The effects of harvesting time on the physicochemical components of aronia berry

The aim of this work was to compare ‘Nero’ and ‘Viking’ aronia cultivars and to determine the optimum harvest dates of each cultivar for various utilizations. For this purpose, we characterized the changes in both aronia cultivars’ physicochemical components over their harvest period and identified the correlations between them. Mean berry weight, dry matter, soluble solid content, antioxidant activity, and anthocyanin content of berries of both cultivars increased until the second and third weeks of September. They then began decreasing gradually, whereas total phenol content and condensed tannins kept increasing until 27 October. It was observed that berries of ‘Nero’ ripened 15 days earlier than those of ‘Viking’. As a result, anthocyanin content of ‘Nero’ peaked earlier (25 August) than that of ‘Viking’. The highest correlation (r = 0.75, P

___

  • Alibabic V, 2018, TURK J AGRIC FOR, V42, P67, DOI 10.3906/tar-1702-59
  • Andrzejewska J, 2015, ACTA SCI POL-HORTORU, V14, P105
  • Atanassova M., 2009, THE J, V44, P413, DOI DOI 10.7598/CST2016.1210
  • BATESMIT.EC, 1973, PHYTOCHEMISTRY, V12, P1809, DOI 10.1016/0031-9422(73)80409-1
  • Bolling BW, 2015, FOOD CHEM, V187, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.04.106
  • Connor AM, 2002, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V127, P238, DOI 10.21273/JASHS.127.2.238
  • Ercisli S, 2010, FOOD TECHNOL BIOTECH, V48, P102
  • Esatbeyoglu T, 2010, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V58, P5147, DOI 10.1021/jf904354n
  • Eyduran SP, 2015, J APPL BOT FOOD QUAL, V88, P134, DOI 10.5073/JABFQ.2015.088.019
  • Fredes C, 2014, CIENC INVESTIG AGRAR, V41, P49, DOI [10.4067/S0718-16202014000100005, 10.4067/s0718-16202014000100005]
  • Guney M, 2019, TURK J AGRIC FOR, V43, P69, DOI 10.3906/tar-1804-95
  • Halasz J, 2010, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V135, P410, DOI 10.21273/JASHS.135.5.410
  • Hudec J, 2006, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V54, P3625, DOI 10.1021/jf060299q
  • Jakobek Lidija, 2007, Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus, V72, P301
  • Jeppsson N, 2000, J HORTIC SCI BIOTECH, V75, P340, DOI 10.1080/14620316.2000.11511247
  • Kaack K., 1992, Tidsskrift for Planteavl, V96, P183
  • Kahkonen MP, 2001, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V49, P4076, DOI 10.1021/jf010152t
  • Kalt W, 2000, J FOOD SCI, V65, P390, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2000.tb16013.x
  • Karacali I, 2004, BAHCE URUNLERININ MU .
  • Kawecki Zdzislaw, 2006, Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research, V14, P67
  • Krupa T., 2007, Vegetable Crops Research Bulletin, V66, P129, DOI 10.2478/v10032-007-0015-7
  • Kulling SE, 2008, PLANTA MED, V74, P1625, DOI 10.1055/s-0028-1088306
  • LOWRY OH, 1951, J BIOL CHEM, V193, P265 .
  • Ochmian I, 2012, NOT BOT HORTI AGROBO, V40, P253
  • PIRIE A, 1977, AM J ENOL VITICULT, V28, P204
  • Pogorzelski E., 2006, J FOOD NUTR SCI, V15, P49
  • Poyraz Engin S, 2018, P UGAP 1 INT GAP AGR, P308
  • Poyraz Engin S, 2018, P ISMS CURR AC STUD, P13
  • Retamales JB, 2018, BLUEBERRIES GROWTH R
  • Serce S, 2010, PHARMACOGN MAG, V6, P9, DOI 10.4103/0973-1296.59960
  • Skupien K, 2007, AGR FOOD SCI, V16, P46, DOI 10.2137/145960607781635822
  • Snebergrova J, 2014, CZECH J FOOD SCI, V32, P25, DOI 10.17221/540/2012-CJFS
  • STRIGL AW, 1995, Z LEBENSM UNTERS FOR, V201, P266, DOI 10.1007/BF01193001
  • Strik B., 2003, ACTA HORTIC, V626, P447 .
  • Tanaka T, 2001, J JPN SOC FOOD SCI, V48, P606
  • Thaipong K, 2006, J FOOD COMPOS ANAL, V19, P669, DOI 10.1016/j.jfca.2006.01.003
  • Wada L, 2002, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V50, P3495, DOI 10.1021/jf011405l
  • Wu XL, 2004, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V52, P7846, DOI 10.1021/jf0486850
  • Zheng W, 2003, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V51, P502, DOI 10.1021/jf020728u
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK