The effects of different metal surface treatment on marginal microleakage in resinbonded restorations

The effects of different metal surface treatment on marginal microleakage in resinbonded restorations

Margins are one of the most important aspects in the success of restorations. Therefore, we evaluated the effects of different metal surface treatments on the marginal microleakage of a resin-bonded non-precious alloy (Remanium CS). After alloy surfaces were roughened by chemical etching or sandblasting the tooth and metal specimens were bonded together in pairs with a chemically curing resin cement (Panavia 21 EX) and placed in methylene blue dye. Spectrophotometry was used to assess marginal leakage. Statistical analysis was completed using the ANOVA test. No statistically significant difference in leakage was found between the groups (F=0.4387, p>0.05).

___

  • 1.Leupold RJ, Faraone KL. Etched castingas an adjunct to mouth preparation forremovable partial dentures. J ProsthetDent 53: 655-8, 1985.
  • 2.Isidor F, Hassna NM, Josephsen K,Kaaber S. Tensile bond strength ofresin-bonded non-precious alloys withchemically and mechanicallyroughened surfaces. Dent Mater 7:225-29, 1991.
  • 3.Yap AUJ, Stokes ANS. Resin-bondedprostheses. Quintessence Int 26: 521-30. 1995.
  • 4.Livaditis GJ. A chemical etching systemfor creating micromechanical retentionin resin-bonded retainers. ProsthetDent 56: 181-8, 1986.
  • 5.Diaz-Arnold AM, Williams VD, AquilinoA. The effect of film thickness on thetensile bond strength of aprosthodontic adhesive. J ProsthetDent 66: 614-8, 1991.
  • 6.Tanaka T, Kamada K, Matsumura H,Atsuta M. A comparison of watertemperatures for thermocycling ofmetal-bonded resin specimens. JProsthet Dent 74: 345-9, 1995.
  • 7.White SN, Sorensen JA, Kang SK,Caputo AA. Microleakage of newcrown and fixed partial denture lutingagents. J Prosthet Dent 67: 156-61,1992.
  • 8.Tjan AHL, Dunn JR, Grant BE. Marginalleakage of cast gold crowns luted withan adhesive resin cement. J ProsthetDent 67: 11-5, 1992.
  • 9.Panavia 21 Technical informationGuide. Kuraray Co., Ltd. Osaka-Japan,1993.
  • 10.El-Sherif MH, El-Messery A, HalhoulMN. The effects of alloy surfacetreatments and resin on the retention ofresin-bonded retainers. J Prosthet Dent65: 782-6, 1991.
  • 11.Atta MO, Smith BGN, Brown D. Bondstrengths of three chemical adhesivecements adhered to a nickel-chromiumalloy for direct bonded retainers. JProsthet Dent 63: 137-43, 1990.
  • 12.White SN, Furuichi R, Kyomen SM.Microleakage through dentin aftercrown cementation. J Endod 21: 9-12,1995.
  • 13.Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Hughie ML,Brown JS. Comparison of shear bondstrengths of two resin luting systemsfor a base and a high noble metal alloybonded to enamel. J Prosthet Dent 72:457-61, 1994.
  • 14.Kohli S, Levine WA, Grisius RJ, FensterRK. The effect of three different surfacetreatments on the tensile strength of theresin bond to nickel-chromium-beryllium alloy. J Prosthet Dent 63: 4-8, 1990.