Assessment of the Perchertal avalanche in Tyrol, Austria

The present study has been conducted to analyze the Perchertal avalanche area near Bärenkopf Mountain, which has several avalanche-prone areas on its slopes, within the area of Pertisau, Tyrol, in Austria. The main focus is on identifying the characteristics of the avalanche process itself to determine the potential risk to endangered objects, which include an important road and a hotel. Another focus is to evaluate the current local hazard map. Based on the dynamic avalanche models (Samos-AT, Ramms), several important action parameters such as impact pressure, avalanche velocity, and run-out length of the Perchertal avalanche track are presented and discussed. A variety of potential avalanche scenarios are presented to construct a picture of the potential threats of this specific avalanche area. Assuming accurate simulation results, suitable technical protection measures are described and combined with a cost-benefit analysis to determine the most economically efficient alternatives.

Assessment of the Perchertal avalanche in Tyrol, Austria

The present study has been conducted to analyze the Perchertal avalanche area near Bärenkopf Mountain, which has several avalanche-prone areas on its slopes, within the area of Pertisau, Tyrol, in Austria. The main focus is on identifying the characteristics of the avalanche process itself to determine the potential risk to endangered objects, which include an important road and a hotel. Another focus is to evaluate the current local hazard map. Based on the dynamic avalanche models (Samos-AT, Ramms), several important action parameters such as impact pressure, avalanche velocity, and run-out length of the Perchertal avalanche track are presented and discussed. A variety of potential avalanche scenarios are presented to construct a picture of the potential threats of this specific avalanche area. Assuming accurate simulation results, suitable technical protection measures are described and combined with a cost-benefit analysis to determine the most economically efficient alternatives.

___

  • Armstrong R (2006). A history of avalanche hazard and avalanche research in the San Juan Mountains, Southwestern Colorado. In: International Snow Science Workshop Proceedings, Telluride, CO, USA, pp. 208–303.
  • Bebi P, Kulakowski D, Rixen C (2009). Snow avalanche disturbances in forest ecosystems – state of research and implications for management. For Ecol Manage 257: 1883–1892.
  • Belanger L, Cassayre Y (2004). Projects for past avalanche observation and zoning in France, after 1999 catastrophic avalanches. In: Proceedings of the 2004 International Snow Science Workshop, Jackson Hole, WY, USA, pp. 416–422.
  • Burrows CJ, Burrows VL (1976). Procedures for the study of snow avalanche chronology using growth layers of woody plants. Boulder, CO, USA: University of Colorado Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research Occasional Paper 23.
  • Carrara PE (1979). The determination of snow avalanche frequency through tree-ring analysis and historical records at Ophir, Colorado. Geol Soc Am Bull 90: 773–780.
  • Casteller A, Stockli V, Villalba R, Mayer AC (2007). An evaluation of dendroecological indicators of snow avalanches in the Swiss Alps. Arct Antarct Alp Res 39: 218–228.
  • Christen M, Buehler Y, Bartelt P, Schumacher L (2011). Ramms User Manual V1.01. Available at http://ramms.slf.ch/ramms/index. php.
  • Frutiger H (1980). Rechtliche Aspekte der Nutzung Beschränkung des Grundeigentums wegen Lawinengefährdung. In: Proceedings of the INTERPRAEVENT International Symposium, Bad Ischl, Austria, 8–12 September 1980, 1: 33–48 (in German).
  • Ganju A, Dimri AP (2002). Prevention and mitigation of avalanche disasters in western Himalayan region. Nat Hazards 31: 357– 3
  • Granig M, Sampl P, Tollinger C, Jörg P (2009). Experiences in avalanche assessment with the powder snow avalanche model SamosAT. In: International Snow Science Workshop Proceedings, Davos, Switzerland, pp. 514–518.
  • Hervas J (2003). Recommendations to Deal with Snow Avalanches in Europe (Nedies Project). Brussels, Belgium: European Commission Joint Research Centre, Institute for Protection and Security of the Citizen Technological and Economic Risk Management Unit.
  • Höller P (2007). Avalanche hazards and mitigation in Austria: a review. Nat Hazards 43: 81–101.
  • Holub M, Fuchs S (2009). Mitigating mountain hazards in Austria – legislation, risk transfer, and awareness building. Nat Hazards Earth Sys 9: 523–537.
  • Jenkins MJ, Hebertson EG (2004). A practitioner’s guide for using dendro-ecological techniques to determine the extent and frequency of avalanches. In: International Snow Science Workshop Proceedings, Jackson Hole, WY, USA, pp. 423–434.
  • Johannesson T, Gauer P, Issler D, Lied K (2009). The Design of Avalanche Protection Dams. Recent Practical and Theoretical
  • Developments. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission Project Report. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/research/ environment/pdf/design_avalanche_protection_dams.pdf. Keiler M, Sailer R, Jörg P, Weber C, Fuchs S, Zischg A, Sauermoser S (2006). Avalanche risk assessment – a multi-temporal approach: results from Galtur, Austria. Nat Hazards Earth Sys 6: 637–651.
  • Lebensministerium (2010). Die wildbach-Richlinie für die Gefahrenzonenplanung. BMLFUW-L.E.3.3.3/0185-IV/5/2007. Vienna, Austria: Die Wildbach & Lebensministerium (in German).
  • Mears AI (1992). Snow avalanche hazard analysis for land-use planning and engineering. Colo Geol Surv Bull 49: 55.
  • Miklau FR, Sauermoser S (2011). Handbuch Technischer Lawinenshutz. Berlin, Germany: Ernst und Sohn (in German).
  • Peretti G (1992). Avalanche study in Italy. In: Proceedings of the European Summer University on Snow and Avalanches. Chamonix, France, 14–25 September 1992. Grenoble, France: Cemagref.
  • Sauermoser S (2008). Avalanche protection in Austria – present stage and future development. In: International Symposium on Mitigative Measures against Snow Avalanches, Egilsstaðir, Iceland, 11–14 March 2008, pp. 108–119.
  • Schaerer PA (1987). Avalanche accidents in Canada III: A selection of case histories of accidents, 1978 to 1984. Montreal, Canada: National Research Council of Canada IRC Paper No. 1468.
  • Simonson SE, Greene EM, Fassnacht SR, Stohlgren TJ, Landry CC (2010). Practical methods for using vegetation patterns to estimate avalanche frequency and magnitude. In: International
  • Snow Science Workshop Proceedings, Lake Tahoe, CA, USA, pp. 548–555. Statistics Austria (2009). Austria Data, Figures, Facts. Vienna, Austria: Statistics Austria.
  • Stepanek DI, Skolaut DI (2001). WLV- Gzp-Eben- Teilgebiet Maurach
  • Perchertal Lawine. Vienna, Austria: Lawinen Aufnahme Blatt 20 (in German). Stethem C, Jamieson B, Schaerer P, Liverman D, Germain D, Walker S (2003). Snow avalanche hazard in Canada – a review. Nat Hazards 28: 487–515.
  • Weir P (2002). Snow Avalanche Management in Forested Terrain. Victoria, BC, Canada: British Columbia Ministry of Forests Land Management Handbook No. 55.
  • Schwaz, Tyrol, Austria. Thus, specials thanks are extended to the Wildbach und Lawinen Verbauung team in Innsbruck, including DI Siegfried Sauermoser, DI Josef Plank, DI Mathias Granig, DI Helmut Hochreiter, DI Philipp Jörg, and DI Christian Tollinger.
Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0985
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK