Probabilistic earthquake hazard assessment for Ankara and its environs

The capital and the second largest city of Turkey, Ankara, is generally considered to be safe in terms of seismic activities and earthquake hazard. However, recent studies and earthquakes experienced in the region showed that Ankara is not indeed seismically safe. As the number of studies on Ankara's seismic hazard increases, the number of scientists who claim that the earthquake hazard in Ankara is higher than expected also increases. However, to date no detailed analysis has been undertaken as to the earthquake hazard facing Ankara. This study has compiled data from the earthquake catalogues available in Turkey and employed the latest knowledge available to produce an Ankara-specific earthquake catalogue. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of the unified data was then used to produced peak ground acceleration (PGA) values for 5%, 10%, 20%, and 40% probability of exceedance over a 50-year return period. The PGA values at main rock sites were determined using the most appropriate attenuation relationship. These show an exceedance probability of 10% over a 50-year return period to range from 0.20 g to 0.25 g for the Ankara provincial districts of Ayaş, Çankaya, Etimesgut, Sincan, and Yenimahalle; from 0.25 g to 0.30 g for Altındağ, Gölbaşı, Keçiören, and Mamak; and from 0.30 g to 0.35 g for Akyurt, Çubuk, Elmadağ, and Kazan.

Probabilistic earthquake hazard assessment for Ankara and its environs

The capital and the second largest city of Turkey, Ankara, is generally considered to be safe in terms of seismic activities and earthquake hazard. However, recent studies and earthquakes experienced in the region showed that Ankara is not indeed seismically safe. As the number of studies on Ankara's seismic hazard increases, the number of scientists who claim that the earthquake hazard in Ankara is higher than expected also increases. However, to date no detailed analysis has been undertaken as to the earthquake hazard facing Ankara. This study has compiled data from the earthquake catalogues available in Turkey and employed the latest knowledge available to produce an Ankara-specific earthquake catalogue. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of the unified data was then used to produced peak ground acceleration (PGA) values for 5%, 10%, 20%, and 40% probability of exceedance over a 50-year return period. The PGA values at main rock sites were determined using the most appropriate attenuation relationship. These show an exceedance probability of 10% over a 50-year return period to range from 0.20 g to 0.25 g for the Ankara provincial districts of Ayaş, Çankaya, Etimesgut, Sincan, and Yenimahalle; from 0.25 g to 0.30 g for Altındağ, Gölbaşı, Keçiören, and Mamak; and from 0.30 g to 0.35 g for Akyurt, Çubuk, Elmadağ, and Kazan.

