Radiation, water, and nitrogen use efficiencies of Gossypium hirsutum L.

Resource use efficiency is a baseline for productive agriculture and proper management of different resources (water, nitrogen, light, and land), and it plays a pivotal role in the accomplishment of this goal. Three field experiments were carried out at the experimental farm area of the Central Cotton Research Institute, Multan, Pakistan, in 2009 and 2010 to investigate the effects of different resources on cotton crops. Treatments for the first experiment included 4 cultivars and 6 nitrogen levels. The second experiment comprised 3 variables, irrigation methods, cultivars, and plant spacing, whereas 2 variables, including different irrigation regimes and glycinebetaine application, were used in the third experiment. Different attributes, such as physiological efficiency, irrigation water use efficiency, and agronomic and economic nitrogen use efficiency, were studied during the course of experimentation. The statistical results revealed that cumulative intercepted photosynthetically active radiation, radiation use efficiencies, water use efficiencies for total biomass, seed cotton, lint, and cottonseed yield were enhanced with the addition of each incremental dose of nitrogen fertilizer and were also recorded as higher for the application of irrigation water through the drip method at the narrow plant spacing of 10 cm. Furthermore, exogenously applied glycinebetaine also significantly increased the attributes studied. Different agronomic and economic nitrogen use efficiencies for seed cotton, lint, and cottonseed yield were notably increased with the application of different nitrogen fertilizer levels and were greater at 160 kg N ha-1.

Radiation, water, and nitrogen use efficiencies of Gossypium hirsutum L.

Resource use efficiency is a baseline for productive agriculture and proper management of different resources (water, nitrogen, light, and land), and it plays a pivotal role in the accomplishment of this goal. Three field experiments were carried out at the experimental farm area of the Central Cotton Research Institute, Multan, Pakistan, in 2009 and 2010 to investigate the effects of different resources on cotton crops. Treatments for the first experiment included 4 cultivars and 6 nitrogen levels. The second experiment comprised 3 variables, irrigation methods, cultivars, and plant spacing, whereas 2 variables, including different irrigation regimes and glycinebetaine application, were used in the third experiment. Different attributes, such as physiological efficiency, irrigation water use efficiency, and agronomic and economic nitrogen use efficiency, were studied during the course of experimentation. The statistical results revealed that cumulative intercepted photosynthetically active radiation, radiation use efficiencies, water use efficiencies for total biomass, seed cotton, lint, and cottonseed yield were enhanced with the addition of each incremental dose of nitrogen fertilizer and were also recorded as higher for the application of irrigation water through the drip method at the narrow plant spacing of 10 cm. Furthermore, exogenously applied glycinebetaine also significantly increased the attributes studied. Different agronomic and economic nitrogen use efficiencies for seed cotton, lint, and cottonseed yield were notably increased with the application of different nitrogen fertilizer levels and were greater at 160 kg N ha-1.

