Burcu Baran KETENCİOĞLU, İnsu YILMAZ, Nuri TUTAR, İnci GÜLMEZ, Fatma Sema OYMAK

Horse allergen sensitivity and respiratory symptoms among horse farm workers

Background/aim: Sensitivity and symptoms related to animal proteins have been investigated in various occupational groups. However, data from horse farm workers are limited. We aimed to determine horse allergen sensitivity in the horse farm workers, and to evaluate its relationship with respiratory symptoms and functional parameters. Materials and methods: A total of 110 subjects were enrolled in the study. The study group consisted of 80 horse farm workers. Face-to-face surveys, skin prick tests SPT , and pulmonary function tests PFT were performed in the study group. Control group consisted of 30 healthy subjects. SPT and PFTs were also performed for control group. The SPT test results of the horse farm workers were compared with the SPT results provided from the medical records of 1376 subjects who admitted to the outpatient clinic with respiratory symptoms. Results: Atopy rate was significantly higher in horse farm workers than in healthy subjects 41% and 13%, respectively; P = 0.008 . Horse allergen sensitivity was positive 8/80 10% in horse farm workers, 0/30 in healthy subjects, and 32/1376 2% in medical records of subjects who were admitted to the outpatient clinic with respiratory symptoms. P = 0.07, P = 0.001, respectively . There was no statistically significant relationship between respiratory symptoms and horse allergen sensitivity in horse farm workers P = 0.67 . However, mean FEV1 ratios were lower in horse farm workers with horse allergen sensitivity than healthy subjects 88.6% ± 17.9, 103.7 ± 10, P = 0.031, respectively . Conclusion: Atopy and animal allergen sensitization were significantly higher in horse farm workers, suggesting the relationship between the intensity of specific allergen exposure and the sensitization to this specific allergen.

Keywords:

Horse farm workers, horse allergen, occupational exposure, respiratory symptoms, skin prick test,

___

1. Cullinan P, Cook A, Gordon S, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Tee RD et al. Allergen exposure, atopy and smoking as determinants of allergy to rats in a cohort of laboratory employees. The Europan Respiratory Journal 1999; 13 (5): 1139-1143. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.13e33.x
2. Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Putcha V, Gordon S, Heederik D, Venables KM et al. Exposure-response relations among laboratory animal workers exposed to rats. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2003; 60 (2): 104-108. doi: 10.1136/ oem.60.2.104
3. Gautrin D, Ghezzo H, Infante-Rivard C, Malo JL. Incidence and determinants of IgE-mediated sensitization in apprentices: A prospective study. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2000; 162 (4 Pt 1): 1222-1228. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.162.4.2001023
4. Roberts G, Lack G. Horse allergy in children. BMJ 2000; 321 (7256): 286-287. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7256.286
5. Seward JP. Occupational allergy to animals. Occupational Medicine 1999; 14 (2): 285-304.
6. Krakowiak A, Wiszniewska M, Krawczyk P, Szulc B, Wittczak T et al. Risk factors associated with airway allergic diseases from exposure to laboratory animal allergens among veterinarians. Internationals Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 2007; 80 (6): 465-475. doi: 10.1007/s00420-006-0153-0
7. Susitaival P, Kirk JH, Schenker MB. Atopic symptoms among California veterinarians. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 2003; 44 (2): 166-171. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10253
8. Lutsky I, Baum GL, Teichtahl H, Mazar A, Aizer F et al. Occupational respiratory disease in veterinarians. Annals of Allergy 1985; 55 (2): 153-156.
9. Rönmark E, Perzanowski M, Platts-Mills T, Lundbäck B. Different sensitization profile for asthma, rhinitis, and eczema among 7-8-year-old children: Report from the obstructive lung disease in Northern Sweden studies. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology 2003; 14 (2): 91-99. doi: 10.1034/j.1399- 3038.2003.00042.x
10. Novembre E, Mori F, Barni S, Pucci N, Rossi ME. Should the skin prick test to horse be included in the standard panel for the diagnosis of respiratory allergy? Journal of Investigational Allergology & Clinical Immunology 2009; 19 (3): 247-249.
11. Liccardi G, Salzillo A, Dente B, Piccolo A, Lobefalo G et al. Horse allergens: An underestimated risk for allergic sensitization in an urban atopic population without occupational exposure. Respiratory Medicine 2009; 103 (3): 414-420. doi: 10.1016/j. rmed.2008.09.017
12. Liccardi G, D’Amato G, Antonicelli L, Berra A, Billeri L et al. Sensitization to horse allergens in Italy: a multicenter study in urban atopic subjects without occupational exposure. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology 2011; 155 (4): 412-417. doi: 10.1159/000321414
13. Tutluoglu B, Atiş S, Anakkaya AN, Altug E, Tosun GA et al. Sensitization to horse hair, symptoms and lung function in grooms. Clinical and Experimental Allergy 2002; 32 (8): 1170- 1173. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.01439.x
14. Simoneti CS, Ferraz E, de Menezes MB, Bagatin E, Arruda LK et al. Allergic sensitization to laboratory animals is more associated with asthma, rhinitis, and skin symptoms than sensitization to common allergens. Clinical and Experimental Allergy 2017; 47 (11): 1436-1444. doi: 10.1111/cea.12994
15. Dykewicz MS. Occupational asthma: current concepts in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2009; 123 (3): 519-528. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.01.061
16. Gregoire C, Rosinski-Chupin I, Rabillon J, Alzari PM, David B et al. cDNA cloning and sequencing reveal the major horse allergen Equ c1 to be a glycoprotein member of the lipocalin superfamily. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 1996; 271 (51): 32951-32959. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.51.32951
17. Mantyjarvi R, Parkkinen S, Rytkonen M, Pentikainen J, Pelkonen J et al. Complementary DNA cloning of the predominant allergen of bovine dander: a new member in the lipocalin family. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 1996; 97 (6):1297-1303. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(96)70198-7
18. Smith W, Butler AJL, Hazell LA, Chapman MD, Pomes A et al. Fel d 4, a cat lipocalin allergen. Clinical and Experimental Allergy 2004; 34 (11): 1732-1738. doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 2222.2004.02090.x
19. Konieczny A, Morgenstern JP, Bizinkauskas CB, Lilley CH, Brauer AW et al. The major dog allergens, Can f 1 and Can f 2, are salivary lipocalin proteins: cloning and immunological characterization of the recombinant forms. Immunology 1997; 92 (4): 577-586. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1997.00386.x
20. Baker J, Berry A, Boscato IM, Gordon S, Walsh BJ et al. Identification of some rabbit allergens as lipocalins. Clinical and Experimental Allergy 2001; 31 (2): 303-312. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2001.00973.x
21. Clark AJ, Ghazal P, Bingham RW, Barrett D, Bishop JO. Sequence structures of a mouse major urinary protein gene and pseudogene compared. The EMBO Journal 1985; 4 (12): 3159-3165.
22. Kimbell-Dunn M, Bradshaw L, Slater T, Erkinjuntti-Pekkanen R, Fishwick D et al. Asthma and allergy in New Zealand farmers. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 1999; 35 (1): 51-57. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199901)35:13.0.co;2-f
23. Moghtaderi M, Farjadian S, Hosseini Z, Raayat A. Increased risk of horse sensitization in southwestern Iranian horse riders. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health 2015; 28 (5): 909-913. doi: 10.13075/ ijomeh.1896.00471