Macro- and micromineral contents of different quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) varieties used as forage by cattle

Mineral deficiencies or mineral excess affect livestock production in most regions of the world. For this reason, it is important to know the mineral contents of forages used in animal feeding. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.), which has become a popular grain crop around the world in recent years, is used as forage in animal feeding. This study was carried out to determine the contents of macro- and microminerals and mineral balance in 9 different quinoa varieties. The results of the study indicated that mineral contents of forages show great variation between quinoa varieties. The Cherry Vanilla variety is rich in all minerals except for molybdenum. Potassium, iron, copper, zinc, manganese, molybdenum, and boron concentration in all quinoa varieties are sufficient to meet the requirements of beef cattle. In contrast, sulfur is insufficient in all varieties. The contents of phosphorus, calcium, and magnesium show deficiencies in some varieties. Although there is usually no risk of tetany (K/Ca + Mg) and milk fever (Ca/P) in quinoa forage, these mineral imbalances may be observed depending on variety.

___

  • AOAC (1990). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Washington, DC, USA: pp. 66- 88.
  • Arthington JD (2002). Mineral supplementation in the grazing cow herd. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Florida Ruminant Nutrition Symposium. pp. 103-112.
  • Aydin I, Uzun F (2008). The possibility of compensating potential tetany hazard arising from N and K fertilization to rangelands by Mg treatments. European Journal of Agronomy 29 (1): 33- 37. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2008.02.003
  • Baskota S, Islam A (2017). Evaluation of forage nutritive value of quinoa cultivars. Field Days Bulletin, LREC Long Reports.
  • Bhargava A, Shukla S, Ohri D (2010). Mineral composition in foliage of some cultivated and wild species of Chenopodium. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 8 (2): 371-376.
  • Bindari YR, Shrestha S, Shrestha N, Gaire TN (2013). Effects of nutrition on reproduction – a review. Advances in Applied Science Research 4 (1): 421-429.
  • Debski B, Gralak MA, Bertrandt J, Klos A (2013). Minerals and polyphenols content of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) plant. Problemy Higieny Epidemiologii 94: 300-304.
  • Debski B, Gralak MA, Bertrandt J, Klos A (2018). Comparison of antioxidant potential and mineral composition of quinoa and lamb’s quarters weed (Chenopodium album). Problemy Higieny Epidemiologii 99 (1): 88-93.
  • Espinoza JE, McDowell LR, Wilkinson N S, Conrad JH, Martin FG (1991). Monthly variation of forage and soil minerals in central Florida. I. Micronutrients. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 22: 1123-1136.
  • FAO (2004). Vitamin and mineral requirements in human nutrition. 2nd ed. World Health Organization and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Report of joint FAO/ WHO expert consultation.
  • Geren H (2015). Effects of different nitrogen levels on the grain yield and some yield components of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under Mediterranean climatic conditions. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 20 (1): 59-64. doi: 10.17557/.39586
  • Geren H, Kavut YT, Altınbaş M (2015). Effect of different row spacings on the grain yield and some yield characteristics of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under Bornova ecological conditions. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 52 (1): 69-78 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • Jacobsen SE, Jorgensen I, Stolen O (1994). Cultivation of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) under temperate climatic conditions in Denmark. The Journal of Agricultural Science 122: 47-52. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600065783
  • Jacobsen SE, Mmujica A, Jensen CR (2003). The resistance of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to adverse abiotic factors. Food Reviews International 19: 99-109.
  • Kakabouki I, Bilalis D, Karkanis A, Zervas G, Tsiplakou E et al. (2014). Effects of fertilization and tillage system on growth and crude protein content of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): an alternative forage crop. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture 26 (1): 18-24. doi: 10.9755/ejfa.v26i1.16831
  • Kayser M, Isselstein J (2005). Potassium cycling and losses in grassland systems: a review. Grass and Forage Science 60 (3): 213-224. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2005.00478
  • Köglberger B (2013). Study on mineral metabolism of dairy cows. Szent Istvan University Faculty of Veterinary Science, Department of Animal Hygiene, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Mertens D (2005). AOAC official method 975.03. In: Horwitz W, Latimer GW (editors). Metal in Plants and Pet Foods. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th ed. Gaitherburg, MD, USA: AOACInternational Suite, pp. 3-4.
  • Mills CF, Bremner I (1980). Nutritional aspects of molybdenum in animals. In: Coughlan MP (editor). Molybdenum and Molybdenum-Containing Enzymes. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, pp. 517-542.
  • Nielsen FH (1997). Boron in human and animal nutrition. Plant and Soil 193: 199-208.
  • NRC (2000). Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle – Update 2000. 7th ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press.
  • NRC (2001). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th revised ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press.
  • Nurfeta A, Tolera A, Eik LO, Sundstol F (2008). Yield and mineral content of ten enset (Ensete ventricosum) varieties. Tropical Animal Health and Production 40: 299-309.
  • Patel VR, Kansara JD, Patel BB, Patel PB, Patel SB (2011). Prevention of milk fever: Nutritional Applied Veterinary World 4 (6): 278- 280. Podkowka Z, Gesinski K, Podkowka L (2018). The influence of additives facilitating ensiling on the quality of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) silage. Journal of Central European Agriculture 19 (3): 607-614. doi: 10.5513/ jcea01/19.3.2237
  • Sharma KD, Bindal G, Rathour R, Rana JC (2012). β-Carotene and mineral content of different Chenopodium species and the effect of cooking on micronutrient retention. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition 63 (3): 290-295. doi: 10.3109/09637486.2011.624493
  • Sönmez O, Turan V, Kaya C (2016). The effects of sulfur, cattle, and poultry manure addition on soil phosphorus. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 40: 536-541. doi: 10.3906/tar-1601- 41
  • Swift ML, Bittman S, Hunt DE, Kowalenko CG (2007). The effect of formulation and amount of potassium fertilizer on macromineral concentration and cation-anion difference in tall fescue. Journal of Dairy Science 90: 1063-1072.
  • Tan M, Temel S (2017). Determination of dry matter yield and some properties of different quinoa genotypes grown in Erzurum and Iğdır conditions. Igdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 7 (4): 257-263 (in Turkish with an abstract in English). doi: 10.21597/jist.2017.219
  • Uke O, Kale H, Kaplan M, Kamalak A (2017). Effects of maturity stages on hay yield and quality, gas and methane production of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). KSU Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi 20 (1): 42-46 (in Turkish with an abstract in English). doi: 10.18016/ksujns.51209
  • Underwood EJ, Suttle NF (1999). The Mineral Nutrition of Livestock. 3rd ed. Wallingford, Oxon, UK: CABI Publishing, CAB International.
  • Zelal A (2017). Hypomagnesemia tetany in cattle. Advances in Dairy Research 5: 2-9. doi: 10.4172/2329-888X.1000178