___

  • Akkar S, Çağnan Z (2010). A local ground-motion predictive model for Turkey, and its comparison with other regional and global ground-motion models. B Seismol Soc Am 100: 2978–2995.
  • Akkar S, Sandıkkaya MA, Bommer J (2014). Empirical ground- motion models for point- and extended-source crustal earthquake scenarios in Europe and the Middle East. Bull Earthquake Eng 12: 359–387.
  • Alsan E, Tezucan L, Bath M (1975). An Earthquake Catalogue for Turkey for the Interval 1913-1970. Kandilli Observatory Seismological Department and Sweden Seismological Institute, Report No. 7-75. Uppsala, Sweden: Sweden Seismological Institute.
  • Ambraseys NN, Finkel CF (1988). The Anatolian earthquake of 17 August 1668. In: Lee WHK, Meyers H, Shimazaki K, editors. Historical Seismograms and Earthquakes of the world. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, pp. 173–180.
  • Ambraseys NN, Finkel CF (1995). The Seismicity of Turkey and Adjacent Areas: A Historical Review, 1500-1800. İstanbul, Turkey: Eren.
  • Aydan O (2001). Comparison of suitability of submerged tunnel and shield tunnel for subsea passage of Bosphorus. Geological Engineering 25: 1–17 (in Turkish).
  • Beyaz T (2004). Development of a new attenuation relationship of seismic energy for Turkey using the strong motion records free of soil effects. PhD, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey (in Turkish).
  • Bozkurt E (2001). Neotectonics of Turkey – a synthesis. Geodin Acta 14: 3–30.
  • Çemen I, Göncüoğlu MC, Dirik K (1999). Structural evolution of the Tuzgölü basin in Central Anatolia, Turkey. J Geol 107: 693–706.
  • Çetinkaya NN, Durgunoğlu HT, Kulaç HF, Karadayılar T (1993). Comparison of earthquake risk analyses for Ankara, İstanbul and İzmir regions. In: Second National Earthquake Engineering Symposium, Chamber of Civil Engineers of Turkey, Proceeding Book, pp. 539–546 (in Turkish).
  • Cornel CA (1968). Engineering seismic risk analysis. B Seismol Soc Am 58: 1583–1606.
  • Deniz A (2006). Estimation of earthquake insurance premium rates based on stochastic methods. MSc, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Deniz A, Korkmaz KA, İrfanoğlu A (2010). Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for İzmir, Turkey. Pure Appl Geophys 167: 1475–1484.
  • Dirik K (2001). Neotectonic evolution of the northwestward arched segment of the Central Anatolian fault zone, Central Anatolia, Turkey. Geodin Acta 14: 147–158.
  • Dirik K, Çemen İ, Göncüoğlu MC (1998). Neotectonics and related intracontinental basin formation in Central Anatolia-Turkey. In: International Conference on Active Tectonic Continental Basins, Abstracts, Belgium.
  • Dirik K, Göncüoğlu MC (1996). Neotectonic characteristics of Central Anatolia. Int Geol Rev 38: 807–817.
  • Dirik K, Özsayın E, Kutluay A (2008). Source of the seismic activity in the south of Ankara (central Anatolia) during last three years. In: 61st Geological Congress of Turkey, Abstracts Book, pp. 76–77 (in Turkish).
  • DLH (Ministry of Transport and Railways, Ports and Airports Construction General Directorate) (2007). Coastal Structures, Railways and Airports Construction Specification for Technical Regulations of Earthquake Hazards. YPU-DLH-060520-001 - Interim Report. Ankara, Turkey: DLH (in Turkish).
  • Erdik M, Doyuran V, Akkaş N, Gülkan P (1985b). A probabilistic assessment of the seismic hazard in Turkey. Tectonophysics 117: 295–344.
  • Eren Y (2000). The seismicity of Konya region. TPJD Special Publication 5: 85–98 (in Turkish).
  • Ergin K, Güçlü U, Aksay G (1971). Earthquake Catalogue of Turkey and Its Surroundings (1965-1970). İstanbul, Turkey: İstanbul Technical University (in Turkish).
  • Ergin K, Güçlü U, Uz Z (1967). Earthquake Catalogue of Turkey and Its Surroundings (In 11 BC until the End of 1964). İstanbul, Turkey: İstanbul Technical University (in Turkish).
  • Ergünay O (1978). Overview of seismic hazard in Ankara. In: Symposium on Problems of Ankara in Terms of Earth Sciences, Geological Society of Turkey, pp. 88–94 (in Turkish).
  • EZ-FRISK (2011). User’s Manual, Version 7.52. Boulder, CO, USA: Risk Engineering Inc.
  • Gencoğlu S, İnan E, Güler H (1990). Earthquake Hazard of Turkey. Ankara, Turkey: TMMOB Chamber of Geophysical Engineers (in Turkish).
  • Gökten E, Varol B (2010). General geology of the region and seismic sources. In: Başokur A, editor. Geological-Geophysical- Geotechnical Properties of Soils West of the City of Ankara and Dynamic Behavior. Ankara, Turkey: Ankara University, pp. 12– 32 (in Turkish).
  • Gülkan P, Kalkan E (2002). Attenuation modeling of recent earthquakes in Turkey. J Seismology 6: 397–409.
  • Gülkan P, Koçyiğit A, Yücemen MS, Doyuran V, Başöz N (1993). Earthquake Zones Map of Turkey Prepared by the Latest Data. METU Report No.: METU/EERC 93-01. Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University (in Turkish).
  • Güllü H, Ansal AM, Özbay A (2008). Seismic hazard studies for Gaziantep city in south Anatolia of Turkey. Nat Hazards 44: 19– 50.
  • Güner R, Yıldız E (2011). Barajların sismik tehlike analizlerinde karşılaşılan sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. In: 1. Türkiye Deprem Mühendisliği Sismoloji Konferansı (in Turkish).
  • Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1944). Frequency of earthquakes in California. B Seismol Soc Am 34: 185–188.
  • İnan E, Çolakoğlu Z, Koç N, Bayülke N, Çoruh E (1996). 1976–1996 Earthquake Acceleration Records with Catalogue. Ankara, Turkey: General Directorate of Disaster Affairs Earthquake Research Department (in Turkish).
  • Kalafat D, Güneş Y, Kekovalı K, Kara M, Deniz P, Yılmazer M (2011). A Revised and Extended Earthquake Catalogue for Turkey Since 1900 (M≥4.0). İstanbul, Turkey: Boğaziçi University Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute.
  • Kalafat D, Kekovalı D, Deniz P, Güneş Y, Pınar A, Horosan G (2008). 31 July 2005 - August 1, 2005 and 20 - December 27, 2007 Afşar- Bala (Ankara, Turkey) earthquake sequence. In: Köksal MD, editor. DAYK Proceedings of the National Symposium on Natural Hazards and Earth Sciences, pp. 21–30 (in Turkish).
  • Kalkan E, Gülkan P (2004). Empirical attenuation equations for vertical ground motion in Turkey. Earthq Spectra 20: 853–882.
  • Kalkan E, Gülkan P, Yılmaz N, Çelebi M (2009). Reassessment of probabilistic seismic hazard in the Marmara region. B Seismol Soc Am 99: 2127–2146.
