Prediction of railway switch point failures by artificial intelligence methods

In recent years, railway transport has been preferred intensively in local and intercity freight and passenger transport. For this reason, it is of utmost importance that railway lines are operated in an uninterrupted and safe manner. In order to carry out continuous operation, all systems must continue to operate with maximum availability. In this study, data were collected from switch motors, which are the important equipment of railways, and the related equipment and these data were evaluated with sector experience and the results related to the failure status of the switch points were revealed. The obtained results were processed with support vector machines and artificial neural networks, which are artificial intelligence methods, and machine learning was performed. In the light of this learning, a decision support model, which predicts possible failures and gives information about the root cause of the failures that have occurred, was developed. This model aims to ensure that the data obtained in each movement of the railway switch point are processed and the necessary corrective and preventive actions are communicated to the maintenance personnel; thus, failures are eliminated before they affect the railway operation and the solution process of the failures that have occurred is shortened. Considering the six switch points from which the data were collected, the experimental results were predicted with 24% RMSE error rates in the SVM method, while they were successfully predicted with RMSE error rates ranging from 2.4% to 6.6% in the ANN method. Therefore, it is observed that the ANN method is more appropriate in the implementation of the established model.

___

  • [1] Lee J, Choi H, Park D, Chung Y, Kim H et al. Fault detection and diagnosis of railway point machines by sound analysis. Sensors 2010; 16: 549-561.
  • [2] Vileniskis M, Remenyte Prescott R, Rama D. A fault detection method for railway point systems. Proc IMechE Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2015; 0(0): 1-14.
  • [3] Arakani HD, Lucas C, Siegel D, Chang S, Dersin P et al. PHM for railway system- a case study on health assessment of the point machines. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (PHM); Denver CO, USA; 2012. pp. 1-5.
  • [4] Bemment SD, Goodall RM, Dixon R, Ward CP. Improving the reliability and availability of railway track switching by analysing historical failure data and introducing functionally redundant subsystems. Proceedings of IMechE Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2018; 232(5): 1407-1424.
  • [5] Vapnik V, Izmailov R. Knowledge transfer in SVM and neural networks. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 2017; 81(2017): 3-19.
  • [6] Hardalac F, Basaranoglu M, Yuksel M, Kutbay U, Kaplan M et al. Mucosal healing rate with azathioprine treatment and prediction by artificial systems. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology 2015; 26(1): 315-321.
  • [7] Yaşar H, Kutbay U, Hardalac F. A new unified system using ANN and complex wavelet transform for tissue density classification in mammography images. In: Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Computer and Technology Applications (ICCTA); Istanbul, Turkey; 2018. pp. 179-183 (in Turkish).
  • [8] Grobbelaar S, Visser JK. Determining the cost of predictive component replacement in order to assist with maintenance decision-making. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering 2015; 26(1): 150-162.
  • [9] Zhao B, Chen S, Wang Y, Li J. Maintenance decision methodology of petrochemical plant based on fuzzy curvelet neural network. Applied Soft Computing 2018; 69(2018): 203-212.
  • [10] Eker O F, Camci F, Kumar U. SVM based diagnostics on railway turnouts. International Journal of Performability Engineering 2012; 8(3): 289-298.
  • [11] Molina L, Resendiz E, Edwards J, Hart J, Barkan C et al. Condition monitoring of railway turnouts and other track components using machine vision. In: Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting; Washington DC, USA; 2011. pp. 1-17.
  • [12] Lichtberger B. Railway Hand Book. Hamburg, Germany: DVV Media Group, 2011, ISBN: 978-3-7771-0422-5.
  • [13] Oztemel E. Artificial Neural Networks. Istanbul, Turkey: Papatya Publishing, 2012, ISBN: 978-975-6797-39-6.
  • [14] Sharma V, Rai S, Dev A. A comprehensive study of artificial neural networks. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Search 2012; 2(10): 278-284.
  • [15] Cuhadar M. Use of artificial neural networks for demand forecasting in tourism sector and comparative analysis with other methods. PhD, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey, 2006.
  • [16] Maind S B, Wankar P. Research paper on basic of artificial neural network. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication 2014; 2(1): 96-100.
  • [17] Camci F. Autonomous, process monitoring, diagnostics, and prognostics using support vector machines and hidden markov models. PhD, Wayne State University, Detroit, USA, 2005.
  • [18] Boser BE, Guyon IM, Vapnik VN. A training algorithm for optimal margin classiffers. In: Proceedings of Fifth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory; Pittsburgh, USA; 1992. pp. 144-152.
  • [19] Chamasemani FF, Singh YP. Multi-class SVM classifiers - an application in hypothyroid detection and classification. In: Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Bio-Inspired Computing: Theories and Applications; Penang, Malaysia; 2011. pp. 351-356.
  • [20] Shaban N. Analysis of the correlation and regression coefficients of the interaction between yield and some parameters of snap beans plants. Trakia Journal of Sciences 2005; 3(6): 27-31.
  • [21] Sokolova M, Japkowicz N, Szpakowicz S. Beyond accuracy, F-score and Roc: a family of discriminant measures for performance evaluation. In: Proceedings of 19th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence; Hobart, Australia; 2006. pp. 105-121.
  • [22] Gupta N, Rawal A, Narasimhan V L, Shiwani S. Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity measurement of various classification techniques on healthcare data. Journal of Computer Engineering 2013; 11(5): 70-73.
  • [23] Madana R, Satyanarayana V. Evaluation of data mining classification methodologies for single label learning on benchmark data sets using R and WEKA. International Journal of Engineering Computational Research and Technology 2016; 1(1): 1-7.
  • [24] Kaya T. A web based software that can make risk estimation for traffic accidents with machine learning methods. MSc, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey, 2015.
  • [25] Saatcioglu D, Ozcakar N. Forecasting intermittent demand with artificial neural networks method. Beykoz Academy Magazine 2016; 4(1): 1-32 (in Turkish).
  • [26] WEKA 3.8, Reference Manual, 2016.
  • [27] Bergmeir C, Hyndman RJ, Koo B. A note on the validity of cross-validation for evaluating autoregressive time series prediction. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2018; 120(2018): 70-83.
  • [28] Clarke B, Fokoue E, Zhang HH. Principles And Theory For Data Mining And Machine Learning. New York, USA: Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg, 2009, ISBN: 978-0-387-98134-5.