Possibilities of using dual K c approach in predicting crop evapotranspiration of second-crop silage maize

The purposes of this study were to develop a dual crop coefficient (Kc) using FAO-56 methodologies and to compare crop evapotranspiration (ETKc) measured under field conditions for second-crop silage maize in the Southeastern Anatolia Region of Turkey with the ETc estimated using FAO-56 dual Kc methodologies. For this study, field experiments were conducted in the 2011 and 2012 growing seasons, and the results were evaluated. To compute dual Kc (Kcb and Ke), all climatological data involving the seedling and harvesting dates, growth stages, water holding of soil at field capacity and at wilting point, soil evaporation layer, and crop characteristics were input into a spreadsheet program. The crop stages observed were 15, 25, 40, and 12 days for the initial, crop development, midseason, and late-season stages, respectively, in 2011, and 12, 23, 43, and 13 days, respectively, for the same stages in 2012. The reference evapotranspiration (ETo) was computed daily using the Penman-Monteith equation. All main and intermediate calculations for the dual Kc and its components Kcb and Ke were based on the FAO-56 guidelines. The Kcb values were computed as 0.15, 1.27, and 0.62 for the initial, midseason, and late-season stages, respectively. However, these figures were 0.15, 1.15, and 0.5 in the FAO-56 in the same order. The dual Kc was 0.64, 1.27, and 0.67 in this study for the initial, midseason, and late-season stages, respectively. The maximum ETc rate occurred in midseason, which had an average maximum value of 10.8 mm day-1. The ETc of silage maize for optimal dry matter during the growing season in the years of the study was 519 mm as the average of two growing seasons. The FAO methodology thus insignificantly overestimated the seasonal ETc (536 mm) for silage maize. Thus, the FAO-56 dual Kc methodology can be used to estimate the crop ETc.

___

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998). Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56. Rome, Italy: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations.
  • Bittman S, Kowalenko CG (2004). Advanced Silage Corn Management. Agassiz, Canada: Pacific Field Corn Association.
  • Bouazzama B, Xanthoulis D, Bouaziz A, Ruelle P, Mailho, JC (2012). Effect of water stress on growth, water consumption and yield of silage maize under flood irrigation in a semi-arid climate of Tadla (Morocco). Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 16: 468-477.
  • Çetin Ö (1996). Irrigation Water Requirement of Second Crop Corn under Harran Plain Conditions. Şanlıurfa, Turkey: Rural Services, Şanlıurfa Research Institute Publications (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • Cetin O, Bilgel L (2002). Effects of different irrigation methods on shedding and yield of cotton. Agric Water Manage 54: 1-15.
  • Chuanyan Z, Zhongren N (2007). Estimating water needs of maize ( Zea mays L.) using the dual crop coefficient method in the arid region of northwestern China. Afr J Agric Res 2: 325-333.
  • Er-Raki S, Chehbouni A, Guemouria N, Ezzahar J, Khabba S, Boulet G, Hanich L (2009). Citrus orchard evapotranspiration: comparison between eddy covariance measurements and the FAO-56 approach estimates. Plant Biosyst 143: 201-208.
  • Howell TA, Steiner JL, Schneider, AD, Evett SR, Tolk SA (1997). Seasonal and maximum daily evapotranspiration of irrigated winter-wheat, sorghum, and corn - Southern High Plains. T ASAE 40: 623-634.
  • Jensen ME, Burman RD, Allen RG (1990). Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Water Requirements. New York, NY, USA: ASCE.
  • Katerji N, Rana G (2008). Crop Evapotranspiration Measurement and Estimation in the Mediterranean Region. Bari, Italy: INRA-CRA.
  • Kenjabaev S, Dernedde Y, Frede HG, Stulina G (2014). Determination of actual crop evapotranspiration (ETc) and dual crop coefficients (Kc) for cotton, wheat and maize in Fergana Valley: integration of the FAO-56 approach and BUDGET. In: EGU General Assembly 2014; 27 April–2 May 2014; Vienna, Austria.
  • Lazzara P, Rana G (2010). The use of crop coefficient approach to estimate actual evapotranspiration: a critical review for major crops under Mediterranean climate. Ital J Agrometeorol 25-39.
  • Li YL, Cui JY, Zhang, TH, Zhao HL (2003). Measurement of evapotranspiration of irrigated spring wheat and maize in a semi-arid region of north China. Agric Water Manage 61: 1-12.
  • Lopez-Urrea R, Olalla FMS, Montoro A, Lopez-Fuster P (2009). Single and dual crop coefficients and water requirements for onion ( Allium cepa L.) under semiarid conditions. Agric Water Manage 96: 1031-1036.
  • Martins JD, Rodrigues GC, Paredes P, Carlesso R, Oliveira ZB, Knies AE, Petry MT, Pereira LS (2013). Dual crop coefficients for maize in southern Brazil: Model testing for sprinkler and drip irrigation and mulched soil. Biosyst Eng 115: 291-310.
  • Niaghi AR, Vand RH, Asadi E, Majnooni-Heris A (2015). Evaluation of single and dual crop coefficient methods for estimation of wheat and maize evapotranspiration. Adv Environ Biol 9: 963- 971.
  • Payero J, Irmak S (2011). Daily crop evapotranspiration, crop coefficient and energy balance components of a surface- irrigated maize field. In: Gerosa G, editor. Evapotranspiration - From Measurements to Agricultural and Environmental Applications. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, pp. 59-78.
  • Piccinni G, Ko J, Marek T, Howell T (2009). Determination of growth-stage-specific crop coefficients ( K C ) of maize and sorghum. Agric Water Manage 96: 1698-1704.
  • Shahrokhnia MH, Sepaskhah AR (2013). Single and dual crop coefficients and crop evapotranspiration for wheat and maize in a semi-arid region. Theor Appl Climatol 114: 495-510.
  • Sharma S, Irmak A, Parkhurst A, Walter-Shea E, Hubbard KG (2012). Evapotranspiration and dual crop coefficients. In: American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2012, abstract #ED13C-0794.
  • Simsek M, Can A, Denek N, Tonkaz T (2011). The effects of different irrigation regimes on yield and silage quality of corn under semi-arid conditions. Afr J Biotechnol 10: 5869-5877.
  • Yazar A, Sezen MS, Gencel B (2002). Drip irrigation of corn in the Southeast Anatolia Project (GAP) area in Turkey. Irrig Drain 51: 293-300.
  • Yolcu R (2014). Effects of different irrigation regimes and different application frequencies of nitrogen on yield and quality of drip-irrigated silage corn under Diyarbakir condition. PhD, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • Yolcu R, Cetin O (2015). Nitrogen fertigation to improve nitrogen use efficiency and crude protein on silage corn. Turk J Field Crops 20: 233-241.