Is the version angle of the glenoid different in bone and cartilage? An MRI study

Background/aim: To determine whether or not there is a difference between the version of the bone and cartilage surfaces of the glenoid. Axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) slices were examined in order to evaluate the measurements taken based on both the cartilage and bone joint surfaces.Materials and methods: A retrospective evaluation was made of the MRI scans of 182 patients. All of the reviewers independently measured the glenoid version angles of all of the patients from 1-182. The process was then repeated, with each reviewer taking second measurements of the angles from 1-182. Pearson correlation coefficient analysis was applied to evaluate the interaction and relationships between the measurements taken from the bone and cartilage. The intra- and interobserver interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were assessed. Analysis of variance was applied to determine any interobserver significant differences. Results: The mean glenoid version was determined as -3.58 ± 4.08° in the bone-based measurements and ?5.81 ± 4.30° in the cartilage-based measurements. The cartilage- and bone-based measurements were found to have inter- and intraobserver reliability. A statistically significant difference was observed between the mean cartilage-based version and the mean bone-based version. Changes in the cartilage- and bone-based measurements were correlated; however, this change was not linear. Conclusion: The cartilage-based version showed a significant difference from the bone- based version. Therefore, in the preoperative planning and evaluation of glenoid-based pathologies, it would be more appropriate to evaluate both the bone and cartilage surface on MRI.
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0144
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

IL-1RN VNTR, IL-2(-330), and IL-4 VNTR gene polymorphisms in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with sinonasal polyposis

Hüseyin ASLAN, Süheyl HAYTOĞLU, Gökhan KURAN, Özge ÖZALP YÜREĞİR, Sevcan TUĞ BOZDOĞAN

Hanane ZAHIR, Jihane BELKHIR, Hanane MOUHIB, Mustapha Ait AMEUR, Mohammed CHAKOUR

Youjin JIANG, Zhengfang ZHANG, Zhiming GU, Hengdi ZOU, Wenhui FAN, Xiaojun CHEN, Hongyou WANG

Batuhan TURGAY, Yavuz Emre ŞÜKÜR, Batuhan ÖZMEN, Ruhşen AYTAÇ, Cem Somer ATABEKOĞLU, Bülent BERKER, Murat SÖNMEZER

Relationship between headache and Internet addiction in children

İlknur TEPECİK BÖYÜKBAŞ, Ayşegül Neşe ÇITAK KURT, Selma TURAL HESAPÇIOĞLU, Mehmet UĞURLU

Caner ÇAKIR, İsmet Çiğdem KILIÇ, Dilek YÜKSEL, Yalin Ay KARYAL, İşin ÜREYEN, Gökhan BOYRAZ, Yasin DURMUŞ, Murat GÜLTEKİN, Nejat ÖZGÜL, Mustafa Alper KARALÖK, Mehmet Coşkun SALMAN, Kunter YÜCE, Ahmet Taner TURAN

Melia KARAKÖSE, İlker ÇORDAN, Mustafa CAN, Muhammet KOCABAŞ, Mustafa KULAKSIZOĞLU, Feridun KARAKURT

Evaluation of interleukin-23 receptor (IL-23R) gene polymorphisms and serum IL-23 levels in patients with psoriasis

Kuyaş Hekimler ÖZTÜRK, Selma KORKMAZ, Seda ÇELİK, Başak FİLİZ, Fevziye Burcu ŞİRİN, İjlal ERTURAN, Mehmet YILDIRIM, Hikmet ORHAN

Does tumor size have prognostic value in patients undergoing lymphadenectomy in endometrioid-type endometrial cancer confined to the uterine corpus?

Nejat ÖZGÜL, Kunter YÜCE, Mehmet Coşkun SALMAN, Murat GÜLTEKİN, Dilek YÜKSEL, Caner ÇAKIR, Işın ÜREYEN, İsmet Çigdem KILIÇ, Yasin DURMUŞ, Gökhan BOYRAZ, Yalın Ay KARYAL, Mustafa Alper KARALÖK, Ahmet Taner TURAN

Shear wave versus strain elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions

Aykut GÜRÜF, Ahmet Veysel POLAT, Mesut ÖZTÜRK, İlkay Koray BAYRAK