___

  • Ahmad S, Ahmad A, Zia-ul-Haq M, Ali H, Khaliq T, Anjum MA, Khan MA, Hussain A, Hoogenboom G (2009). Resources use efficiency of field grown transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L.) under irrigated semiarid environment. J Food Agric Environ 7: 487–492.
  • Ahmad S, Raza I (2014). Optimization of management practices to improve cotton fiber quality under irrigated arid environment. J Food Agric Environ 12: 609–613.
  • Ahmad S, Raza I, Ali H, Shahzad AN, Atiq-ur-Rehman, Sarwar N (2014). Response of cotton crop to exogenous application of glycinebetaine under sufficient and scarce water conditions. Braz J Bot 37: 407–415.
  • Alitabar RA, Salimbeck R, Alishah O, Andrkhor SAA (2012). Interactive effects of nitrogen and row spacing on growth and yield of cotton varieties. Int J Biol 4: 124–129.
  • Barbar SA (1976). Efficient fertilizer use. In: Patterson FL, editor. Agronomic Research for Food. Madison, WI, USA: ASA Special Publication 26, pp. 13–29.
  • Bhattarai S, McHugh J, Lotz G, Midmore D (2003). Physiological responses of cotton to subsurface drip irrigation on heavy clay soil. In: Unkovich M, O’Leary G, editors. Proceedings of the 11th Australian Agronomy Conference, 2–6 February 2003; Geelong, Australia. Serpentine, Australia: Australian Society of Agronomy, pp. 1–2.
  • Bibi Z, Khan NU, Mussarat M, Khan MJ, Ahmad R, Khan IU, Shaheen S (2011). Response of Gossypium hirsutum genotypes to various nitrogen levels. Pak J Bot 43: 2403–2409.
  • Boquet DJ, Breitenbeck GA (2000). Nitrogen rate effect on partitioning of nitrogen and dry matter by cotton. Crop Sci 40: 1685–1693.
  • Cetin O, Bilgel L (2002). Effects of different irrigation methods on shedding and yield of cotton. Agr Water Manage 54: 1–15.
  • DeTar WR, Maas SJ, Fitzgerald GJ (1999). Drip vs furrow irrigation of cotton on sandy soil with ¼ mile runs includes: yield monitoring, remote sensing, and electronic soil survey. Proc Beltwide Conf 1: 375–380.
  • Doorenboss J, Pruitt WO (1977). Guidelines for Predicting Crop Water Requirements. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization.
  • Hallikeri SS, Halemani HL, Patil VC, Palled YB, Patil BC, Katageri IS (2010). Effect of nitrogen levels, split application of nitrogen and detopping on seed cotton yield and fiber quality in Bt- cotton. Karnataka J Agr Sci 23: 418–422.
  • Ibragimov N, Evett SR, Esanbekov Y, Kamilov BS, Mirzaev L, Lamers PA (2007). Water-use-efficiency of irrigated cotton in Uzbekistan under drip and furrow irrigation. Agr Water Manage 90: 112–120.
  • Ibrahim MAS, Ahmad KE, Osman S, Ali ETS, Hamada AA (2010). Response of new cotton varieties to nitrogen fertilization in Sudan Gezira. Afr J Agric Res 5: 1213–1219.
  • Iqbal J (2011). Modeling the impact of climate change on seed cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yield in Punjab (Pakistan). PhD, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
  • Iqbal J, Wajid SA, Ahmad A, Arshad M (2012). Comparative studies on seed cotton yield in relation to nitrogen rates and sowing dates under diverse agro-environment of Punjab. Pak J Sci 64: 59–63.
  • Jonghan K, Piccinni G (2009). Characterizing leaf gas exchange responses of cotton to full and limited irrigation conditions. Field Crop Res 112: 77–89.
  • Khalifa EMA (2006). Cotton crop production using different irrigation systems. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Misr Society of Agricultural Engineering, 22 November 2006; Cairo, Egypt. Cairo, Egypt: Misr Society of Agricultural Engineering, pp. 1129–1148.
  • Lambin EF, Meyfroidt P (2011). Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. P Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 3465–3472.
  • Larson JA, Gwathmey CO, Hayes RM (2005). Effects of defoliation timing and desiccation on net revenues from ultra-narrow row cotton. J Cotton Sci 9: 204–214.
  • Mahmood T, Ashraf M, Shahbaz M (2009). Does exogenous application of glycine betaine as a pre-sowing seed treatment improve growth and regulate some key physiological attributes in wheat plants grown under water deficit conditions? Pak J Bot 41: 1291–1302.
  • Maqsood M, Hussain T, Tayyab M, Ibrahim M (2006). Effect of different irrigation levels on the yield and radiation-use- efficiency of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under two sowing methods. Pak J Agric Sci 43: 21–24.
  • Monteith JL, Elston JF (1983). Performance and productivity of foliage in the field. In: Dale JE, Milthorpe FL, editors. The Growth and Functioning of Leaves. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 499–518.
  • Naidu BP, Cameron DF, Konduri SV (1998). Improving drought tolerance of cotton by glycine betaine application and selection. In: Michalk DL, Pratley JE, editors. Proceedings of the 9th Australian Agronomy Conference, 20–23 July 1998; Wagga Wagga, Australia. Serpentine, Australia: Australian Society of Agronomy, pp. 1–5.
  • Nichols SP, Snipes CE, Jones MA (2004). Cotton growth, lint yield and fiber quality as affected by row spacing and cultivars. J Cotton Sci 8: 1–12.
  • Norton ER, Silvertooth JC (2001). Evaluation of a drip vs. furrow irrigated cotton production system. In: Cotton: A College of Agriculture Report. Tucson, AZ, USA: University of Arizona, pp. 1–7.
  • Parr JF (1973). Chemical and biochemical considerations for maximizing the efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen. J Environ Qual 2: 75–84.
  • Rashidi M, Seilsepour M, Gholami M (2011). Response of yield, yield components and fiber properties of cotton to different application rates of nitrogen and boron. Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 10: 525–531.
  • Reddy KC, Malik RK, Reddy SS, Nyakatawa EZ (2007). Cotton growth and yield response to nitrogen applied through fresh and composted poultry litter. J Cotton Sci 11: 26–34.
  • Robertson WC, Groves FE, Hogan R Jr, Espinoza L, Ismanov M, Franks R (2006). Evaluation of drip irrigation for cotton in Arkansas. AAES Res Ser 552: 73–77.
  • Roche R, Milroy S, Hammer G (2001). Crop growth and maturity in ultra narrow row and conventionally spaced cotton. In: Unkovich M, O’Leary G, editors. Proceedings of the 11th Australian Agronomy Conference, 2–6 February 2013; Geelong, Australia. Serpentine, Australia: Australian Society of Agronomy, pp. 1–6.
  • Rosenthal WD, Gerik TJ (1991). Radiation-use-efficiency among cotton cultivars. Agron J 83: 655–658.
  • Saleem MT (1994). Efficient use of plant nutrients. In: Proceedings of the 4th National Congress of Soil Science 24–26 May 1994; Islamabad, Pakistan. Islamabad, Pakistan: Soil Science Society of Pakistan, pp. 2–12.
  • Sawan ZM, Hafez SA, Basyony AE, Alkassas AR (2006). Cotton seed, protein, oil yields and oil properties as affected by nitrogen fertilizer and foliar application of potassium and a plant growth retardant. World J Agr Sci 2: 56–65.
  • Seilsepour M, Rashidi M (2011). Effect of different application rates of nitrogen on yield and quality of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Amer-Euras J Agric Environ Sci 10: 366–370.
  • Shallan MA, Hassan HMM, Namich AAM, Ibrahim AA (2012). Effect of sodium, nitroprusside, putrescine and glycine betaine on alleviation of drought stress in cotton plant. Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 12: 1252–1265.
  • Singh M, Gumber RK, Brar AS, Saig M (2007). Efficacy of fertilizer application in cotton under drip and flood irrigation system. In: Proceedings of the 4th World Cotton Research Conference, September 10–14 2007; Lubbock, TX, USA. Washington DC, USA: International Cotton Advisory Committee.
  • Singh Y, Rao SS, Regar PL (2010). Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effects on seed cotton yield, water productivity and yield response factor in shallow soils of semi-arid environment. Agr Water Manage 97: 965–970.
  • Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Dickey DA (1996). Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill.
  • Szeicz G (1974). Solar radiation for plant growth. J Appl Ecol 11: 617–636.
  • Wajid A, Ahmad A, Khaliq T, Alam S, Hussain A, Hussain K, Naseem W, Usman M, Ahmad S (2010). Quantification of growth, yield and radiation-use-efficiency of promising cotton cultivars at varying nitrogen levels. Pak J Bot 42: 1703–1711.
  • Wei C, MAT, Wang X, Wang J (2012). The fate of fertilizer N applied to cotton in relation to irrigation methods and N dosage in arid area. J Arid Land 4: 320–329.
  • Yadav RL (2003). Assessing on-farm efficiency and economics of fertilizer N, P and K in rice wheat systems of India. Field Crop Res 81: 39–51.
  • Zhang Y, Hu W, Gao Y, Yao Y, Tang M, Hu G (2008). Fertilizing irrigated cotton for high yield and high nitrogen use efficiency. Better Crops 92: 6–7.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Effect of strainer type, spray pressure, and orifice size on the discharge coefficient of standard flat-fan nozzles