  • Kaplan T (2004). Neotectonics and seismicity of the Ankara region: a case study in the Uruş area. MSc, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Kasapoğlu KE (2000). Geotechnical Properties of Soils and Seismicity of the City of Ankara, Turkey. Ankara, Turkey: Chamber of Geological Engineers of Turkey Publishing (in Turkish).
  • Kasapoğlu KE (2007). What You Want to Know about Earthquakes and Turkey. Ankara, Turkey: Chamber of Geological Engineers of Turkey Publishing (in Turkish).
  • Kayabalı K, Beyaz T (2011). Strong motion attenuation relationship for Turkey-a different perspective. Bull Eng Geol Environ 70: 467–481.
  • Kiremidjian AS, Mortgat C, Shah H (1992). Stanford Seismic Hazard Analysis-STASHA. Stanford, CA, USA: John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center.
  • Koçyiğit A (1991). Changing stress orientation in progressive intracontinental deformation as indicated by the neotectonics of the Ankara region (NW Central Anatolia). TPJD Bulletin 3: 43–55.
  • Koçyiğit A (2000). General neotectonic characteristics and seismicity of Central Anatolia. Haymana-Tuzgölü-Ulukışla Basins Applied Study (Workshop) TPJD Special Publication 5: 1–26 (in Turkish).
  • Koçyiğit A (2008a). Earthquake sources in Ankara and its surrounding. In: Pampal S, Özmen B, editors. Workshop for Earthquake Hazard and Risk of Ankara, Workshop Book. Ankara, Turkey, Gazi University, pp. 33–53 (in Turkish).
  • Koçyiğit A (2008b). The seismicity of Ankara and 2005-2007 Afşar (Bala-Ankara) earthquake source. MTA Natural Resources and Economic Bulletin 6: 1–7 (in Turkish).
  • Koçyiğit A (2009). Seismicity of Ankara and source of the 2005-2007 Afşar (Bala-Ankara) earthquakes. Journal of Maps 141: 1–12 (in Turkish).
  • Koçyiğit A, Deveci S (2008). Ankara orogenic phase, its age and transition from thrusting-dominated Palaeotectonic period to the strike-slip neotectonic period, Ankara (Turkey). Turk J Earth Sci 17: 433–459.
  • Koçyiğit A, Kaplan T (2004). Seismical outline of Ankara region: a case study on the 2000.08.22 Uruş and the 2003.02.27 Çamlıdere earthquakes, Ankara-Turkey. ATAG-8, Abstracts Book, p. 14.
  • Koçyiğit A, Özacar A (2003). Extensional neotectonic regime through the NE edge of the outer Isparta angle, SW Turkey: new field and seismic data. Turk J Earth Sci 12: 67–90.
  • Koçyiğit A, Rojay B, Cihan M, Özacar A (2001). The June 6, 2000 Orta (Çankırı, Turkey) earthquake: sourced from a new antithetic sinistral strike-slip structure of the North Anatolian fault system, the Dodurga fault zone. Turk J Earth Sci 10: 69–82.
  • Kramer SL (1995). Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.
  • McGuire RK, Arabasz WJ (1990). An introduction to probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Geotechnical and Environmental Geophysics, Society of Exploration Geophysicists 1: 33–353.
  • Öcal N (1968a). The Seismicity of Turkey and Earthquake Geography Catalogue for Earthquakes in Turkey (1850–1960). İstanbul, Turkey: National Education Ministry İstanbul Kandilli Observatory Seismology Publication (in Turkish).
  • Öcal N (1968b). Catalogue for Earthquakes in Turkey (1960–1964). İstanbul, Turkey: National Education Ministry İstanbul Kandilli Observatory Seismology Publication (in Turkish).
  • Orhan A, Seyrek E, Tosun H (2007). A probabilistic approach for earthquake hazard assessment of the province of Eskişehir, Turkey. Nat Hazard Earth Sys 7: 607–614.
  • Özsayın E, Dirik K (2007). Quaternary activity of the Cihanbeyli and Yeniceoba fault zones: İnönü-Eskişehir fault system, Central Anatolia. Turk J Earth Sci 16: 471–492.
  • Pampal S (2006). Revealing the latest earthquakes and earthquake hazards in Ankara, Turkey. Chamber of Architects of Turkey 42: 24–27 (in Turkish).
  • Pampal S, Kozlu B (2000). Seismicity of Ankara. Turkey Engineering News Magazine 409: 25–31 (in Turkish).
  • Pampal S, Özmen B, Koçkar MK (2008). The Seismicity of Ankara. In: Pampal S, Özmen B, editors. Workshop of Earthquake Hazard and Risk of Ankara Proceedings Book, pp. 55–74 (in Turkish).
  • Pınar N, Lahn E (1952). Annotated Catalogue of Earthquakes of Turkey. Ankara, Turkey: Ministry of Public Works Directorate of Construction and Urban Affairs Publication (in Turkish).
  • Şaroğlu F, Emre Ö, Boray A (1987). Active Faults in Turkey and Seismicity. Ankara, Turkey: General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration Department of Geological Survey Report No: 8174 (in Turkish).
  • Şaroğlu F, Emre Ö, Kuşçu İ (1992). Active Fault Map of Turkey. Ankara, Turkey: General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration.
  • Selçuk L, Selçuk AS, Beyaz T (2010). Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Lake Van basin, Turkey. Nat Hazards 54: 949–965.
  • Seyitoğlu G (2007). Neotectonic structures around Ankara: Eldivan- Elmadağ tectonic junction and Kırıkkale-Erbaa fault. TMMOB Chamber of Geology Engineering Technical Tours Series 4: 1–14 (in Turkish).
  • Seyitoğlu G, Işık V, Kırman E, İleri İ (2006). Neotectonics Features of the Southern Gölbaşı-Elmadag Features. Ankara, Turkey: Ankara University Scientific Research Project Final Report (in Turkish).
  • Tabban A (1976). The reason for having an earthquake risk in Ankara. Earthquake Research Institute of Bulletin Ankara 14: 1–33 (in Turkish).
  • Tabban A, Gencoğlu S (1975). Earthquake and parameters. Earthquake Research Bulletin 11: 7–83 (in Turkish).
  • Ulusay R, Tuncay E, Sönmez H, Gökçeoğlu C (2004). An attenuation relationship based on Turkish strong motion data and iso- acceleration map of Turkey. Eng Geol 74: 265–291.
  • Utku M (2008). Earthquake hazard of Ankara. Cumhuriyet Science and Technology Magazine 1086: 6–7 (in Turkish).
  • Yücemen S (1982). Analyses of Seismic Risk. Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University (in Turkish).
  • Yücemen S, Akkaya A (1995). A comparative study of stochastic models for seismic hazard estimation. In: El-Sabh MI, Venkatesh S, Denis H, Murty TS, editors. Land-Based and Marine Hazards: Scientific and Management Issues, Series on Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 5–24.
  • Yunatcı AA (2010). GIS based seismic hazard mapping of Turkey. PhD, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0985
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

