What is the reason for the high Bouguer gravity anomaly at Çumra, Konya (Central Anatolia)?

The Bouguer gravity anomaly map of Turkey shows relatively high values around the Çumra region, Konya. This area has a flat topography and a thick cover of sediments despite being seated on a suture zone formed between Anatolide and Tauride Platforms after the Neo-Tethys Ocean closed. High Bouguer gravity anomalies indicate an anomalous mass excess buried under the flat topography. In the present study, the gravity anomaly is studied using several analysis and processing methods in order to understand and infer its possible sources. Spectral analysis of the anomaly showed that the mass should be buried at a depth of about 4.8 km. The geometry of the mass is forward modelled using the vertical prisms method, which assumes that the mass is a homogeneous layer, represented by separate identical prisms. The observed anomaly and the calculated anomaly retrieved from the modelled geometry are compared mathematically and the mass geometry is updated depending on the differences between them. After a total of 10 iterations, the RMS error decreases below 1% and thus the calculated model is considered accurate. Then the achieved model is used for mass estimations, which showed that if the density difference between the medium and the target mass is set as 0.25 g/cm3, about 67 Gt of extra mass is needed to produce such a gravity anomaly. Correlation with geological maps and aeromagnetic anomalies of the region points out that this excess mass may be due to a remnant ophiolitic rock from the Neo-Tethys Ocean.

___

  • Ateş A, Kearey P (1995). A new method for determining magnetization direction from gravity and magnetic anomalies: application to the deep structure of the Worcester Graben. J Geol Soc Lond 152: 561-566.
  • Banks RJ, Swain CJ (1978). The isostatic compensation of East Africa. Proc R Soc Lond A 364: 331-352.
  • Berlin M (2005). Tectonic Wedging in the California Coast Ranges: Useful Model or an Unreasonable Hypothesis? GEOL 5690, Tect West U.S.
  • Büyüksaraç A, Reiprich S, Ateş A (1998). Three-Dimensional magnetic model of amphibolite complex in Taşkesti area, Mudurnu Valley, North-West Turkey. J Balk Geop Soc 33: 44- 52.
  • Cordell L, Henderson RG (1968). Iterative three dimensional solution of gravity anomaly data using a digital computer. Geophysics 33: 596-601.
  • Dewey JF, Burke KC (1973). Tibetan, Variscan and Precambrian basement reactivition: products of continental collision. J Geol 81: 683-692.
  • Dolmaz MN (2007). An aspect of the subsurface structure of the Burdur-Isparta area, SW Anatolia, based on gravity and aeromagnetic data and some tectonic implications. Earth Pla Sp 59: 5-12.
  • Ercan T (1986). Cenozoic volcanism of Central Anatolia. MTA Derg 107: 119-140 (article in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • Genç T (1997). Gravite ve Manyetik Yöntemlerde Modelleme. In: Canıtez N, editor. Jeofizikte Modelleme. İstanbul, Turkey: Literatür Yayınları, pp. 57-84.
  • Hahn A, Kind EG, Mishra DC (1976). Depth estimation of magnetic sources by means of Fourier amplitude spectra. Geop Pros 24: 287-308.
  • Kane I, Stampolidis A, Tsokas NG, Bushati S, Kondopoulou D, Tsourlos P (2005). The structure of the ophiolitic belt in Albania inferred from geomagnetic anomalies. An Geop 48: 231-246.
  • Kearey P (1991). A possible source of the South-Central England magnetic anomaly: basaltic rocks beneath the London platform. J Geol Soc Lond 148: 775-780.
  • Manghnani MH, Coleman RG (1981). Gravity profiles across the Samail Ophiolite, Oman. J Geop Res 86: 2509-2525.
  • Maus S, Dimri V (1996). Depth estimation from the scaling power spectrum of potential fields? Geop J Int 124: 113-120.
  • MTA (General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration of Turkey) (2002). Geological Maps of Turkey (scale: 1/500000).
  • MTA (General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration of Turkey) (2006). Bouguer gravity anomaly map of Turkey (scale:1/2.000.000). Ankara, Turkey: MTA Pub.
  • MTA (General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration of Turkey) (2007). Aeromagnetic Map (Total Intensity) of Turkey (scale: 1/2.000.000). Ankara, Turkey: MTA Pub.
  • Nouck PN, Eliezer MD, Mbarga TN, Tabod C (2006). Spectral analysis and gravity modelling in the Yagoua, Cameroon, sedimentary basin. Geof Int 45: 209-215.
  • Okay AI (2008). Geology of Turkey: a synopsis. Anschnitt 21: 19-42.
  • Okay AI (2011). Tavşanli zone: the northern subducted margin of the Anatolide-Tauride block. MTA Derg 142: 195-226.
  • Okay AI, Tüysüz O (1999). Tethyan sutures of northern Turkey. Geol Soc Lond Spec Pub 156: 475-515.
  • Öksüm E, Etiz A, Dolmaz MN (2005). An attempt to define depth of the structure based on three dimensional (3-D) modeling of gravity anomalies. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi 18: 219-227 (article in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • Parker RL (1972). The rapid calculation of potential anomalies. Geop J R Ast Soc 35: 447-455.
  • Pawlowski RS, Hansen RO (1990). Gravity anomaly separation by Wiener filtering. Geophysics 55: 539-548.
  • Rao PB, Radhakrishna M, Haripriya K, Rao BS, Chandrasekharam D (2016). Magnetic anomalies over the Andaman Islands and their geological significance. J Earth Syst Sci 125: 359-368.
  • Robertson AH, Okay A, Parlak O, Ustaömer T (2009). The Tectonic Setting and Development of the Anatolian Suture Zones: Problems and Possible Solutions. 62nd Geol Kur Turkey, Ankara, Turkey: MTA.
  • Rogers N, Blake S, Burton K (2008). An Introduction to Our Dynamic Planet. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Savvaidis AS, Tsokas GN, Papazachos CB, Kondopoulou D (2000). A geophysical study of the ophiolite complex and the sedimentary basins ın the northwest part of the Chalkidiki Peninsula (N. Greece). Surv Geop 567-595.
  • Şengör AMC, Yılmaz Y (1981). Tethyan evolution of Turkey: a plate tectonic approach. Tectonophysics 75: 181-241.
  • Shelton AW (1990). The interpretation of gravity data in Oman: constraints on the ophiolite emplacement mechanism. Geol Soc Lond Spec Pub 459-471.
  • Smith A (1971). Alpine deformation and the oceanic areas of Tethys, Mediterranean and Atlantic. Geol Soc Am Bull 82: 2039-2070.
  • Spector A, Grant F (1970). Statistical models for interpreting aeromagnetic data. Geophysics 35: 293-302.