIC who were brought by ambulance to the participant EDs. CIC were defined as a patient who requires LSI or needs intensive care admission for any reason. Patient demographics, clinical features, reason for transport, performed procedures in the ambulance or ED were sought. Finally, the short-term outcomes of transported CIC and transport-associated risks were analyzed. Results. During the study period, a total 2094 children were brought by ambulance to all participant EDs. Only 227 (10.8%) of them were critically-ill. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers were less likely to perform procedures in CIC if they were staffed with paramedics (p

PDF

___

1. Shah MN. The formation of the emergency medical services system. Am J Public Health 2006; 96: 414- 423.

2. Seid T, Ramaiah R, Grabinsky A. Pre-hospital care of pediatric patients with trauma. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2012; 2: 114-120.

3. Al-Anazi AF. Pediatric emergency medical services and their drawbacks. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2012; 5: 220-227

4. Seidel JS. Emergency medical services and the pediatric patient: are the needs being met? II. Training and equipping emergency medical services providers for pediatric emergencies. Pediatrics 1986; 78: 808-812.

5. Gausche M, Lewis RJ, Stratton SJ, et al. Effect of out-of-hospital pediatric endotracheal intubation on survival and neurological outcome: a controlled clinical trial. JAMA 2000; 283: 783-790.

6. Ludwig S, Selbst S. A child-oriented emergency medical services system. Curr Probl Pediatr 1990; 20: 109-158.

7. Sariyer G, Ataman MG, Akay S, Sofuoglu T, Sofuoglu Z. An analysis of Emergency Medical Services demand: time of day, day of the week, and location in the city. Turk J Emerg Med 2016; 17: 42-47.

8. Resmi Gazete. Ambulans ve Acil Bakım Teknikerleri ile Acil Tıp Teknisyenlerinin Çalışma Usul ve Esaslarına Dair Tebliğ. http://www.resmigazete. gov.tr/eskiler/2009/03/20090326-4.htm (Accessed on December 03, 2018).

9. Morris DL, Cross AB. Is the emergency ambulance service misused? Br Med J 1980; 281: 121-123.

10. Gersan LW, Shvarch L. Emergency medical service utilization by the elderly. Ann Emerg Med 1982; 11: 610-612.

11. Brismar B, Dahlgren BE, Larson J. Ambulance utilization in Sweden: analysis of emergency ambulance missions in urban and rural areas. Ann Emerg Med 1984; 13: 1037-1039.

12. Rademaker AW, Powell DG, Read JH. Inappropriate use and unmet need in paramedic and nonparamedic ambulance systems. Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16: 553- 556.

13. Mosley I, Nicol M, Donnan G, Patrick I, Kerr F, Dewey H. The impact of ambulance practice on acute stroke care. Stroke 2007; 38: 2765-2770.

14. Rokos IC, French WJ, Koenig WJ, et al. Integration of pre-hospital electrocardiograms and ST- elevation myocardial infarction receiving center (SRC) networks: impact on door-to-balloon times across 10 independent regions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2: 339-346.

15. Phelps MA, Rodriguez RM, Passanante M, Dresden G, Kriza K. EMS activation in a cohort of critically ill patients. J Emerg Med 2002; 22: 127-131.

16. Kulshrestha A, Singh J. Inter-hospital and intrahospital patient transfer: recent concepts. Indian J Anaesth 2016; 60: 451-457.

17. Kost S, Arruda J. Appropriateness of ambulance transportation to a suburban pediatric emergency department. Prehosp Emerg Care 1999; 3: 187-190.

18. Richard J, Osmond MH, Nesbitt L, Stiell IG. Management and outcomes of pediatric patients transported by emergency medical services in a Canadian prehospital system. CJEM 2006; 8: 6-12.

19. Jewkes F. Prehospital emergency care for children. Arch Dis Child 2001; 84: 103-105.

20. Emergency Medical Services Education Agenda for the Future: A Systems Approach. (Available at: https://www.ems.gov/ pdf/ education/ EMSEducation- for-the- Future-A- Systems-Approach/ EMS_Education_Agenda.pdf. (Accessed on December 09, 2018).

21. Hansen M, Lambert W, Guise JM, Warden CR, Mann NC, Wang H. Out-of-hospital pediatric airway management in the United States. Resuscitation 2015; 90: 104-110.

22. Su E, Mann NC, McCall M, Hedges JR. Use of resuscitation skills by paramedics caring for critically injured children in Oregon. Prehosp Emerg Care 1997; 1: 123-127.

23. Izawa J, Iwami T, Gibo K, et al. Timing of advanced airway management by emergency medical services personnel following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a population-based cohort study. Resuscitation 2018; 128: 16-23.

24. Stroud MH, Prodhan P, Moss MM, Anand KJ. Redefining the golden hour in pediatric transport. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2008; 9: 435-437.

25. King BR, King TM, Foster RL, McCans KM. Pediatric and neonatal transport teams with and without a physician: a comparison of outcomes and interventions. Pediatr Emerg Care 2007; 23: 77-82.

26. Ong ME, Cho J, Ma MH, et al; PAROS Investigators. Comparison of emergency medical services systems in the pan-Asian resuscitation outcomes study countries: report from a literature review and survey. Emerg Med Australas 2013; 25: 55-63