First report of sphaeronitid blastozoans (Echinodermata) in the Middle Ordovician of the Taurides, Turkey

Elise NARDIN, Mehmet Cemal GÖNCÜOĞLU, Bertrand LEFEBVRE

Altuğ HASÖZBEK, Burhan ERDOĞAN, Muharrem SATIR, Wolfgang SIEBEL

Ersel GÖZ, Selahattin KADİR, Ali GÜREL, Muhsin EREN

Whole-rock geochemistry of basic and intermediate intrusive rocks in the Ishiagu area: further evidence of anorogenic setting of the Lower Benue rift, southeastern Nigeria

Anthony CHUKWU, Smart Chika OBIORA

Reply to comment by Erkül and Erkül on Al-in-hornblende thermobarometry and Sr-Nd-O-Pb isotopic compositions of the Early Miocene Alaçam granite in NW Anatolia (Turkey)

Altuğ HASÖZBEK, Erhan AKAY, Burhan ERDOĞAN, Muharrem SATIR, Wolfgang SIEBEL, Güllü Deniz DOĞAN, Heinrich TAUBALD

Testing of the recently developed tectonomagmatic discrimination diagrams from hydrothermally altered igneous rocks of 7 geothermal fields

Kailasa PANDARINATH

Probabilistic earthquake hazard assessment for Ankara and its environs

Bülent ÖZMEN, B. Burçak Başbuğ ERKAN

Whole-rock geochemistry of basic and intermediate intrusive rocks in the Ishiagu area: further evidence of anorogenic setting of the Lower Benue rif, southeastern Nigeria

Smart OBIORA CHIKA, Anthony CHUKWU

New fossils of Gaindatherium (Rhinocerotidae, Mammalia) from the Middle Miocene of Pakistan

Abdul Majid KHAN, Esperanza CERDEÑO, Muhammad AKHTAR

Geology, mineralogy, geochemistry, and depositional environment of a Late Miocene/Pliocene fuviolacustrine succession, Cappadocian Volcanic Province, central Anatolia, Turkey

Ali GÜREL, Muhsin EREN, Selahattin KADİR, Ersel GÖZ