Bahadir SAYINCI

Barley molybdenum cofactor sulfurase (MCSU): sequencing, modeling, and its comparison to other higher plants

Ertuğrul FİLİZ, Assaf DISTELFELD, TZION FAHIMA, Özge Karakaş METİN, Eviatar NEVO, Song WEINING, Ahu Altinkut UNCUOĞLU

Influences of different iron levels on plant growth and photosynthesis of W. Murcott mandarin grafted on two rootstocks under high pH conditions

MERAL İNCESU, TURGUT YEŞİLOĞLU, BERKEN ÇİMEN, BİLGE YILMAZ

Radiation, water, and nitrogen use efficiencies of Gossypium hirsutum L.

Shakeel AHMAD, ILYAS RAZA, DİLBAUGH MUHAMMAD, HAKOOMAT ALI, SAJJAD HUSSAIN, HÜLYA DOĞAN, MUHAMMAD ZIAULHAQ

Evaluation of drought tolerance of winter bread wheat genotypes underdrip irrigation and rain-fed conditions

JAMALA MURSALOVA, ZEYNAL AKPAROV, JAVID OJAGHI, MAHAMMAD ELDAROV, SAVAŞ BELEN, NURBERDI GUMMADOV, ALEXEY MORGOUNOV

Short-term hydrological responses to silvicultural treatments withina stream buffer zone: a case study

Ferhat KARA, Latif KALIN, Edward Francis LOEWENSTEIN

Evaluation of pyrosequencing for large-scale identificationof plant species (grasses as a model)

Nadia HAIDER

Transcriptome analysis of banana (Musa balbisiana) basedon next-generation sequencing technology

Suthanthiram BACKIYARANI, Subbaraya UMA, Marimuthu Somasundram SARASWATHI, Asoor Santhanam SARAVANAKUMAR, Arumugam CHANDRASEKAR

Clonal propagation and synthetic seed production from nodal segments ofCape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.), a tropical fruit plant

BAHTİYAR BUHARA YÜCESAN, ALİYU MOHAMMED, MERVE ARSLAN, EKREM GÜREL

Sensitivity of soil evaporation and reference evapotranspirationto climatic variables in South Korea

Mehmet AYDIN, Yeong-sang JUNG, Jae E. YANG, Su-jung KIM, Kyung-dae KIM