Evaluation of outer hair cell function and medial olivocochlear efferent system in patients with type II diabetes mellitus
This study was designed to investigate the function of outer hair cells and medial olivocochlear efferents in type II diabetes mellitus (DM). Materials and methods: There were 50 patients with type II DM and 51 age- and sex-matched healthy controls included in the study. Both groups were compared in terms of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs), distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), and contralateral suppression of TEOAE. Results: Pure tone thresholds of the patients with type II DM were significantly higher than in the controls (P < 0.05). The TEOAE amplitudes at 1 kHz and at 1.5, 2, 3, 4, and 6 kHz signal-to-noise ratio amplitudes on DPOAE testing were significantly lower in the patients than controls (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the type II DM and control groups regarding contralateral suppression test results of TEOAEs. Conclusion: Type II DM seems to impact the auditory system at the cochlear level by affecting the functions of outer hair cells, and it results in elevation of the thresholds on audiometry and a decrease in the amplitudes of otoacoustic emissions.
Evaluation of outer hair cell function and medial olivocochlear efferent system in patients with type II diabetes mellitus
This study was designed to investigate the function of outer hair cells and medial olivocochlear efferents in type II diabetes mellitus (DM). Materials and methods: There were 50 patients with type II DM and 51 age- and sex-matched healthy controls included in the study. Both groups were compared in terms of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs), distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), and contralateral suppression of TEOAE. Results: Pure tone thresholds of the patients with type II DM were significantly higher than in the controls (P < 0.05). The TEOAE amplitudes at 1 kHz and at 1.5, 2, 3, 4, and 6 kHz signal-to-noise ratio amplitudes on DPOAE testing were significantly lower in the patients than controls (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the type II DM and control groups regarding contralateral suppression test results of TEOAEs. Conclusion: Type II DM seems to impact the auditory system at the cochlear level by affecting the functions of outer hair cells, and it results in elevation of the thresholds on audiometry and a decrease in the amplitudes of otoacoustic emissions.
___
- Maison SF, Liberman MC. Predicting vulnerability to acoustic
- injury with a noninvasive assay of olivocochlear reflex strength.
- J Neurosci 2000; 20: 4701–4707. 9.
- Hall JW. Handbook of Otoacoustic Emissions. San Diego, CA,
- USA: Singular Thomson Learning, 2000.
- Yost WA. Fundamentals of Hearing. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, 2000.
- Berlin CI, Hood LJ, Cecola RP, Jackson DF, Szabo P. Does type I afferent neuron dysfunction reveal itself through lack of efferent suppression? Hear Res 1993; 65: 40–50.
- Collet L. Use of otoacoustic emissions to explore the medial olivocochlear system in humans. Br J Audiol 1993; 27: 155–159.
- Harrell RW. Puretone evaluation. In: Katz J, editor. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams Wilkins, 2002. pp. 71–87.
- Cullen JR, Cinnamond MJ. Hearing loss in diabetics. J Laryngol Otol 1993; 107: 179–182.
- Axelsson A, Sigroth K, Vertes D. Hearing in diabetics. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1978; 356: 1–23.
- Ottaviani F, Dozio N, Neglia CB, Riccio S, Scavini M. Absence of otoacoustic emissions in insulin-dependent diabetic patients: is there evidence for diabetic cochleopathy? J Diabetes Complications 2002; 16: 338–343.
- Karabulut H, Dagli M, Ates A, Karaaslan Y. Results for audiology and distortion product and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Laryngol Otol 2010; 124: 137–140.
- Korres SG, Balatsouras DG, Economou C, Ferekidis E, Kandiloros D, Adamopoulos G. Effect of the number of averaged responses in transient evoked otoacoustic emissions on the results of neonatal hearing screening. Audiology 2000; 39: 293–299.
- Namyslowski G, Morawski K, Kossowska I, Lisowska G, Koehler B, Jarosz-Chobot P. Contralateral suppression of TEOAE in diabetic children. Effects of 1.0 kHz and 2.0 kHz pure tone stimulation--preliminary study. Scand Audiol Suppl 2001; 126–129.
- Ugur AK, Kemaloglu YK, Ugur MB, Gunduz B, Saridogan C, Yesilkaya E, Bideci A, Cinaz P, Goksu N. Otoacoustic emissions and effects of contralateral white noise stimulation on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in diabetic children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 73: 555–559.
- Hood LJ, Berlin CI, Bordelon J, Rose K. Patients with auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony lack efferent suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Am Acad Audiol 2003; 14: 302–313.
- Göksoy C, Utkuçal R. Contralateral white noise-induced enhancement in the guinea pigs MLR: a possible link to directional hearing. Turk J Med Sci 2000; 30: 433–439.
- Maison S, Micheyl C, Collet L. Sinusoidal amplitude modulation alters contralateral noise suppression of evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans. Neuroscience 1999; 91: 133–138.
- Gkoritsa E, Korres S, Segas I, Xenelis I, Apostolopoulos N, Ferekidis E. Maturation of the auditory system: 2. Transient otoacoustic emission suppression as an index of the medial olivocochlear bundle maturation. Int J Audiol 2007; 46: 277– 286.
- Oliveira JR, Fernandes JC, Costa Filho OA. Age impact on the efferent system activities in cochlear mechanical properties in normal hearing individuals. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 75: 340–344.
- Berlin CI, Hood LJ, Hurley AE, Wen H, Kemp DT. Binaural noise suppresses linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions more than ipsilateral or contralateral noise. Hear Res 1995; 87: 96–103.
- Karabulut H, Hizli S, Dagli M, Karabulut I, Acar B, Celik E, Abaci A, Ozdemir O, Karasen RM. Audiological findings in celiac disease. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2011; 73: 82–87.
- Makishima K, Tanaka K. Pathological changes of the inner ear and central auditory pathway in diabetics. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1971; 80: 218–228.
- Bayazit Y, Yilmaz M, Kepekci Y, Mumbuc S, Kanlikama M. Use of the auditory brainstem response testing in the clinical evaluation of the patients with diabetes mellitus. J Neurol Sci 2000; 181: 29–32.