Phenotypic variability of autochthonous walnut (Juglansregia L) genotypes in northwestern Bosnia and Herzegovina

The main objective of this study was to examine the characteristics and the relationship between walnuts in the Una-Sana Canton based on phenotypic properties. This is the first study of preselection of walnut variability in this area. In this study, we evaluated the phenological and morphological characteristics of 75 selected genotypes during 2014 and 2015. Twenty-four phenotypic traits were monitored throughout 2 years on different sites. The results of the PCA analysis showed a very high heterogeneity of walnut seedlings on the examined sites, from the aspect of observed parameters. A limited number of superior genotypes were found, but individual genotypes with high nut and kernel weight, as well as the colour of the kernel were determined, which would classify them as high-ranked parents in hybridization programs. Certain number of genotypes with high values of traits such as: nut weight, kernel weight and a high percentage of kernel were selected for future studies. Amongst the selected trees, genotype G25 had the highest weight of nuts and kernel, as well as a satisfactory color of the kernel. This genotype could be used as a superior tree for further breeding programs in the future. A highlevel of phenotypic variability in this studyrevealed the existence of a rich genetics pool of nuts variation. The genetic diversity of walnuts obtained from our studies will represent a valuable source of information for breeding programs of Persian walnut in future.

___

  • Akca Y, 2004, NEW ZEAL J CROP HORT, V32, P337, DOI 10.1080/01140671.2004.9514313
  • Arzani K, 2008, NEW ZEAL J CROP HORT, V36, P159, DOI 10.1080/01140670809510232
  • Asadian G., 2005, INT J AGRIC BIOL, V7, P71
  • Aslantas R, 2006, NEW ZEAL J CROP HORT, V34, P231, DOI 10.1080/01140671.2006.9514412
  • Atefi J, 1997, ACTA HORTIC, P101, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.442.13
  • Becirspahic D, 2017, WORKS FACULTY AGR FO, V67, P29
  • Becirspahic D, 2017, WORKS FACULTY AGR FO, V67, P114
  • Bernard A, 2018, TREE GENET GENOMES, V14, DOI 10.1007/s11295-017-1214-0
  • Chatfield C, 1995, INTRO MULTIVARIATE A .
  • Cosmulescu S., 2013, South-Western Journal of Horticulture Biology and Environment, V4, P117
  • Cosmulescu S, 2012, PAK J BOT, V44, P307
  • Ebrahimi A, 2015, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V193, P195, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.06.049
  • Forde H., 1996, FRUIT BREEDING, V3, P241
  • Forde HI, 1979, ADV FRUIT BREEDING, P439
  • Germain E, 1997, ACTA HORTIC, P21, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.442.2
  • Gundeli MA, 2019, INT J AGR FOR LIFE S, V3, P350
  • HANSCHE PE, 1972, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V97, P279
  • Hotelling H, 1936, BIOMETRIKA, V28, P321, DOI 10.2307/2333955
  • IPGRI, 1994, DESCR WALN JUGL SPP .
  • Kazankaya A, 2001, ACTA HORTIC, P97, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.544.11
  • Keles H, 2014, ACTA SCI POL-HORTORU, V13, P167
  • Khadivi-Khub A, 2015, ACTA PHYSIOL PLANT, V37, P1
  • Korac M., 1997, PLANT GENET RESOUR N, V111, P72
  • McGranahan G, 2012, FRUIT BREEDING TEMPE, P827
  • MCGRANAHAN GH, 1992, HORTSCIENCE, V27, P186, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.27.2.186
  • Okatan V, 2018, FOLIA HORTIC, V30, P93, DOI 10.2478/fhort-2018-0010
  • Polat M, 2015, SCI PAP-SER B-HORTIC, V59, P81
  • Rezaei Z, 2018, EUPHYTICA, V214, DOI 10.1007/s10681-018-2153-z
  • Ruiz-Garcia L, 2011, SPAN J AGRIC RES, V9, P179
  • Sen SM, 1992, ACTA HORTIC, V317, P171, DOI DOI 10.17660/ACTAHORTIC.1992.317.19
  • Sharma OC, 2001, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V88, P163, DOI 10.1016/S0304-4238(00)00204-1
  • Sharma SD, 1998, FRUIT VARIETIES J, V52, P20
  • Skender A, 2017, WORKS FACULTY AGR FO, V67, P130
  • Skender A, 2017, GENETIKA-BELGRADE, V49, P613, DOI [10.2298/GENSR1702613S, 10.2298/gensr1702613s]
  • Skender A, 2015, GENETIKA-BELGRADE, V47, P45, DOI 10.2298/GENSR1501045S
  • Solar A, 2011, J SCI FOOD AGR, V91, P1205, DOI 10.1002/jsfa.4300
  • Toprak S, 2019, INT J AGR FORESTRY L, V3, P295
  • UPOV, 1999, GUID COND TESTS DIST .
  • Yarilgac T, 2001, ACTA HORTIC, P93, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.544.10
  • Zeneli G, 2005, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V105, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2004.11.003
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Effect of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (Na-CMC) added to urea-formaldehyde resin on particleboard properties

Abdullah İSTEK, İsmail ÖZLÜSOYLU, Aziz BİÇER

Suleyman TEMEL, Bilal KESKİN

Memis KESDEK, Saban KORDALİ, Ayse Usanmaz BOZHUYUK, Melek GUDEK

Exogenous cysteine alleviates mercury stress by promoting antioxidant defence in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings

Aslı YILMAZ, Ebru GEZGİNCİOGLU, Aykut KARAMAN, Özkan AKSAKAL, Sakineh Mohammadi KOHNEHSHAHRI, Ferhunde AYSIN

Necati CETİN, Mehmet YAMAN, Kevser KARAMAN, Bunyamin DEMİR

Isolation and identification of Bacillus pumilus YHH-2, a potential pathogen to the alfalfa weevil (Hypera postica Gyllenhal)

Selma SEZEN, Hatice ÖĞÜTCÜ, Yasemin ERBEY, Burak ALAYLAR, Mahmut ERBEY, Medine GÜLLÜCE, Mehmet KARADAYI

Ferhunde AYSİN, Aykut KARAMAN, Asli YİLMAZ, Ozkan AKSAKAL, Ebru GEZGİNCİOGLU, Sakineh Mohammadi KOHNEHSHAHRİ

DNA fingerprinting and genetic diversity analysis of world quinoa germplasm using iPBS-retrotransposon marker system

Tolga KARAKÖY, Muhammad Azhar NADEEM, Faheem Shehzad BALOCH, Muzaffer BARUT

Identification of genetic diversity among mutant lemon and mandarin varieties using different molecular markers

Ertuğrul TURGUTOĞLU, Görkem SÜLÜ, Aytül KİTAPCI, Yıldız AKA KAÇAR, İlknur POLAT, Özhan ŞİMŞEK, Gül SATAR

Effect of morphological components on the herbage yield and quality of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Wild.) grown at different dates

Bilal KESKİN, Süleyman TEMEL